Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Legal Pluralism in the Commons: The Case of Toyooka, Japan Cover

Legal Pluralism in the Commons: The Case of Toyooka, Japan

Open Access
|Aug 2026

References

  1. Asad, T. (1998). Anthropology & the colonial encounter. Amherst, NY: Humanity Books.
  2. Asano, T. (2014). International Nature Reserves and Local Inhabitants: The Case of the “Wise Use” of Ramsar Wetlands in Japan. Japanese Journal of Human Geography, 66(6), 536551. 10.4200/jjhg.66.6_536
  3. Bell, S., McGillivray, D., Pedersen, O., Lees, E., & Stokes, E. (2024). Environmental law. Tenth edn. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/he/9780192847690.001.0001
  4. Berbés-Blázquez, M., González, J. A., & Pascual, U. (2016). Towards an ecosystem services approach that addresses social power relations. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 19, 134143. 10.1016/j.cosust.2016.02.003
  5. Blomley, N. (2008). Enclosure, common right and the property of the poor. Social & Legal Studies, 17(3), 311331. 10.1177/0964663908093966
  6. Bodley, J. (2008). Anthropology and Contemporary Human Problems. Lanham: Alta Mira.
  7. Bollier, D. (2017). Reinventing law for the commons. In M. Scanlan (Ed.), Law and Policy for a New Economy: Sustainable, Just and Democratic (pp. 137164). Edward Elgar Publishing. 10.4337/9781786434524.00018
  8. Borrows, J. (2016). Seven gifts: Revitalizing living laws through indigenous legal practice. Lakehead Law Journal, 2, 214.
  9. Bryman, A. (2016). Social Research Methods. Fifth Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  10. Capra, F., & Mattei, U. (2015). The ecology of law: Toward a legal system in tune with nature and community. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
  11. Chizu, S. (2025). Exploring how commoning helps reconfigure feminist analytical tools in times of socio-ecological crises. ジェンダー研究: お茶の水女子大学ジェンダー研究所年報, 28, 2138.
  12. Cohen, A. J., & Healy, S. (2025). Diverse Legalities: Towards a Legal Theory for a Postcapitalist Political Economy. Law and Contemporary Problems, 88(1), 79115. 10.2139/ssrn.5249078
  13. Convention on Biological Diversity. (2010). Aichi Biodiversity Targets, adopted at the 10th Conference of the Parties (COP 10), Nagoya, Japan, 18–29 October. Available at: https://www.cbd.int [Accessed on 17th December 2023].
  14. Convention on Wetlands of International Importance especially as Waterfowl Habitat. (1971). Treaty adopted at Ramsar, Iran on 2 February 1971. Available at: https://www.ramsar.org [Accessed on 17th March 2023].
  15. Cumbers, A. (2015). Constructing a global commons in, against and beyond the state. Space and Polity, 19(1), 6275. 10.1080/13562576.2014.995465
  16. Davies, M. (2017). Law unlimited. Routledge. 10.4324/9781315775913
  17. Davies, M. (2022). Ecolaw: legality, life, and the normativity of Nature. Routledge. 10.4324/9781003128335
  18. de Sousa Santos, B. (2002). Toward a new legal common sense: law, globalization, and emancipation. 2nd ed. Butterworths.
  19. de Sousa Santos, B. (2014). Epistemologies of the South: justice against epistemicide. Boulder – London: Paradigm Publishers.
  20. Ehrlich, E. (1962). Fundamental Principles of the Sociology of Law. Walter Moll trans. Russell and Russell.
  21. Escobar, A. (2017). Designs for the Pluriverse: Radical Interdependence, Autonomy, and the Making of Worlds. Duke University Press. 10.1215/9780822371816
  22. Evans, J., & Jones, P. (2011). The walking interview: Methodology, mobility and place. Applied geography, 31(2), 849858. 10.1016/j.apgeog.2010.09.005
  23. Ewick, P., & Silbey, S. (1998). The Common Place of Law: Stories from Everyday Life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226212708.001.0001
  24. Federici, S. (2004). Caliban and the witch: women, the body and primitive accumulation. Autonomedia.
  25. Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures: selected essays Basic.
  26. Geertz, C. (1983). Local Knowledge: Fact and Law in Comparative Perspective. In C. Geertz (Ed.), Local Knowledge: Further Essays in Interpretive Anthropology (pp. 167234). Basic Books.
  27. Gibson-Graham, J. K., Cameron, J., & Healy, S. (2016). Commoning as a postcapitalist politics 1. In A. Amin, & P. Howell (Eds.), Releasing the commons: Rethinking the Futures of the Commons (pp. 192212). Routledge. 10.4324/9781315673172-12
  28. Graham, M. (1999). Some thoughts about the philosophical underpinnings of Aboriginal worldviews. Worldviews: Global Religions, Culture, and Ecology, 3(2),105118. 10.1163/156853599X00090
  29. Graham, N., Davies, M., & Godden, L. (2017). Broadening law’s context: materiality in socio-legal research. Griffith Law Review, 26(4), 480510. 10.1080/10383441.2017.1548001
  30. Grear, A. (2015). Deconstructing anthropos: A critical legal reflection on ‘anthropocentric’ law and anthropocene ‘humanity’. Law and critique, 26, 225249. 10.1007/s10978-015-9161-0
  31. Grear, A. (2017). ‘Anthropocene, Capitalocene, Chthulucene’: Re-encountering environmental law and its ‘subject’ with Haraway and new materialism. In L. Kotze (Ed.), Environmental Law and Governance for the Anthropocene (pp. 7797). Hart Publishing.
  32. Griffiths, J. (1986). What is Legal Pluralism? Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 24, 155. 10.1080/07329113.1986.10756387
  33. Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (2019). Ethnography: Principles in practice. Routledge. 10.4324/9781315146027
  34. Haraway, D. (2012). Awash in urine: DES and Premarin in multispecies response-ability. Women’s studies quarterly, 40(1/2), 301316. 10.1353/wsq.2012.0005
  35. Harm Benson, M. (2012). Mining sacred space: law’s enactment of competing ontologies in the American West. Environment and Planning A, 44(6), 14431463. 10.1068/a44579
  36. Ingold, T. (2008). Bindings against Boundaries: Entanglements of Life in an Open World. Environment and Planning A, 40(8), 17961810. 10.1068/a40156
  37. Ishihara, H., Pascual, U., & Hodge, I. (2017). Dancing with storks: the role of power relations in payments for ecosystem services. Ecological Economics, 139, 4554. 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.04.007
  38. Japan Satoyama Satoumi Assessment. (2010). Satoyama-Satoumi Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Socio-ecological Production Landscapes of Japan – Summary for Decision Makers. United Nations University, Tokyo, Japan.
  39. Kamada, M. (2017). Satoyama Landscape of Japan—Past, Present, and Future. In S. K. Hong & N. Nakagoshi (Eds.), Landscape Ecology for Sustainable Society (pp. 87109) Springer, Cham. 10.1007/978-3-319-74328-8_6
  40. Keating, A. (2009). From Intersections to Interconnections: Lessons for Transformation from This Bridge Called My Back: Radical Writings by Women of Colour. In M. T. Berger, & K. Guidroz (Eds.), The Intersectional Approach: Transforming the Academy Through Race, Class, and Gender (pp. 8199). University of North Carolina Press.
  41. Knight, C. (2010). The discourse of “encultured nature” in Japan: The concept of satoyama and its role in 21st-century nature conservation. Asian Studies Review, 34(4), 421441. 10.1080/10357823.2010.527920
  42. Kobayashi, N. (2017). The City Where the Storks Fly: Sustainable Agriculture and Species Reintroduction in Toyooka City, Japan. Anthropology Department Honors Papers. 15. https://digitalcommons.conncoll.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1014&context=anthrohp [Accessed on 07th of March 2025).
  43. Li, T. M. (2007). The will to improve: governmentality, development and the practice of politics. Duke University Press.
  44. Linebaugh, P. (2008). The Magna Carta Manifesto: Liberties and Commons for All. University of California Press. 10.1525/9780520932708
  45. Mahmood, S. (2011). Politics of Piety: The Islamic Revival and the Feminist Subject. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 10.2307/j.ctvct00cf
  46. McKean, M. (1982). The Japanese experience with scarcity: Management of traditional common lands. Environmental Review: ER, 6(2), 6391. 10.2307/3984155
  47. McKean, M. (1992). Management of Traditional Common Lands (Iriaichi) in Japan. In D. W. Bromley (Ed.), Making the commons work (pp. 6398). ICS Press.
  48. McKean, M. (1996). Old voices for new commons. Common Property Resource Digest, 39, 1216.
  49. Merchant, C. (1990). The death of nature: Women, ecology, and the scientific revolution. Harper and Rowe.
  50. Merry, S. E. (1990). Getting Justice and Getting Even: Legal Consciousness among Working-Class Americans. Chicago: Chicago University Press. 10.1515/9780691221984
  51. Merry, S. E. (2020). An Anthropological Perspective on Legal Pluralism. In P. Schiff Berman (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Global Legal Pluralism (pp. 169185). Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197516744.013.20
  52. Mies, M. (2014). No commons without a community. Community Development Journal, 49(suppl_1), i106i117. 10.1093/cdj/bsu007
  53. Ministry of the Environment, Japan. (1992). Act on Conservation of Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora. Available at: https://www.env.go.jp/nature/kisho/kisei/en/species/#:~:text=ACES%20prohibits%2C%20in%20principle%2C%20the,sale%20leading%20to%20the%20transfer [Accessed on 15th May 2024].
  54. Ministry of the Environment Japan. (2012). The National Biodiversity Strategy of Japan 2012–2020 Roadmap towards the Establishment of an Enriching Society in Harmony with Nature. Available online at: https://www.env.go.jp/press/files/en/528.pdf [accessed on 22nd November 2023].
  55. Ministry of the Environment, Japan. (2023). The National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan of Japan 2023–2030: The Roadmap to Realizing Nature-Positive by 2030. Available at: https://www.env.go.jp/content/000256855.pdf [Accessed on March 4th 2025].
  56. Miyanaga, K., & Shimada, D. (2018). ‘The tragedy of the commons’ by underuse: toward a conceptual framework based on ecosystem services and satoyama perspective. International Journal of the Commons, 12(1), 332351. 10.18352/ijc.817
  57. Moore, S. F. (1973). Law and social change: the semi-autonomous social field as an appropriate subject of study. Law & Society Review, 7(4), 719746. 10.2307/3052967
  58. Moretti, C. (2017). Walking. In D. Culhane & D. Elliott (Eds.), A different kind of ethnography: Imaginative practices and creative methodologies. University of Toronto Press.
  59. Morimoto, Y. (2011). What is Satoyama? Points for discussion on its future direction. Landscape and Ecological Engineering, 7, 163171. 10.1007/s11355-010-0120-5
  60. Naito, K., Kikuchi, N., & Ohsako, Y. (2014). Role of the oriental white stork in maintaining the cultural landscape in the Toyooka Basin, Japan. In Biocultural Landscapes: Diversity, Functions and Values (pp. 3344). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. 10.1007/978-94-017-8941-7_4
  61. Nightingale, A. J. (2019). Commoning for inclusion? Commons, exclusion, property and socio-natural becomings. International journal of the commons, 13(1), 1635. 10.18352/ijc.927
  62. Nakamura, N., & Sato, C. (2023). More-than-Human Commoning through Women’s Kokorozashi Business for Collective Well-being: A Case from Aging and Depopulating Rural Japan. International Journal of the Commons, 17(1), 125140. 10.5334/ijc.1215
  63. Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511807763
  64. Pieraccini, M. (2016) Beyond legal facts and discourses: towards a social-ecological production of the legal. In: R. Thomas-Pellicer, V. De Lucia, & S. Sullivan (Eds.), Contributions to Law, Philosophy and Ecology: Exploring re-embodiments (pp. 227243). United Kingdom: Routledge.
  65. Robinson, D. F., & Graham, N. (2018). Legal Pluralisms, Justice and Spatial Conflicts: New Directions in Legal Geography. The Geographical Journal, 184(1), 307. 10.1111/geoj.12247
  66. Saito, O., & Shibata, H. (2013). Satoyama and Satoumi, and ecosystem services: A conceptual framework. In A. Kumar Duraiappah, K. Nakamura, K. Takeuchi, M. Watanabe, & M. Nishi (Eds.), Satoyama-Satoumi Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Socio-Ecological Production Landscapes of Japan (pp. 1759). UNU: New York. 10.18356/c18ba22c-en
  67. Sarat, A., & Kearns, T. R. (Eds.) (1995). Law in Everyday Life. University of Michigan Press.
  68. Satsuka, S. (2012). Biodiversity in Satoyama conservation: Aesthetics, science, and the politics of knowledge. RCC Perspectives, 9, 7982.
  69. Satsuka, S. (2014). The Satoyama Movement: Envisioning Multispecies Commons in Postindustrial Japan. RCC Perspectives, 3, 8794.
  70. Shimada, D. (2014). External impacts on traditional commons and present-day changes: a case study of iriai forests in Yamaguni district, Kyoto, Japan. International Journal of the Commons, 8(1), 207235. 10.18352/ijc.348
  71. Smith, L. T. (2012). Decolonising Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples. Second Edition. Zed Books: London.
  72. Takahashi, T., Matsushita, K., & de Jong, W. (2017). Factors affecting the creation of modern property ownership of forest commons in Japan: An examination of historical, prefectural data. Forest Policy and Economics, 74, 6270. 10.1016/j.forpol.2016.10.012
  73. Takamura, G. (2025). Compliance-Oriented Legalization and the Problematization of Irregularities in Japanese Common Forest Registration: Perspectives of Commoners and Forestry Cooperatives, Asian Journal of Law and Society (pp. 119). 10.1017/als.2025.10027
  74. Takamura, G., Nishide, T., Kanazawa, Y., & Hayashi, M. (2021). Bundle of Rights Reversed. International Journal of the Commons, 15(1), 259275. 10.5334/ijc.1080
  75. Takeuchi, K. (2003). The Nature of Satoyama Landscapes. In: K. Takeuchi, R. Brown, I. Washitani, A. Tsunekawa, & M. Yokohari (Eds.). Satoyama (pp. 939). Tokyo: Springer. 10.1007/978-4-431-67861-8_2
  76. Takeuchi, K. (2010). Rebuilding the relationship between people and nature: the Satoyama Initiative. Ecol Res., 25, 891897. 10.1007/s11284-010-0745-8
  77. Tamanaha, B. Z. (2007). Understanding Legal Pluralism: Past to Present, Local to Global. Sydney Law Review, 30, 375411.
  78. Toyooka City Office. (2012). Community Development to Live in Harmony with the Oriental White Stork in Toyooka City, Hyogo, Japan. Available at: https://satoyama-initiative.org/cse_studies/community-development-to-live-in-harmony-with-the-oriental-white-stork-in-toyooka-city-hyogo-japan/ [Accessed on 2nd April 2024].
  79. Tsing, A. (2015). The Mushroom at the End of the World: On the Possibility of Life in Capitalist Ruins. Princeton University Press. 10.1515/9781400873548
  80. Watson, I. (2002). Aboriginal Laws and the Sovereignty of Terra Nullius. Borderlands E-Journal, 1(2), 1532.
  81. Watson, I. (2014). Aboriginal peoples, colonialism and international law: Raw law. Routledge. 10.4324/9781315858999
  82. Yamamoto, S. (2013). Forest Volunteer Activity in Japan. In T. Murota & K. Takeshita (Eds.), Local Commons and Democratic Environmental Governance (pp. 287303). UNUP.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/ijc.1616 | Journal eISSN: 1875-0281
Language: English
Page range: 398 - 413
Submitted on: Jul 3, 2025
Accepted on: Jun 1, 2026
Published on: Aug 11, 2026
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2026 David McKeown, Margherita Pieraccini, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.