Have a personal or library account? Click to login
An Analysis of the Channels for Accessing Economic Benefits in the Commons Governance Regime of Space Resources Cover

An Analysis of the Channels for Accessing Economic Benefits in the Commons Governance Regime of Space Resources

By: Xiaodao Li  
Open Access
|Jun 2023

References

  1. 1Alsdaifat, S. A. (2018). Who Owns What in Outer Space: Dilemmas regarding the Common Heritage of Mankind. Pecs J. Int’l & Eur. L., 21.
  2. 2Anderson, S. W., et al. (2019). «The development of natural resources in outer space.» Journal of Energy & Natural Resources Law, 37(2): 227258. DOI: 10.1080/02646811.2018.1507343
  3. 3Buxton, C. R. (2004). «Property in outer space: the common heritage of mankind principle vs. the first in time, first in right, rule of property.» J. Air L. & Com., 69.
  4. 4Byrd, L. C. (2021). Soft Law in Space: A Legal Framework for Extraterrestrial Mining. Emory LJ, 71, 801.
  5. 5Chouhan, K. S. (2020). Privatization of Outer-Space and Ownership: ISA as a Model of Regulation for Resource Exploitation. CMR University Journal for Contemporary Legal Affairs, 1(2).
  6. 6Cox, M., Arnold, G., & Tomás, S. V. (2009). A Review and Reassessment of Design Principles for Community-Based Natural Resource Management.”. Ecol Soc, 15. DOI: 10.5751/ES-03704-150438
  7. 7Craven, M. (2019). ‘Other Spaces’: Constructing the Legal Architecture of a Cold War Commons and the Scientific-Technical Imaginary of Outer Space. European Journal of International Law, 30(2), 547572. DOI: 10.1093/ejil/chz024
  8. 8Cross, M. a. K. D. (2021). Outer space and the idea of the global commons. International Relations, 35(3), 385. DOI: 10.1177/00471178211036223
  9. 9Deudney, D. (2020). Dark Skies: Space Expansionism. Planetary Geopolitics, and the Ends of Humanity. Oxford University Press, 177178. DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780190903343.001.0001
  10. 10Finnemore, M., & Sikkink, K. (1998). International norm dynamics and political change. International organization, 52(4), 901. DOI: 10.1162/002081898550789
  11. 11Garrick, D. (2018). Decentralisation and drought adaptation: Applying the subsidiarity principle in transboundary river basins. International Journal of the Commons, 12(1). 313314. DOI: 10.18352/ijc.816
  12. 12Gwata, H. K. (2019). An analysis of the potential implications of the introduction of the “use it or lose it” policy in the Zimbabwean mining sector. University of Pretoria, 1520.
  13. 13Gawronski, C. J. (2018). Where No Law Has Gone Before: Space Resources, Subsequent Practice, and Humanity’s Future in Space. Ohio St. LJ, 79, 206211. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3275372
  14. 14Hafner, G. (2012). The Declaration on International Cooperation in the Exploration and Use of Outer Space for the Benefit and in the Interest of All States, 267287. DOI: 10.7767/boehlau.9783205791850.267
  15. 15Hagen, R., & Crombez, C. (2018). Governance of the global commons: a question of supply and demand, the answer of polycentricism. In The Commons and a New Global Governance, 111. Edward Elgar Publishing. DOI: 10.4337/9781788118514.00015
  16. 16Heim, B. E. (1990). Exploring the last frontiers for mineral resources: a comparison of international law regarding the deep seabed, outer space, and Antarctica. Vand. J. Transnat’l L., 23, 846.
  17. 17Hofmann, M., & Blount, P. (2018). Emerging commercial uses of space: Regulation reducing risks. The Journal of World Investment & Trade, 19(5–6), 10011023. DOI: 10.1163/22119000-12340117
  18. 18Hysing, E., & Olsson, J. (2017). Green inside activism for sustainable development: Political agency and institutional change. Springer, 29. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-56723-5
  19. 19Jakhu, R. S., & Freeland, S. (2016). The relationship between the outer space treaty and customary international law. Available at SSRN 3397145. 7. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3397145
  20. 20Janssen, M. A. (2022). A Perspective on the Future of Studying the Commons. International Journal of the Commons, 16(1), 244. DOI: 10.5334/ijc.1207
  21. 21Khatwani, N. (2019). “Common Heritage of Mankind for Outer Space.” Astropolitics, 17(2), 89103. DOI: 10.1080/14777622.2019.1638679
  22. 22Kim, H. T. (2018). Fundamental Principles of Space Resources Exploitation: A Recent Development of International and Municipal Law. JE Asia & Int’l L., 11, 35. DOI: 10.14330/jeail.2018.11.1.02
  23. 23Koch, J. S. (2018). Institutional Framework for the Province of all Mankind: Lessons from the International Seabed Authority for the Governance of Commercial Space Mining. Astropolitics, 16(1), 127. DOI: 10.1080/14777622.2017.1381824
  24. 24Koop, A. (2022), https://www.visualcapitalist.com/visualized-which-countries-are-dominating-space/, 2022 (accessed 11 Apr 2023)
  25. 25Lambach, D., & Wesel, L. (2021). Tackling the Space Debris Problem: A Global Commons Perspective. Paper presented at the Proc. 8th European Conference on Space Debris.
  26. 26Leib, K. (2015). State sovereignty in space: Current models and possible futures. Astropolitics, 13(1), 124, 21. DOI: 10.1080/14777622.2015.1015112
  27. 27Locke, J. (1689). Two Treatises of Government, https://www.yorku.ca/comninel/courses/3025pdf/Locke.pdf, 123, 2023 (accessed 14 Apr 2023)
  28. 28Manoli, M. (2016). Property rights in outer space: The case of private ownership of celestial bodies. McGill University, 80.
  29. 29March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (2004). The logic of appropriateness. Arena Oslo.
  30. 30Mirzaee, S. (2017). “Outer Space and Common Heritage of Mankind: Challenges and Solutions.” RUDN Journal of Law, 21(1), 102114. DOI: 10.22363/2313-2337-2017-21-1-102-114
  31. 31Morris, A. (2016). Intergalactic property law: A new regime for a new age. Vand. J. Ent. & Tech. L., 19, 11111112.
  32. 32Muñoz-Patchen, C. (2018). Regulating the space commons: Treating space debris as abandoned property in violation of the outer space treaty. Chi. J. Int’l L., 19, 235236.
  33. 33NASA. (2020). Artemis Plan: NASA’s Lunar Exploration Program Overview. https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/atoms/files/artemis_plan-20200921.pdf, 2829, 2020 (accessed 2 Oct 2021)
  34. 34Orazgaliyev, S., & Araral, E. (2019). Conflict and cooperation in global commons: Theory and evidence from the Caspian Sea. International Journal of the Commons, 13(2). DOI: 10.5334/ijc.914
  35. 35Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge university press, 90102. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511807763
  36. 36Ostrom, E. (2010). Beyond markets and states: polycentric governance of complex economic systems. American economic review, 100(3), 13. DOI: 10.1257/aer.100.3.641
  37. 37Owolabi, K. M. W. (2013). “The principle of the common heritage of mankind.” Nnamdi Azikiwe University Journal of International Law and Jurisprudence, 4.
  38. 38Oz, B. S. (2018). Governing Outer Space as a Global Commons: Examining ‘Tragedy’in Orbital Medium. University of Cape Town.
  39. 39Paxson III, E. W. (1992). Sharing the benefits of outer space exploration: Space law and economic development. Mich. J. Int’l L., 14, 487.
  40. 40Pershing, A. D. (2019). Interpreting the Outer Space Treaty’s Non-Appropriation Principle: Customary International Law from 1967 to Today. Yale J. Int’l L., 44, 149.
  41. 41Peters, B. G. (2019). Institutional theory in political science: The new institutionalism. Edward Elgar Publishing, 35.
  42. 42Raclin, G. C. (1985). From Ice to Ether: The adoption of a regime to govern resource exploitation in outer space. Nw. J. Int’l L. & Bus., 7, 758.
  43. 43Saletta, M. S., & Orrman-Rossiter, K. (2018). Can space mining benefit all of humanity?: The resource fund and citizen’s dividend model of Alaska, the ‘last frontier’. Space Policy, 43, 5. DOI: 10.1016/j.spacepol.2018.02.002
  44. 44Sattler, R. (2005). Transporting a Legal System for Property Rights: From the Earth to the Stars. Chi. J. Int’l L., 6, 23.
  45. 45Steer, C. (2017). Global commons, cosmic commons: Implications of military and security uses of outer space. Geo. J. Int’l Aff., 18, 1011. DOI: 10.1353/gia.2017.0003
  46. 46Stern, P. (2011). Design principles for global commons: Natural resources and emerging technologies. International Journal of the Commons, 5(2). DOI: 10.18352/ijc.305
  47. 47Tennen, L. I. (2015). Enterprise rights and the legal regime for exploitation of outer space resources. U. of Pac. L. Rev., 47, 281.
  48. 48Tepper, E. (2021). The big bang of space governance: Towards polycentric governance of space activities. NYUJ Int’l L. & Pol., 54, 494.
  49. 49The Legal Subcommittee. (2021). Report of the Legal Subcommittee on its sixtieth session, at sec. XIII.
  50. 50Verrax, F. (2019). Elinor Ostrom or the Revolution of the Commons. In Economic Theory and Globalization, 210. Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-23824-7_9
  51. 51Vogler, J. (2012). Global commons revisited. Global Policy, 3(1), 68. DOI: 10.1111/j.1758-5899.2011.00156.x
  52. 52Wrench, J. G. (2019). “Non-Appropriation, No Problem: The Outer Space Treaty Is Ready for Asteroid Mining.” Case W. Res. J. Int’l L., 51, 440447.
  53. 53Yang, L., et al. (2021). Building a compound and collaborative governance framework to improve international space sustainability. Global Public Policy and Governance, 1(2), 204. DOI: 10.1007/s43508-021-00018-7
  54. 54Yan, Y. (2022). A legal approach to the national emergency management of space weather: China as a case study. Acta Astronautica, 198, 260. DOI: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2022.05.046
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/ijc.1243 | Journal eISSN: 1875-0281
Language: English
Submitted on: Nov 24, 2022
Accepted on: May 7, 2023
Published on: Jun 2, 2023
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2023 Xiaodao Li, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.