Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Knowledge for the Commons: What is Needed Now? Cover

Knowledge for the Commons: What is Needed Now?

Open Access
|Mar 2024

References

  1. 1Alinsky. (1971/1989). Rules for radicals. New York: Vintage Books.
  2. 2Bartels, K. (2017). ‘The double bind of social innovation’. Urban Studies, 54(16), 37893805. DOI: 10.1177/0042098016682935
  3. 3Blijleven, W., & van Hulst, M. (2021). ‘How do frontline civil servants engage the public? Practices, embedded agency, and bricolage’. The American Review of Public Administration, 51(4), 278292. DOI: 10.1177/0275074020983805
  4. 4Brenner, N., & Schmid, C. (2015). ‘Towards a new epistemology of the urban?’ City, 19(2–3), 151182. DOI: 10.1080/13604813.2015.1014712
  5. 5Bollier, D., & Helfrich, S. (2019). Free, Fair and Alive: The Insurgent Power of the Commons. Canada: New Society.
  6. 6Bollier. D., & Helfrich, S. (Eds.) (2012). The wealth of the commons. Amhurst: Levellers Press.
  7. 7Byrne, D., & Ragin, C. C. (Eds.) (2009). The SAGE handbook of case-based methods. London: Sage Publishing. DOI: 10.4135/9781446249413
  8. 8Boswell, J. (2022). Magical thinking in public policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780192848789.001.0001
  9. 9Boswell, J., Corbett, J., & Rhodes, R. (2019). The Art and Craft of Comparison (Strategies for Social Inquiry). Cambridge: Press. DOI: 10.1017/9781108561563
  10. 10Caffentzis, G. (2004). ‘A Tale of Two Conferences: Globalization, the Crisis of Neoliberalism and the Question of the Commons’. Paper presented to AlterGlobalisation conference. Global Justice Center, San Miguel de Allende, Mexico: summer 2004.
  11. 11Chance, T. (2022). So, what exactly are CLTs…… A new form of commoning? 7th April 2022, London: Community land Trust Network.
  12. 12Christophers, B. (2018). The New Enclosures. London: Verso.
  13. 13Cook, S. D. N., & Wagenaar, H. (2012). Navigating the Eternally Unfolding Present: Toward an Epistemology of Practice. The American Review of Public Administration, 42(1), 338. DOI: 10.1177/0275074011407404
  14. 14Davis, J. E. (2015). ‘Common Ground: Community-led development on community-owned land’. CLT Roots, 1 June. Available at: http://www.cltroots.org/archives/3231 (Accessed: 31/3/2017).
  15. 15Davis, J. E. (2017). ‘Common ground: Community-owned land as a platform for equitable and sustainable development’. University of San Francisco Law Review, 51(1), 150.
  16. 16DeFilippis, J. (2004). Unmaking goliath. Abingdon: Routledge.
  17. 17Durose, C., Richardson, L., Rozenburg, M., Ryan, M., & Escobar, O. (2021). ‘Community control in the housing commons: a conceptual typology’. International Journal of the Commons, 15(1), 291304. DOI: 10.5334/ijc.1093
  18. 18Durose, C., van Hulst, M., Jeffares, S., Escobar, O., Agger, A., & de Graaf, L. (2016). ‘Five ways to make a difference: perceptions of practitioners working in urban neighborhoods’. Public Administration Review, 76(4), 576586. DOI: 10.1111/puar.12502
  19. 19Durose, C., van Ostaijen, M., van Hulst, M., Escobar, O., & Agger, A. (2022). ‘Working the urban assemblage: a transnational study of transforming practices’. Urban Studies, 59(10), 21292146. DOI: 10.1177/00420980211031431
  20. 20Emirbayer, M., & Mische, A. (1998). ‘What is agency?’ American Journal of Sociology, 103(4), 9621023. DOI: 10.1086/231294
  21. 21Feldman, M. S., & Orlikowski, W. J. (2011). ‘Theorizing practice and practicing theory’. Organization Science, 22(5), 12401253. DOI: 10.1287/orsc.1100.0612
  22. 22Flinders, M., Wood, M., & Cunningham, M. (2016). ‘The politics of co-production’. Evidence & Policy, 12(2), 26179. DOI: 10.1332/174426415X14412037949967
  23. 23Forester, J. (1999). The deliberative practitioner. Massachusetts: MIT Press.
  24. 24Freeman, R., Griggs, S., & Boaz, A. (2011). ‘The Practice of Policy Making’. Evidence & Policy, 7(2), 127136. DOI: 10.1332/174426411X579180
  25. 25Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. New York: Basic Books.
  26. 26Gibson-Graham, J. K. (1996). The end of capitalism (as we knew it): A feminist critique of political economy. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI: 10.1177/030981689706200111
  27. 27Gibson-Graham, J. K. (2006). A Postcapitalist Politics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  28. 28Gibson-Graham, J. K., Cameron, J., & Healy, S. (2016). ‘Commoning as a postcapitalist politics’. In A. Amin and P. Howell (Eds.), Releasing the Commons: Rethinking the Futures of the Commons. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge, pp: 192212. DOI: 10.4324/9781315673172-12
  29. 29Giddens, A. (1979). Central problems in social theory. University of California Press. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-349-16161-4
  30. 30Harvey, D. (2000). Spaces of hope. 2nd ed. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
  31. 31Hess, C. (2008). ‘Mapping new commons [conference presentation]’. Presented at The Twelfth Biennial Conference of the International Association for the Study of the Commons. Cheltenham, UK. 14–18 July. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1356835
  32. 32Hupe, P., & Hill, M. (2007). ‘Street level bureaucracy and public accountability’. Public Administration, 85(2), 27999. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2007.00650.x
  33. 33Huron, A. (2018). Carving out the commons: tenant organizing and housing cooperatives in Washington, D.C. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. DOI: 10.5749/j.ctt2121778
  34. 34Jeffrey, C., & Dyson, J. (2021). ‘Geographies of the future: prefigurative politics’. Progress in Human Geography, 45(4), 641658. DOI: 10.1177/0309132520926569
  35. 35Jonas, M., & Littig, B. (2015). ‘Sustainable practices’. In J. D. Wright (Ed.), International Encyclopaedia of the Social and Behavioural Sciences. pp. 834838. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.91053-5
  36. 36Kumar, A. (2021). ‘Between metis and techne: politics possibilities and limits of improvisation’. Social and Cultural Geography, 22(6), 783806. DOI: 10.1080/14649365.2019.1645201
  37. 37Lawson, V. (2007). ‘Geographies of Care and Responsibility’. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 97(1), 111. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8306.2007.00520.x
  38. 38Linebaugh, P. (2014). Stop, Thief! The Commons, Enclosures, and Resistance. Oakland, California: PM Press.
  39. 39Maslach, C., & Jackson, S. (1981). ‘The measurement of experienced burnout’. Journal of Occupational Behaviour, 2, 99113. DOI: 10.1002/job.4030020205
  40. 40Mattei, U., & Mancall, M. (2019). ‘Communology: The Emergence of a Social Theory of the Commons’. South Atlantic Quarterly, 118(4): 725746. DOI: 10.1215/00382876-7825576
  41. 41Mol, A. (2002). The Body Multiple: ontology in medical practice. Durham, USA: Duke University Press. DOI: 10.1215/9780822384151
  42. 42Noterman, E. (2016). ‘Beyond tragedy: Differential commoning in a manufactured housing cooperative’. Antipode, 48(2), 433452. DOI: 10.1111/anti.12182
  43. 43Ortner, S. B. (1989). High religion: a cultural and political history of Sherpa Buddhism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. DOI: 10.1515/9780691218076
  44. 44Power, E. R., & Bergan, T. L. (2019). ‘Care and Resistance to Neoliberal Reform in Social Housing’. Housing, Theory and Society, 36(4), 426447. DOI: 10.1080/14036096.2018.1515112
  45. 45Richardson, L., Durose, C., & Perry, B. (2019). ‘Moving towards hybridity in causal explanation: the example of citizen participation’. Social Policy & Administration, 53(2), 265278. DOI: 10.1111/spol.12481
  46. 46Rihoux, B., & Ragin, C. C. (2009). Configurational comparative methods. London: Sage Publishing.
  47. 47Ryan, M. (2016). Qualitative comparative analysis for reviewing evidence and making decisions. In G. Stoker & M. Evans (Eds.), Evidence-based policy making in the social sciences: Methods that Matter. Bristol, GB: Policy Press, pp. 83101. DOI: 10.46692/9781447329381.006
  48. 48Ryan, M. (2021). Why citizen participation succeeds or fails: a comparative analysis of participatory budgeting. Bristol, UK: Bristol University Press. DOI: 10.1332/policypress/9781529209921.001.0001
  49. 49Sandberg, J., & Tsoukas, H. (2011). ‘Grasping the logic of practice’. Academy of Management Review, 36(2), 338360. DOI: 10.5465/AMR.2011.59330942
  50. 50Schaffer, F. C. (2016). Elucidating social science concepts. London: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780203814932
  51. 51Schatzki, T. R. (2006). On organizations as they happen. Organization Studies, 27(12), 18631873. DOI: 10.1177/0170840606071942
  52. 52Schatzki, T. R., Knorr Cetina, K., & von Savigny, E. (Eds.) (2001). The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory. London: Routledge.
  53. 53Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner. New York: Basic Books.
  54. 54Scott, J. C. (1998). Seeing like a state: How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
  55. 55Sennett, R. (2012). Together: The Rituals, Pleasures and Politics of Cooperation. London: Allen Lane.
  56. 56Shove, E., Pantzar, M., & Watson, M. (2012). The Dynamics of Social Practice: Everyday Life and how it Changes. London: Sage Publishing. DOI: 10.4135/9781446250655
  57. 57Steele, J. (2022). Self-renovating neighbourhoods as an alternative to the false choice of gentrification or decline. Unpublished thesis, University of Leicester. http://www.jerichoroad.co.uk/2022_STEELE-JM_PhD.pdf
  58. 58Tadros, M. (2015). ‘Contentious and Prefigurative Politics: Vigilante Groups’ Struggle against Sexual Violence in Egypt (2011–2013)’. Development and Change, 46(6), 13451368. DOI: 10.1111/dech.12210
  59. 59Tummers, L., & MacGregor, S. (2019). Beyond wishful thinking. International Journal of the Commons, 13(1), 6283. DOI: 10.18352/ijc.918
  60. 60Wagenaar, H. (2004). ‘“Knowing” the Rules: Administrative Work as Practice’. Public Administration Review, 64(6), 64355. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00412.x
  61. 61Wagenaar, H., & Cook, S. N. (2003). ‘Understanding policy practices’. In M. A. Hajer & H. Wagenaar (Eds.), Deliberative policy analysis: Understanding governance in the network society. Oxford: Oxford University Press (pp. 139171). DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511490934.007
  62. 62Wagenaar, H., Kieslich, K., Hangel, N., Zimmerman, B., & Prainsack, B. (2022). ‘Collaborative Comparisons: a pragmatist approach towards designing large-scale comparative qualitative research’. Social Science and Medicine – Qualitative Research in Health, 2, 100172. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssmqr.2022.100172
  63. 63Walljasper, J., & Ristau, J. (2011). ‘How you can become a commoner’. On the Commons, 3 March 2011. (https://www.onthecommons.org/magazine/how-you-can-become-commoner#:~:text=Commoning%20represents%20a%20%E2%80%9Cthird%20way%E2%80%9D%E2%80%94not%20locked%20into%20the,actions%20that%20shape%20their%20future%20of%20their%20communities last accessed 23 May 2023)
  64. 64Weber, M. (1946). From Max Weber, H. H. Gerth & C. Wright Mills (Eds.), Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  65. 65Williams, O. R. (2018). Community control as a relationship between a place-based population and institution. Local Economy, 33(5), 45976. DOI: 10.1177/0269094218786898
  66. 66Yates, L. (2015). ‘Rethinking Prefiguration: Alternatives, Micropolitics and Goals in Social Movements’. Social Movement Studies, 14(1), 121. DOI: 10.1080/14742837.2013.870883
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/ijc.1250 | Journal eISSN: 1875-0281
Language: English
Submitted on: Dec 11, 2022
Accepted on: Jan 16, 2024
Published on: Mar 13, 2024
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2024 Liz Richardson, Catherine Durose, Matt Ryan, Jess Steele, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.