Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Local Stakeholders Understand Recreational Fisheries as Social-Ecological Systems but Do Not View Governance Systems as Influential for System Dynamics Cover

Local Stakeholders Understand Recreational Fisheries as Social-Ecological Systems but Do Not View Governance Systems as Influential for System Dynamics

Open Access
|Oct 2019

Figures & Tables

ijc-13-2-945-g1.png
Figure 1

Vilas County is a lake-rich region of northern Wisconsin that supports recreational fishing opportunities, which are an important component of the region’s economy.

ijc-13-2-945-g2.png
Figure 2

The average number (A) and rate (B) of new variables added to our understanding of the social-ecological system declined as the number of informants interviewed increased. The lines represent means from a rarefaction analysis that added informants at random.

ijc-13-2-945-g3.png
Figure 3

All concepts and variables present in stakeholder mental models coded into the Social Ecological Systems Framework (SESF) using attribution (closed arrows) or subsumption (open arrows) relationships (see Hinkel et al. 2014). See Table S1 for how concepts from FCMS were coded in the SESF.

ijc-13-2-945-g4.png
Figure 4

Stakeholders consistently included more actor concepts in their mental models compared to governance and environment concepts and researchers included more resource system concepts than managers and anglers. Mean values highlighted with asterisks indicates that they were significantly different from those without asterisks.

ijc-13-2-945-g5.png
Figure 5

(A) Stakeholders consistently reported larger influences of actor and resource system variables on other variables (outdegree) compared to governance and environment variables. However, (B) The cumulative effects that other variables had on a given variable (indegree) did not significantly differ among the SESF components. Mean values highlighted with asterisks indicates that they were significantly different from those without asterisks.

ijc-13-2-945-g6.png
Figure 6

The larger representation of actor and resource system concepts and their influence on other concepts did not lead to significant differences in equilibrium outcomes among Social Ecological System Framework components. Average equilibrium outcomes were calculated as the average percent change of state variables within the four Social Ecological System Framework components at equilibrium from initial conditions. Equilibrium conditions were determined from adjacency matrices that iterated out the relationships described in fuzzy cognitive maps to an equilibrium state.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/ijc.945 | Journal eISSN: 1875-0281
Language: English
Submitted on: Nov 15, 2018
Accepted on: Jul 24, 2019
Published on: Oct 30, 2019
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2019 Jacob P. Ziegler, Stuart E. Jones, Christopher T. Solomon, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.