Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Accessibility to Space Infrastructures and Outer Space: Anthropological Insights from Europe’s Spaceport Cover

Accessibility to Space Infrastructures and Outer Space: Anthropological Insights from Europe’s Spaceport

Open Access
|Dec 2023

References

  1. 1Aima, R. (2018). Life on MARS: Dubai projects a new vision of nationalism. In World Policy Journal (Vol. 35, Issue 1, pp. 1015). Duke University Press. DOI: 10.1215/07402775-6894696
  2. 2Aschbacher, J. (2023). A holistic approach for launchers and exploration in Europe | LinkedIn. LinkedIn. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/holistic-approach-launchers-exploration-europe-josef-aschbacher/
  3. 3Atkins, S. (2022). Governance in Outer Space: The Case for a New Global Order. https://www.nasa.gov/specials/artemis/
  4. 4Bawaka Country, Mitchell, A., Wright, S., Suchet-Pearson, S., Lloyd, K., Burarrwanga, L., Ganambarr, R., Ganambarr-Stubbs, M., Ganambarr, B., Maymuru, D., & Maymuru, R. (2020). Dukarr lakarama: Listening to Guwak, talking back to space colonization. Political Geography, 81, 102218. DOI: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2020.102218
  5. 5Beery, J. (2016). Unearthing global natures: Outer space and scalar politics. Political Geography, 55, 92101. DOI: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2016.04.003
  6. 6Buck, S. (1998). Organizing the Commons: Definitions and Assumptions. https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
  7. 7Casumbal-Salazar, I. (2017). A Fictive Kinship: Making “Modernity,” “Ancient Hawaiians,” and the Telescopes on Mauna Kea — University of Minnesota Press. 4(2). https://www.upress.umn.edu/book-division/images/other-images/a-fictive-kinship-making-modernity-ancient-hawaiians-and-the-telescopes-on-mauna-kea. DOI: 10.5749/natiindistudj.4.2.0001
  8. 8Chambaz, B., Dezoteux, B., Redon, D., & Azoulay, G. (2021). Traversée culturelle dans les archives de l’espace. Vol.2: Le centre spatial guyannais.
  9. 9Chocho-Dufail, J. (2023). Mémoires des expropriés de Kourou et Sinnamary.
  10. 10CSG. (2019). De l’Algérie à la Guyane. Centre Spatial Guyanais. https://centrespatialguyanais.cnes.fr/fr/centre-spatial-guyanais/histoire-du-spatial-en-guyane/histoire-du-csg/la-guyane-port-spatial-de
  11. 11CSG Archives. (1964). (25W614) Recherche de Sites de Lancement.
  12. 12CSG Archives. (1965). (25W602) Note sur les problemes urbanisme poses par l’implemantation du CSG au Kourou.
  13. 13Cui, Z., & Xu, Y. (2022). Impact simulation of Starlink satellites on astronomical observation using worldwide telescope. Astronomy and Computing, 41, 100652. DOI: 10.1016/j.ascom.2022.100652
  14. 14Dalakoglou, D. (2016). Infrastructural gap: Commons, state and anthropology. City, 20(6), 822831. DOI: 10.1080/13604813.2016.1241524
  15. 15Demaze, M. T., & Manusset, S. (2008). L’agriculture itinérante sur brûlis en Guyane française: la fin des durabilités écologique et socioculturelle ? Cahiers d’Outre-Mer, 61(241–242), 3148. DOI: 10.4000/com.3173
  16. 16ESA. (2021). Earth from Space: Kourou, French Guiana. European Space Agency. https://www.esa.int/Applications/Observing_the_Earth/Copernicus/Earth_from_Space_Kourou_French_Guiana
  17. 17ESA. (2022). ESA – ESA Council Meeting at Ministerial Level – Media Conference. https://www.esa.int/ESA_Multimedia/Videos/2022/11/ESA_Council_Meeting_at_Ministerial_Level_-_Media_Conference
  18. 18ESOC. (2023, September 12). Space Environment Statistics · Space Debris User Portal. https://sdup.esoc.esa.int/discosweb/statistics/
  19. 19European Union. (2023). Fair and sustainable use of space.
  20. 20Finnegan, C. (2022). Indigenous Interests in Outer Space: Addressing the Conflict of Increasing Satellite Numbers with Indigenous Astronomy Practices. Laws, 11(2). DOI: 10.3390/laws11020026
  21. 21Foust, J. (2023). France, Germany and Italy sign agreement on launch vehicle development – SpaceNews. Space News. https://spacenews.com/france-germany-and-italy-sign-agreement-on-launch-vehicle-development/
  22. 22Garcia, D. (2021). Global commons law: norms to safeguard the planet and humanity’s heritage. International Relations, 35(3), 422445. DOI: 10.1177/00471178211036027
  23. 23Goehring, J. S. (2021). Why Isn’t Outer Space a Global Commons? https://perma.cc/9XJG-8BTL
  24. 24Gorman, A. (2005). The cultural landscape of interplanetary space. Journal of Social Archaeology, 5(1), 85107. DOI: 10.1177/1469605305050148
  25. 25Gorman, A. (2007). La Terre et l’Espace: Rockets, prisons, protests and heritage in Australia and French Guiana. Archaeologies, 3(2), 153168. DOI: 10.1007/s11759-007-9017-9
  26. 26Hertzfeld, H. R., Weeden, B., & Johnson, C. D. (2015). How Simple Terms Mislead Us: The Pitfalls of Thinking about Outer Space as a Commons. http://www.act.nato.int/globalcommons
  27. 27Jones, A. (2023). China attracts moon base partners, outlines project timelines. Space News. https://spacenews.com/china-attracts-moon-base-partners-outlines-project-timelines/
  28. 28Kahanamoku, S. S. (2019). The fight for Mauna Kea and the future of science. Massive Science. https://massivesci.com/notes/mauna-kea-thirty-meter-telescope-colonialism-astronomy/
  29. 29Keates, N., & Maremont, M. (2021). Elon Musk’s SpaceX Is Buying Up a Texas Village. Homeowners Cry Foul. The Wall Street Journal. https://www.wsj.com/articles/elon-musk-spacex-rocket-boca-chica-texas-starbase-11620353687
  30. 30Klinger, J. (2017). Rare Earth Frontiers: From Terrestrial Subsoils to Lunar Landscapes. Cornell University Press.
  31. 31Klinger, J. M. (2019). Environmental Geopolitics and Outer Space. Environmental Geopolitics and Outer Space, 26(3), 666703. DOI: 10.1080/14650045.2019.1590340
  32. 32Kopack, R. (2021). Baikonur 2.0: ‘inland-offshore’ space economies in post-Soviet Kazakhstan. Culture, Theory and Critique, 62(1–2), 96112. DOI: 10.1080/14735784.2021.1929363
  33. 33Kopack, R. A. (2019). Rocket Wastelands in Kazakhstan: Scientific Authoritarianism and the Baikonur Cosmodrome. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 109(2), 556567. DOI: 10.1080/24694452.2018.1507817
  34. 34Kyba, C. C. M., Altıntaş, Y. Ö., Walker, C. E., & Newhouse, M. (2023). Citizen scientists report global rapid reductions in the visibility of stars from 2011 to 2022. Science (New York, N.Y.), 379(6629), 265268. DOI: 10.1126/science.abq7781
  35. 35Maile, D. U. (2009). On the Violence of the Thirty Meter Telescope and the Dakota Access Pipeline. In Cultural Critique (Vol. 73, pp. 88124). University of Minnesota Press. DOI: 10.1353/cul.0.0049
  36. 36Messeri, L. (2016). Placing Outer Space: an Earthly Ethnography of Other Worlds. Duke University Press. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctv11cw9f7
  37. 37Milligan, T. (2023). From the Sky to the Ground: Indigenous Peoples in an Age of Space Expansion. Space Policy, 63. DOI: 10.1016/j.spacepol.2022.101520
  38. 38Miner Murray, M. (2019). Why Are Native Hawaiians Protesting Against a Telescope? The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/22/us/hawaii-telescope-protest.html
  39. 39Molera, G. (2022). On Hawaii’s Mauna Kea, the fight over telescopes is nearing a peaceful end. NPR. https://www.npr.org/2022/07/31/1114314076/hawaii-mauna-kea-telescope-space-observatory
  40. 40Mosely, M. (2022). The Hawaiian elders awaiting trial for protesting the world’s largest telescope. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/feb/08/hawaii-elders-awaiting-trial-for-protesting-worlds-largest-telescope-mauna-kea
  41. 41NASA. (2023a). Moon to Mars. https://www.nasa.gov/topics/moon-to-mars
  42. 42NASA. (2023b). Artemis Accords. National Aeronautics and Space Administration. https://www.nasa.gov/artemis-accords/
  43. 43Nelson, J. W. (2020). The Artemis Accords and the Future of International Space Law. Insights, 24(31).
  44. 44Nightingale, A. J. (2019). Commoning for inclusion? commons, exclusion, property and socio-natural becomings. International Journal of the Commons, 13(1), 16. DOI: 10.18352/ijc.927
  45. 45Nordman, E. (2021). Commons in Space. In The Uncommon Knowledge of Elinor Ostrom: Essential Lessons for Collective Action (pp. 149170). https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
  46. 46Olson, V. (2018). Into the extreme: U.S. environmental systems and politics beyond Earth. University of Minnesota Press. DOI: 10.5749/j.ctvgd2z0
  47. 47Osada, Y. (2022). Governance of Space Resources Activities: In the Wake of the Artemis Accords. Georgetown Journal of International Law, 53(3), 399511. https://heinonline.org/HOL/License
  48. 48Parkhurst, A., & Jeevendrampillai, D. (2020). Towards an anthropology of gravity: Emotion and embodiment in microgravity environments. Emotion, Space and Society, 35. DOI: 10.1016/j.emospa.2020.100680
  49. 49Pic, P., Evoy, P., & Morin, J.-F. (2023). Outer Space as a Global Commons: An Empirical Study of Space Arrangements. International Journal of the Commons, 17(1), 288301. DOI: 10.5334/ijc.1271
  50. 50Rabitz, F. (2023). Space Resources and the Politics of International Regime Formation. International Journal of the Commons, 17(1), 243255. DOI: 10.5334/ijc.1274
  51. 51Reaven, E. (2016). The United States Commercial Space Launch Competitiveness Act: The Creation of Private Space Property Rights and the Omission of the Right to Freedom from Harmful Interference. Washington University Law Review, 94(1), 233260. https://www.nasa.gov/content/goddard/new-nasa-mission-to-help-us-leam-how-to-
  52. 52Redfield, P. (2000). Space in the tropics: from convicts to rockets in French Guiana (1st ed.). University of California Press. https://www.ucpress.edu/book/9780520219854/space-in-the-tropics. DOI: 10.1525/california/9780520219847.001.0001
  53. 53Redfield, P. (2002). The Half-Life of Empire in Outer Space: Social Studies of Science, 32(5–6), 791825. DOI: 10.1177/030631270203200508
  54. 54Rementeria, S. (2022). Power Dynamics in the Age of Space Commercialisation. Space Policy, 60. DOI: 10.1016/j.spacepol.2021.101472
  55. 55Roulette, J., & Mindock, C. (2023). SpaceX has few alternatives if lawsuit upends Musk’s Texas launch plans. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/technology/space/spacex-has-few-alternatives-if-lawsuit-upends-musks-texas-launch-plans-2023-05-03/
  56. 56Sammler, K. G., & Lynch, C. R. (2021). Spaceport America: Contested Offworld Access and the Everyman Astronaut. Geopolitics, 26(3), 704728. DOI: 10.1080/14650045.2019.1569631
  57. 57Smiles, D. (2020). The Settler Logics of (Outer) Space. https://www.societyandspace.org/articles/the-settler-logics-of-outer-space
  58. 58Stang, G. (2013). Global commons: Between cooperation and competition. European Union Institute for Security Studies.
  59. 59Szolucha, A. (2023). SpaceX’s biggest rocket flies for the first time: But Do We Understand What This Actually Means? The Geek Anthropologist. https://thegeekanthropologist.com/2023/04/20/spacexs-biggest-rocket-flies-for-the-first-time-but-do-we-understand-what-this-actually-means/
  60. 60Tepper, E. (2019a). Structuring the Discourse on the Exploitation of Space Resources: Between Economic and Legal Commons. Space Policy, 49. DOI: 10.1016/j.spacepol.2018.06.004
  61. 61Tepper, E. (2019b). The Big Bang of Space Governance: Towards Decentralized Regulation of Space Activities.
  62. 62Tepper, E., & Whitehead, C. (2018). Moon inc: The New Zealand Model of Granting Legal Personality to Natural Resources Applied to Space. New Space, 6(4), 288298. www.icao.int/Meetings/SPACE2016/Presentations/1e%20-%20M.%20AlAhbabi%20-. DOI: 10.1089/space.2018.0025
  63. 63TMT. (2023). Partners | Thirty Meter Telescope. https://web.archive.org/web/20120116225239/http://www.tmt.org/about-tmt/partners
  64. 64Trevino, N. B. (2020). The Cosmos is Not Finished [The University of Western Ontario]. https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etdhttps://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd/7567
  65. 65Tsayem Demaze, M. (2008). Croissance démographique, pression foncière et insertion territoriale par les abattis en Guyane française. Norois, 206, 111127. DOI: 10.4000/norois.1131
  66. 66UN. (2023). UNODA Treaties Database. https://treaties.unoda.org/t/outer_space
  67. 67UNOOSA. (1967). Outer Space Treaty. https://www.unoosa.org/oosa/en/ourwork/spacelaw/treaties/outerspacetreaty.html
  68. 68Valentine, D. (2012). Exit Strategy: Profit, Cosmology, and the Future of Humans in Space. Anthropology Quarterly, 85(4), 10451067. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41857289?seq=1. DOI: 10.1353/anq.2012.0073
  69. 69Venkatesan, A., Begay, D., Burgasser, A. J., Hawkins, I., Kimura, K., Maryboy, N., & Peticolas, L. (2019). Towards inclusive practices with indigenous knowledge. In Nature Astronomy (Vol. 3, Issue 12, pp. 10351037). Nature Research. DOI: 10.1038/s41550-019-0953-2
  70. 70Venkatesan, A., Lowenthal, J., Prem, P., & Vidaurri, M. (2020). The impact of satellite constellations on space as an ancestral global commons. In Nature Astronomy (Vol. 4, Issue 11, pp. 10431048). Nature Research. DOI: 10.1038/s41550-020-01238-3
  71. 71Vertesi, J. (2020). Shaping science: organizations, decisions, and culture on NASA’s teams. University of Chicago Press.
  72. 72Vogler, J. (2012). Global Commons Revisited. Global Policy, 3(1), 6171. DOI: 10.1111/j.1758-5899.2011.00156.x
  73. 73Wiser, L., & Aganaba, T. (2023). An evolving space governance system: Balancing interests in five policy debates. In Acta Astronautica (Vol. 203, pp. 537543). Elsevier Ltd. DOI: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2022.11.023
  74. 74Witze, A. (2023). 2022 was a record year for space launches. Nature, 613(7944), 426. DOI: 10.1038/d41586-023-00048-7
  75. 75Yap, X. S., & Truffer, B. (2022). Contouring ‘earth-space sustainability.’ In Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions (Vol. 44, pp. 185193). Elsevier B.V. DOI: 10.1016/j.eist.2022.06.004
  76. 76Yap, X.-S., Janssen, M. A., Aganaba, T., Tutton, R., Korpershoek, K., Profitiliotis, G., Rabitz, F., Subbiah, M. S., & Wagenknecht, L. (2023). Four Alternative Scenarios of Commons in Space: Prospects and Challenges. International Journal of the Commons, 17(1), 390410. DOI: 10.5334/ijc.1272
  77. 77Young, J. (1987). “Pity the Indians of Outer Space”: Native American Views of the Space. In Young Source: Western Folklore (Vol. 46, Issue 4). http://www.jstor.orgURL:http://www.jstor.org/stable/1499889http://www.jstor.org/stable/1499889?seq=1&cid=pdf-reference#references_tab_contents. DOI: 10.2307/1499889
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/ijc.1284 | Journal eISSN: 1875-0281
Language: English
Submitted on: Apr 11, 2023
Accepted on: Dec 4, 2023
Published on: Dec 26, 2023
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2023 Karlijn Korpershoek, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.