Figure 1
Evolution of the number of publications within the gender and the commons fields.
Sources: Genre&Com; ijc2020.
Figure 2
Main journals publishing in the double field gender and the commons.
Sources: Genre&Com; ijc2020.
Figure 3
Disciplines represented in the double field Gender and the commons.
Sources: Genre&Com; ijc2020.
Figure 4
Disciplines represented in the double field according the journal.
Sources: Genre&Com.
Figure 5
Pluridisciplinarity per publication within the double field gender and the commons.
Sources: Genre&Com.
Table 1
Main contributors to the literature crossing gender studies and the commons.
| CONTRIBUTORS WITH MORE THAN 3 PUBLICATIONS | |
|---|---|
| AUTHORS | NBRE OF PUBLICATIONS |
| Meinzen-Dick, Ruth | 12 |
| Agarwal, Bina | 11 |
| Federici, Silvia | 7 |
| Zwarteveen, Margreet | 6 |
| Mwangi, Esther | 5 |
| Larson, Anne | 4 |
[i] Source: Genre&Com.
Figure 6
Co-authoring within the double field gender and the commons.
Sources: Genre&Com; ijc2020.
Figure 7
Citations of papers within the double field.
Sources: Genre&Com; Genre&Com; ijc2020.
Figure 8
Types of ressources/services represented within the double field gender and the commons.
Sources: Genre&Com.
Figure 9
Representation of countries within the double field gender and the commons.
Sources: Genre&Com.
Figure 10
Mapping of the different approaches within the double field.
Sources: Genre&Com.
Table 2
Representation of disciplines within each sub field.
| REPRESENTATION OF DISCIPLINES WITHIN EACH SUB FIELD IN % OF OCCURRENCES | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ANALYTICAL APPROACH | POLITICAL APPROACH | |||
| GENDER | FEMINIST | GENDER | FEMINIST | |
| anthropology | 4.9% | 5.6% | 8.5% | 5.1% |
| economics | 21.0% | 14.8% | 11.3% | 8.9% |
| engineering | 3.1% | 5.6% | 2.8% | 6.3% |
| envir. studies | 15.2% | 11.1% | 14.1% | 11.4% |
| gender studies | 2.7% | 5.6% | 2.8% | 5.1% |
| geography/urban studies | 11.2% | 11.1% | 16.9% | 12.7% |
| miscellaneous | 4.9% | 7.4% | 2.8% | 3.8% |
| philosophy | 3.6% | 3.7% | 1.4% | 7.6% |
| political science | 14.7% | 5.6% | 11.3% | 11.4% |
| regional/cultural studies | 1.8% | 3.7% | 2.8% | 1.3% |
| rural/peasant studies | 1.8% | 3.7% | 2.8% | 1.3% |
| sociology | 15.2% | 14.8% | 19.7% | 25.3% |
[i] Within the analytical framework of the commons intersecting with gender perspectives, economics represents 21% of the disciplines.
Source: Genre&Com.
Figure 11
Mapping of the different approaches within the double field accroding the gender of the author.
Sources: Genre&Com.