Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Cui Bono: Do Open Source Software Incubator Policies and Procedures Benefit the Projects or the Incubator? Cover

Cui Bono: Do Open Source Software Incubator Policies and Procedures Benefit the Projects or the Incubator?

Open Access
|Apr 2022

References

  1. 1Alonso de Magdaleno, M. I., & Garcia-Garcia, J. (2015). Sustainability and social responsibility reporting in open source software. International Journal of the Commons, 9(1), 369. DOI: 10.18352/ijc.503
  2. 2ASF. (2021a). The Apache Incubator. https://incubator.apache.org/
  3. 3ASF. (2021b). Briefing: The Apache Way. https://www.apache.org/theapacheway/
  4. 4ASF. (2021c). Incubation Policy. http://people.apache.org/~geirm/incubator/incubation_policy.html
  5. 5ASF. (2021d). What is the ASF? https://www.apache.org/foundation/
  6. 6Barnard, G. A. (1947). Significance Tests for 2 × 2 Tables. Biometrika, 34(1/2), 123. DOI: 10.2307/2332517
  7. 7Benkler, Y. (2008). The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom. Yale University Press. DOI: 10.12987/9780300127232
  8. 8Berger, R. L. (1994). Power Comparison of Exact Unconditional Tests for Comparing Two Binomial Proportions. 16.
  9. 9Boschloo, R. D. (1970). Raised conditional level of significance for the 2 × 2-table when testing the equality of two probabilities. Statistica Neerlandica, 24(1), 19. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9574.1970.tb00104.x
  10. 10Brudney, J. L., & Meijs, L. C. P. M. (2009). It Ain’t Natural: Toward a New (Natural) Resource Conceptualization for Volunteer Management. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 38(4), 564581. DOI: 10.1177/0899764009333828
  11. 11Cox, M., Arnold, G., & Tomás, S. V. (2010). A Review of Design Principles for Community-based Natural Resource Management. Ecology and Society, 15(4). JSTOR. DOI: 10.5751/ES-03704-150438
  12. 12Crawford, S. E. S., & Ostrom, E. (1995). A Grammar of Institutions. American Political Science Review, 89(3), 582600. DOI: 10.2307/2082975
  13. 13David, P. A., & Shapiro, J. S. (2008). Community-based production of open-source software: What do we know about the developers who participate? Information Economics and Policy, 20(4), 364398. DOI: 10.1016/j.infoecopol.2008.10.001
  14. 14Free Software Foundation. (2021). What is Copyleft? https://www.gnu.org/licenses/copyleft.en.html
  15. 15Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (2017). Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780203793206
  16. 16Grant, L., & Langpap, C. (2019). Private provision of public goods by environmental groups. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(12), 53345340. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1805336115
  17. 17Hahn, R. W. (2004). The Economic Analysis of Regulation: A Response to the Critics. The University of Chicago Law Review, 71(3), 10211054. JSTOR.
  18. 18Hayes, A. F., & Krippendorff, K. (2007). Answering the Call for a Standard Reliability Measure for Coding Data. Communication Methods and Measures, 1(1), 7789. DOI: 10.1080/19312450709336664
  19. 19Hertel, G., Niedner, S., & Herrmann, S. (2003). Motivation of software developers in Open Source projects: An Internet-based survey of contributors to the Linux kernel. Research Policy, 32(7), 11591177. DOI: 10.1016/S0048-7333(03)00047-7
  20. 20Hess, C., & Ostrom, E. (2007). Understanding Knowledge as a Commons: From Theory to Practice. MIT Press. DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/6980.001.0001
  21. 21Hughes, J. (2021). krippendorffsalpha: An R Package for Measuring Agreement Using Krippendorff’s Alpha Coefficient. ArXiv:2103.12170 [Stat]. http://arxiv.org/abs/2103.12170
  22. 22Islam, M., Miller, J., & Park, H. D. (2017). But what will it cost me? How do private costs of participation affect open source software projects? Research Policy, 46(6), 10621070. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2017.05.005
  23. 23Izquierdo, J. L. C., & Cabot, J. (2020). A Survey of Software Foundations in Open Source. ArXiv Preprint ArXiv:2005.10063. http://arxiv.org/abs/2005.10063
  24. 24Khudairi, S. (2019, March 19). The Apache Way to Sustainable Open Source Success. The Apache Software Foundation Blog. https://blogs.apache.org/foundation/entry/the-apache-way-to-sustainable
  25. 25Lakhani, K., & Wolf, R. G. (2003). Why Hackers Do What They Do: Understanding Motivation and Effort in Free/Open Source Software Projects. SSRN Electronic Journal. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.443040
  26. 26Leprince-Ringuet, D. (2021, February 8). How much are open-source developers really worth? Hundreds of billions of dollars, say economists. ZDNet. https://www.zdnet.com/article/how-much-are-open-source-developers-really-worth-hundreds-of-billions-of-dollars-say-economists/
  27. 27MacQuillin, I. (2015, September 4). OPINION: The fundraising commons – not quite the tragedy we might think. http://blogs.plymouth.ac.uk/criticalfundraising/2015/09/04/opinion-the-fundraising-commons-not-quite-the-tragedy-we-might-think/
  28. 28OMB. (2020). 2018, 2019, and 2020 Report to Congress on the Benefits and Costs of Federal Regulations and Agency Compliance with the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act. https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/2018_2019_2020-OMB-Cost-Benefit-Report.pdf
  29. 29Ostrom, E. (2009). Understanding Institutional Diversity. In Understanding Institutional Diversity. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400831739. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctt7s7wm
  30. 30Ostrom, V., & Ostrom, E. (1977). Public Goods and Public Choices. In E. S. Savas (Ed.), Alternatives for Delivering Public Services. Routledge.
  31. 31Pearson, K. (1900). On the criterion that a given system of deviations from the probable in the case of a correlated system of variables is such that it can be reasonably supposed to have arisen from random sampling. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science, 50(302), 157175. DOI: 10.1080/14786440009463897
  32. 32Posner, E., & Weyl, E. G. (2013). Benefit-Cost Analysis for Financial Regulation. American Economic Review, 103(3), 393397. DOI: 10.1257/aer.103.3.393
  33. 33Rice, D., Siddiki, S., Frey, S., Kwon, J. H., & Sawyer, A. (2021). Machine coding of policy texts with the Institutional Grammar. Public Administration, 99(2), 248262. DOI: 10.1111/padm.12711
  34. 34Riehle, D., & Berschneider, S. (2012). A Model of Open Source Developer Foundations. In I. Hammouda, B. Lundell, T. Mikkonen, & W. Scacchi (Eds.), Open Source Systems: Long-Term Sustainability, 378, 1528. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-33442-9_2
  35. 35Roberts, R. D. (1987). Financing Public Goods. Journal of Political Economy, 95(2), 420. DOI: 10.1086/261463
  36. 36Schweik, C. M., & English, R. C. (2012). Internet Success: A Study of Open-Source Software Commons. MIT Press. DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/9780262017251.001.0001
  37. 37Schweik, C. M., & English, R. (2013). Preliminary steps toward a general theory of internet-based collective-action in digital information commons: Findings from a study of open source software projects. International Journal of the Commons, 7(2), 234. DOI: 10.18352/ijc.397
  38. 38Sickles, R. C., & Zelenyuk, V. (2019). Measurement of Productivity and Efficiency: Theory and Practice (1st ed.). Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/9781139565981
  39. 39Siegel, P. H., O’Shaughnessy, J. J., & Franz, D. P. (2009). The Sarbanes-Oxley Act: A Cost Benefit Analysis Using the U.S. Banking Industry. SSRN Electronic Journal. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1608962
  40. 40Sugden, R. (1984). Reciprocity: The Supply of Public Goods Through Voluntary Contributions. The Economic Journal, 94(376), 772787. DOI: 10.2307/2232294
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/ijc.1176 | Journal eISSN: 1875-0281
Language: English
Submitted on: Dec 31, 2021
Accepted on: Apr 11, 2022
Published on: Apr 29, 2022
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2022 Anamika Sen, Curtis Atkisson, Charlie Schweik, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.