References
- 1Arbell, Y. (2021a). ‘“A place that is different from the usual capitalist world”: the potential of Community-led housing as safe and just spaces’. JSSJ(July), pp. 1–29.
- 2Arbell, Y. (2021b).
‘Beyond Affordability: English Cohousing Communities as White Middle-Class Spaces’ . Housing, Theory and Society (pp. 1–22). Routledge. DOI: 10.1080/14036096.2021.1998217 - 3Arbell, Y., Middlemiss, L., & Chatterton, P. (2020). ‘Contested subjectivities in a UK housing cooperative: old hippies and Thatcher’s children negotiating the commons’. Geoforum, 110, 58–66. DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.01.017
- 4Archer, M. (1995). Realist Social Theory. Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511557675
- 5Archer, T., et al. (2021). Homes in Community Hands: Year Two evaluation report. Sheffield. Available at:
https://www4.shu.ac.uk/research/cresr/sites/shu.ac.uk/files/homes-in-community-hands-year2-eval-report.pdf . - 6Archer, T., Arbell, Y., Moore, T., Mullins, D., & Rafalowicz-Campbell, M. (2022). Homes in community hands: year three evaluation report. Centre for Regional Economic and Social Research, Sheffield Hallam University.
https://www.shu.ac.uk/centre-regional-economic-social-research/publications/homes-in-community-hands-year-three-evaluation-report - 7Benson, M., & Hamiduddin, I. (Eds.) (2017). Self-build homes: Social discourse, experiences and directions. London: UCL Press. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctt1xhr521
- 8Bhaskar, R. (1979). The possibility of naturalism: a philosophical critique of the contemporary human sciences. New York: Routledge.
- 9Blandy, S. (2018). ‘Gated communities revisited: defended homes nested in security enclaves’. People, Place and Policy Online, 11(3), 136–142. DOI: 10.3351/ppp.2017.2683778298
- 10Bliss, N. (2009). Bringing democracy home. The Commission on Co-operative and Mutual Housing. Available at:
http://www.cch.coop/bcmh/bringing-democracy-home.html - 11Bliss, N. (2016). 1,001 cooperative and community-led homes: the housing revolution starts here. The confederation of cooperative housing.
- 12Bourdieu, P. (1990). The Logic of Practice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. DOI: 10.1515/9781503621749
- 13Boyer, R. H. W., & Leland, S. (2018).
‘Cohousing for whom? Survey evidence to support the diffusion of socially and spatially integrated housing in the United States’ . Housing Policy Debate, 28(5), 653–667. Routledge. DOI: 10.1080/10511482.2018.1424724 - 14Bunce, S. (2016). Pursuing Urban Commons: Politics and Alliances in Community Land Trust Activism in East London. Antipode, 48(1), 134–150. DOI: 10.1111/anti.12168
- 15Byrne, K., & Healy, S. (2006). ‘Cooperative subjects: Toward a post-fantasmatic enjoyment of the economy’. Rethinking Marxism, 18(2), 241–258. DOI: 10.1080/08935690600578919
- 16Caffentzis, G., & Federici, S. (2014). Commons Against and Beyond Capitalism. Community Development Journal, 49(S1), i92–i105. DOI: 10.1093/cdj/bsu006
- 17Chatterton, P. (2010). ‘So What Does It Mean to be Anti-capitalist? Conversations with Activists from Urban Social Centres’. Urban Studies, 47(6), 1205–1224. DOI: 10.1177/0042098009360222
- 18Chatterton, P. (2013). ‘Towards an agenda for post-carbon cities: Lessons from LILAC, the UK’s first ecological, affordable cohousing community’. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37(5), 1654–1674. DOI: 10.1111/1468-2427.12009
- 19Chatterton, P. (2015). Low impact living: A field guide to ecological, affordable community building. Oxon: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781315765921
- 20Cook, M. (2013). ‘“Gay times”: Identity, locality, memory, and the brixton squats in 1970’s London’. Twentieth Century British History, 24(1), 84–109. DOI: 10.1093/tcbh/hwr053
- 21Coudroy de Lille, L. (2016). Housing cooperatives in Poland: The origins of a deadlock. In L. Tummers (Ed.), The re-emergence of co-housing in Europe Routledge (NY). DOI: 10.1080/17535069.2015.1011424
- 22De Angelis, M. (2017). Omnia Sunt Communia. 1st edition. London: Zed. DOI: 10.5040/9781350221611
- 23Ellis, D. (2017). ‘On taking (back) control: Lessons from Community Action in 1970s Britain’. Renewal, 25(1), 53–61.
- 24Emmel, N., et al. (Eds.) (2018). Doing realist research. London: SAGE Publications. DOI: 10.4135/9781526451729
- 25Fernández-Arrigoitia, M., Scanlon, K., & West, K. (2018). Well-being and age in co-housing life: thinking with and beyond design. London. Available at:
https://www.housinglin.org.uk/Topics/type/Well-being-and-age-in-co-housing-life-Thinking-with-and-beyond-design/ - 26Field, M. (2015). Understanding Cohousing in the UK for the 21st-Century. Wohnbund.
- 27Field, M. (2017).
‘Models of self- build and collaborative housing in the United Kingdom’ . In M. Benson & I. Hamiduddin (Eds.), Self-Build Homes: Social Discourse, Experiences and Directions (pp. 38–56). London: UCL Press. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctt1xhr521.9 - 28Field, M. (2020). Creating community-led and self-build homes. Bristol: Policy Press. DOI: 10.46692/9781447344407
- 29Flint, J. F. (2003). ‘Housing and ethopolitics: constructing identities of active consumption and responsible community’. Economy and Society, 32(4), 611–629. DOI: 10.1080/0308514032000107628
- 30Gibson-Graham, J. K. (2006a). A postcapitalist politics. 1st edn. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
- 31Heath, L. (2019). Less than 15% of £163m Community Housing Fund allocated as deadline looms, Inside Housing. Available at:
https://www.insidehousing.co.uk/news/news/less-than-15-of-163m-community-housing-fund-allocated-as-deadline-looms-64464 (Accessed: 1 July 2020). - 32Hodkinson, S., Watt, P., & Mooney, G. (2013). ‘Introduction: Neoliberal housing policy – time for a critical re-appraisal’. Critical Social Policy, 33(1), 3–16. DOI: 10.1177/0261018312457862
- 33Huber, A. (2017).
‘Theorising the dynamics of collaborative consumption practices: A comparison of peer-to-peer accommodation and cohousing’ . Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions. Elsevier B.V., 23, 53–69. DOI: 10.1016/j.eist.2016.12.001 - 34Hudson, J., Scanlon, K., Udagawa, C., Arrigoitia, M. F., Ferreri, M., & West, K. (2021). ‘A Slow Build-Up of a History of Kindness’: Exploring the Potential of Community-Led Housing in Alleviating Loneliness. Sustainability, 13(20),
11323 . DOI: 10.3390/su132011323 - 35Huron, A. (2015). ‘Working with strangers in saturated space: Reclaiming and maintaining the urban commons’. Antipode, 47(4), 963–979. DOI: 10.1111/anti.12141
- 36Huron, A. (2018). Carving out the commons: Tenant organizing and housing cooperatives in Washington, D.C. Minneapolis, London: University of Minnesota Press. DOI: 10.5749/j.ctt2121778
- 37Jarvis, H. (2011). ‘Saving space, sharing time: Integrated infrastructures of daily life in cohousing’. Environment and Planning A, 43(3), 560–577. DOI: 10.1068/a43296
- 38Jones, A. (2016). Alternative capital, friendship and emotional work: What makes it possible to live in intentional communities into older age. Univesrity of Sussex.
- 39Kearns, A., & Parkes, A. (2003). ‘Living in and leaving poor neighbourhood conditions in England’. Housing Studies, 18(6), 827–851. DOI: 10.1080/0267303032000135456
- 40Kelly, M. (2013).
‘Foucault, Subjectivity, and Technologies of the Self’ . In C. Falzon, T. O’Leary, & J. Sawicki (Eds.), A Companion to Foucault, First Edition. Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Published. (pp. 510–525). DOI: 10.1002/9781118324905.ch26 - 41Kennedy, E. H., Beckley, T. M., McFarlane, B. L., & Nadeau, S. (2009). Why we don’t “walk the talk”: Understanding the environmental values/behaviour gap in Canada. Human Ecology Review, 151–160.
- 42Lang, R., & Novy, A. (2014). Cooperative Housing and Social Cohesion: The Role of Linking Social Capital. European Planning Studies, 22(8), 1744–1764, DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2013.800025
- 43Lang, R., Chatterton, P., & Mullins, D. (2020).
‘Grassroots innovations in community-led housing in England: the role and evolution of intermediaries’ . International Journal of Urban Sustainable Development, 12(1), 52–72. Taylor & Francis. DOI: 10.1080/19463138.2019.1663525 - 44Leitner, H., Sheppard, E., & Sziartot, K. M. (2008). ‘The spatialities of contentious politics’. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 33(2), 157–172. DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-5661.2008.00293.x
- 45Linebaugh, P. (2014). Stop, thief!: The commons, enclosures, and resistance. Oakland: PM Press.
- 46Lloyd, M. G., Peel, D., & Janssen-Jansen, L. B. (2015).
‘Self-build in the UK and Netherlands: mainstreaming self-development to address housing shortages?’ Urban, Planning and Transport Research, 3(1), 19–31. Routledge. DOI: 10.1080/21650020.2014.987403 - 47Lowndes, V., & Pratchett, L. (2012). ‘Local governance under the coalition government: Austerity, localism and the “Big Society”’. Local Government Studies, 38(1), 21–40. DOI: 10.1080/03003930.2011.642949
- 48McCay, B. J. (2002). ‘Emergence of institutions for the commons: contexts, situations, and events’. The drama of the commons, 361–402.
- 49Moore, T., & Mullins, D. (2013). ‘Scaling-up or going-viral: comparing self-help housing and community land trust facilitation’. Third Sector Research Centre, working paper, 94 4(March), 333–353. DOI: 10.1332/204080513X671931
- 50Mullins, D., & Sacranie, H. (2014). ‘Evaluation of the Empty Homes Community Grants Programme (EHCGP)’–Midlands region baseline case studies report, University of Birmingham’. (April).
- 51Nightingale, A. J. (2011). ‘Beyond Design Principles Subjectivity Emotion and the (Ir) Rational Commons’. Society & Natural Resources, 24(2), 119–132. DOI: 10.1080/08941920903278160
- 52Nightingale, A. J. (2019). ‘Commoning for inclusion? commons, exclusion, property and socio-natural becomings’. International Journal of the Commons, 13(1),
16 . DOI: 10.18352/ijc.927 - 53O’mahony, L. F., & Overton, L. (2015). ‘Asset-based Welfare, Equity Release and the Meaning of the Owned Home’. Housing Studies, 30(3), 392–412. DOI: 10.1080/02673037.2014.963523
- 54Ostrom, E. (2007). Challenges and growth: the development of the interdisciplinary field of institutional analysis. Journal of Institutional Economics, 3(3), 239–264. DOI: 10.1017/S1744137407000719
- 55Ostrom, E., Janssen, M. A., & Anderies, J. M. (2007). Going beyond panaceas. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(39), 15176–15178. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0701886104
- 56Radical Routes. (2013). Radical Routes, Aims & Principles. Available at:
http://www.radicalroutes.org.uk/ (Accessed: 2 July 2016). - 57Reckwitz, A. (2016).
‘Practices and their Affects’ . In A. Hui, T. Schatzki, & E. Shove (Eds.). The Nexus of Practices. 1st Ed. (London: Routledge). - 58Riedy, C., et al. (2019).
‘“It’s a great idea for other people”: Cohousing as a housing option for older Australians’ . Urban Policy and Research, 37(2), 227–242. Routledge. DOI: 10.1080/08111146.2018.1531750 - 59Rowlands, R. (2012). How do we plan community?: Planning, housing and co-operative development. University of Birmingham.
- 60Ruiu, M. L. (2014). ‘Differences between cohousing and gated communities. A literature review’. Sociological Inquiry, 84(2), 316–335. DOI: 10.1111/soin.12031
- 61Sayer, A. (2010).
Bourdieu, ethics and practice . In Cultural analysis and Bourdieu’s legacy (pp. 99–113). Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780203878620-12 - 62Scanlon, K., & Fernández-Arrigoitia, M. (2015). ‘Development of new cohousing: Lessons from a London scheme for the over-50s’. Urban Research & Practice, 8(1), 106–121. DOI: 10.1080/17535069.2015.1011430
- 63Singh, N. (2017). ‘Becoming a commoner: The commons as sites for affective socio-nature encounters and co-becomings’. 17(4), 751–776.
- 64Sinner, J., Tadaki, M., Challies, E., Kilvington, M., Tane, P., & Robb, C. A. (2022). ‘Crafting Collective Management Institutions in Messy Real-World Settings: A Call for Action Research’. International Journal of the Commons, 16(1), 1–13. DOI: 10.5334/ijc.1145
- 65Skeggs, B. (2005). ‘The making of class and gender through visualizing moral subject formation’. Sociology, 39(5), 965–982. DOI: 10.1177/0038038505058381
- 66Springer, S. (2012). ‘Neoliberalism as discourse: between Foucauldian political economy and Marxian poststructuralism’. Critical Discourse Studies, 9(2), 133–147. DOI: 10.1080/17405904.2012.656375
- 67Stavrides, S. (2016). Common space: The city as commons. Bloomsbury Publishing. DOI: 10.5040/9781350219267
- 68Stavrides, S. (2019). Common spaces of urban emancipation. Manchester University Press. DOI: 10.7765/9781526158697
- 69Taylor Aiken, G., Middlemiss, L., Sallu, S., & Hauxwell-Baldwin, R. (2017). Researching climate change and community in neoliberal contexts: an emerging critical approach. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 8(4),
e463 . DOI: 10.1002/wcc.463 - 70Thompson, M. (2015). ‘Between boundaries: From commoning and guerrilla gardening to Community Land Trust development in Liverpool’. Antipode, 47(4), 1021–1042. DOI: 10.1111/anti.12154
- 71Thompson, M. (2018).
‘From co-ops to Community Land Trusts: Tracing the historical evolution and policy mobilities of collaborative housing movements’ . Housing, Theory and Society. Routledge, 37(1), 82–100. DOI: 10.1080/14036096.2018.1517822 - 72Tummers, L., (Ed.). (2016). The Re-Emergence of Co-housing in Europe. Routledge (NY). DOI: 10.4324/9781315659886
- 73Van Laerhoven, F., Schoon, M., & Villamayor-Tomas, S. (2020). ‘Celebrating the 30th anniversary of ostrom’s governing the commons: Traditions and trends in the study of the commons, revisited’. International Journal of the Commons, 14(1), 208–224. DOI: 10.5334/ijc.1030
- 74Velicu, I., & García-López, G. (2018). ‘Thinking the Commons Through Ostrom and Butler: Boundedness and Vulnerability’. Theory, Culture & Society, 35, 55–73. DOI: 10.1177/0263276418757315
- 75Whaley, L. (2018). ‘The Critical Institutional Analysis and Development (CIAD) Framework’. International Journal of the Commons, 12(2), 137–161. DOI: 10.18352/ijc.848
- 76Whaley, L., & Weatherhead, E. K. (2014). An integrated approach to analyzing (adaptive) comanagement using the “politicized” IAD framework. Ecology and Society, 19(1). DOI: 10.5751/ES-06177-190110
- 77Wang, J., Pan, Y., & Hadjri, K. (2020).
‘Social sustainability and supportive living: exploring motivations of British cohousing groups’ . Housing and Society (pp. 1–27). Routledge. DOI: 10.1080/08882746.2020.1788344 - 78Williams, A., Goodwin, M., & Cloke, P. (2014). ‘Neoliberalism, Big Society, and progressive localism’. Environment and Planning A, 46(12), 2798–2815. DOI: 10.1068/a130119p