Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Re-Enchanting the Commons through Community-Based Governance to Grow Civic Virtue for Social-Ecological Sustainability Cover

Re-Enchanting the Commons through Community-Based Governance to Grow Civic Virtue for Social-Ecological Sustainability

Open Access
|Aug 2026

References

  1. Agrawal, A. (2003). Sustainable governance of common-pool resources: Context, methods, and politics. Annual Review of Anthropology, 32, 243262. 10.1146/annurev.anthro.32.061002.093112
  2. Akers, J. F., & Yasué, M. (2019). Motivational crowding in payments for ecosystem service schemes: A global systematic review. Conservation and Society, 17(4), 377389. 10.4103/cs.cs_18_90
  3. Ayivor, J. S., Nyametso, J. K., & Ayivor, S. (2020). Protected area governance and its influence on local perceptions, attitudes and collaboration. Land, 9(9), 310. 10.3390/land9090310
  4. Baxter, D. E., & Pelletier, L. G. (2019). Is nature relatedness a basic human psychological need? A critical examination of the extant literature. Canadian Psychology, 60(1), 2134. 10.1037/cap0000145
  5. Berger, P. L., & Neuhaus, R. J. (1977). To Empower People: The Role of Mediating Structures in Public Policy. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.
  6. Berkes, F. (2007). Community-based conservation in a globalized world. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 104(39), 1518815193. 10.1073/pnas.0702098104
  7. Berkes, F. (2018). Sacred Ecology (4th ed.). New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315114644
  8. Berkes, F. (2023). Making connections: Leopold’s land health, indigenous ways of knowing, social-ecological resilience, and One Health. CABI One Health, 2(1). 10.1079/cabionehealth.2023.0008
  9. Berkes, F., Doubleday, N. C., & Cumming, G. S. (2012). Aldo Leopold’s Land Health from a resilience point of view: Self-renewal capacity of social–ecological systems. EcoHealth, 9(3), 278287. 10.1007/s10393-012-0796-0
  10. Black, H. M., & Neill, J. T. (2024). Wellbeing through nature: A qualitative exploration of psychosocial aspects of a Landcare ACT nature-connection program. Journal of Outdoor and Environmental Education. 10.1007/s42322-024-00184-2
  11. Böhme, J., Spreitzer, E.-M., & Wamsler, C. (2024). Conducting sustainability research in the anthropocene: Toward a relational approach. Sustainability Science. 10.1007/s11625-024-01510-9
  12. Bollier, D., & Helfrich, S. (2019). Free, Fair and Alive: The Insurgent Power of the Commons. Gabriola Island, Canada: New Society Publishers.
  13. Bowles, S. (2008). Policies designed for self-interested citizens may undermine ‘the moral sentiments’: Evidence from economic experiments. Science, 320(5883), 16051609. 10.1126/science.1152110
  14. Bratman, G. N., Olvera-Alvarez, H. A., & Gross, J. J. (2021). The affective benefits of nature exposure. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 15, e12630. 10.1111/spc3.12630
  15. Campbell, A. (2016). Two steps forward, one step back: The ongoing failure to capture synergies in natural resource management (Australia). In M. D. Young & C. Esau (Eds.), Transformational Change in Environmental and Natural Resource Management: Guidelines for Policy Excellence (pp. 8094). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
  16. Christens, B. D., McCormick, M. L., & Wolf, J. (2025). Understanding and promoting nature connectedness: A human ecological perspective. Current Opinion in Psychology, 65, 102046. 10.1016/j.copsyc.2025.102046
  17. Clement, F., Harcourt, W. J., Joshi, D., & Sato, C. (2019). Feminist political ecologies of the commons and commoning. International Journal of the Commons, 13(1), 115. 10.18352/ijc.972
  18. Curtis, A., Ross, H., Marshall, G. R., Baldwin, C., Cavaye, J., Freeman, C., . . . Syme, G. J. (2014). The great experiment with devolved NRM governance: Lessons from community engagement in Australia and New Zealand since the 1980s. Australasian Journal of Environmental Management, 21(2), 175199. 10.1080/14486563.2014.935747
  19. DeCaro, D. A. (2019). Humanistic rational choice: Understanding the fundamental motivations that drive self-organization and cooperation in commons dilemmas. In B. Hudson, J. Rosenbloom, & D. Cole (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of the Study of the Commons (pp. 117132). Abingdon-on-Thames, UK: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315162782-10
  20. DeCaro, D. A., Janssen, M. A., & Lee, A. (2015). Synergistic effects of voting and enforcement on internalized motivation to cooperate in a resource dilemma. Judgment and Decision Making, 10(6), 511537. 10.1017/S1930297500006975
  21. DeCaro, D. A., Janssen, M. A., & Lee, A. (2021). Motivational foundations of communication, voluntary cooperation, and self-governance in a common-pool resource dilemma. Current Research in Ecological and Social Psychology, 2(100016), 119. 10.1016/j.cresp.2021.100016
  22. DeCaro, D. A., & Stokes, M. (2008). Social-psychological principles of community-based conservation and conservancy motivation: Attaining goals within an autonomy-supportive environment. Conservation Biology, 22(6), 14431451. 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.00996.x
  23. DeCaro, D. A., & Stokes, M. K. (2013). Public participation and institutional fit: A social–psychological perspective. Ecology and Society, 18(4), 40. 10.5751/ES-05837-180440
  24. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behaviour. New York: Plenum Press. 10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7
  25. Dedeurwaerdere, T., Admiraal, J., Beringer, A., Bonaiuto, F., Cicero, L., Fernandez-Wulff, P., . . . Melindi-Ghidi, P. (2016). Combining internal and external motivations in multi-actor governance arrangements for biodiversity and ecosystem services. Environmental Science and Policy, 58, 110. 10.1016/j.envsci.2015.12.003
  26. de Vos, A., Quinlan, A., Biggs, R., Bennett, E. M., Martín-López, B., Norström, A. V., . . . Wallington, C. (2025). Welcome home! Introducing SocSES: A society for inclusive and impactful social-ecological research. Ecology and Society, 30(2), 32. 10.5751/ES-16164-300232
  27. Di Domenico, S. I., & Ryan, R. M. (2017). The emerging neuroscience of intrinsic motivation: A new frontier in self-determination research. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 11, 145. 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00145
  28. Epstein, G. (2017). Local rulemaking, enforcement and compliance in state-owned forest commons. Ecological Economics, 131, 312321. 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.09.012
  29. Ezzine-de-Blas, D., Corbera, E., & Lapeyre, R. (2019). Payments for environmental services and motivation crowding: Towards a conceptual framework. Ecological Economics, 156, 434443. 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.07.026
  30. Frey, B. S., & Jegen, R. (2001). Motivation crowding theory: A survey of empirical evidence. Journal of Economic Surveys, 15, 589611. 10.1111/1467-6419.00150
  31. Gibson-Graham, J. K., Cameron, J., & Healy, S. (2016). Commoning as a post-capitalist politics. In A. Amin & P. Howell (Eds.), Releasing the Commons: Rethinking the Futures of the Commons (pp. 192212). Abingdon, UK: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315673172-12
  32. Gifford, R. (2011). The dragons of inaction: Psychological barriers that limit climate change mitigation and adaptation. American Psychologist, 66(4), 290302. 10.1037/a0023566
  33. Harcourt, W. (2021). Rethinking life-in-common in the Australian landscape. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space, 4(4), 13301345. 10.1177/2514848621989602
  34. Hartberg, Y., Cox, M., & Villamayor-Tomas, S. (2016). Supernatural monitoring and sanctioning in community-based resource management. Religion, Brain and Behavior, 6(2), 95111. 10.1080/2153599X.2014.959547
  35. Hinchman, L. P., & Hinchman, S. K. (2007). What we owe the Romantics. Environmental Values, 16(3), 333354. 10.3197/096327107X228382
  36. Holy See. (2015). Papal Encyclical Laudato Si’: On Care for Our Common Home. Online: https://www.vatican.va/content/francesco/en/encyclicals/documents/papa-francesco_20150524_enciclica-laudato-si.html (accessed 16 February 2026).
  37. Hurly, J., & Walker, G. J. (2019). Nature in our lives: Examining the human need for nature relatedness as a basic psychological need. Journal of Leisure Research, 50(4), 290310. 10.1080/00222216.2019.1578939
  38. Keali’ikanaka’oleohaililani, K., & Giardina, C. P. (2016). Embracing the sacred: An indigenous framework for tomorrow’s sustainability science. Sustainability Science, 11, 5767. 10.1007/s11625-015-0343-3
  39. Kellert, S. R. (1997). Kinship to Mastery: Biophilia in Human Evolution and Development. Washington, D.C., USA: Island Press.
  40. Kimmerer, R. W. (2013). Braiding Sweetgrass: Indigenous Wisdom, Scientific Knowledge, and the Teachings of Plants. Minneapolis: Milkweed Editions.
  41. KPMG. (2021). Building resilience in local communities: The wellbeing benefits of participating in Landcare. Retrieved from Online: https://landcareaustralia.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Wellbeing-benefits-participating-landcare-Report-KPMG-2021.pdf (accessed 15 March 2026).
  42. Kuo, F. E., Sullivan, W. C., Coley, R. L., & Brunson, L. (1998). Fertile ground for community: Inner-city neighborhood common spaces. American Journal of Community Psychology, 26, 823851. 10.1023/A:1022294028903
  43. Ladak, A., Wilks, M., & Anthis, J. R. (2023). Extending perspective taking to nonhuman animals and artificial entities. Social Cognition, 41(3), 274302. 10.1521/soco.2023.41.3.274
  44. Landon, A. C., Woosnam, K. M., Kyle, G. T., & Keith, S. J. (2021). Psychological needs satisfaction and attachment to natural landscapes. Environment and Behavior, 53(6), 661683. 10.1177/0013916520916255
  45. Lejano, R. P. (2019). Relationality and social–ecological systems: Going beyond or behind sustainability and resilience. Sustainability, 11(10), 2760. 10.3390/su11102760
  46. Leopold, A. (1949). A Sand County Almanac and Sketches Here and There. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  47. Llewellyn, O., & Khalid, F. (2024). Al-Mizan: A covenant for the Earth. Retrieved from Birmingham, UK. Online: https://www.almizan.earth/ (accessed 28 March 2026):
  48. LoTemplio, S., McDonnell, A. S., Nadkarni, N., Walker, S., Gallegos-Riofrío, C. A., Scott, E. E., . . . Strayer, D. L. (2023). Healthy by nature: Policy practices aimed at maximizing the human behavioral health benefits of nature contact. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 10(2), 247255. 10.1177/23727322231197578
  49. Lumber, R., Richardson, M., & Sheffield, D. (2017). Beyond knowing nature: Contact, emotion, compassion, meaning, and beauty are pathways to nature connection. Plos One, 12(5), e0177186. Online: https://doi.org/0177110.0171371/journal.pone.0177186.
  50. Malik, A. (2025). Deep cooperation as a meaningful foundation for polycentric order. In A. Thiel, E. Baldwin, M. Stephan, & S. Villamayor-Tomas (Eds.), Modes of Coordination and Performance in Polycentric Governance: Disentangling Complexity (pp. 153171). Oxford, UK: Oxford Academic. 10.1093/9780198944720.003.0009
  51. Marshall, G. R. (2008a). Community-based, regional delivery of natural resource management: Building system-wide capacities to motivate voluntary farmer adoption of conservation practices. Canberra: Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation. Online: https://dlc.dlib.indiana.edu/dlcrest/api/core/bitstreams/5021c28a-2430-43a0-92c0-5b522bcdf19f/content.
  52. Marshall, G. R. (2008b). Nesting, subsidiarity, and community-based environmental governance beyond the local level. International Journal of the Commons, 2(1), 7597. 10.18352/ijc.50
  53. Marshall, G. R. (2015). Polycentricity, subsidiarity and adaptive efficiency. Paper presented at the International Workshop on Polycentricity, Ostrom Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis, Indiana University, Bloomington, USA.
  54. Marshall, G. R., Hine, D. W., & East, M. J. (2017). Can community-based governance strengthen citizenship in support of climate change adaptation? Testing insights from Self-Determination Theory. Environmental Science and Policy, 72, 19. 10.1016/j.envsci.2017.02.010
  55. Marshall, G. R., & Lobry de Bruyn, L. A. (2022). Community-based governance and global sustainability. In A. Dale, J. Curnow, A. Campbell, & M. Seigel (Eds.), Global Resilience through Local Self-Reliance: The Landcare Model (pp. 5769). Canberra: Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research
  56. Marshall, G. R., & Malik, A. (2019). Polycentricity and citizenship in environmental governance. In A. Thiel, D. E. Garrick, & W. Blomquist (Eds.), Governing Complexity: Analyzing and Applying Polycentricity (pp. 197218). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108325721.010
  57. Menzies, H. (2014). Reclaiming the Commons for the Common Good. Gabriola Island, Canada: New Society Publishers.
  58. Merchant, C. (1990). The Death of Nature: Women, Ecology and the Scientific Revolution. New York: Harper Collins.
  59. Molsher, R., & Townsend, M. (2015). Improving wellbeing and environmental stewardship through volunteering in nature. EcoHealth, 13, 151155. 10.1007/s10393-015-1089-1
  60. Moore, C. L., & Van Vliet, K. J. (2022). Women’s experiences of nature as a pathway to recovery from sexual assault. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 62(1), 123150. 10.1177/0022167819847094
  61. Morizot, B. (2022). Ways of Being Alive. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
  62. Nightingale, A. J. (2019). Commoning for inclusion? Political communities, commons, exclusion, property and socio-natural becomings. International Journal of the Commons, 13(1), 1635. 10.18352/ijc.927
  63. Norgaard, R. B. (1994). Development Betrayed: The End of Progress and a Coevolutionary Revisioning of the Future. London and New York: Routledge.
  64. Ostrom, E. (1982). Beyond positivism. In E. Ostrom (Ed.), Strategies of Political Inquiry (pp. 1128). Beverly Hills, USA: Sage Publications.
  65. Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511807763
  66. Ostrom, E. (1998). A behavioral approach to the rational choice theory of collective action. American Political Science Review, 92(1), 122. 10.2307/2585925
  67. Ostrom, E. (2000). Crowding out citizenship. Scandinavian Political Studies, 23(1), 315. 10.1111/1467-9477.00028
  68. Ostrom, E. (2010). Beyond markets and states: Polycentric governance of complex economic systems. American Economic Review, 100(3), 641672. 10.1257/aer.100.3.641
  69. Ostrom, V. (1997). The Meaning of Democracy and the Vulnerability of Democracies. A Response to Tocqueville’s Challenge. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press. 10.3998/mpub.15021
  70. Ostrom, V., Tiebout, C. M., & Warren, R. (1961). The organization of government in metropolitan areas: A theoretical inquiry. American Political Science Review, 55, 831842. 10.2307/1952530
  71. Passmore, H., & Howell, A. J. (2014). Eco-existential positive psychology: Experiences in nature, existential anxieties, and well-being. The Humanistic Psychologist, 42(4), 370388. 10.1080/08873267.2014.920335
  72. Paton, S., Curtis, A., McDonald, G., & Woods, M. (2004). Regional natural resource management: Is it sustainable? Australasian Journal of Environmental Management, 11(4), 259267 10.1080/14486563.2004.10648622
  73. Poteete, A. R., Janssen, M. A., & Ostrom, E. (2010). Working Together: Collective Action, the Commons, and Multiple Methods in Practice. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 10.2307/j.ctt3fgxrd.5
  74. Poussard, H. (1992). Community landcare to test government policies and programs. Proceedings of the 7th International Soil Conservation Organisation Conference, Sydney.
  75. Read, J. (2011). The production of subjectivity: From transindividuality to the commons. New Formations, 70(1), 113131. 10.3898/NEWF.70.07.2010
  76. Richardson, M., Passmore, H.-A., Lumber, R., Thomas, R., & Hunt, A. (2021). Moments, not minutes: The nature-wellbeing relationship. International Journal of Wellbeing, 11, 833. 10.5502/ijw.v11i1.1267
  77. Ruiz-Mallén, I., Schunko, C., Corbera, E., Rös, M., & Reyes-García, V. (2015). Meanings, drivers, and motivations for community-based conservation in Latin America. Ecology and Society, 20(3), 33. 10.5751/ES-07733-200333
  78. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 6878. 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
  79. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-Determination Theory: Basic Psychological Needs in Motivation, Development, and Wellness. New York: Guilford Publishing. 10.1521/978.14625/28806
  80. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2019). Brick by brick: The origins, development, and future of self-determination theory. In A. J. Elliot (Ed.), Advances in Motivation Science (Vol. 6, pp. 111156). Amsterdam: Elsevier. 10.1016/bs.adms.2019.01.001
  81. Ryan, R. M., Kuhl, J., & Deci, E. L. (1997). Nature and autonomy: An organizational view of social and neurobiological aspects of self-regulation in behavior and development. Development and Psychopathology, 9, 701728. 10.1017/S0954579497001405
  82. Schoon, M., & Van der Leeuw, S. (2015). The shift toward social-ecological systems perspectives: Insights into the human-nature relationship. Natures Sciences Sociétés, 23(2), 166174. 10.1051/nss/2015034
  83. Sheffield, D., Butler, C. W., & Richardson, M. (2022). Improving nature connectedness in adults: A meta-analysis, review and agenda. Sustainability, 14(9), 12494. 10.3390/su141912494
  84. Singh, N. M. (2017). Becoming a commoner: The commons as sites for affective socio-nature encounters and co-becomings. Ephemera: Theory and Politics In Organization, 17(4), 751776.
  85. Soga, M., & Gaston, K. J. (2024). Do people who experience more nature act more to protect it? A meta-analysis Biological Conservation, 289, 110417. 10.1016/j.biocon.2023.110417
  86. Soto-Oñate, D., Petrovics, D., & Bauwens, T. (2026). Post-growth meets polycentric governance: Toward an interdisciplinary research program. Ecological Economics, 242, 108891. 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108891
  87. Sugiyama, T., Leslie, E., Giles-Corti, B., & Owen, N. (2008). Associations of neighbourhood greenness with physical and mental health: Do walking, social coherence and local social interaction explain the relationships? Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 62, e9. 10.1136/jech.2007.064287
  88. Taylor, C. (2007). A Secular Age. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Belknap Press. 10.4159/9780674044289-005
  89. Taylor, C. (2011). Recovering the sacred. Inquiry, 54(2), 113125. 10.1080/0020174X.2011.559047
  90. Turner, R. A., Gill, D. A., Fitzsimmons, C., Forster, J., Mahon, R., Peterson, A., & Stead, S. (2018). Supporting enhancement of stewardship in small-scale fisheries: Perceptions of governance among Caribbean coral reef fishers. In S. Salas, M. J. Barragán-Paladines, & R. Chuenpagdee (Eds.), Viability and Sustainability of Small-Scale Fisheries in Latin America and The Caribbean (pp. 473494). Cham, Germany: Springer International Publishing. 10.1007/978-3-319-76078-0_20
  91. Watts, V. (2013). Indigenous place-thought and agency amongst humans and non-humans (First Woman and Sky Woman go on a European world tour!). Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society, 2(1), 2034. https://ikdll.nau.edu/id/eprint/80/.
  92. Weinstein, N., Przybylski, A. K., & Ryan, R. M. (2009). Can nature make us more caring? Effects of immersion in nature on intrinsic aspirations and generosity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35(10), 13151329. 10.1177/0146167209341649
  93. Wilson, E. (1984). Biophilia: The Human Bond with Other Species. Cambridge, USA: Harvard University Press. 10.4159/9780674045231
  94. Winkler-Schor, S., van Riper, C. J., Ezzine-de-Blas, D., & Naughton-Treves, L. (2025). Expanding self-determination theory: Examining the role of nature relatedness in agroforestry adoption among Indigenous landholders in Mexico. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 107, 102732. 10.1016/j.jenvp.2025.102732
  95. Zelenski, J. M., Dopko, R. L., & Capaldi, C. A. (2015). Cooperation is in our nature: Nature exposure may promote cooperative and environmentally sustainable behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 42, 2431. 10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.01.005
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/ijc.1752 | Journal eISSN: 1875-0281
Language: English
Page range: 347 - 363
Submitted on: Apr 7, 2026
Accepted on: Jul 19, 2026
Published on: Aug 6, 2026
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2026 Graham R. Marshall, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.