References
- 1Abbott, K. W., & Faude, B. (2021). Choosing low-cost institutions in global governance. International Theory, 13(3), 397–426. DOI: 10.1017/S1752971920000202
- 2Abbott, K. W., & Snidal, D. (2010). International regulation without international government: Improving IO performance through orchestration. The Review of International Organizations, 5, 315–344. DOI: 10.1007/s11558-010-9092-3
- 3Abbott, K. W., Green, J. F., & Keohane, R. O. (2016). Organizational ecology and institutional change in global governance. International Organization, 70(2), 247–277. DOI: 10.1017/S0020818315000338
- 4Abbott, K. W., Keohane, R. O., Moravcsik, A., Slaughter, A. M., & Snidal, D. (2000). The concept of legalization. International organization, 54(3), 401–419. DOI: 10.1162/002081800551271
- 5ATCM. (1981). Report of the Eleventh Consultative Meeting. Buenos Aires.
- 6Bilder, R. B. (2009). A legal regime for the mining of helium-3 on the moon: US policy options. Fordham Int’l LJ, 33, 243.
- 7Blay, S. K. (1992). New trends in the protection of the Antarctic environment: the 1991 Madrid Protocol. American Journal of International Law, 86(2), 377–399. DOI: 10.2307/2203243
- 8Boley, A., & Byers, M. (2020). US policy puts the safe development of space at risk. Science, 370(6513), 174–175. DOI: 10.1126/science.abd3402
- 9Butkevičienė, E., & Rabitz, F. (2022). Sharing the benefits of asteroid mining. Global Policy, 13(2), 247–258. DOI: 10.1111/1758-5899.13035
- 10Byers, M. (2019). Cold, dark, and dangerous: international cooperation in the arctic and space. Polar Record, 55(1), 32–47. DOI: 10.1017/S0032247419000160
- 11Caminos, H., & Molitor, M. R. (1985). Progressive development of international law and the package deal. American Journal of International Law, 79(4), 871–890. DOI: 10.2307/2201830
- 12Churchill, R. R. (2015).
The 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea . In: D. R. Rothwell, A. G. O. Elferink, K. N. Scott & T. Stephens (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the Law of the Sea (pp. 24–45). Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/law/9780198715481.003.0002 - 13COPUOS. (2021). G-77 and China Statement During the Sixtieth Session of the Legal Subcommittee of the United Nations Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space. May 31 to June 11, 2021.
- 14COPUOS. (2023). Russian Federation – Input to the Working Group on Legal Aspects of Space Resource Activities. Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space, A/AC.105/C.2/2023/CRP.20. March 20, 2023.
- 15Cross, M. A. K. D. (2021). Outer space and the idea of the global commons. International Relations, 35(3), 384–402. DOI: 10.1177/00471178211036223
- 16Davis, C. L. (2004). International institutions and issue linkage: Building support for agricultural trade liberalization. American Political Science Review, 98(1), 153–169. DOI: 10.1017/S0003055404001066
- 17Deplano, R. (2021). The Artemis Accords: Evolution or revolution in international space law?. International & Comparative Law Quarterly, 70(3), 799–819. DOI: 10.1017/S0020589321000142
- 18Dimitrov, R. S. (2020). Empty institutions in global environmental politics. International Studies Review, 22(3), 626–650. DOI: 10.1093/isr/viz029
- 19Dimitrov, R. S., Sprinz, D. F., DiGiusto, G. M., & Kelle, A. (2007). International Nonregimes: A research agenda. International studies review, 9(2), 230–258. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2486.2007.00672.x
- 20Doshi, P. D. (2016). Regulating the final frontier: Asteroid mining and the need for a new regulatory regime. Notre Dame Journal of International & Comparative Law, 6(1), 15.
- 21European Union. (2023).
Council conclusions on fair and sustainable use of space . Council of the European Union, 9675/23. - 22Farias, D. B. L., & Roger, C. (2022). Differentiation in Environmental Treaty Making: Measuring Provisions and How They Reshape the Depth–Participation Dilemma. Global Environmental Politics (pp. 1–22). DOI: 10.1162/glep_a_00686
- 23Finnemore, M., & Sikkink, K. (1998). International norm dynamics and political change. International organization, 52(4), 887–917. DOI: 10.1162/002081898550789
- 24Garcia, D. (2021). Global commons law: norms to safeguard the planet and humanity’s heritage. International Relations, 35(3), 422–445. DOI: 10.1177/00471178211036027
- 25Haas, E. B. (1980). Why collaborate? Issue-linkage and international regimes. World politics, 32(3), 357–405. DOI: 10.2307/2010109
- 26Hague Working Group. (2019). Building Blocs for the Development of an International Framework on Space Resource Activities. Leiden: The Hague International Space Resources Governance Working Group.
- 27Hale, T., Smith, S. M., Black, R., Cullen, K., Fay, B., Lang, J., & Mahmood, S. (2022). Assessing the rapidly-emerging landscape of net zero targets. Climate Policy, 22(1), 18–29. DOI: 10.1080/14693062.2021.2013155
- 28Hayes, S. M., & McCullough, E. A. (2018). Critical minerals: A review of elemental trends in comprehensive criticality studies. Resources Policy, 59, 192–199. DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2018.06.015
- 29Heise, J. (2018). Space, the final frontier of enterprise: Incentivizing asteroid mining under a revised international framework. Mich. J. Int’l L., 40, 189. DOI: 10.36642/mjil.40.1.space
- 30Ikenberry, G. J. (1996). The future of international leadership. Political Science Quarterly, 111(3), 385–402. DOI: 10.2307/2151968
- 31Jaeckel, A., Gjerde, K. M., & Ardron, J. A. (2017). Conserving the common heritage of humankind–Options for the deep-seabed mining regime. Marine Policy, 78, 150–157. DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2017.01.019
- 32Joyner, C. C. (1986). Legal implications of the concept of the common heritage of mankind. International & Comparative Law Quarterly, 35(1), 190–199. DOI: 10.1093/iclqaj/35.1.190
- 33Keyuan, Z. (1991). The common heritage of mankind and the Antarctic Treaty System. Netherlands International Law Review, 38(2), 173–198. DOI: 10.1017/S0165070X00003740
- 34Khatwani, N. (2019). Common Heritage of Mankind for Outer Space. Astropolitics, 17(2), 89–103. DOI: 10.1080/14777622.2019.1638679
- 35Kim, R. E. (2017). Should deep seabed mining be allowed? Marine Policy, 82, 134–137. DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2017.05.010
- 36Mazzucato, M., & Robinson, D. K. (2018). Co-creating and directing Innovation Ecosystems? NASA’s changing approach to public-private partnerships in low-earth orbit. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 136, 166–177. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.03.034
- 37Mendenhall, E., Tiller, R., & Nyman, E. (2023). The ship has reached the shore: The final session of the ‘Biodiversity Beyond National Jurisdiction’ negotiations. Marine Policy, 155, 105686. DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2023.105686
- 38Mitchell, R. B., & Keilbach, P. M. (2001). Situation structure and institutional design: Reciprocity, coercion, and exchange. International Organization, 55(4), 891–917. DOI: 10.1162/002081801317193637
- 39Moog, S., Spicer, A., & Böhm, S. (2015). The politics of multi-stakeholder initiatives: The crisis of the Forest Stewardship Council. Journal of Business Ethics, 128, 469–493. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-013-2033-3
- 40Morgera, E. (2016). The need for an international legal concept of fair and equitable benefit sharing. European Journal of International Law, 27(2), 353–383. DOI: 10.1093/ejil/chw014
- 41Muzaka, V. (2011). Linkages, contests and overlaps in the global intellectual property rights regime. European Journal of International Relations, 17(4), 755–776. DOI: 10.1177/1354066110373560
- 42Oberthür, S., & Rabitz, F. (2014). On the EU’s performance and leadership in global environmental governance: the case of the Nagoya Protocol. Journal of European Public Policy, 21(1), 39–57. DOI: 10.1080/13501763.2013.834547
- 43Pekkanen, S. M. (2019). Governing the new space race. American Journal of International Law, 113, 92–97. DOI: 10.1017/aju.2019.16
- 44Poast, P. (2012). Does issue linkage work? Evidence from European alliance negotiations, 1860 to 1945. International Organization, 66(2), 277–310. DOI: 10.1017/S0020818312000069
- 45Pop, V. (2009). Who owns the moon?: Extraterrestrial aspects of land and mineral resources ownership (Vol. 2). Dordrecht: Springer.
- 46Roger, C., & Dauvergne, P. (2016). The rise of transnational governance as a field of study. International Studies Review, 18(3), 415–437. DOI: 10.1093/isr/viw001
- 47Schulz, T., Hufty, M., & Tschopp, M. (2017). Small and smart: the role of Switzerland in the Cartagena and Nagoya protocols negotiations. International environmental agreements: politics, law and economics, 17(4), 553–571. DOI: 10.1007/s10784-016-9334-9
- 48Shammas, V. L., & Holen, T. B. (2019). One giant leap for capitalistkind: Private enterprise in outer space. Palgrave Communications, 5(1). DOI: 10.1057/s41599-019-0218-9
- 49Skodvin, T., & Andresen, S. (2006). Leadership revisited. Global Environmental Politics, 6(3), 13–27. DOI: 10.1162/glep.2006.6.3.13
- 50Sparenberg, O. (2019). A historical perspective on deep-sea mining for manganese nodules, 1965–2019. The Extractive Industries and Society, 6(3), 842–854. DOI: 10.1016/j.exis.2019.04.001
- 51Treves, T. (2015).
Historical Development of the Law of the Sea . In: D. R. Rothwell, A. G. O. Elferink, K. N. Scott & T. Stephens (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the Law of the Sea (pp. 1–23). Oxford: Oxford University Press. - 52Underdal, A. (2002). One question, two answers. Environmental regime effectiveness: Confronting theory with evidence (pp. 3–45).
- 53Watts, A. D. (1987).
Antarctic Mineral Resources: Negotiations for a Mineral Resources Regime . In: G. D. Triggs (Ed.), The Antarctic Treaty Regime. Law, Environment and Resources (pp. 164–175). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511565502.018 - 54Young, O. R. (1991). Political Leadership and regime formation: on the development of institutions in international society. International organization, 45(3), 281–308. DOI: 10.1017/S0020818300033117
- 55Young, O. R. (2017).
Conceptualization: Goal setting as a strategy for Earth system governance . In: F. Biermann & N. Kanie (Eds.), Governing through goals: Sustainable Development Goals as Governance Innovation (pp. 31–51). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/9780262035620.003.0002