Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Actor Resistance Influences Effectiveness of Ostrom’s Design Principles for Governing Contested Landscapes Cover

Actor Resistance Influences Effectiveness of Ostrom’s Design Principles for Governing Contested Landscapes

International Journal of the Commons
Volume 18 (2024): Issue 1
By: Sivee Chawla,  Tiffany H. Morrison and  Graeme S. Cumming  
Open Access
|Apr 2024

References

  1. 1Baggio, J. A., Barnett, A. J., Perez-Ibarra, I., Brady, U., Ratajczyk, E., Rollins, N., … Janssen, M. A. (2016). Explaining success and failure in the commons: the configural nature of Ostrom’s institutional design principles. International Journal of the Commons, 10(2). DOI: 10.18352/ijc.634
    Back to article
  2. 2Baguley, T. (2009). Standardized or simple effect size: what should be reported? Br J Psychol, 100(Pt 3), 603–17. Epub 2008 Nov 17. PMID: 19017432. DOI: 10.1348/000712608X377117
    Back to article
  3. 3Banerjee, O., Crossman, N. D., & de Groot, R. S. (2013). Ecological Processes, Functions and Ecosystem Services. In Ecosystem Services in Agricultural and Urban Landscapes. DOI: 10.1002/9781118506271.ch2
    Back to article
  4. 4Barredo, J. I., Kasanko, M., McCormick, N., & Lavalle, C. (2003). Modelling dynamic spatial processes: simulation of urban future scenarios through cellular automata. Landscape and Urban Planning, 64(3), 145–160. DOI: 10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00218-9
    Back to article
  5. 5Beilin, R., Reichelt, N., & Sysak, T. (2013). Resilience in the Transition Landscapes of the Peri-urban: From ‘Where’ with ‘Whom’ to ‘What’. Urban Studies, 52(7), 1304–1320. DOI: 10.1177/0042098013505654
    Back to article
  6. 6Bian, Z. X., Wang, S., Wang, Q. B., Yu, M., & Qian, F. K. (2018). Effects of urban sprawl on arthropod communities in peri-urban farmed landscape in Shenbei New District, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, China. Sci Rep, 8(1), 101. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-18474-9
    Back to article
  7. 7Binder, C. R., Hinkel, J., Bots, P. W. G., & Pahl-Wostl, C. (2013). Comparison of Frameworks for Analyzing Social-ecological Systems. Ecology and Society, 18(4). DOI: 10.5751/ES-05551-180426
    Back to article
  8. 8Borenstein, M. (2009). Effect sizes for continuous data. In H. Cooper, L. V. Hedges, & J. C. Valentine (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis (pp. 221–235). Russell Sage Foundation.
    Back to article
  9. 9Botequilha Leitão, A., & Ahern, J. (2002). Applying landscape ecological concepts and metrics in sustainable landscape planning. Landscape and Urban Planning, 59(2), 65–93. DOI: 10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00005-1
    Back to article
  10. 10Campos, P. R., Rosas, A., de Oliveira, V. M., & Gomes, M. A. (2013). Effect of Landscape Structure on Species Diversity. PLoS One, 8(6), e66495. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0066495
    Back to article
  11. 11Cerquetti, M., Nanni, C., & Vitale, C. (2019). Managing the landscape as a common good? Evidence from the case of “Mutonia” (Italy). Land Use Policy, 87. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104022
    Back to article
  12. 12Chen, Y. (2009). Spatial interaction creates period-doubling bifurcation and chaos of urbanization. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 42(3), 1316–1325. DOI: 10.1016/j.chaos.2009.03.022
    Back to article
  13. 13Chirisa, I. (2010). An Analysis of the Environmental Stewardship Concept and Its Applicability in Peri-Urban Towns: Lessons from Epworth In Zimbabwe. Journal of Sustainable Development in Africa, 12(4).
    Back to article
  14. 14Christopoulos, D. T. (2019). inflection: Finds the Inflection Point of a Curve. Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=inflection
    Back to article
  15. 15Cox, M. (2008). Balancing accuracy and meaning in common-pool resource theory. Ecology and Society. DOI: 10.5751/ES-02683-130244
    Back to article
  16. 16Cumming, G. (2002). Habitat shape, species invasions, and reserve design: Insights from simple models. Conservation Ecology, 6(1). DOI: 10.5751/ES-00373-060103
    Back to article
  17. 17Cumming, G. S. (2011). Spatial Resilience in Social-Ecological Systems. 1st Edition. (pp. 243). Springer Publishing.
    Back to article
  18. 18Cumming, G., Southworth, J., Rondon, X. J., & Marsik, M. (2012). Spatial complexity in fragmenting Amazonian rainforests: Do feedbacks from edge effects push forests towards an ecological threshold? Ecological Complexity, 11, 67–74. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecocom.2012.03.002
    Back to article
  19. 19Deslatte, A., Szmigiel-Rawska, K., Tavares, A. F., Ślawska, J., Karsznia, I., & Łukomska, J. (2022), Land use institutions and social-ecological systems: A spatial analysis of local landscape changes in Poland, Land Use Policy, 114. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105937
    Back to article
  20. 20Elmi, M., Rouhani, A., & Keshavarz, E. (2022). Landscape Metrics for Urbanization and Urban Land-Use Change Monitoring from Remote Sensing Images : A case of Shiraz Metropolis, Iran. International Journal of Earth Sciences Knowledge and Applications, 4(1).
    Back to article
  21. 21Epstein, G., Pérez, I., Schoon, M., & Meek, C. L. (2014). Governing the invisible commons: Ozone regulation and the Montreal Protocol. International Journal of the Commons, 8(2). DOI: 10.18352/ijc.407
    Back to article
  22. 22Ernstson, H. (2011). Transformative collective action: a network approach to transformative change in ecosystem-based management. In Ö. Bodin & H. C. Prell (Eds.), Social Networks and Natural Resource Management: Uncovering the Social Fabric of Environmental Governance.: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511894985.012
    Back to article
  23. 23Fisher, R. A. (1936). The wave of advance of advantageouse genes. Annals of Human Genetics, 7, 15. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-1809.1937.tb02153.x
    Back to article
  24. 24Fleischman, F. D., Ban, N. C., Evans, L. S., Epstein, G., Garcia-Lopez, G., & Villamayor-Tomas, S. (2014). Governing large-scale social-ecological systems: Lessons from five cases. International Journal of the Commons, 8(2), 428–456. DOI: 10.18352/ijc.416
    Back to article
  25. 25Foster, S. R., & Iaione, C. (2019). Ostrom in the City: Design Principles and Practices for the Urban Commons. In B. Hudson, J. Rosenbloom, & D. Cole (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of the Study of the Commons. DOI: 10.4324/9781315162782-19
    Back to article
  26. 26Frazier, A. E., & Wang, L. (2013). Modeling landscape structure response across a gradient of land cover intensity. Landscape Ecology, 28(2), 233–246. DOI: 10.1007/s10980-012-9839-8
    Back to article
  27. 27Friedman, H. (1982). Simplified Determinations of Statistical Power, Magnitude of Effect and Research Sample Sizes. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 42(2), 521–526. DOI: 10.1177/001316448204200214
    Back to article
  28. 28Gashu Adam, A. (2020). Urban Built-Up Property Formation Process in the Peri-Urban Areas of Ethiopia. In Land Use Change and Sustainability. DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.86708
    Back to article
  29. 29Gotelli, N. J., & Graves, G. R. (1996). Null Models in Ecology: Simthsonian Institution Press.
    Back to article
  30. 30Government of India. (2013). National Land Utilization Policy (Draft).
    Back to article
  31. 31Haase, D., Frantzeskaki, N., & Elmqvist, T. (2014). Ecosystem services in urban landscapes: practical applications and governance implications. Ambio, 43(4), 407–412. DOI: 10.1007/s13280-014-0503-1
    Back to article
  32. 32Hedblom, M., Andersson, E., & Borgström, S. (2017). Flexible land-use and undefined governance: From threats to potentials in peri-urban landscape planning. Land Use Policy, 63, 523–527. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.02.022
    Back to article
  33. 33Hettiarachchi, M., Morrison, T. H., & McAlpine, C. (2019). Power, politics and policy in the appropriation of urban wetlands: the critical case of Sri Lanka. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 46(4). DOI: 10.1080/03066150.2017.1393801
    Back to article
  34. 34Hettiarachchi, M., Morrison, T. H., Wickramsinghe, D., Mapa, R., De Alwis, A., & McAlpine, C. A. (2014). The eco-social transformation of urban wetlands: A case study of Colombo, Sri Lanka. Landscape and Urban Planning, 132, 55–68. DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.08.006
    Back to article
  35. 35Huang, Q., Xu, C., Jiang, W., Yue, W., Rong, Q., Gu, Z., & Su, M. (2021). Urban compactness and patch complexity influence PM2.5 concentrations in contrasting ways: Evidence from the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area of China. Ecological Indicators, 133. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108407
    Back to article
  36. 36Huntjens, P., Lebel, L., Pahl-Wostl, C., Camkin, J., Schulze, R., & Kranz, N. (2012). Institutional design propositions for the governance of adaptation to climate change in the water sector. Global Environmental Change, 22(1), 67–81. DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.09.015
    Back to article
  37. 37Kimura, Y. T. (2014). The Mathematics of Patterns: The modeling and analysis of reaction-diffusion equations.
    Back to article
  38. 38Koch, J., Dorning, M. A., Van Berkel, D. B., Beck, S. M., Sanchez, G. M., Shashidharan, A., … Meentemeyer, R. K. (2019). Modeling landowner interactions and development patterns at the urban fringe. Landscape and Urban Planning, 182, 101–113. DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.09.023
    Back to article
  39. 39Kohli, I. S., & Haslam, M. C. (2017). An Analysis of the Replicator Dynamics for an Asymmetric Hawk-Dove Game. International Journal of Differential Equations, 2017, 1–7. DOI: 10.1155/2017/8781570
    Back to article
  40. 40Krivan, V., & Cressman, R. (2022). The asymmetric Hawk-Dove game with costs measured as time lost. J Theor Biol, 547, 111162. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2022.111162
    Back to article
  41. 41Lacroix, K., & Richards, G. (2015). An alternative policy evaluation of the British Columbia carbon tax: broadening the application of Elinor Ostrom’s design principles for managing common-pool resources. Ecology and Society, 20(2). DOI: 10.5751/ES-07519-200238
    Back to article
  42. 42Magliocca, N., McConnell, V., & Walls, M. (2015). Exploring sprawl: Results from an economic agent-based model of land and housing markets. Ecological Economics, 113, 114–125. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.02.020
    Back to article
  43. 43Margreiter, M., Sutter, M., & Dittrich, D. (2005). Individual and Collective Choice and Voting in Common Pool Resource Problem with Heterogeneous Actors. Environ Resource Econ, 32, 241–271. DOI: 10.1007/s10640-005-3359-9
    Back to article
  44. 44Maria de Almeida, C., Batty, M., Vieira Monteiro, A. M., Câmara, G., Soares-Filho, B. S., Cerqueira, G. C., & Pennachin, C. L. (2003). Stochastic cellular automata modeling of urban land use dynamics: empirical development and estimation. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 27(5). DOI: 10.1016/S0198-9715(02)00042-X
    Back to article
  45. 45Martin, P., Le Gal, E., & Choy, D. L. (2016). Effect of Social and Institutional Fragmentation on Collective Action in Peri-Urban Settings. In B. Maheshwari, B. Thoradeniya, & V. P. Singh (Eds.), Balanced Urban Development: Options and Strategies for Liveable Cities (pp. 465–480). Cham: Springer International Publishing. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-28112-4_28
    Back to article
  46. 46Mathias, J. D., Anderies, J. M., Baggio, J., Hodbod, J., Huet, S., Janssen, M. A., … Schoon, M. (2020). Exploring non-linear transition pathways in social-ecological systems. Sci Rep, 10(1), 4136. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-59713-w
    Back to article
  47. 47MATLAB. (2016). version 9.0.0.3 (R2016a). Natick, Massachusetts: The MathWorks, Inc.
    Back to article
  48. 48Maynard Smith, J. (1974). The theory of games and the evolution of animal conflicts. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 47(1), 209–221. DOI: 10.1016/0022-5193(74)90110-6
    Back to article
  49. 49McGinnis, M. D., & Ostrom, E. (2014). Social-ecological system framework: initial changes and continuing challenges. Ecology and Society, 19(2). DOI: 10.5751/ES-06387-190230
    Back to article
  50. 50Menatti, L. (2017). Landscape: from common good to human right. International Journal of the Commons, 11(2). DOI: 10.18352/ijc.738
    Back to article
  51. 51Meyfroidt, P., Roy Chowdhury, R., de Bremond, A., Ellis, E. C., Erb, K. H., … Verburg, P. H. 2018. Middle-range theories of land system change. Global Environmental Change, 53, 52–67. DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.08.006
    Back to article
  52. 52Milkoreit, M., Hodbod, J., Baggio, J., Benessaiah, K., Calderón-Contreras, R., Donges, J. F., … Werners, S. E. (2018). Defining tipping points for social-ecological systems scholarship—an interdisciplinary literature review. Environmental Research Letters, 13(3). DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/aaaa75
    Back to article
  53. 53Morrison, T. H., Adger, W. N., Agrawal, A., Brown, K., Hornsey, M. J., Hughes, T. P., Jain, M., Lemos, M. C., McHugh, L. H., O’Neill, S., & Van Berkel, D. (2022). Radical interventions for climate-impacted systems. Nature Climate Change, 12, 1100–1106. DOI: 10.1038/s41558-022-01542-y
    Back to article
  54. 54Morrison, T. H., Adger, W. N., Brown, K., Hettiarachchi, M., Huchery, C., Lemos, M. C., & Hughes, T. P. (2020). Political dynamics and governance of World Heritage ecosystems. Nature Sustainability, 3(11), 947–955. DOI: 10.1038/s41893-020-0568-8
    Back to article
  55. 55Müller, B., Bohn, F., Dreßler, G., Groeneveld, J., Klassert, C., Martin, R., … Schwarz, N. (2013). Describing human decisions in agent-based models – ODD + D, an extension of the ODD protocol. Environmental Modelling & Software, 48, 37–48. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.06.003
    Back to article
  56. 56Mundoli, S., Manjunatha, B., & Nagendra, H. (2017). Commons that provide: the importance of Bengaluru’s wooded groves for urban resilience. International Journal of Urban Sustainable Development, 9(2), 184–206. DOI: 10.1080/19463138.2016.1264404
    Back to article
  57. 57Murali, R., Suryawanshi, K., Redpath, S., Nagendra, H., & Mishra, C. (2019). Changing use of ecosystem services along a rural-urban continuum in the Indian Trans-Himalayas. Ecosystem Services, 40. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.101030
    Back to article
  58. 58Murunga, M., Partelow, S., & Breckwoldt, A. (2021). Drivers of collective action and role of conflict in Kenyan fisheries co-management. World Development, 141. DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105413
    Back to article
  59. 59Myers, J. (2020). Fixing Urban Planning with Ostrom: Strategies for existing Cities to Adopt Polycenric, Bottom-up Regulation of Land Use. Mercatus Research Paper. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3561745
    Back to article
  60. 60Nagendra, H., & Ostrom, E. (2014). Applying the social-ecological system framework to the diagnosis of urban lake commons in Bangalore, India. Ecology and Society, 19(2). DOI: 10.5751/ES-06582-190267
    Back to article
  61. 61Nagendra, H., Unnikrishnan, H., & Sen, S. (2013). Villages in the City: Spatial and Temporal Heterogeneity in Rurality and Urbanity in Bangalore, India. Land, 3(1), 1–18. DOI: 10.3390/land3010001
    Back to article
  62. 62Narain, V. (2009). Growing city, shrinking hinterland: land acquisition, transition and conflict in peri-urban Gurgaon, India. Environment and Urbanization, 21(2), 501–512. DOI: 10.1177/0956247809339660
    Back to article
  63. 63Narain, V. (2021). Social capital and disaster risk reduction in a periurban context. In Disaster Resilience and Sustainability (pp. 651–665). DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-323-85195-4.00010-X
    Back to article
  64. 64Noss, R. F. (2011). Between the devil and the deep blue sea: Florida’s unenviable position with respect to sea level rise. Climatic Change, 107(1–2), 1–16. DOI: 10.1007/s10584-011-0109-6
    Back to article
  65. 65Nowak, M., & May, R. (1992). Evolutionary games and spatial chaos. Nature, 359, 826–829. DOI: 10.1038/359826a0
    Back to article
  66. 66NRSC and ISRO. (2011). Manual on “Preparation of Geo Spatial Layers Using High Resolution (Cartosat-1 Pan+LISS-IV Mx) Orthorectified Satellite Imagery”. Space Based Information Support for Decentralized Planning (SIS-DP), Remote Sensing and GIS Applications Area National Remote Sensing Centre, Indian Space Research Or-ganisation (ISRO), Department of Space, Government of India, Hyderabad.
    Back to article
  67. 67Okpara, U. T., Stringer, L. C., Akhtar-Schuster, M., Metternicht, G. I., Dallimer, M., & Requier-Desjardins, M. (2018). A social-ecological systems approach is necessary to achieve land degradation neutrality. Environmental Science & Policy, 89. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2018.07.003
    Back to article
  68. 68Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action, Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511807763
    Back to article
  69. 69Ostrom, E. (2005). Understanding institutional diversity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
    Back to article
  70. 70Ostrom, E. (2007). A diagnostic approach for going beyond panaceas. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 104(39), 15181–15187. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0702288104
    Back to article
  71. 71Ostrom, E. (2009). A General Framwork for Analyzing Sustainability of Socio-Ecological Systems.pdf. Science, 325, 422. DOI: 10.1126/science.1172133
    Back to article
  72. 72Partelow, S. (2015). Coevolving Ostrom’s social–ecological systems (SES) framework and sustainability science: four key co-benefits. Sustainability Science, 11(3), 399–410. DOI: 10.1007/s11625-015-0351-3
    Back to article
  73. 73Patil, S., Dhanya, B., Vanjari, R. S., & Purushothaman, S. (2018). Urbanisation and New Agroecologies. Eoconomic & Poliltical Weekly, LIII(41).
    Back to article
  74. 74Petrovskii, S., Alharbi, W., Alhomairi, A., & Morozov, A. (2020). Modelling Population Dynamics of Social Protests in Time and Space: The Reaction-Diffusion Approach. Mathematics, 8(1). DOI: 10.3390/math8010078
    Back to article
  75. 75Poteete, A. R., & Ostrom, E. (2004). Heterogeneity, Group Size and Collective Action: The Role of Institutions in Forest Management. Development and Change, 35(3). DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7660.2004.00360.x
    Back to article
  76. 76Pourhoseingholi, M. A., Baghestani, A. R., & Vahedi, M. (2012). How to control confounding effects by statistical analysis. Gastroenterology and Hepatology From Bed to Bench, 5(2).
    Back to article
  77. 77Purushothaman, S., & Patil, S. (2017). Regional Economies and Small Farmers in Karnataka. Economic and Political Weekly, 46(52).
    Back to article
  78. 78Ramachandra, T., Aithal, B. H., & Sanna, D. D. (2012). Insights to urban dynamics through landscape spatial pattern analysis. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 18, 329–343. DOI: 10.1016/j.jag.2012.03.005
    Back to article
  79. 79Ratner, B. D., Meinzen-Dick, R., May, C., & Haglund, E. (2013). Resource conflict, collective action, and resilience: an analytical framework. International Journal of the Commons, 7(1). DOI: 10.18352/ijc.276
    Back to article
  80. 80Rauws, W. S., & de Roo, G. (2011). Exploring Transitions in the Peri-Urban Area. Planning Theory & Practice, 12(2), 269–284. DOI: 10.1080/14649357.2011.581025
    Back to article
  81. 81Ravetz, J., Fertner, C., & Nielsen, T. S. (2013). The Dynamics of Peri-Urbanization. In Peri-urban futures: Scenarios and models for land use change in Europe. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-30529-0_2
    Back to article
  82. 82Robinson, L. W., Ontiri, E., Alemu, T., & Moiko, S. S. (2017). Transcending Landscapes: Working Across Scales and Levels in Pastoralist Rangeland Governance. Environ Manage, 60(2), 185–199. DOI: 10.1007/s00267-017-0870-z
    Back to article
  83. 83Sarkar, S., & Bandyopadhyay, S. (2013). Dynamics of the Peri-Urban Interface: Issues and Perspectives of Management. Transactions of the Institute of Indian Geographers, 50.
    Back to article
  84. 84Schlager, E. (2004). Common-pool Resource Theory. In Environmental Governance Reconsidered: Challenges, Choices, and Opportunities (pp. 145–175). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    Back to article
  85. 85Sciaini, M., Fritsch, M., Scherer, C., Simpkins, C. E., & Golding, N. (2018). NLMR and landscapetools : An integrated environment for simulating and modifying neutral landscape models in R. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 9(11), 2240–2248. DOI: 10.1111/2041-210X.13076
    Back to article
  86. 86Simon, H. (1972). Theories of Bounded Rationality. In C. B. M. & R. Radner (Eds.), Decision and Organization.
    Back to article
  87. 87Singh, A. K., & Narain, V. (2019). Fluid Institutions: Commons in Transition in the Periurban Interface. Society & Natural Resources, 1–10. DOI: 10.1080/08941920.2018.1559380
    Back to article
  88. 88Teklemariam, A., & Cochrane, L. (2021). The Rush to the Peripheries: Land Rights and Tenure Security in Peri-Urban Ethiopia. Land, 10(2). DOI: 10.3390/land10020193
    Back to article
  89. 89Tidball, K., & Stedman, R. (2013). Positive dependency and virtuous cycles: From resource dependence to resilience in urban social-ecological systems. Ecological Economics, 86. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.10.004
    Back to article
  90. 90Tilman, D., Lehman, C. L., & Kareiva, P. (1997). Population Dynamics in Spatial Habitats. In D. Tilman & P. Kareiva (Eds.), Spatial Ecology. Princeton University Press. DOI: 10.1515/9780691188362
    Back to article
  91. 91Turner, B. L., Meyfroidt, P., Kuemmerle, T., Müller, D., & Chowdhury, R. R. (2020). Framing the search for a theory of land use. Journal of Land Use Science, 15, 489–508. DOI: 10.1080/1747423X.2020.1811792
    Back to article
  92. 92Turner, M. G., Donato, D. C., & Romme, W. H. (2012). Consequences of spatial heterogeneity for ecosystem services in changing forest landscapes: priorities for future research. Landscape Ecology, 28, 1081–1097. DOI: 10.1007/s10980-012-9741-4
    Back to article
  93. 93Turner, M. G., & Gardner, R. H. (2015). Landscape Ecology in Theory and Practice (second ed.). DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-2794-4
    Back to article
  94. 94Tyson, W. (2017). Using social-ecological systems theory to evaluate large-scale comanagement efforts: a case study of the Inuvialuit Settlement Region. Ecology and Society, 22(1). DOI: 10.5751/ES-08960-220105
    Back to article
  95. 95Unnikrishnan, H., Katharina Gerullis, M., Cox, M., et al. (2023). Unpacking dynamics of diverse nested resource systems through a diagnostic approach. Sustain Sci, 18, 153–180. DOI: 10.1007/s11625-022-01268-y
    Back to article
  96. 96Unnikrishnan, H., Mundoli, S., Manjunatha, B., & Nagendra, H. (2016). Down the drain: the tragedy of the disappearing urban commons of Bengaluru. South Asian Water Studies, 5(3).
    Back to article
  97. 97van Schrojenstein Lantman, J., Verburg, P. H., Bregt, A., & Geertman, S. (2011). Core Principles and Concepts in Land-Use Modelling: A Literature Review. In Land-Use Modelling in Planning Practice (pp. 35–57). DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-1822-7_3
    Back to article
  98. 98Vedeld, T. (2000). Village politics: Heterogeneity, leadership and collective action. Journal of Development Studies, 36(5). DOI: 10.1080/00220380008422648
    Back to article
  99. 99Verburg, P. H., de Nijs, T. C. M., Ritsema van Eck, J., Visser, H., & de Jong, K. (2004). A method to analyse neighbourhood characteristics of land use patterns. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 28(6), 667–690. DOI: 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2003.07.001
    Back to article
  100. 100Verburg, P. H., Kok, K., Pontius, R. G., & Veldkamp, A. (2006). Modeling Land-Use and Land-Cover Change. In Land-Use and Land-Cover Change (pp. 117–135). DOI: 10.1007/3-540-32202-7_5
    Back to article
  101. 101Vidyarthi, S., Mathur, S., & Agarwal, S. K. (2017). Understanding India’s New Approach to Spatial Planning and Development: A Salient Shift?: Oxford University Press.
    Back to article
  102. 102Vij, S., & Narain, V. (2016). Land, water & power: The demise of common property resources in periurban Gurgaon, India. Land Use Policy, 50. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.08.030
    Back to article
  103. 103Villamayor-Tomas, S., Fleischman, F. D., Ibarra, I. P., Thiel, A., & van Laerhoven, F. (2014). From Sandoz to Salmon: Conceptualizing resource and institutional dynamics in the Rhine watershed through the SES framework. International Journal of the Commons, 8(2). DOI: 10.18352/ijc.411
    Back to article
  104. 104Wandl, A., Rooij, R., & Rocco, R. (2016). Towards Sustainable Territories-in-Between: A Multidimensional Typology of Open Spaces in Europe. Planning Practice & Research, 32(1), 55–84. DOI: 10.1080/02697459.2016.1187978
    Back to article
  105. 105White, J. W., Rassweiler, A., Samhouri, J. F., Stier, A. C., & White, C. (2014). Ecologists should not use statistical significance tests to interpret simulation model results. Oikos, 123(4), 385–388. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2013.01073.x
    Back to article
  106. 106Wilson, D. S., Ostrom, E., & Cox, M. E. (2013). Generalizing the core design principles for the efficacy of groups. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 90, S21–S32. DOI: 10.1016/j.jebo.2012.12.010
    Back to article
  107. 107Xie, H., & Wu, Q. (2019). Analysis of Fallow Farming Decision-Making Behavior of Farmers Based on Hawk-Dove Game Theory: The Case of Guizhou Province. Sustainability, 11(14). DOI: 10.3390/su11143821
    Back to article
  108. 108Yi, Y., Zhang, C., Zhang, G., Xing, L., Zhong, Q., Liu, J., … Kang, H. (2021). Effects of Urbanization on Landscape Patterns in the Middle Reaches of the Yangtze River Region. Land, 10(10). DOI: 10.3390/land10101025
    Back to article
  109. 109Zhang, S., de Roo, G., & Rauws, W. (2019). Understanding self-organization and formal institutions in peri-urban transformations: A case study from Beijing. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 47(2). DOI: 10.1177/2399808319888223
    Back to article
  110. 110Zhu, L., Tang, Y., & Shen, S. (2023). Pattern study and parameter identification of a reaction-diffusion rumor propagation system with time delay. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 166, 112970. DOI: 10.1016/j.chaos.2022.112970
    Back to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/ijc.1242 | Journal eISSN: 1875-0281
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Submitted on: Nov 22, 2022
Accepted on: Feb 18, 2024
Published on: Apr 17, 2024
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Keywords:
Peri-urban,
social ecological systems,
cross-scale,
heterogeneity,
appropriation,
resistance

© 2024 Sivee Chawla, Tiffany H. Morrison, Graeme S. Cumming, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 18 (2024): Issue 1Next article