Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Towards Democratisation of Public Administration: Public-Commons Partnerships in Barcelona Cover

Towards Democratisation of Public Administration: Public-Commons Partnerships in Barcelona

By: Marina Pera and  Sonia Bussu  
Open Access
|Feb 2024

References

  1. 1Ajuntament de Barcelona. (2017). Programa de patrimoni Ciutadà d’ús i gestió comunitàries. Retrieved from https://ajuntament.barcelona.cat/participaciociutadana/sites/default/files/documents/comunsurbans_doc_sm_0.pdf
  2. 2Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2007). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of PA Research and Theory, 18(4). DOI: 10.1093/jopart/mum032
  3. 3Ansell, C., Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2023). The democratic quality of co-creation: A theoretical exploration. Public Policy and Administration. DOI: 10.1177/09520767231170715
  4. 4Avritzer, L. (2010). “Living under a Democracy: Participation and Its Impact on the Living Conditions of the Poor.” Latin American Research Review, 45(4), 166185. Project MUSE. DOI: 10.1353/lar.2010.0044
  5. 5Baiocchi, G., Heller, P., & Silva, M. K. (2011). Bootstrapping Democracy: Transforming Local Governance and Civil Society in Brazil. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. DOI: 10.46692/9781847422293
  6. 6Baker, T., & McGuirk, P. (2017). Assemblage thinking as methodology: commitments and practices for critical policy research. Territory, Politics, Governance, 5(4). DOI: 10.1080/21622671.2016.1231631
  7. 7Barnes, M., Newman, J., & Sullivan, H. (2007). Power, participation and political renewal: Case studies in public participation. Bristol, UK: Policy Press. DOI: 10.46692/9781847422293
  8. 8Bartels, K. (2020). Transforming the relational dynamics of urban governance: How social innovation research can create a trajectory for learning and change. Urban Studies, 57(14). DOI: 10.1177/0042098019889290
  9. 9Bartels, K., & Turnbull, N. (2020). Relational PA: a synthesis and heuristic classification of relational approaches. Public Management Review, 22(9), 13241346, DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2019.1632921
  10. 10Bartels, K. P. R. (2017). The double bind of social innovation: Relational dynamics of change and resistance in neighbourhood governance. Urban Studies, 54(16). DOI: 10.1177/0042098016682935
  11. 11Bartels, K. P. R. (2019). Connecting: A Relational approach to re-rooting communities, public services, and politics. In Stout, M (Ed.), The Future of Progressivism. Applying Follettian Thinking to Contemporary Issues. Anoka, MN: Process Century Press.
  12. 12Bennett, H., & Brunner, R. (2022). Political and ethical dilemmas in multi-agency participatory research: The role of the buffer zone. Methodological Innovations, 15(3), 387399. DOI: 10.1177/20597991221129775
  13. 13Bianchi, I., Pera, M., Calvet-Mir, L., Villamayor, S., Ferreri, M., Reguero, N., & Maestre Andrés, S. (2022). Urban commons and the local state: co-production between enhancement and co-optation. Territory, Politics, Governance. DOI: 10.1080/21622671.2022.2108491
  14. 14Blanco, I., & Gomà, R. (2020). New Municipalism. In A. Kobayashi (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of Human Geography. Oxford: Elsevier. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-08-102295-5.10676-6
  15. 15Blanco, I., Lowndes, V., & Salazar, Y. (2022). Understanding institutional dynamics in participatory governance: how rules, practices and narratives combine to produce stability or diverge to create conditions for change, Critical Policy Studies, 16(2). DOI: 10.1080/19460171.2021.1984265
  16. 16Bollier, D., & Helfrich, S. (2019). Free, fair and alive: The insurgent power of commons. New Society Publishers.
  17. 17Bua, A., & Bussu, S. (2023). Introduction to the Volume. In A. Bua & S. Bussu (Eds.), Reclaiming Participatory Governance. London: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781003218517
  18. 18Bussu, S. (2019). Collaborative governance: Between invited and invented spaces. In S. Elstub & O. Escobar (Eds.), Handbook of Democratic Innovation and Governance. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. DOI: 10.4337/9781786433862.00012
  19. 19Bussu, S., Bua, A., Dean, R., & Smith, G. (2022). Introduction: Embedding Participatory Governance. Critical Policy Studies, 16(2). DOI: 10.1080/19460171.2022.2053179
  20. 20Bussu, S., & Galanti, M. T. (2018). Facilitating coproduction: the role of leadership in coproduction initiatives in the UK, Policy and Society, 37(3). DOI: 10.1080/14494035.2018.1414355
  21. 21Bynner, C., Escobar, O., & Weakley, S. (2023). Facilitators as culture change workers: advancing public participation and deliberation in local governance. Local Government Studies. DOI: 10.1080/03003930.2023.2190586
  22. 22De Angelis, M. (2013). Does capital need commons fix? Ephemera: Theory and Politics in Organizations, 13(3).
  23. 23Dean, R. (2023). Deliberating Like a State: Locating PA Within the Deliberative System. Political Studies. DOI: 10.1177/00323217231166285
  24. 24Durose, C., & Richardson, L. (2016). Debating co-productive design. In L. Richardson and C. Durose (Eds.), Designing public policy for co-production: theory, practice and change. Bristol: Policy Press.
  25. 25Escobar, O. (2019). Facilitators: the micropolitics of public participation and deliberation. S. Elstub and O. Escobar (Eds.), Handbook of Democratic Innovation and Governance. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. DOI: 10.4337/9781786433862.00022
  26. 26Feinberg, A., Ghorbani, A., & Herder, P. (2021). Diversity and Challenges of the Urban Commons: A Comprehensive Review. International Journal of the Commons, 15(1). DOI: 10.5334/ijc.1033
  27. 27Forné, L., & Castro, M. (2022). Noves mètriques I valors per a una institucionalitat publicomunitària: Algunes propostes des de l’experiència del programa de Patrimoni ciutadà. In S. Eizaguirre & J. Rodrigo (Eds.), Perquè tot és de tothom. Barcelona: Icaria.
  28. 28Fung, A. (2006). Empowered participation: Reinventing Urban Democracy. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
  29. 29Fung, A., & Wright, E. O. (2003) Deepening Democracy: Institutional Innovations in Empowered Participatory Governance. London: Verso.
  30. 30García-Espin, P. (2023). Surfing Disappointment The Uneasy Inclusion of Social Movement Activists in Local Participatory Institutions: A Case Study of Madrid (2015–2019). In A. Bua and S. Bussu (Eds.), Reclaiming Participatory Governance. London: Routledge.
  31. 31Haxeltine, A., Pel, B., Wittmayer, J., Dumitru, A., Kemp, R., & Avelino, F. (2017) Building a middle-range theory of transformative social innovation: Theoretical pitfalls and methodological responses. European Public & Social Innovation Review, 2(1). DOI: 10.31637/epsir.17-1.5
  32. 32Jessop, B., Moulaert, F., Hulgard, L., & Hamdouch, A. (2013). Social innovation research: a new stage ininnovation analysis? In F. Moulaert, D. MacCallum, A. Mehmood, A. Hamdouch (Eds.). International handbook on social innovation: collective action, social learning and transdisciplinary research. Elgaronline. DOI: 10.4337/9781849809993
  33. 33Lane, C. (1998). ‘Introduction: theories and issues in the study of trust’. In C. Lane and R. Bachmann (Eds), Trust in and between organizations. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780198293187.001.0001
  34. 34Laval, C., & Dardot, P. (2015). Común: ensayo sobre la revolución en el siglo XXI. Barcelona: Gedisa.
  35. 35Lejano, R. (2021). Relationality: An alternative framework for analysing policy. Journal of Public Policy, 41(2). DOI: 10.1017/S0143814X20000057
  36. 36Lowndes, V., & Roberts, M. (2013). Why Institutions Matter: The New Institutionalism in Political Science. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, Red Globe Press. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-137-32913-4_2
  37. 37Martí-Costa, M., & Dalmau-Torva, M. (2013). Can Batlló: Sustaining an insurgent urbanism. Planning Theory and Practice, 14(4).
  38. 38Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511807763
  39. 39Pera, M. (2022). Estudi de la gestió cívica a Barcelona:La gestió d’equipaments municipals com a pràctica democràtica i comunitària. [Doctoral dissertation] www.tdx.cat
  40. 40Pera, M., Bianchi, I., & Salazar, Y. (2023). The embeddedness of public-common institutions: the Citizen Assets Programme in Barcelona. In A. Bua and S. Bussu (Eds.), Reclaiming Participatory Governance. London: Routledge.
  41. 41Russell, B., Milburn, K., & Heron, K. (2022). Strategies for a new municipalism: Public–common partnerships against the new enclosures. Urban Studies. DOI: 10.1177/00420980221094700
  42. 42Stavrides, S. (2016). Common space: The city as commons. London: Zed Books. DOI: 10.5040/9781350219267
  43. 43van Meerkerk, I., & Edelenbos, J. (2018). Boundary Spanners in Public Management and Governance. Elgaronline. DOI: 10.4337/9781786434173
  44. 44Wagenaar, H. (2023). The Democratic Multiverse: Governance, Associations and the Prospects for Progressive Democratic Renewal. In A. Bua and S. Bussu (Eds.), Reclaiming Participatory Governance. London: Routledge.
  45. 45Williams, P. (2012). Collaboration in public policy and practice: Perspectives on boundary spanners. Bristol University Press. DOI: 10.46692/9781447306306
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/ijc.1385 | Journal eISSN: 1875-0281
Language: English
Submitted on: Jan 31, 2024
Accepted on: Feb 7, 2024
Published on: Feb 27, 2024
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2024 Marina Pera, Sonia Bussu, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.