References
- 1Agrawal, A. (2001). Common property institutions and sustainable governance of resources. World development, 29(10), 1649–1672. DOI: 10.1016/S0305-750X(01)00063-8
- 2Agrawal, A. (2003). Sustainable governance of common-pool resources: context, methods, and politics. Annual review of anthropology, 32(1), 243–262. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.anthro.32.061002.093112
- 3Agrawal, A. (2005). Environmentality: Technologies of Government and the Making of Subjects. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. DOI: 10.1215/9780822386421
- 4Agrawal, A. (2014). “Studying the commons, governing common-pool resource outcomes: Some concluding thoughts.” Environmental Science & Policy, 36, 86–91. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2013.08.012
- 5Agrawal, A., Gupta, A., Hathaway, M., Narotzky, S., Raffles, H., Skaria, A., Sundar, N., & Agrawal, A. (2005). Environmentality: Community, intimate government, and the making of environmental subjects in Kumaon, India. Current anthropology, 46(2), 161–190. DOI: 10.1086/427122
- 6Baland, J. M., & Platteau, J. P. (1996).
Halting degradation of natural resources: is there a role for rural communities? Rome, Italy: FAO. - 7Basurto, X. (2008). Biological and ecological mechanisms supporting marine self-governance: the Seri callo de hacha fishery in Mexico. Ecology and Society, 13(2). DOI: 10.5751/ES-02587-130220
- 8Basurto, X., Blanco, E., Nenadovic, M., & Vollan, B. (2016). Integrating simultaneous prosocial and antisocial behavior into theories of collective action. Science Advances, 2(3),
e1501220 . DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.1501220 - 9Basurto, X., Gelcich, S., & Ostrom, E. (2013). The social–ecological system framework as a knowledge classificatory system for benthic small-scale fisheries. Global Environmental Change, 23(6), 1366–1380. DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.08.001
- 10Bennett, A., Acton, L., Epstein, G., Gruby, R. L., & Nenadovic, M. (2018). Embracing conceptual diversity to integrate power and institutional analysis: Introducing a relational typology. International Journal of the Commons, 12(2), 330–357. DOI: 10.18352/ijc.819
- 11Blaikie, P. (2006). Is small really beautiful? Community-based natural resource management in Malawi and Botswana. World development, 34(11), 1942–1957. DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2005.11.023
- 12Boettke, P. J., & Aligica, P. D. (2009). Challenging institutional analysis and development: The Bloomington school. London: Routledge.
- 13Bresnihan, P. (2016). Transforming the fisheries: neoliberalism, nature, and the commons. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctt1d4v0w4
- 14Brisbois, M. C., Morris, M., & de Loë, R. (2019). Augmenting the IAD framework to reveal power in collaborative governance–An illustrative application to resource industry dominated processes. World Development, 120, 159–168. DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.02.017
- 15Brockington, D. (2008). Preserving the new Tanzania: Conservation and land use change. The International Journal of African Historical Studies, 41(3), 557–579.
- 16Büscher, B., Fletcher, R., Brockington, D., Sandbrook, C., Adams, W. M., Campbell, L., Corson, C., Dressler, W., Duffy, R., & Gray, N. (2017). Half-Earth or Whole Earth? Radical ideas for conservation, and their implications. Oryx, 51(3), 407–410. DOI: 10.1017/S0030605316001228
- 17Butler, J. (1997). Further reflections on conversations of our time. Diacritics, 27(1), 13–15. DOI: 10.1353/dia.1997.0004
- 18Butler, J. (1999). Gender trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.
- 19Butler, J., Laclau, E., Zizek, S., & Žižek, S. (2000). Contingency, hegemony, universality: Contemporary dialogues on the left. London: Verso.
- 20Campbell, B., Mandondo, A., Nemarundwe, N., Sithole, B., De Jong, W., Luckert, M., & Matose, F. (2001). Challenges to proponents of common property recource systems: Despairing voices from the social forests of Zimbabwe. World development, 29(4), 589–600. DOI: 10.1016/S0305-750X(00)00114-5
- 21Campbell, L. M. (2005). Overcoming obstacles to interdisciplinary research. Conservation biology, 19(2), 574–577. DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00058.x
- 22Campbell, L. M. (2007). Local conservation practice and global discourse: a political ecology of sea turtle conservation. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 97(2), 313–334. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8306.2007.00538.x
- 23Cashman, K. (1991). Systems of knowledge as systems of domination: The limitations of established meaning. Agriculture and Human Values, 8(1–2), 49–58. DOI: 10.1007/BF01579656
- 24Chowns, E. (2015). Is community management an efficient and effective model of public service delivery? Lessons from the rural water supply sector in Malawi. Public Administration and Development, 35(4), 263–276. DOI: 10.1002/pad.1737
- 25Cleaver, F. (2000). Moral ecological rationality, institutions and the management of common property resources. Development and change, 31(2), 361–383. DOI: 10.1111/1467-7660.00158
- 26Cleaver, F. (2002). Reinventing institutions: Bricolage and the social embeddedness of natural resource management. The European journal of development research, 14(2), 11–30. DOI: 10.1080/714000425
- 27Cleaver, F. (2012). Development through bricolage: rethinking institutions for natural resource management. London: Routledge.
- 28Cleaver, F., & De Koning, J. (2015). Furthering critical institutionalism. International Journal of the Commons, 9(1), 1–18. DOI: 10.18352/bmgn-lchr.605
- 29Clement, F. (2010). Analysing decentralised natural resource governance: proposition for a “politicised” institutional analysis and development framework. Policy Sciences, 43(2), 129–156. DOI: 10.1007/s11077-009-9100-8
- 30Cox, M., Villamayor-Tomas, S., Epstein, G., Evans, L., Ban, N. C., Fleischman, F., Nenadovic, M., & Garcia-Lopez, G. (2016). Synthesizing theories of natural resource management and governance. Global Environmental Change, 39, 45–56. DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.04.011
- 31De Moor, T. (2009). Avoiding tragedies: a Flemish common and its commoners under the pressure of social and economic change during the eighteenth century 1. The Economic History Review, 62(1), 1–22. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0289.2008.00426.x
- 32De Moor, T. (2011). From common pastures to global commons: A historical perspective on interdisciplinary approaches to commons. Natures Sciences Sociétés, 19(4), 422–431. DOI: 10.1051/nss/2011133
- 33Epstein, G., Bennett, A., Gruby, R., Acton, L., & Nenadovic, M. (2014).
Studying power with the social-ecological system framework . In Understanding society and natural resources (pp. 111–135). Dordrecht: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-017-8959-2_6 - 34Fabinyi, M., Evans, L., & Foale, S. (2014). Social-ecological systems, social diversity, and power: insights from anthropology and political ecology. Ecology and Society, 19(4). DOI: 10.5751/ES-07029-190428
- 35Fabinyi, M., Foale, S., & Macintyre, M. (2015). Managing inequality or managing stocks? An ethnographic perspective on the governance of small-scale fisheries. Fish and Fisheries, 16(3), 471–485. DOI: 10.1111/faf.12069
- 36Feeny, D., Berkes, F., McCay, B. J., & Acheson, J. M. (1990). The tragedy of the commons: twenty-two years later. Human ecology, 18(1), 1–19. DOI: 10.1007/BF00889070
- 37Feeny, D., Hanna, S., & McEvoy, A. F. (1996). Questioning the assumptions of the” tragedy of the commons” model of fisheries. Land economics, 187–205. DOI: 10.2307/3146965
- 38Fleischman, F. D., Ban, N. C., Evans, L. S., Epstein, G., Garcia-Lopez, G., & Villamayor-Tomas, S. (2014). Governing large-scale social-ecological systems: lessons from five cases. International Journal of the Commons, 8(2), 428–456. DOI: 10.18352/ijc.416
- 39Fleischman, F. D., Loken, B., Garcia-Lopez, G. A., & Villamayor-Tomas, S. (2014). Evaluating the utility of common-pool resource theory for understanding forest governance and outcomes in Indonesia between 1965 and 2012. International Journal of the Commons, 8(2), 304–336. DOI: 10.18352/ijc.409
- 40Forsyth, T., & Johnson, C. (2014). Elinor Ostrom’s legacy: governing the commons, and the rational choice controversy. Development and Change, 45(5), 1093–1110. DOI: 10.1111/dech.12110
- 41Foucault, M. (1982). The subject and power. Critical inquiry, 8(4), 777–795. DOI: 10.1086/448181
- 42García-López, G. A. (2019). Rethinking elite persistence in neoliberalism: Foresters and techno-bureaucratic logics in Mexico’s community forestry. World Development, 120, 169–181. DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.03.018
- 43García López, G. A., Velicu, I., & D’Alisa, G. (2017). Performing counter-hegemonic common (s) senses: Rearticulating democracy, community and forests in Puerto Rico. Capitalism Nature Socialism, 28(3), 88–107. DOI: 10.1080/10455752.2017.1321026
- 44Giddens, A. (1977). Studies in Social and Political Theory. London, UK: Hutchinson of London.
- 45Giddings, L. S., & Grant, B. M. (2007). A Trojan horse for positivism?: A critique of mixed methods research. Advances in nursing science, 30(1), 52–60. DOI: 10.1097/00012272-200701000-00006
- 46Goldman, M. (1997). ‘Customs in common’: The epistemic world of the commons scholars. Theory and Society, 26(1), 1–37. DOI: 10.1023/A:1006803908149
- 47Gordon, H. S. (1954). The Economic Theory of a Common-Property Resource: The Fishery. Journal of Political Economy, 62(2), 124–142. DOI: 10.1086/257497
- 48Gruby, R. L., & Basurto, X. (2014). Multi-level governance for large marine commons: politics and polycentricity in Palau’s protected area network. Environmental science & policy, 36, 48–60. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2013.06.006
- 49Hall, K., Cleaver, F., Franks, T., & Maganga, F. (2014). Capturing critical institutionalism: A synthesis of key themes and debates. The European Journal of Development Research, 26(1), 71–86. DOI: 10.1057/ejdr.2013.48
- 50Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162(3859), 1243–1248. DOI: 10.1126/science.162.3859.1243
- 51Igoe, J., Neves, K., & Brockington, D. (2010). A spectacular eco-tour around the historic bloc: Theorising the convergence of biodiversity conservation and capitalist expansion. Antipode, 42(3), 486–512. DOI: 10.1002/9781444391442.ch1
- 52Johnson, C. (2004). Uncommon ground: the ‘poverty of history’ in common property discourse. Development and change, 35(3), 407–434. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7660.2004.00359.x
- 53Johnson, J. (2006). Consequences of positivism: A pragmatist assessment. Comparative Political Studies, 39(2), 224–252. DOI: 10.1177/0010414005282982
- 54Jones, S. D. (2015). Bridging political economy analysis and critical institutionalism: an approach to help analyse institutional change for rural water services. International Journal of the Commons, 9(1), 65–86. DOI: 10.18352/ijc.520
- 55Kashwan, P. (2016). Integrating power in institutional analysis: A micro-foundation perspective. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 28(1), 5–26. DOI: 10.1177/0951629815586877
- 56Kashwan, P., MacLean, L. M., & García-López, G. A. (2019). Rethinking power and institutions in the shadows of neoliberalism: (An introduction to a special issue of World Development). World Development, 120, 133–146. DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.05.026
- 57Knight, J. (1992). Institutions and social conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511528170
- 58Leslie, H. M., Basurto, X., Nenadovic, M., Sievanen, L., Cavanaugh, K. C., Cota-Nieto, J. J., & Nagavarapu, S. (2015). Operationalizing the social-ecological systems framework to assess sustainability. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(19), 5979–5984. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1414640112
- 59Li, T. M. (2006).
Neo-liberal strategies of government through community: The social development program of the World Bank in Indonesia . Toronto, TO: International Law and Justice Working Papers. University of Toronto. - 60Li, T. M. (2007). The will to improve: Governmentality, development, and the practice of politics. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. DOI: 10.1215/9780822389781
- 61Lukes, S. (1974). Power: A Radical View. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave MacMillan. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-349-02248-9
- 62Mansfield, B. (2004). Neoliberalism in the oceans: “rationalization,” property rights, and the commons question. Geoforum, 35(3), 313–326. DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2003.05.002
- 63McCay, B. J., & Acheson, J. (1987). The question of the commons: The culture and ecology of communal resources. Tucson, AR: University of Arizona Press.
- 64McCay, B. J., & Jentoft, S. (1998). Market or community failure? Critical perspectives on common property research. Human organization, 57, 21–29. DOI: 10.17730/humo.57.1.372712415k227u25
- 65McGinnis, M., & Ostrom, E. (2014). Social-ecological system framework: initial changes and continuing challenges. Ecology and Society, 19(2). DOI: 10.5751/ES-06387-190230
- 66Mehta, L., Leach, M., & Scoones, I. (2001). Editorial: Environmental governance in an uncertain world. Ids Bulletin-Institute of Development Studies, 32(4), 1–9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1759-5436.2001.mp32004001.x
- 67Moore, B.,
Jr. (1978). Injustice: The Social Bases of Obedience and Revolt: The Social Bases of Obedience and Revolt. White Plains: M.E. Sharpe. - 68Mosse, D. (1997). The symbolic making of a common property resource: history, ecology and locality in a tank-irrigated landscape in south India. Development and change, 28(3), 467–504. DOI: 10.1111/1467-7660.00051
- 69Mosse, D. (1998). Making and misconceiving community in South Indian tank irrigation. Crossing Boundaries: Conference of the International Association for Common Property,
June . - 70Mosse, D. (2003). The rule of water: statecraft, ecology and collective action in South India. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
- 71Mosse, D. (2006). Collective action, common property, and social capital in South India: An anthropological commentary. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 54(3), 695–724. DOI: 10.1086/500034
- 72Mudliar, P., & Koontz, T. (2018). The muting and unmuting of caste across inter-linked action arenas: inequality and collective action in a community-based watershed group. International Journal of the Commons, 12(1), 225–248. DOI: 10.18352/ijc.807
- 73Ostrom, E. (1982). Strategies of political inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
- 74Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511807763
- 75Ostrom, E. (1998). A behavioral approach to the rational choice theory of collective action: Presidential address, American Political Science Association, 1997. American political science review, 92(1), 1–22. DOI: 10.2307/2585925
- 76Ostrom, E. (2005). Understanding institutional diversity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
- 77Ostrom, E. (2009). A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science, 325(5939), 419–422. DOI: 10.1126/science.1172133
- 78Ostrom, E., Gardner, R., Walker, J., Walker, J. M., & Walker, J. (1994). Rules, games, and common-pool resources. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. DOI: 10.3998/mpub.9739
- 79Ostrom, E. E., Dietz, T. E., Dolšak, N. E., Stern, P. C., Stonich, S. E., & Weber, E. U. (2002). The drama of the commons. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
- 80Patterson, J., Schulz, K., Vervoort, J., Van Der Hel, S., Widerberg, O., Adler, C., Hurlbert, M., Anderton, K., Sethi, M., & Barau, A. (2017). Exploring the governance and politics of transformations towards sustainability. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 24, 1–16. DOI: 10.1016/j.eist.2016.09.001
- 81Popper, K. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. London: Routledge. DOI: 10.1063/1.3060577
- 82Poteete, A. R., Janssen, M. A., & Ostrom, E. (2010). Working together: collective action, the commons, and multiple methods in practice. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. DOI: 10.1515/9781400835157
- 83Ribot, J. C., & Peluso, N. L. (2003). A theory of access. Rural sociology, 68(2), 153–181. DOI: 10.1111/j.1549-0831.2003.tb00133.x
- 84Robbins, P. (2011). Political ecology: A critical introduction (Vol. 16). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
- 85Roth, D. (2009). Property and authority in a migrant society: Balinese irrigators in Sulawesi, Indonesia. Development and Change, 40(1), 195–217. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7660.2009.01511.x
- 86Saunders, F. P. (2014). The promise of common pool resource theory and the reality of commons projects. International Journal of the Commons, 8(2), 636–656. DOI: 10.18352/ijc.477
- 87Schlüter, M., Hinkel, J., Bots, P., & Arlinghaus, R. (2014). Application of the SES framework for model-based analysis of the dynamics of social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 19(1). DOI: 10.5751/ES-05782-190136
- 88Scott, J. C. (1985). Weapons of the weak: Everyday forms of peasant resistance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
- 89Scott, J. C. (1998). Seeing like a state: How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
- 90Springate-Baginski, O., Soussan, J. G., Dev, O. P., Yadav, N. P., & Kiff, E. (1999).
Community forestry in Nepal: Impacts on common property resource management . Rome, Italy: FAO. - 91Stubbs, P. (2005). Stretching concepts too far?: multi-level governance, policy transfer and the politics of scale in South-eastern Europe. South East European Politics, 6(2), 66–87.
- 92Velicu, I., & García-López, G. (2018). Thinking the commons through Ostrom and Butler: Boundedness and vulnerability. Theory, Culture & Society, 35(6), 55–73. DOI: 10.1177/0263276418757315
- 93Wade, R. (1989). Village republics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- 94West, P., Igoe, J., & Brockington, D. (2006). Parks and peoples: the social impact of protected areas. Annual Review of Anthropology, 35, 251–277. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.anthro.35.081705.123308
- 95Whaley, L., & Cleaver, F. (2017). Can ‘functionality’ save the community management model of rural water supply? Water resources and rural development, 9, 56–66. DOI: 10.1016/j.wrr.2017.04.001