Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Continuity of care: betrayed values or misplaced nostalgia? Cover

Continuity of care: betrayed values or misplaced nostalgia?

By: Martin Roland  
Open Access
|Oct 2012

Abstract

Care is better coordinated when doctors have personal responsibility for their patients. Continuity and a sense of personal responsibility are becoming more difficult to provide in hospitals, in part because of the European Working Time Directive. However, in many countries general practitioners are self-employed and able to organise their practices as they wish. In the UK, they increasingly do so in ways that make it difficult for patients to get continuity of care. This is despite most patients being clear that they want to see a regular doctor, and professional bodies in primary care consistently promoting continuity as a core value. General practitioners need to decide whether continuity of care matters. If it does, then they need to take a lead in ensuring that care is organised so that patients who want to see a regular doctor are able to do so. Suggestions are included for how contemporary practice can be organised to promote this traditional but still highly relevant value.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.1056 | Journal eISSN: 1568-4156
Language: English
Submitted on: Sep 6, 2012
Accepted on: Sep 25, 2012
Published on: Oct 25, 2012
Published by: Igitur, Utrecht Publishing & Archiving
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2012 Martin Roland, published by Igitur, Utrecht Publishing & Archiving
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.