Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Coping with Dismantling Forces: Traditional Management and Transformations of Székely-Hungarian Village Commons of Transylvania, in the 16–21th Centuries Cover

Coping with Dismantling Forces: Traditional Management and Transformations of Székely-Hungarian Village Commons of Transylvania, in the 16–21th Centuries

Open Access
|Oct 2022

References

  1. 1Agrawal, A. (2001). Common property institutions and sustainable governance of resources. World development, 29(10), 16491672. DOI: 10.1016/S0305-750X(01)00063-8
  2. 2Agrawal, A. (2003). Sustainable governance of common-pool resources: context, methods, and politics. Annual review of anthropology, 32(1), 243262. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.anthro.32.061002.093112
  3. 3Agrawal, A., & Yadama, G. (1997). How do local institutions mediate market and population pressures on resources? Forest Panchayats in Kumaon, India. Development and change, 28(3), 435465. DOI: 10.1111/1467-7660.00050
  4. 4Alvarez, J. S. (2014). When the enemy is the state: common lands management in northwest Spain (1850–1936). International Journal of the Commons, 8(1). DOI: 10.18352/ijc.389
  5. 5Ambrus, T. (2011). A székely falutízesek: Egy sajátos települé-srendszer mint a társadalmi-gazdasági tevékenység kerete.
  6. 6Anderies, J. M., Janssen, M. A., & Ostrom, E. (2004). A framework to analyze the robustness of social-ecological systems from an institutional perspective. Ecology and society, 9(1). DOI: 10.5751/ES-00610-090118
  7. 7Anderies, J. M., Walker, B. H., & Kinzig, A. P. (2006). Fifteen weddings and a funeral: case studies and resilience-based management. Ecology and society, 11(1). DOI: 10.5751/ES-01690-110121
  8. 8Armitage, D. (2008). Governance and the commons in a multi-level world. International Journal of the commons, 2(1), 732. DOI: 10.18352/ijc.28
  9. 9Bárdi, N., & Pál, J. (Eds.) (2016). Székelyföld története III. Budapest. MTA BTK.
  10. 10Bárth, J. (2010). Székely közbirtokosságok a 20. század első felében. Az Eszterházy Károly Főiskola tudományos közleményei (Új sorozat 38. köt.). 5163.
  11. 11Barthel, S., Crumley, C. L., & Svedin, U. (2013). Biocultural refugia: combating the erosion of diversity in landscapes of food production. Ecology and Society, 18(4). DOI: 10.5751/ES-06207-180471
  12. 12Baur, I., & Binder, C. R. (2013). Adapting to socioeconomic developments by changing rules in the governance of common property pastures in the Swiss Alps. Ecology and Society, 18(4). DOI: 10.5751/ES-05689-180460
  13. 13Beltrán Tapia, F. J. (2010). Diversity of economic landscapes and common land persistence in 19th century Spain: an interpretative proposal (No. 1009). Asociación Española de Historia Económica.
  14. 14Berkes, F. (2012). Sacred Ecology. New York, NY: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780203123843
  15. 15Berkes, F., Colding, J., & Folke, C. (Eds.) (2008). Navigating social-ecological systems: building resilience for complexity and change. Cambridge University Press.
  16. 16Bogataj, N. (2017). The Commons, European Heritage of the Local Collective Action. Sapere l’Europa, sapere d’Europa, 4, 335.
  17. 17Bogataj, N., & Kr, J. (2014). A forest commons revival in Slovenia. Society & Natural Resources, 27(8), 867881. DOI: 10.1080/08941920.2014.918225
  18. 18Bürgi, M., & Russell, E. W. (2001). Integrative methods to study landscape changes. Land use policy, 18(1), 916. DOI: 10.1016/S0264-8377(00)00041-7
  19. 19Capra, F. (1982). The Turning Point: A New Vision of Reality. Futurist, 16(6), 1924.
  20. 20Cox, M., Arnold, G., & Tomás, S. V. (2010). A review of design principles for community-based natural resource management. Ecology and Society, 15(4). DOI: 10.5751/ES-03704-150438
  21. 21Curtis, D. (2013). Tine de Moor’s ‘Silent Revolution’. Reconsidering her theoretical framework for explaining the emergence of institutions for collective management of resources. International Journal of the Commons, 7(1). DOI: 10.18352/ijc.354
  22. 22Curtis, D. R. (2016a). Coping with crisis: The resilience and vulnerability of pre-industrial settlements. Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781315574233
  23. 23Curtis, D. R. (2016b). Did the Commons Make Medieval and Early Modern Rural Societies More Equitable? A Survey of Evidence from across Western Europe, 1300–1800. Journal of agrarian change, 16(4), 646664. DOI: 10.1111/joac.12101
  24. 24Csiby, A. (1939). A székely közbirtokossági vagyonok eredete, történelmi és jogi fejlődése az ősfoglalástól napjainkig: különös tekintettel Ditró es Szárhegy községek borszéki közbirtokosságának borezéki közös vagyonára.
  25. 25De Keyzer, M. (2018). Inclusive commons and the sustainability of peasant communities in the medieval Low Countries. Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781315167060
  26. 26De Moor, T. (2008). The silent revolution: A new perspective on the emergence of commons, guilds, and other forms of corporate collective action in Western Europe. International review of social history, 53(S16), 179212. DOI: 10.1017/S0020859008003660
  27. 27De Moor, T., Laborda-Pemán, M., Lana-Berasain, J. M., Van Weeren, R., & Winchester, A. (2016). Ruling the commons. Introducing a new methodology for the analysis of historical commons. International Journal of the Commons, 10(2). DOI: 10.18352/ijc.760
  28. 28Egyed, Á. (2002). Falu, város, civilizáció: fejezetek Erdély gazdaság-és társadalomtörtenetéből, 1848–1914. Kriterion.
  29. 29Egyed, Á. (2007). A székelyek rövid története a megtelepedéstől 1918-ig.
  30. 30Egyed, Á., Hermann, G. M., & Oborni, T. (Eds.) (2016). Székelyföld története II. Budapest. MTA BTK.
  31. 31Egyed, Á., & Magyari, A. (Eds.) (2001). A székelység története a 17–19. században. Pallas-Akadémia Könyvkiadó. Csíkszereda
  32. 32Endfield, G. H. (2012). The resilience and adaptive capacity of social-environmental systems in colonial Mexico. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(10), 36763681. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1114831109
  33. 33Fischer, J., Hartel, T., & Kuemmerle, T. (2012). Conservation policy in traditional farming landscapes. Conservation letters, 5(3), 167175. DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-263X.2012.00227.x
  34. 34Folke, C. (2006). Resilience: The emergence of a perspective for social–ecological systems analyses. Global environmental change, 16(3), 253267. DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.002
  35. 35Folke, C., Colding, J., & Berkes, F. (2003). Synthesis: building resilience and adaptive capacity in social-ecological systems. Navigating social-ecological systems: Building resilience for complexity and change, 9(1), 352387.
  36. 36Folke, C., Pritchard, L., Jr., Berkes, F., Colding, J., & Svedin, U. (2007). The problem of fit between ecosystems and institutions: ten years later. Ecology and society, 12(1). DOI: 10.5751/ES-02064-120130
  37. 37Garda, D. (2002a). A székely közbirtokosság l. Csíkszereda
  38. 38Garda, D. (2002b). A székely közbirtokosság ll. Csíkszereda
  39. 39Gatto, P., & Bogataj, N. (2015). Disturbances, robustness and adaptation in forest commons: Comparative insights from two cases in the Southeastern Alps. Forest Policy and Economics, 58, 5664. DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2015.03.011
  40. 40Hanspach, J., Hartel, T., Milcu, A. I., Mikulcak, F., Dorresteijn, I., Loos, J., … & Fischer, J. (2014). A holistic approach to studying social-ecological systems and its application to southern Transylvania. Ecology and Society, 19(4). DOI: 10.5751/ES-06915-190432
  41. 41Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons: the population problem has no technical solution; it requires a fundamental extension in morality. Science, 162(3859), 12431248. DOI: 10.1126/science.162.3859.1243
  42. 42Hartel, T., Fischer, J., Câmpeanu, C., Milcu, A. I., Hanspach, J., & Fazey, I. (2014). The importance of ecosystem services for rural inhabitants in a changing cultural landscape in Romania. Ecology and society, 19(2). DOI: 10.5751/ES-06333-190242
  43. 43Hartel, T., Olga Réti, K., Craioveanu, C., Gallé, R., Popa, R., Ioni, A., … & Czúcz, B. (2016). Rural social–ecological systems navigating institutional transitions: case study from Transylvania (Romania). Ecosystem Health and Sustainability, 2(2), e01206. DOI: 10.1002/ehs2.1206
  44. 44Holling, C. S. (1973). Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual review of ecology and systematics, 4(1), 123. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
  45. 45Imreh, I. (1973). A rendtartó székely falu. Kriterion
  46. 46Imreh, I. (1983). A törvényhozó székely falu. Kriterion.
  47. 47Iordachescu, G. (2022). Convivial conservation prospects in Europe—from wilderness protection to reclaiming the commons. Conservation and Society. DOI: 10.4103/cs.cs_35_21
  48. 48Iordchescu, G., Varga, A., Vasile, M., & Opincaru, I. S. (2021). Homoródfalva Közbirtokosság. The Christmas village of Romania, In: ICCA Consortium. 2021. Territories of Life: 2021 Report. ICCA Consortium: worldwide.
  49. 49Mantescu, L., & Vasile, M. (2009). Property reforms in rural Romania and community-based forests. Romanian Sociology, 7(2), 95113.
  50. 50Mapire – Historical Maps Online, First Military Survey. URL https://mapire.eu/hu/map/firstsurvey-hungary/?layers=147
  51. 51Mateescu, O. (2017). Serial anachronism: Re-assembling Romanian forest commons (Doctoral dissertation).
  52. 52Mateescu, O. (2021). Value and distributive repair. Dialectical Anthropology, 45(1), 2945. DOI: 10.1007/s10624-020-09618-x
  53. 53Molnár, Z., Gellény, K., Margóczi, K., & Biró, M. (2015). Landscape ethnoecological knowledge base and management of ecosystem services in a Székely-Hungarian pre-capitalistic village system (Transylvania, Romania). Journal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine, 11(1), 122. DOI: 10.1186/1746-4269-11-3
  54. 54O’Grady, T., & Tagliapietra, C. (2017). Biological welfare and the commons: A natural experiment in the Alps, 1765–1845. Economics & Human Biology, 27, 137153. DOI: 10.1016/j.ehb.2017.05.008
  55. 55Opincaru, I. S. (2021). Elements of the institutionalization process of the forest and pasture commons in Romania as particular forms of social economy. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 92(1), 101118. DOI: 10.1111/apce.12294
  56. 56Oroszi, S. (1995). Emlékezés a székely közösségek erdőire. Országos Erdészeti Egyesület, Erdészettörténeti Szakosztály.
  57. 57Oroszi, S. (2010). Arányosítások a székely közbirtokosságokban. Az Eszterházy Károly Főiskola tudományos közleményei (Új sorozat 38. köt.). 3336.
  58. 58Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge university press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511807763
  59. 59Ostrom, E. 2005. Understanding Institutional Diversity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  60. 60Ostrom, E. (2007). A diagnostic approach for going beyond panaceas. Proceedings of the national Academy of sciences, 104(39), 1518115187. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0702288104
  61. 61Ostrom, E. (2009). A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science, 325(5939), 419422. DOI: 10.1126/science.1172133
  62. 62Ostrom, E. (2014). Do institutions for collective action evolve?. Journal of Bioeconomics, 16(1), 330. DOI: 10.1007/s10818-013-9154-8
  63. 63Ostrom, E., & Janssen, M. A. (2004). Multi-level governance and resilience of social-ecological systems. In Globalisation, poverty and conflict (pp. 239259). Dordrecht: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/1-4020-2858-X_13
  64. 64Pemán, M. L., & De Moor, T. (2013). A tale of two commons. Some preliminary hypotheses on the long-term development of the commons in Western and Eastern Europe, 11th–19th centuries. International Journal of the Commons, 7(1). DOI: 10.18352/ijc.355
  65. 65Polányi, K. (1944). The Great Transformation. (Vol. 2, p. 145). Boston: Beacon press.
  66. 66Schwartz, S. H. (2012). An overview of the Schwartz theory of basic values. Online readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1), 23070919. DOI: 10.9707/2307-0919.1116
  67. 67Stahl, H. H. (1992). A régi román falu és öröksége. Eötvös Loránd Tudományegyetem Bölcsészettudományi Kar, Román Filológiai Tanszék.
  68. 68Sutcliffe, L., Paulini, I., Jones, G., Marggraf, R., & Page, N. (2013). Pastoral commons use in Romania and the role of the Common Agricultural Policy. International Journal of the Commons, 7(1). DOI: 10.18352/ijc.367
  69. 69Szabó, Á. T. (2009). Kooperáló közösségek: munkavégzés és kapcsolatok a falusi gazdálkodásban. Mentor.
  70. 70Szántay, A. (2015). Rural commons in eighteenth-century Hungary. Rural Commons, 6878.
  71. 71van Bavel, B. (2010). Rural Revolts and Structural Change in the Low Countries, Thirteenth-Early Fourteenth Centuries. Survival and discord in medieval society. Essays in honour of Christopher Dyer, 249268. DOI: 10.1484/M.TMC-EB.3.4217
  72. 72van Gils, H., Siegl, G., & Bennett, R. M. (2014). The living commons of West Tyrol, Austria: Lessons for land policy and land administration. Land Use Policy, 38, 1625. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.10.011
  73. 73Van Zanden, J. L. (1999). Chaloner Memorial Lecture: The Paradox of the Marks. The Exploitation of Commons in the Eastern Netherlands, 1250–1850. The Agricultural History Review, 125144.
  74. 74Vasile, M. (2017). The commons and the cash economy: financialization and distance in the forest and pasture commons of the Romanian Carpathians.
  75. 75Vasile, M. (2018). Formalizing commons, registering rights: The making of the forest and pasture commons in the Romanian Carpathians from the 19th century to post-socialism. International Journal of the Commons, 12(1). DOI: 10.18352/ijc.805
  76. 76Vasile, M. (2019). Forest and Pasture Commons in Romania. Territories of Life, Potential ICCAs: Country Report. 53 pp.
  77. 77Vázquez, I. (2020). Toward an Integrated History to Govern the Commons: Using the Archive to Enhance Local Knowledge. International Journal of the Commons, 14(1). DOI: 10.5334/ijc.989
  78. 78Whiteman, G., & Cooper, W. H. (2000). Ecological embeddedness. Academy of Management Journal, 43(6), 12651282. DOI: 10.2307/1556349
  79. 79Winchester, A. J., & Straughton, E. A. (2010). Stints and sustainability: managing stock levels on common land in England, c. 1600–2006. Agricultural History Review, 58(1), 3048.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/ijc.1187 | Journal eISSN: 1875-0281
Language: English
Submitted on: Feb 9, 2022
Accepted on: Sep 11, 2022
Published on: Oct 7, 2022
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2022 Johanna Hartmann, Miklós Bán, Zoltán Barta, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.