Table 1
Interviews.
| Actors | Nº of interviews | Type of information collected |
|---|---|---|
| Village authorities | 4 | Village history (migrations), rules of access to resources |
| Local farmer-herders | 31 | |
| Whose livelihoods depend primarily on herding (Fulbe) | 14 | Rules of access to resources, personal access to pastoral resources, herd mobility, relations with other resource users |
| Whose livelihoods depend primarily on farming | 17 | |
| Transhumant herders | 6 | |
| Cashew producers | 12 | Rules of access to resources (crop residues, cashew orchards etc.), relations with herders (damage to crops, etc.) |
Map 1
Poykoro: pastoral livelihoods under farming pressure (2017).
Table 2
Hohfeld’s legal relations (correlates).
| A’s | B’s | |
|---|---|---|
| Static correlates | Claim-Right | Duty |
| Liberty | No right | |
| Dynamic correlates | Power | Liability |
| Immunity | No power |
[i] (after Hohfeld 1913, and Bromley 1989).
Table 3
Hohfeld’s legal relations (opposites).
| A’s | B’s | |
|---|---|---|
| Static opposites | Claim-Right | No right |
| Liberty | Duty | |
| Dynamic opposites | Power | No power |
| Immunity | Liability |
[i] (after Hohfeld 1913, and Bromley 1989).
Table 4
Hohfeld’s legal correlative relations applied to access to pastoral resources.
| Access to pastoral resources | Prevailing type of relation | Herders (A) | Farmers (B) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rangeland | Static | Liberty | No right |
| Conversion to agricultural land | Dynamic | Liability | Power |
| Forage in cultivated plots in the dry season and in orchards in the rainy season | Static | Liberty | No right |
| Enclosure of cashew orchards | Dynamic | Liability | Power |
| Ponds and pastoral wells | Static | Liberty | No right |
| Domestic wells | Static | Duty | Claim-right |
[i] Source: Authors.