Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Impact of Heterogeneity in a Global Knowledge Commons: Implications for Governance of the DNA Barcode Commons Cover

The Impact of Heterogeneity in a Global Knowledge Commons: Implications for Governance of the DNA Barcode Commons

International Journal of the Commons
Volume 13 (2019): Issue 2
By: Janis Geary,  Trish Reay and  Tania Bubela  
Open Access
|Oct 2019

References

  1. 1Agrawal, A., & Gibson, C. C. (2001). Introduction: The Role of Community in Natural Resource Conservation. In A. Agrawal, & C. C. Gibson (Eds.), Communities and the Environment: Ethnicity, Gender, and the State in Community-Based Conservation (pp. 1–31). New Brunswick, New Jersey, and London: Rutgers University Press.
    Back to article
  2. 2Australian Government. (2008). Biodiversity Hotspots. Text. Department of the Environment and Energy. September 2. http://www.environment.gov.au/biodiversity/conservation/hotspots
    Back to article
  3. 3Basurto, X., Kingsley, G., McQueen, K., Smith, M., & Weible, C. M. (2010). A Systematic Approach to Institutional Analysis: Applying Crawford and Ostrom’s Grammar. Political Research Quarterly, 63(3), 523–37. DOI: 10.1177/1065912909334430
    Back to article
  4. 4Black, M. (1962). Models and Metaphors: Studies in Language and Philosophy. Syracuse, NY: Cornell University Press.
    Back to article
  5. 5Brito, D. L., Intriligator, M. D., & Sheshinski, E. (1997). Privatization and the Distribution of Income in the Commons. Journal of Public Economics, 64(2), 181–205. DOI: 10.1016/S0047-2727(96)01611-8
    Back to article
  6. 6Bubela, T., Adams, R., Chandrasekharan, S., Mishra, A., & Liu, S. (2017). Governance of Biomedical Research Commons to Advance Clinical Translation: Lessons from the Mouse Model Community. In K. J. Strandburg, B. M. Frischmann, & M. J. Madison (Eds.), Governing Medical Knowledge Commons (pp. 222–258). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/9781316544587.011
    Back to article
  7. 7Bubela, T., Schofield, P. N., Ryan, D. D., Adams, R., & Einhorn, D. (2012). Managing Intellectual Property to Promote Pre-Competitive Research: The Mouse as a Model for Constructing a Robust Research Commons. Journal of Law, Information and Science, 22(1), 98. http://search.informit.com.au/documentSummary;dn=050814668635987;res=IELHSS
    Back to article
  8. 8Burlando, R. M., & Guala, F. (2005). Heterogeneous Agents in Public Goods Experiments. Experimental Economics, 8(1), 35–54. DOI: 10.1007/s10683-005-0436-4
    Back to article
  9. 9Castle, D., Hanner, R., Hollingsworth, P. M., & Li, D. (2015). Discussion Document: The International Society for the Barcode of Life (ISBOL). Retrieved from http://ibol.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/ISBOL150819-Final.pdf
    Back to article
  10. 10Centre for Biodiversity Genomics. (2016). Organization. Retrieved from http://biodiversitygenomics.net/about/organization/
    Back to article
  11. 11Costa, F. O., & Carvalho, G. R. (2007). The Barcode of Life Initiative: Synopsis and Prospective Societal Impacts of DNA Barcoding of Fish. Life Sciences Society and Policy, 3(2), 29. DOI: 10.1186/1746-5354-3-2-29
    Back to article
  12. 12Crawford, S., & Ostrom, E. (1995). A Grammar of Institutions. American Political Science Review, 89(3), 582–600. DOI: 10.2307/2082975
    Back to article
  13. 13Crawford, S., & Ostrom, E. (2005). A Grammar of Institutions. In E. Ostrom (Ed.), Understanding Institutional Diversity (pp. 137–74). Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.
    Back to article
  14. 14Dedeurwaerdere, T. (2010). Self-Governance and International Regulation of the Global Microbial Commons: Introduction to the Special Issue on the Microbial Commons. International Journal of the Commons, 4(1), 390–403. DOI: 10.18352/ijc.215
    Back to article
  15. 15Fischbacher, U., & Gaechter, S. (2006). Heterogeneous Social Preferences and the Dynamics of Free Riding in Public Goods. Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=874928
    Back to article
  16. 16Fleischman, F. D., Ban, N. C., Evans, L. S., Epstein, G., Garcia-Lopez, G., & Villamayor-Tomas, S. (2014). Governing Large-Scale Social-Ecological Systems: Lessons from Five Cases. International Journal of the Commons, 8(2), 428–56. DOI: 10.18352/ijc.416
    Back to article
  17. 17Friedland, R., & Alford, R. (1991). Bringing Society Back In: Symbols, Practices and Institutional Contradictions. In W. Powell, & P. Dimaggio (Eds.), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (pp. 232–63). Chicago, IL: University Of Chicago Press.
    Back to article
  18. 18Freidson, E. (2001). Professionalism, the Third Logic. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    Back to article
  19. 19Frischmann, B. M., Madison, M. J., & Strandburg, K. J. (2014). Governing Knowledge Commons. In B. M. Frischmann, M. J. Madison, & K. J. Strandburg (Eds.), Governing Knowledge Commons (pp. 1–43). New York: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199972036.001.0001
    Back to article
  20. 20Geary, J., & Bubela, T. (2010). Interview Guides for DNA Barcode Commons Case Study. Education and Research Archive. DOI: 10.7939/R3N873F7M
    Back to article
  21. 21Geary, J., & Bubela, T. (2019). Governance of a global genetic resource commons for non-commercial research. International Journal of the Commons, 13(1), 205–243. DOI: 10.18352/ijc.859
    Back to article
  22. 22Goodrick, E. (2002). From Management as a Vocation to Management as a Scientific Activity: An Institutional Account of a Paradigm Shift. Journal of Management, 28(5), 649–68. DOI: 10.1177/014920630202800505
    Back to article
  23. 23Goodrick, E., & Reay, T. (2011). Constellations of Institutional Logics Changes in the Professional Work of Pharmacists. Work and Occupations, 38(3), 372–416. http://wox.sagepub.com/content/38/3/372.short. DOI: 10.1177/0730888411406824
    Back to article
  24. 24Hayo, B., & Vollan, B. (2012). Group Interaction, Heterogeneity, Rules, and Co-Operative Behaviour: Evidence from a Common-Pool Resource Experiment in South Africa and Namibia. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 81(1), 9–28. DOI: 10.1016/j.jebo.2011.09.002
    Back to article
  25. 25Hebert, P. D. N., Cywinska, A., Ball, S. L., & deWaard, J. R. (2003). Biological Identifications through DNA Barcodes. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 270(1512), 313–21. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2002.2218
    Back to article
  26. 26Hensmans, M. (2003). Social Movement Organizations: A Metaphor for Strategic Actors in Institutional Fields. Organization Studies, 24(3), 355–81. DOI: 10.1177/0170840603024003908
    Back to article
  27. 27Hoffman, A. J. (1999). Institutional Evolution and Change: Environmentalism and the U.S. Chemical Industry. The Academy of Management Journal, 42(4), 351–71. DOI: 10.2307/257008
    Back to article
  28. 28iBOL. (2015a). Partner Nations. International Barcode of Life. Retrieved from http://ibol.org/about-us/partner-nations/
    Back to article
  29. 29iBOL. (2015b). Project Governance. The Organization of the iBOL Team. International Barcode of Life. Retrieved from http://ibol.org/about-us/project-governance/#
    Back to article
  30. 30iBOL. (2015c). Sponsors|iBOL. International Barcode of Life. Retrieved from http://ibol.org/about-us/sponsors/
    Back to article
  31. 31iBOL. (2015d). What Is iBOL|iBOL. International Barcode of Life. Retrieved from http://ibol.org/about-us/what-is-ibol/
    Back to article
  32. 32Jansen, H. (2010). The Logic of Qualitative Survey Research and Its Position in the Field of Social Research Methods. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 11(2). Retrieved from http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1450
    Back to article
  33. 33Jaskiewicz, P., Heinrichs, K., Rau, S. B., & Reay, T. (2016). To be or not to be: How family firms manage family and commercial logics in succession. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 40(4), 781–813. DOI: 10.1111/etap.12146
    Back to article
  34. 34Lee, M. D. P., & Lounsbury, M. (2015). Filtering institutional logics: Community logic variation and differential responses to the institutional complexity of toxic waste. Organization Science, 26(3), 847–866. DOI: 10.1287/orsc.2014.0959
    Back to article
  35. 35Li, D., Castle, D., Hanner, R., & Hollingsworth, P. (2013). Kunming Declaration on the Promotion of DNA Barcoding and Biodiversity Science. Kunming, China. Retrieved from http://www.innogen.ac.uk/downloads/Kunming-Declaration2.pdf
    Back to article
  36. 36Lindahl, T. (2012). Coordination Problems and Resource Collapse in the Commons – Exploring the Role of Knowledge Heterogeneity. Ecological Economics, 79, 52–59. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.04.016
    Back to article
  37. 37LMMC. (2002). Cancun Declaration of Like-Minded Megadiversity Countries. Cancun, Mexico. Retrieved from https://www.environment.gov.za/sites/default/files/docs/cancun_lmmc_declaration1.pdf
    Back to article
  38. 38Lounsbury, M. (2002). Institutional Transformation and Status Mobility: The Professionalization of the Field of Finance. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 255–66. DOI: 10.2307/3069295
    Back to article
  39. 39Lounsbury, M. (2007). A Tale of Two Cities: Competing Logics and Practice Variation in the Professionalizing of Mutual Funds. Academy of Management Journal, 50(2), 289–307. DOI: 10.5465/amj.2007.24634436
    Back to article
  40. 40Mishra, A., & Bubela, T. (2014). Legal Agreements and the Governance of Research Commons: Lessons from Materials Sharing in Mouse Genomics. OMICS: A Journal of Integrative Biology, 18(4), 254–73. DOI: 10.1089/omi.2013.0158
    Back to article
  41. 41Ostrom, E. (1987). Institutional Arrangements for Resolving the Commons Dilemma: Some Contending Approaches. In B. J. McCay, & J. M. Acheson (Eds.), The question of the commons: The culture and ecology of communal resources (pp. 250–265). Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona Press.
    Back to article
  42. 42Ostrom, E. (2005). Understanding Institutional Diversity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
    Back to article
  43. 43Poteete, A. R., Janssen, M., & Ostrom, E. (2010a). Meta-Analysis: Getting the Big Picture through Synthesis. In Working Together: Collective Action, the Commons, and Multiple Methods in Practice (pp. 89–112). Princeton University Press. DOI: 10.1515/9781400835157.89
    Back to article
  44. 44Poteete, A. R., Janssen, M. A., & Ostrom, E. (2010b). Overcoming Methodological Challenges. In A. R. Poteete, M. A. Janssen, & E. Ostrom (Eds.), Working Together: Collective Action, the Commons, and Multiple Methods in Practice (pp. 3–30). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. DOI: 10.1515/9781400835157
    Back to article
  45. 45Poteete, A. R., & Ostrom, E. (2004). Heterogeneity, Group Size and Collective Action: The Role of Institutions in Forest Management. Development and Change, 35(3), 435–61. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7660.2004.00360.x
    Back to article
  46. 46Ratnasingham, S. (2015). Informatics Tools for the Second Decade of DNA Barcoding. Presented at the 6th International Barcode of Life Conference, Guelph, August 20. http://dnabarcodes2015.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/SujeevanRatnasingham.pdf
    Back to article
  47. 47Reay, T., & Hinings, C. R. (2005). The Recomposition of an Organizational Field: Health Care in Alberta. Organization Studies, 26(3), 351–84. DOI: 10.1177/0170840605050872
    Back to article
  48. 48Reay, T., & Hinings, C. R. (2009). Managing the Rivalry of Competing Institutional Logics. Organization Studies, 30(6), 629–52. DOI: 10.1177/0170840609104803
    Back to article
  49. 49Reay, T., Jaskiewicz, P., & Hinings, C. R. (2015). How family, business, and community logics shape family firm behavior and “rules of the game” in an organizational field. Family Business Review, 28(4), 292–311. DOI: 10.1177/0894486515577513
    Back to article
  50. 50Reay, T., & Jones, C. (2016). Qualitatively Capturing Institutional Logics. Strategic Organization, 14(4), 441–54. DOI: 10.1177/1476127015589981
    Back to article
  51. 51Ruttan, L. M. (2006). Sociocultural Heterogeneity and the Commons. Current Anthropology, 47(5), 843–53. DOI: 10.1086/507185
    Back to article
  52. 52Ruttan, L. M. (2008). Economic Heterogeneity and the Commons: Effects on Collective Action and Collective Goods Provisioning. World Development, 36(5), 969–85. DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2007.05.005
    Back to article
  53. 53Sakane, N., van Wijk, M. T., Langensiepen, M., & Becker, M. (2014). A quantitative model for understanding and exploring land use decisions by smallholder agrowetland households in rural areas of East Africa. Agriculture, ecosystems & environment, 197, 159–173. DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2014.07.011
    Back to article
  54. 54Schweik, C., & English, R. (2012). Internet Success: A Study of Open-Source Software Commons. Cambridge, Massachusetts; London, England: MIT Press. https://mitpress.mit.edu/books/internet-success. DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/9780262017251.001.0001
    Back to article
  55. 55Shiferaw, B., Kebede, T. A., & Reddy, V. R. (2012). Community Watershed Management in Semiarid India: The State of Collective Action and Its Effects on Natural Resources and Rural Livelihoods. In E. Mwangi, H. Markelova, & R. Meinzen-Dick (Eds.), Collective Action and Property Rights for Poverty Reduction: Insights from Africa and Asia (pp. 153–188). Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    Back to article
  56. 56Siddiki, S., Weible, C. M., Basurto, X., & Calanni, J. (2011). Dissecting policy designs: An application of the institutional grammar tool. Policy Studies Journal, 39(1), 79–103. DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2010.00397.x
    Back to article
  57. 57Tautz, D., Arctander, P., Minelli, A., Thomas, R. H., & Vogler, A. P. (2003). A plea for DNA taxonomy. Trends in ecology & evolution, 18(2), 70–74. DOI: 10.1016/S0169-5347(02)00041-1
    Back to article
  58. 58Thornton, P. H. (2002). The Rise of the Corporation in a Craft Industry: Conflict and Conformity in Institutional Logics. The Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 81–101. DOI: 10.2307/3069286
    Back to article
  59. 59Thornton, P. H. (2004). Markets from Culture: Institutional Logics and Organizational Decisions in Higher Education Publishing. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
    Back to article
  60. 60Thornton, P. H., Jones, C., & Kury, K. (2005). Institutional Logics and Institutional Change in Organizations: Transformation in Accounting, Architecture, and Publishing. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 23, 125–170. DOI: 10.1016/S0733-558X(05)23004-5
    Back to article
  61. 61Thornton, P. H., & Ocasio, W. (1999). Institutional Logics and the Historical Contingency of Power in Organizations: Executive Succession in the Higher Education Publishing Industry, 1958–1990. American Journal of Sociology, 105(3), 801–43. DOI: 10.1086/210361
    Back to article
  62. 62Thornton, P. H., & Ocasio, W. (2008). Institutional Logics. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, R. Suddaby, & K. Sahlin-Andersson (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Ltd.
    Back to article
  63. 63Thornton, P. H., Ocasio, W., & Lounsbury, M. (2012). The Institutional Logics Perspective: A New Approach to Culture, Structure and Process. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199601936.001.0001
    Back to article
  64. 64Tyler, T. R. (1990). Why People Obey the Law: Procedural Justice, Legitimacy, and Compliance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
    Back to article
  65. 65United Nations. (2010). Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and the Fair and Equitable Sharing of Benefits Arising from Their Utilization (ABS) to the Convention on Biological Diversity. 20 Oct 2010. C.N.782.2010.
    Back to article
  66. 66Varughese, G., & Ostrom, E. (2001). The Contested Role of Heterogeneity in Collective Action: Some Evidence from Community Forestry in Nepal. World Development, 29(5), 747–65. DOI: 10.1016/S0305-750X(01)00012-2
    Back to article
  67. 67Vedeld, T. (2000). Village Politics: Heterogeneity, Leadership and Collective Action. Journal of Development Studies, 36(5), 105–34. DOI: 10.1080/00220380008422648
    Back to article
  68. 68Yancy, H. F., Zemlak, T. S., Mason, J. A., Washington, J. D., Tenge, D. J., Nguyen, N.-L. T., & Barnett, J. D. (2008). Potential Use of DNA Barcodes in Regulatory Science: Applications of the Regulatory Fish Encyclopedia. Journal of Food Protection, 71(1), 210–17. DOI: 10.4315/0362-028X-71.1.210
    Back to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/ijc.861 | Journal eISSN: 1875-0281
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Submitted on: Oct 5, 2017
Accepted on: Apr 8, 2019
Published on: Oct 30, 2019
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Keywords:
knowledge commons,
global,
heterogeneity,
institutional logics,
grammar of institutions,
DNA barcoding

© 2019 Janis Geary, Trish Reay, Tania Bubela, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 13 (2019): Issue 2Next article