Have a personal or library account? Click to login
What is “Political” in Commons-Public Partnership? The Italian Cases of Bologna and Naples Cover

What is “Political” in Commons-Public Partnership? The Italian Cases of Bologna and Naples

By: Antonio Vesco and  Sandro Busso  
Open Access
|Apr 2024

References

  1. 1Asara, V. (2019). The redefinition and co-production of public services by urban movements. The Can Batlló social innovation in Barcelona. Partecipazione e conflitto, 12(2), 539565.
  2. 2Bartels, K. (2017). The double bind of social innovation: Relational dynamics of change and resistance in neighbourhood governance. Urban Studies, 54(16), 37893805. DOI: 10.1177/0042098016682935
  3. 3Bauwens, M. (2005). The Political Economy of Peer Production. CTheory, 121.
  4. 4Birchall, J. (Ed.) (2002). The new mutualism in public policy. London: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780203470565
  5. 5Bollier, D., & Helfrich, S. (Eds.) (2015). Patterns of Commoning. Amherst: Levellers Press.
  6. 6Bollier, D., & Helfrich, S. (2019). Free, fair, and alive: The insurgent power of the commons. New Society Publishers.
  7. 7Bookchin, M. (2015). The Next Revolution. Popular Assemblies and the Promise of Direct Democracy. London and New York: Verso.
  8. 8Brown, W. (2015). Undoing the Demos. Neoliberalism’s Stealth Revolution. New York: Zone Books. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctt17kk9p8
  9. 9Busso, S. (2017). The de-politicization of social policy at the time of social investment. Mechanisms and distinctive features. Partecipazione e conflitto, 10(2), 421447.
  10. 10Busso, S., & De Luigi, N. (2019). Civil Society Actors and the Welfare State. A historically-based analytical framework. Partecipazione e Conflitto, 12(2), 259296.
  11. 11Cress, D. M. (1997). Nonprofit incorporation among movements of the poor: Pathways and consequences for homeless social movement organizations. The Sociological Quarterly, 38(2), 343360. DOI: 10.1111/j.1533-8525.1997.tb00481.x
  12. 12della Porta, D. (2008). Consensus in movements, Conference Il governo della società nel XXI secolo. Accademia di Studi Storici Aldo Moro, Rome, 17–20 November.
  13. 13Dikeç, M., & Swyngedouw, E. (2017). Theorizing the politicizing city. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 41(1), 118. DOI: 10.1111/1468-2427.12388
  14. 14Dines, N. (2000). What are “social centres”? A study of self-managed occupations in Naples during the 1990s. Transgressions: A Journal of Urban Exploration, 5, 2339.
  15. 15Foster, S. R., & Iaione, C. (2016). The city as a commons. Yale Law & Policy Review, 34(2), 281349.
  16. 16Fressoli, M., Arond, E., Abrol, D., Smith, A., Ely, A., & Dias, R. (2014). When grassroots innovation movements encounter mainstream institutions: implications for models of inclusive innovation. Innovation and Development, 4(2), 277292. DOI: 10.1080/2157930X.2014.921354
  17. 17Gargiulo, E., & Cirulli, A. (2016). Gli spazi occupati a Napoli: informalità, trasformazioni urbane e discorsi sui beni comuni. In G. Punziano (Ed.), Società, economia e spazio a Napoli. GSSI Social Sciences.
  18. 18Gibson-Graham, J. K. (2006). A Postcapitalist Politics. London & Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  19. 19Giugni, M. (1998). Social movements and change: Incorporation, transformation, and democratization. In: M. Giugni, D. McAdam & C. Tilly (Eds.), From contention to democracy. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
  20. 20Hage, G. (2015). Alter-Politics. Critical Anthropology and the Radical Imagination. Carlton, Victoria: Melbourne University Press.
  21. 21Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2009). Commonwealth. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctvjsf48h
  22. 22Harvey, D. (2012). Rebel cities: From the right to the city to the urban revolution. London and New York: Verso.
  23. 23Heinmiller, T. (2009). Path dependency and collective action in common pool governance. International Journal of the Commons, 3(1), 131147. DOI: 10.18352/ijc.79
  24. 24Helfrich, S. (2021). Commons public partnership. An Introduction. Conference presentation.
  25. 25Kioupkiolis, A. (2019). The Common and Counter-Hegemonic Politics: Re-Thinking Social Change. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. DOI: 10.1515/9781474446167
  26. 26Kioupkiolis, A. (2020). Report 2. The Common. Heteropolitics. Refiguring the Common and the Political. Deliverable D.3.2., ERC COG 2016–724692.
  27. 27Kioupkiolis, A. (2021). Transforming city government: Italian variants on urban commoning. Administrative Theory & Praxis. DOI: 10.1080/10841806.2021.1945374
  28. 28Massa Critica. (2019). Assembly communiqué, September 5. http://www.massacriticanapoli.org/comunicato-dellassemblea-del-5-settembre/, accessed December 12, 2019.
  29. 29Mattei, U. (2011). Beni Comuni. Un manifesto. Rome-Bari: Laterza.
  30. 30McGinnis, M. D. (1999). Polycentric governance and development: Readings from the workshop in political theory and policy analysis. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. DOI: 10.3998/mpub.16052
  31. 31Micciarelli, G. (2017). Introduzione all’uso civico e collettivo urbano. La gestione diretta dei beni comuni urbani. Munus, 1.
  32. 32Observatorio Metropolitano. (2014). La Apuesta Municipalista: La Democracia Empieza Por Lo Cercano. Madrid: Traficantes de Sueños.
  33. 33Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511807763
  34. 34Ostrom, E. (2005). Understanding Institutional Diversity. Princeton, NJ, and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
  35. 35Ostrom, E. (2008). Tragedy of the Commons. In: S. N. Durlauf & L. E. Blume (Eds.), The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Hampshire: Palgrave, pp. 35736. DOI: 10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_2047-1
  36. 36Ostrom, E. (2012). The Future of the Commons. Beyond Market Failure and Government Regulation. London: The Institute of Economic Affairs. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3916843
  37. 37Ostrom, E., & Andersson, K. P. (2008). Analyzing Decentralized Resource Regimes from a Polycentric Perspective. Policy Sciences, 41(1), 7193. DOI: 10.1007/s11077-007-9055-6
  38. 38Piscopo, C. (2017). Per una cultura del territorio e degli spazi democratica e partecipata. www.ateatro.it, accessed September 15, 2019.
  39. 39Piven F. F., & Cloward, R. A. (1977). Poor People’s Movements: Why They Succeed, How They Fail. New York: Vintage Books.
  40. 40Rose, C. M. (2020). Thinking about the commons. International Journal of the Commons, 14(1), 557566. DOI: 10.5334/ijc.987
  41. 41Roth, L., Monterde, A., & Calleja-López, A. (2019). (Eds.) Ciudades democráticas. La revuelta municipalista en el ciclo post-15M. Barcelona: Icaria.
  42. 42Russell, B. (2019). Beyond the local trap: New municipalism and the rise of the fearless cities. Antipode, 51(3), 9891010. DOI: 10.1111/anti.12520
  43. 43Sarnow, M., & Tiedemann, N. (2022). Interrupting the neoliberal masculine state machinery? Strategic selectivities and municipalist practice in Barcelona and Zagreb. Urban Studies, July 2022. DOI: 10.1177/00420980221101454
  44. 44Tang, C. P., & Tang, S. Y. (2001). Negotiated autonomy: Transforming self-governing institutions for local common-pool resources in two tribal villages in Taiwan. Human Ecology, 29(1), 4967. DOI: 10.1023/A:1007143705304
  45. 45Thrane, S., Blaabjerg, S., & Møller, R. H. (2010). Innovative path dependence: Making sense of product and service innovation in path dependent innovation processes. Research Policy, 39(7), 932944. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2010.04.003
  46. 46Treccani Encyclopedia. (2020). Usi civici. https://www.treccani.it/enciclopedia/usi-civici_(Enciclopedia-Italiana)/, accessed March 13, 2020.
  47. 47Vergne, J. P., & Durand, R. (2010). The missing link between the theory and empirics of path dependence: Conceptual clarification, testability issue, and methodological implications. Journal of Management Studies, 47(4), 736759. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00913.x
  48. 48Vesco, A. (2021). The Neapolitan way to the commons: poetics of irony and “creative use of the law” in the case of L’Asilo. Journal of Modern Italian Studies, 27(1), 125150. DOI: 10.1080/1354571X.2021.1950339
  49. 49Vesco, A., & Kioupkiolis, A. (2022). Italian alliances between commoning and law: Framing new regulations by challenging rules in Naples. Focaal, 1, 115. DOI: 10.3167/fcl.2022.050402
  50. 50Wagenaar, H. (2019). Making Sense of Civic Enterprise. Social Innovation, Participatory Democracy and the Administrative State. Partecipazione e conflitto, 12(2), 297324.
  51. 51Wodak, R. (2009). Discursive construction of national identity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
  52. 52Yeo, S. (2002). The new mutualism and Labour’s Third Way. In: J. Birchall (Ed.), The new mutualism in public policy. London: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780203470565.ch11
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/ijc.1238 | Journal eISSN: 1875-0281
Language: English
Submitted on: Nov 9, 2022
Accepted on: Feb 19, 2024
Published on: Apr 5, 2024
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2024 Antonio Vesco, Sandro Busso, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.