References
- 1Andersen, H., & Munck, R. (1999). Neighbourhood images in Liverpool: “It’s all down to the people”. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
- 2Atkinson, R., Dörfler, T., & Rothfuß, E. (2018). Selforganisation and the co-production of governance: The challenge of local responses to climate change. Politics and Governance, 6(1), 169–179. DOI: 10.17645/pag.v6i1.1210
- 3Avelino, F., & Grin, J. (2017). Beyond deconstruction. a reconstructive perspective on sustainability transition governance. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 22, 15–25.
- 4Bartels, K. P. R. (2017). The double bind of social innovation: Relational dynamics of change and resistance in neighbourhood governance. Urban Studies, 54(16), 3789–3805. DOI: 10.1177/0042098016682935
- 5Bartels, K. P. R. (2019).
Connecting: A relational approach to re-rooting communities, public services, and politics . In: M. Stout (Ed.), The future of progressivism: Applying Follettian thinking to contemporary issues (pp. 317–353). Claremont, CA: Century Process Press. - 6Bartels, K. P. R. (2020a). Transforming the relational dynamics of urban governance: How social innovation research can create a trajectory for learning and change. Urban Studies, 57(14), 2868–2884. DOI: 10.1177/0042098019889290
- 7Bartels, K. P. R. (2020b).
Fitting . In: Intermediating Social Innovation in Urban Governance. In Sullivan, H. & Dickinson, H (Eds.), ‘A Handbook of the Public Servant’. Palgrave. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-03008-7_14-1 - 8Bartels, K. P. R. (2022). Experiential learning: Sustaining community-led social innovation by transforming relational dynamics. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research. DOI: 10.1080/13511610.2022.2121268
- 9Bianchi, I., Pera, M., & Calvet-Mir, L., et al. (2022). Urban commons and the local state: co-production between enhancement and co-optation, Territory, Politics, Governance. DOI: 10.1080/21622671.2022.2108491
- 10Blanco I., Griggs, S., & Sullivan, H. (2014). Situating the local in the neoliberalisation and transformation of urban governance. Urban Studies, 51(15), 3129–3146.
- 11Boland, P. (2010). ‘Capital of culture—you must be having a laugh!’ Challenging the official rhetoric of Liverpool as the 2008 European cultural capital. Social & Cultural Geography, 11(7), 627–645. DOI: 10.1080/14649365.2010.508562
- 12Bollier, D. (2020).
Commoning as a transformative social paradigm . In: J. G. Speth & K. Courrier (Eds.), The New Systems Reader (pp. 348–361). London: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780367313401-28 - 13Bollier, D., & Helfrich, S. (Eds.) (2015). Patterns of commoning. Amherst, MA: Off the Common Press.
- 14Bollier, D., & Helfrich, S. (2019). Free, fair and alive. The insurgent power of the commons. Gabriola Island: New Society Publishers.
- 15Bourdieu, P. (1998). Practical reason: On the theory of action. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
- 16Bua, A., & Bussu, S. (Eds.) (2023). Reclaiming participatory governance: Social movements and the reinvention of democratic innovation. London: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781003218517
- 17Bussu, S., Bua, A., Dean, R., & Smith, G. (2022). Introduction: Embedding participatory Governance. Critical Policy Studies, 16(2), 133–145. DOI: 10.1080/19460171.2022.2053179
- 18Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory. A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: Sage.
- 19Couch, C. (2003).
C ity of change and challenge: Urban planning and regeneration in Liverpool. Aldershot: Ashgate. - 20Dey, P., & Teasdale, S. (2016). The tactical mimicry of social enterprise strategies: Acting ‘as if’ in the everyday life of third sector organizations. Organization, 23(4), 485–504. DOI: 10.1177/1350508415570689
- 21Domanski, D., Howaldt, J., & Kaletka, C. (2020). A comprehensive concept of social innovation and its implications for the local context – on the growing importance of social innovation ecosystems and infrastructures. European Planning Studies, 28(3), 454–474. DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2019.1639397
- 22Feinberg, A., Ghorbani, A., & Herder, P. (2021). Diversity and challenges of the urban commons: A Comprehensive Review. International Journal of the Commons, 15(1), 1–20.
- 23Follett, M. P. (1918/1998). The new state. Group organization: The solution of popular government. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
- 24Follett, M. P. (1942/2003). Dynamic administration. H. C. Metalf & L. Urwick (Eds.), London: Harper & Brothers Publishers/Routledge.
- 25Greenwood, D. J., & Levin, M. (2007). Introduction to action research: Social research for social change. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. DOI: 10.4135/9781412984614
- 26Galego, D., Moulaert, F., Brans, M., & Santinha, G. (2021): Social innovation & governance: a scoping review. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research. DOI: 10.1080/13511610.2021.1879630
- 27Howaldt, J., Kaletka, C., & Schröder, A. (2021). A research agenda for social innovation. The emergence of a research field. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. DOI: 10.4337/9781789909357
- 28Huron, A. (2015). Working with strangers in saturated space: Reclaiming and maintaining the urban commons. Antipode, 47(4), 963–979. DOI: 10.1111/anti.12141
- 29Jones, G, & Meegan, R. (2015). Measuring the size and scope of the voluntary and community sector in the Liverpool City Region. Retrieved on 18-08-2018 from
http://www.socialvalueuk.org/app/uploads/2016/03/SizeandShapeofVCSFINAL.pdf - 30Kaletka, C., Markmann, M., & Pelka, B. (2016). Peeling the onion. An exploration of the layers of social innovation ecosystems. European Public Social & Social Innovation Review, 1(2), 83–93.
- 31Kennett P., Jones G., Meegan, R., & Croft, J. (2015). Recession, austerity and the ‘great risk shift’: Local government and household impacts and responses in Bristol and Liverpool. Local Government Studies, 41(4), 622–644.
- 32Kim, S. (2021). A participatory local governance approach to social innovation: A case study of Seongbuk-gu, South Korea. Environment & Planning C: Politics & Space. DOI: 10.1177/23996544211005784
- 33Lichterman, P., & Eliasoph, N. (2015). Civic action. American Journal of Sociology, 120(3), 789–863. DOI: 10.1086/679189
- 34Longhurst, N. (2015). Towards an ‘alternative’ geography of innovation: Alternative milieu, socio-cognitive protection and sustainability experimentation. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 17, 183–198. DOI: 10.1016/j.eist.2014.12.001
- 35MacCallum D., Moulaert F., Hillier J., et al. (2009). Social innovation and territorial development. Farnham: Ashgate.
- 36MacGillivray, A., Conaty, P., & Wadhams, C. (2001). Low flying heroes. Micro-social enterprise below the radar screen. London: New Economics Foundation.
- 37Manzo, L. C., & Brithbill, N. (2007).
Toward a participatory ethics . In S. Kindon, R. Pain & M. Kesby (Eds.), Participatory Action Research Approaches and Methods: Connecting People, Participation and Place (pp. 33–40). Hoboken: Taylor and Francis. - 38McCabe, A., & Phillimore, J. (2017). Community groups in context. Local activities and actions. Bristol: The Policy Press. DOI: 10.1332/policypress/9781447327776.001.0001
- 39Moulaert, F., MacCallum, D., & Mehmood, A., et al. (Eds.) (2013). The international handbook on social innovation. Collective action, social learning and transdisciplinary research. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
- 40Moulaert, F., MacCallum, D., Van den Broeck, P., & Garcia, M. (2019).
Bottom-linked governance and socially innovative political transformation . In J. Howaldt, C. Kaletka, A. Schröder & M. Zirngiebl (Eds.), Atlas of social innovation. 2nd Volume: A world of new practices (pp. 63–66). München: oekom verlag. - 41Moulaert, F., Swyngedouw, E., & Martinelli, F., et al. (Eds.) (2010). Can neighbourhoods save the city? Community development and social innovation. London: Routledge.
- 42OECD. (2022). Building local ecosystems for social innovation A methodological framework. Retrieved 01–11–2022 from
https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/industry-and-services/building-local-ecosystems-for-social-innovation_bef867cd-en - 43Pel, B., Wittmayer, J. M., Avelino, F., & Bauler, T. (2023). Paradoxes of transformative social innovation: From critical awareness towards strategies of inquiry. Novation, 4, 35–62.
- 44Pel, B., Wittmayer, J. M., Dorland, J., & Søgaard Jørgensen, M. (2020). Unpacking the social innovation ecosystem: an empirically grounded typology of empowering network constellations. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 33(3), 311–336. DOI: 10.1080/13511610.2019.1705147
- 45Pikner, T., Willman, K., & Jokinen, A. (2020). Urban commoning as a vehicle between government institutions and informality: Collective gardening practices in Tampere and Narva. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 44, 711–729.
- 46Radywyl, N., & Bigg, C. (2013). Reclaiming the commons for urban transformation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 50, 159–170. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.12.020
- 47Rein, M., & Schön, D. A. (1994). Frame reflection: Toward the resolution of intractable policy controversies. New York: Basic Books.
- 48Roe, E. (1994). Narrative policy analysis. Theory and practice. Durham: Duke University Press. DOI: 10.1515/9780822381891
- 49Russell, B., Milburn, K., & Heron, K. (2022). Strategies for a new municipalism: Public–common partnerships against the new enclosures. Urban Studies. DOI: 10.1177/00420980221094700
- 50Scott-Cato, M., & Hillier, J. (2010). How could we study climate-related social innovation? Applying Deleuzean philosophy to Transition Towns. Environmental Politics, 19(6), 869–887.
- 51Seyfang, G., & Smith, A. (2007). Grassroots innovations for sustainable development: towards a new research and policy agenda. Environmental Politics, 16, 584–603.
- 52Sgaragli, F. (Ed.) (2014). Enabling social innovation ecosystems for community-led territorial development. Rome: Fondazione Giacomo Brodolini.
- 53Silver, D. (2018). Everyday radicalism and the democratic imagination: Dissensus, rebellion and utopia. Politics and Governance, 6(1), 161–168. DOI: 10.17645/pag.v6i1.1213
- 54Speth, J. G., & Courrier, K. (2020). The new systems reader. London: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780367313401
- 55Stone, D. (2002). Policy paradox. The art of political decision making. New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company.
- 56Stout, M., & Love, J. M. (2016). A radically democratic response to global governance: Dystopian utopias. New York: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781315623450
- 57Stout, M., & Love, J. M. (2018). Integrative governance: Generating sustainable responses to global crises. New York: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781315526294
- 58Sykes, O., Brown, J., Cocks, M., Shaw, D., & Couch, C. (2013). A city profile of Liverpool. Cities, 35, 299–318. DOI: 10.1016/j.cities.2013.03.013
- 59Tavory, I., & Timmermans, S. (2014). Abductive analysis: Theorizing qualitative research. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226180458.001.0001
- 60Terstriep, J., Rehfeld, D., & Kleverbeck, M. (2020). Favourable social innovation ecosystem(s)? An explorative approach, European Planning Studies, 28(5), 881–905.
- 61Thompson, M. (2015). Between Boundaries: From commoning and guerrilla gardening to community land trust development in Liverpool. Antipode, 47(4), 1021–1042. DOI: 10.1111/anti.12154
- 62Thompson, M. (2019). Playing with the rules of the game: Social innovation for urban transformation. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 43, 1168–1192.
- 63Tummers, L., & MacGregor, S. (2019). Beyond wishful thinking: a FPE perspective on commoning, care, and the promise of co-housing. International Journal of the Commons, 13(1), 62–83.
- 64Von Schnurbein, G., Potluka, O., & Mayer, A. (2021). Creating social innovation in urban development through collaborative processes. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research. DOI: 10.1080/13511610.2021.1910800
- 65Wagenaar, H. (2011). Meaning in Action. Interpretation and Dialogue in Policy Analysis. Armonk: M.E. Sharpe.
- 66Wagenaar, H. (2019). Making sense of civic enterprise. Social innovation, participatory democracy and the administrative state. PArtecipazione e COnflitto, 12(2), 297–324.
- 67Weiss, R. S. (1994). Learning from strangers: The art and method of qualitative interview studies. New York, NY: The Free Press.
- 68Wilks-Heeg, S., Ellis, D., & Nurse, A. (2011). Who governs Merseyside? A Democratic Audit briefing paper. Retrieved 30–01–2018 from
https://democraticaudituk.files.wordpress.com/2013/06/who-governs-merseyside1.pdf - 69Wolfram, M. (2018). Cities shaping grassroots niches for sustainability transitions: Conceptual reflections and an exploratory case study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 173, 11–23. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.044