Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Problem Framing Influences Linkages Among Networks of Collective Action Situations for Water Provision, Wastewater, and Water Conservation in a Metropolitan Region Cover

Problem Framing Influences Linkages Among Networks of Collective Action Situations for Water Provision, Wastewater, and Water Conservation in a Metropolitan Region

International Journal of the Commons
Volume 14 (2020): Issue 1
By: Evan M. Dennis and  Eduardo Brondizio  
Open Access
|May 2020

References

  1. 1Bates, L. E., Green, M., Leonard, R., & Walker, I. (2013). The influence of forums and multilevel governance on the climate adaptation practices of Australian organizations. Ecology and Society, 18(4). DOI: 10.5751/ES-06120-180462
    Back to article
  2. 2Bettini, Y., Brown, R. R., & de Haan, F. J. (2015). Exploring institutional adaptive capacity in practice: Examining water governance adaptation in Australia. Ecology and Society, 20(1). DOI: 10.5751/ES-07291-200147
    Back to article
  3. 3Brondizio, E., Vogt, N., Mansur, A., Costa, S., Anthony, E., & Hetrick, S. (2016). A conceptual framework for analyzing deltas as coupled Social Ecological Systems: An example from the Amazon River Delta and Estuary. Sustainability Science, 11, 1–19. DOI: 10.1007/s11625-016-0368-2
    Back to article
  4. 4Brugnach, M., Dewulf, A., Pahl-Wostl, C., & Taillieu, T. (2008). Toward a relational concept of uncertainty: About knowing too little, knowing too differently, and accepting not to know. Ecology and Society, 13(2), 30. DOI: 10.5751/ES-02616-130230
    Back to article
  5. 5Clement, F. (2010). Analysing decentralised natural resource governance: proposition for a “politicised” institutional analysis and development framework. Policy Sciences, 43(2), 129–156. DOI: 10.1007/s11077-009-9100-8
    Back to article
  6. 6Cole, D. H., Graham, E., & McGinnis, M. D. (2019). Combining the IAD and SES frameworks. International Journal of the Commons, 13(1), 1–32. DOI: 10.18352/ijc.864
    Back to article
  7. 7Dewulf, A., Craps, M., Bouwen, R., Taillieu, T., & Pahl-Wostl, C. (2005). Integrated management of natural resources: dealing with ambiguous issues, multiple actors and diverging frames. Water Sci Technol, 52(6), 115–124. DOI: 10.2166/wst.2005.0159
    Back to article
  8. 8Dewulf, A., Gray, B., Putnam, L., Lewicki, R., Aarts, N., Bouwen, R., & Woerkum, C. V. (2009). Disentangling approaches to framing in conflict and negotiation research: A meta-paradigmatic perspective. Human Relations, 62(2), 155–193. DOI: 10.1177/0018726708100356
    Back to article
  9. 9Gritsenko, D. (2018). Explaining choices in energy infrastructure development as a network of adjacent action situations: The case of LNG in the Baltic Sea region. Energy Policy, 112, 74–83. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2017.10.014
    Back to article
  10. 10Huitema, D., & Meijerink, S. (2010). Realizing water transitions. The role of policy entrepreneurs in water policy change. Ecology and Society, 15(2). DOI: 10.5751/ES-03488-150226
    Back to article
  11. 11Huitema, D., Mostert, E., Egas, W., Moellenkamp, S., Pahl-Wostl, C., & Yalcin, R. (2009). Adaptive water governance: Assessing the institutional prescriptions of adaptive (co-)management from a governance perspective and defining a research agenda. Ecology and Society, 14(1). DOI: 10.5751/ES-02827-140126
    Back to article
  12. 12Isendahl, N., Dewulf, A., Brugnach, M., François, G., Möllenkamp, S., & Pahl-Wostl, C. (2009). Assessing framing of uncertainties in water management practice Water Resources Management, 23(15), 3191–3205. DOI: 10.1007/s11269-009-9429-y
    Back to article
  13. 13Johnston, H. (1995). A methodology for frame analysis: From discourse to cognitive schema. In H. Johnston & B. Klandermans (Eds.), Social movements and culture. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
    Back to article
  14. 14Jones, M. D., & McBeth, M. K. (2010). A Narrative Policy Framework: Clear enough to be wrong? Policy Studies Journal, 38(2), 329–353. DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2010.00364.x
    Back to article
  15. 15Kauneckis, D., & Imperial, M. T. (2005). Collaborative watershed governance in Lake Tahoe: An institutional analysis. International Journal of Organization Theory and Behavior, 10, 503–546. DOI: 10.1108/IJOTB-10-04-2007-B004
    Back to article
  16. 16Kimmich, C., & Tomas, S. (2017). Assessing action situation networks: A configurational perspective on water and energy governance in irrigation systems. Water Economics and Policy. DOI: 10.1142/S2382624X18500054
    Back to article
  17. 17Lach, D., Rayner, S., & Ingram, H. (2005). Taming the waters: strategies to domesticate the wicked problems of water resource management. International Journal of Water, 3(1), 1–17. DOI: 10.1504/IJW.2005.007156
    Back to article
  18. 18Lubell, M., M, S., Scholz, J., & Mihriye, M. (2002). Watershed partnerships and the emergence of collective action institutions. American Journal of Political Science, 46(1), 148–163. DOI: 10.2307/3088419
    Back to article
  19. 19Mankad, A. (2012). Decentralised water systems: Emotional influences on resource decision making. Environment International, 44(1), 128–140. DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2012.01.002
    Back to article
  20. 20Mankad, A., & Tapsuwan, S. (2011). Review of socio-economic drivers of community acceptance and adoption of decentralised water systems. Journal of Environmental Management, 92(3), 380–391. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.10.037
    Back to article
  21. 21McGinnis, M. D. (2011a). An introduction to IAD and the language of the Ostrom Workshop: A simple guide to a complex framework. Policy Studies Journal, 39(1), 169–183. DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2010.00401.x
    Back to article
  22. 22McGinnis, M. D. (2011b). Networks of adjacent action situations in polycentric governance. Policy Studies Journal, 39(1), 51–78. DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2010.00396.x
    Back to article
  23. 23McGinnis, M. D. (2015). Polycentric governance in theory and practice: Dimensions of aspiration and practical limitations (Feb 29, 2016 version). Paper presented at the Paper presented at the Vincent and Elinor Ostrom Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis (Dec. 14–17, 2015), Indiana University Bloomington.
    Back to article
  24. 24McGinnis, M. D., & Ostrom, E. (2014). Social-ecological system framework: Initial changes and continuing challenges. Ecology and Society, 19(2). DOI: 10.5751/ES-06387-190230
    Back to article
  25. 25Michael Uhrhammer Communications. (2012). METRO Wastewater Joint Powers Authority 2011-2013 strategic plan. Adopted April 5, 2012. San Diego, California: METRO Wastewater Joint Powers Authority.
    Back to article
  26. 26Milchram, C., Märker, C., Schlör, H., Künneke, R., & van de Kaa, G. (2019). Understanding the role of values in institutional change: the case of the energy transition. Energy, Sustainability and Society, 9(1), 46. DOI: 10.1186/s13705-019-0235-y
    Back to article
  27. 27Mobley, C. (2016). What matters when explaining environmentalism at the watershed level: Who you are, where you live, what you see, or what you perceive? Environment and Behavior, 48(9), 1148–1174. DOI: 10.1177/0013916515586058
    Back to article
  28. 28MWD water sales and State Water Project water conditions – 1990 to 2015. Retrieved from http://www.mwdh2o.com/PDF%202016%20Background%20Materials/Chart%20-%20MWD%20Water%20Sales%20and%20SWP%20Conditions%20-%20All%20Years%20(1990-2015).pdf
    Back to article
  29. 29Nowell, B. (2010). Out of sync and unaware? Exploring the effects of problem frame alignment and discordance in community collaboratives. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20(1), 91–116. DOI: 10.1093/jopart/mup006
    Back to article
  30. 30Oberlack, C., Boillat, S., Brönnimann, S., Gerber, J.-D., Heinimann, A., Speranza, C. I., … Wiesmann, U. (2018). Polycentric governance in telecoupled resource systems. Ecology and Society, 23(1). DOI: 10.5751/ES-09902-230116
    Back to article
  31. 31Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511807763
    Back to article
  32. 32Ostrom, E. (2010). Polycentric systems for coping with collective action and global environmental change. Global Environmental Change, 20(4), 550–557. DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.07.004
    Back to article
  33. 33Ostrom, E. (2011). Background on the Institutional Analysis and Development framework. Policy Studies Journal, 39(1), 7–27. DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2010.00394.x
    Back to article
  34. 34Ostrom, E., & Ostrom, V. (1999). Public goods and public choices. In M. McGinnis (Ed.), Polycentricity and local public economies: Readings from the Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis (pp. 75–103). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
    Back to article
  35. 35Ostrom, V. (1999). Polycentricity (Part I). In M. McGinnis (Ed.), Polycentricity and local public economies: Readings from the Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis (pp. 52–55). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
    Back to article
  36. 36Pahl-Wostl, C., Craps, M., Dewulf, A., Mostert, E., Tabara, D., & Taillieu, T. (2007). Social learning and water resources management. Ecology and Society, 12(2). DOI: 10.5751/ES-02037-120205
    Back to article
  37. 37Pahl-Wostl, C., Tabara, D., Bouwen, R., Craps, M., Dewulf, A., Mostert, E., … Taillieu, T. (2008). The importance of social learning and culture for sustainable water management. Ecological Economics, 64(3), 484–495. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.08.007
    Back to article
  38. 38Pilip-Florea, S. J. (2012). A critical analysis of technological innovation and economic development in Southern California’s urban water reuse and recycling industry. (MA Thesis), University of California, Los Angeles.
    Back to article
  39. 39Ruiz-Ballesteros, E., & Brondizio, E. (2013). Building negotiated agreement: The emergence of community-based tourism in Floreana (Galápagos Islands). Human Organization, 72(4), 323–335. DOI: 10.17730/humo.72.4.4767536442q23q31
    Back to article
  40. 40San Diego County Water Authority. (2002). Diversification. 2002 San Diego County Water Authority annual report. San Diego, CA: Author.
    Back to article
  41. 41San Diego County Water Authority. (2010). WaterWorks. Assuring our future. Annual Report 2010. San Diego, CA: Author.
    Back to article
  42. 42Steyaert, P., & Ollivier, G. (2007). The European Water Framework Directive: How ecological assumptions frame technical and social change. Ecology and Society, 12(1). DOI: 10.5751/ES-02018-120125
    Back to article
  43. 43Tobar, H., & Wallace, A. (March 5, 1991). 50% water-delivery cut will be blow to San Diego: Drought: Metropolitan Water District directors also vote a 90% cut in allocation for agricultural users. Los Angeles Times, p. 5. Retrieved from http://articles.latimes.com/1991-03-05/news/mn-67_1_water-district
    Back to article
  44. 44Villamayor-Tomas, S., Grundmann, P., Epstein, G., Evans, T., & Kimmich, C. (2015). The water-energy-food security nexus through the lenses of the value chain and the Institutional Analysis and Development frameworks. Water Alternatives, 8, 735–755. http://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/all-abs/274-a8-1-7/file
    Back to article
  45. 45Villamayor-Tomas, S., Thiel, A., Amblard, L., Zikos, D., & Blanco, E. (2019). Diagnosing the role of the state for local collective action: Types of action situations and policy instruments. Environmental Science & Policy, 97, 44–57. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2019.03.009
    Back to article
  46. 46Water Resources Department. (2011). 2010 urban water management plan. San Diego, CA: San Diego County Water Authority.
    Back to article
  47. 47Whaley, L., & Weatherhead, E. K. (2014). An integrated approach to analyzing (adaptive) comanagement using the “Politicized” IAD framework. Ecology and Society, 19(1). DOI: 10.5751/ES-06177-190110
    Back to article
  48. 48Zetland, D. (2008). Conflict and cooperation within an organization: A case study of the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California. (Ph.D. Dissertation), University of California, Davis. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1129046
    Back to article
  49. 49Zetland, D. (2017). Desalination and the commons: tragedy or triumph? International Journal of Water Resources Development, 33(6), 890–906. DOI: 10.1080/07900627.2016.1235015
    Back to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/ijc.974 | Journal eISSN: 1875-0281
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Submitted on: Apr 8, 2019
Accepted on: Apr 26, 2020
Published on: May 20, 2020
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Keywords:
Polycentricity,
Collective Action,
SES,
Water,
California,
Adaptive Management,
Network of Adjacent Action Situations,
Politicized IAD

© 2020 Evan M. Dennis, Eduardo Brondizio, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 14 (2020): Issue 1Next article