Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Designing an Integrated Care Initiative for Vulnerable Families: Operationalisation of Realist Causal and Programme Theory, Sydney Australia Cover

Designing an Integrated Care Initiative for Vulnerable Families: Operationalisation of Realist Causal and Programme Theory, Sydney Australia

Open Access
|Jul 2019

References

  1. Eastwood, JG, Kemp, BA and Jalaludin, BB. Realist theory construction for a mixed method multilevel study of neighbourhood context and postnatal depression. SpringerPlus, 2016; 5: 1081. DOI: 10.1186/s40064-016-2729-9
  2. Eastwood, J. Designing initiatives for vulnerable families: from theory to design in Sydney, Australia. International Journal of Integrated Care, 2017; 17(5). DOI: 10.5334/ijic.3540
  3. Eastwood, J, De Souza, D, Shaw, M, Garg, P, Woolfenden, S, Tyler, I, et al. Designing initiatives for vulnerable families: from theory to design in Sydney, Australia. Int J Integr Care, 2019; 19(3): 9, 1–11. DOI: 10.5334/ijic.3963
  4. Morgan, K, Eastwood, J and Faniran, S. Headline population indicators data report 2009: A report for the South West Sydney region on key statistics relating to the health and wellbeing of its children and families. Liverpool, NSW: Karitane & Sydney South West Area Health Service; 2009.
  5. Alexander, K, Brown, M, Halim, S, Hendry, A and Eastwood, J. Child and Family Health Indicators Report: Inner West Sydney 2013. Sydney, NSW: Sydney Local Health District; 2015.
  6. Eastwood, J. Building Realist Program Theory for Interventions for Vulnerable Children and Families in Sydney, Australia. Int J Integr Care, 2017; 17(5). DOI: 10.5334/ijic.3539
  7. Eastwood, JG, Jalaludin, BB and Kemp, LA. Realist explanatory theory building method for social epidemiology: a protocol for a mixed method multilevel study of neighbourhood context and postnatal depression. SpringerPlus, 2014; 3: 12. DOI: 10.1186/2193-1801-3-12
  8. Eastwood, J, Kemp, L, Garg, P, Tyler, I and de Souza, D. A Protocol for Concretizing and Contextualizing a Critical Realist “Theory of Neighbourhood Context, Stress, Depression, and the Developmental Origins of Health and Disease (DOHD)”, Sydney Australia. Int J Integr Care, 2017; 17(5). DOI: 10.5334/ijic.3538
  9. Eastwood, JG, Kemp, LA, Garg, P, Tyler, I and De Souza, DE. A Critical Realist Translational Social Epidemiology Protocol for Concretising and Contextualising a “Theory of Neighbourhood Context, Stress, Depression, and the Developmental Origins of Health and Disease (DOHaD)”, Sydney Australia. Int J Integr Care, 2019; 19(3): 8, 1–13. DOI: 10.5334/ijic.3962
  10. Muntaner, C. Invited Commentary: Social Mechanisms, Race, and Social Epidemiology. Am J Epidemiol, 1999; 150(2): 1216. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009970
  11. Layder, D. New Strategies in Social Research: An Introduction and Guide. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press; 1993.
  12. Danermark, B, Ekstrom, M, Jakobsen, L and Karlsson, J. Explaining Society: Critical realism in the social sciences. London: Routledge; 2002.
  13. Pawson, R and Tiley, N. Realistic Evaluation. London: Sage; 1997.
  14. Denyer, D, Tranfield, D and Van Aken, JE. Developing design propositions through research synthesis. Organization studies, 2008; 29(3): 393413. DOI: 10.1177/0170840607088020
  15. Keller, C, Gare, K, Edenius, M and Lindblad, S. Innovations in health care: Design theory and realist evaluation combined. Innovations, 2010; 11: 222010.
  16. Mackenzie, M and Blamey, A. The Practice and the Theory: Lessons from the Application of a Theories of Change Aproach. Evaluation, 2005; 11(2): 15168. DOI: 10.1177/1356389005055538
  17. De Souza, DE. Elaborating the Context-Mechanism-Outcome configuration (CMOc) in realist evaluation: A critical realist perspective. Evaluation, 2013; 19(2): 14154. DOI: 10.1177/1356389013485194
  18. Blamey, A and Mackenzie, M. Theories of change and realistic evaluation peas in a pod or apples and oranges? Evaluation, 2007; 13(4): 43955. DOI: 10.1177/1356389007082129
  19. Wastell, D and White, S. Beyond bureaucracy: Emerging trends in social care informatics. Health Informatics J, 2014; 20(3): 2139. DOI: 10.1177/1460458213487535
  20. Moore, G, et al. Process evaluation in complex public health intervention studies: the need for guidance. J Epidemiol Community Health, 2014; 68(2): 1012. DOI: 10.1136/jech-2013-202869
  21. Craig, P, Dieppe, P, Macintyre, S, Michie, S, Nazareth, I and Petticrew, M. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ, 2008; 337: a1655. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.a1655
  22. Eastwood, J, Woolfenden, S, Miller, E, Shaw, M, Garg, P, Liu, H, et al. Implementation, mechanisms of effect and context of an integrated care intervention for vulnerable families in Central Sydney Australia: A research and evaluation protocol. Int J Integr Care, 2019; In Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.3980 | Journal eISSN: 1568-4156
Language: English
Submitted on: Feb 12, 2018
|
Accepted on: May 21, 2019
|
Published on: Jul 26, 2019
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2019 John G. Eastwood, Miranda Shaw, Pankaj Garg, Denise E. De Souza, Ingrid Tyler, Lauren Dean, Morag MacSween, Michael Moore, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.