Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Commoning Semantic Interoperability in Healthcare Cover

Commoning Semantic Interoperability in Healthcare

International Journal of the Commons
Volume 16 (2022): Issue 1
By: Mate Bestek,  Erik Grönvall and  Joanna Saad-Sulonen  
Open Access
|Aug 2022

References

  1. 1Abbott, R. (2017). The sentinel initiative as a knowledge commons. Governing Medical Knowledge Commons, 823(110), 121–143. DOI: 10.1017/9781316544587.007
    Back to article
  2. 2Adel, E., El-Sappagh, S., Barakat, S., & Elmogy, M. (2019). Chapter 13—Ontology-based electronic health record semantic interoperability: A survey. In N. Dey, A. S. Ashour, S. J. Fong, & S. B. T.-U.-H. M. S. Borra (Eds.), Advances in ubiquitous sensing applications for healthcare (pp. 315–352). Academic Press. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-815370-3.00013-X
    Back to article
  3. 3Araral, E. (2009). What Explains Collective Action in the Commons? Theory and Evidence from the Philippines. World Development, 37(3), 687–697. DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2008.08.002
    Back to article
  4. 4Ashrafi, N., Kuilboer, J. P., & Stull, T. (2018). Semantic interoperability in healthcare: Challenges and roadblocks. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 2107, 119–122.
    Back to article
  5. 5Benfeldt, O., Persson, J. S., & Madsen, S. (2020). Data Governance as a Collective Action Problem. Information Systems Frontiers, 22(2), 299–313. DOI: 10.1007/s10796-019-09923-z
    Back to article
  6. 6Bestek, M. (2021). Democratizing health data semantics—A commons-based technology-enhanced activity space to support productive work with health data semantics [Doctoral, IT University of Copenhagen]. https://en.itu.dk/-/media/EN/Research/PhD-Programme/PhD-defences/2022/PhD-Thesis-Temporary-Verstion-Mate-Bestek-pdf.pdf
    Back to article
  7. 7Bollier, D., & Helfrich, S. (2019). Free, fair, and alive: The insurgent power of the commons. https://catalog.library.vanderbilt.edu/discovery/fulldisplay/alma991043706481903276/01VAN_INST:vanui
    Back to article
  8. 8Bollinger, J. M., Zuk, P. D., Majumder, M. A., Versalovic, E., Villanueva, A. G., Hsu, R. L., McGuire, A. L., & Cook-Deegan, R. (2019). What is a medical information commons? Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics, 47(1), 41–50. DOI: 10.1177/1073110519840483
    Back to article
  9. 9Bonnedahl, K. J. (2014). Local Management of a Global Commons? : The Case of Climate Standard Development in the Swedish Food Sector. International Journal of Business and Management, 9(11), 31–47. DOI: 10.5539/ijbm.v9n11p31
    Back to article
  10. 10Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming Qualitative Information. SAGE Publications, Inc. https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/transforming-qualitative-information/book7714
    Back to article
  11. 11Bubela, T., Genuis, S. K., Janjua, N. Z., Krajden, M., Mittmann, N., Podolak, K., & Svenson, L. W. (2019). Medical information commons to support learning healthcare systems: Examples from canada. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics, 47(1), 97–105. DOI: 10.1177/1073110519840488
    Back to article
  12. 12Carpentier, P. (2021). Open source hardware, exploring how industry regulation affects knowledge commons governance: An exploratory case study. International Journal of the Commons, 15(1), 154–169. DOI: 10.5334/ijc.1081
    Back to article
  13. 13Cinner, J. E., & McClanahan, T. R. (2006). Socioeconomic factors that lead to overfishing in small-scale coral reef fisheries of Papua New Guinea. Environmental Conservation, 33(1), 73–80. Cambridge Core. DOI: 10.1017/S0376892906002748
    Back to article
  14. 14Contreras, J. L., & Knoppers, B. M. (2018). The Genomic Commons. Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics, 19(1), 429–453. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-genom-083117-021552
    Back to article
  15. 15Cumbers, A. (2015). Constructing a global commons in, against and beyond the state. Space and Polity, 19(1), 62–75. DOI: 10.1080/13562576.2014.995465
    Back to article
  16. 16Daniel, C., Ouagne, D., Sadou, E., Forsberg, K., Gilchrist, M. M., Zapletal, E., Paris, N., Hussain, S., Jaulent, M.-C., & Kalra, D. (2016). Cross border semantic interoperability for clinical research: The EHR4CR semantic resources and services. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science Proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science, 2016, 51–59. DOI: 10.1002/lrh2.10014
    Back to article
  17. 17Desouza, K. C. (2008). Understanding knowledge as a commons: From theory to practice. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(2), 333–334. DOI: 10.1002/asi.20747
    Back to article
  18. 18Deverka, P. A., Gilmore, D., Richmond, J., Smith, Z., Mangrum, R., Koenig, B. A., Cook-Deegan, R., Villanueva, A. G., Majumder, M. A., & McGuire, A. L. (2019). Hopeful and concerned: Public input on building a trustworthy medical information commons. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics: A Journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 47(1), 70–87. DOI: 10.1177/1073110519840486
    Back to article
  19. 19Dulong de Rosnay, M., & Stalder, F. (2020). Digital commons. Internet Policy Review, 9(4), 15 p. DOI: 10.14763/2020.4.1530
    Back to article
  20. 20Ellaway, R., Poulton, T., Fors, U., McGee, J., & Albright, S. (2008). Building a virtual patient commons. Medical Teacher, 30(2), 170–174. DOI: 10.1080/01421590701874074
    Back to article
  21. 21Ellingsen, G., & Monteiro, E. (2003). A patchwork planet: Integration and cooperation in hospitals. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 12(1), 71–95. DOI: 10.1023/A:1022469522932
    Back to article
  22. 22Evans, B. J. (2017). Genomic data commons. In Governing medical knowledge commons (pp. 74–101). Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/9781316544587.005
    Back to article
  23. 23Flowers, S. (2017). Chronic disease, new thinking, and outlaw innovation: Patients on the edge in the knowledge commons. In Governing medical knowledge commons (pp. 326–347). Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/9781316544587.015
    Back to article
  24. 24Frexia, F., Mascia, C., Lianas, L., Delussu, G., Sulis, A., Meloni, V., Del Rio, M., & Zanetti, G. (2021). OpenEHR is FAIR-Enabling by Design [Preprint]. Health Informatics. DOI: 10.1101/2021.02.18.21251988
    Back to article
  25. 25Fuchs, C. (2020). The Ethics of the Digital Commons. Journal of Media Ethics, 35(2), 112–126. DOI: 10.1080/23736992.2020.1736077
    Back to article
  26. 26Gamal, A., Barakat, S., & Rezk, A. (2021). Standardized electronic health record data modeling and persistence: A comparative review. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 114, 103670. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2020.103670
    Back to article
  27. 27Geary, J., & Bubela, T. (2019). Governance of a global genetic resource commons for non-commercial research: A case-study of the DNA barcode commons. International Journal of the Commons, 13(1), 205–243. DOI: 10.18352/ijc.859
    Back to article
  28. 28Hall, M. A., & Schulman, K. A. (2010). Property, privacy, and the pursuit of integrated electronic medical records. The Fragmentation of U.S. Health Care: Causes and Solutions. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195390131.003.008
    Back to article
  29. 29Hasan, M. B., Driessen, P. P. J., Majumder, S., Zoomers, A., & Laerhoven, F. van. (2020). A Community Management Plus Model for the Governance of Rural Drinking Water Systems: A Comparative Case Study of Pond Sand Filter Systems in Bangladesh. International Journal of the Commons, 14(1), 662–679. DOI: 10.5334/ijc.1006
    Back to article
  30. 30Hess, C. (2008). Mapping the new commons. SSRN Electronic Journal. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1356835
    Back to article
  31. 31Institute Of Medicine, I. (2013). A continuously learning health care system. In M. Smith, R. Saunders, L. Stuckhardt, & M. J. McGinnis (Eds.), Best care at lower cost: The path to continuously learning health care in america. The National Academies Press. DOI: 10.17226/13444
    Back to article
  32. 32Jormanainen, V. (2018). Large-scale implementation and adoption of the Finnish national Kanta services in 2010–2017: A prospective, longitudinal, indicator-based study. Finnish Journal of EHealth and EWelfare, 10(4), 381–395. DOI: 10.23996/fjhw.74511
    Back to article
  33. 33Laerhoven, F. van, Schoon, M., & Villamayor-Tomas, S. (2020). Celebrating the 30th Anniversary of Ostrom’s Governing the Commons: Traditions and Trends in the Study of the Commons, Revisited. International Journal of the Commons, 14(1), 208–224. DOI: 10.5334/ijc.1030
    Back to article
  34. 34Larson, M., & Chon, M. (2017). The greatest generational impact: Open neuroscience as an emerging knowledge commons. In Governing medical knowledge commons, 27, 166–191. Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/9781316544587.009
    Back to article
  35. 35Lazo, K. (2019). Governing the Health Commons: An Institutional Analysis and Development (Iad) Framework on Health Devolution in Greater Manchester [Doctoral, Manchester Metropolitan University]. http://e-space.mmu.ac.uk/626071/
    Back to article
  36. 36Linebaugh, P. (2008). The Magna Carta manifesto: Liberties and commons for all. University of California Press. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=213412. DOI: 10.1525/9780520932708
    Back to article
  37. 37Lohmann, R. A. (2016). The Ostroms’ Commons Revisited. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 45(4_suppl), 27–42S. DOI: 10.1177/0899764016643613
    Back to article
  38. 38Marchetti, A., Strandburg, K. J., Frischmann, B. M., & Madison, M. J. (2017). Governing medical knowledge commons. In Cambridge studies on governing knowledge commons (pp. 1–9). Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/9781316544587
    Back to article
  39. 39Marttila, S., Botero, A., & Saad-Sulonen, J. (2014a). Towards commons design in participatory design. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 2(July 2017), 9–12. DOI: 10.1145/2662155.2662187
    Back to article
  40. 40Marttila, S., Botero, A., & Saad-Sulonen, J. (2014b). Towards commons design in participatory design. Proceedings of the 13th Participatory Design Conference: Short Papers, Industry Cases, Workshop Descriptions, Doctoral Consortium Papers, and Keynote Abstracts – Volume 2, 9–12. DOI: 10.1145/2662155.2662187
    Back to article
  41. 41Matthiesen, S., & Bjørn, P. (2015). Why replacing legacy systems is so hard in global software development: An information infrastructure perspective. CSCW 2015 – Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing, 876–890. DOI: 10.1145/2675133.2675232
    Back to article
  42. 42Mattioli, M. (2017). Cancer: From a kingdom to a commons. In Governing medical knowledge commons (pp. 144–165). Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/9781316544587.008
    Back to article
  43. 43Mazzucato, M. (2018). The value of everything: Making and taking in the global economy.
    Back to article
  44. 44Mcginnis, M., & Ostrom, E. (1992). DESIGN PRINCIPLES FOR LOCAL AND GLOBAL COMMONS. Linking Local and Global Commons.
    Back to article
  45. 45McGuire, A. L., Majumder, M. A., Villanueva, A. G., Bardill, J., Bollinger, J. M., Boerwinkle, E., Bubela, T., Deverka, P. A., Evans, B. J., Garrison, N. A., Glazer, D., Goldstein, M. M., Greely, H. T., Kahn, S. D., Knoppers, B. M., Koenig, B. A., Lambright, J. M., Mattison, J. E., O’Donnell, C., … Cook-Deegan, R. (2019). Importance of participant-centricity and trust for a sustainable medical information commons. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics: A Journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 47(1), 12–20. DOI: 10.1177/1073110519840480
    Back to article
  46. 46Min, L., Atalag, K., Tian, Q., Chen, Y., & Lu, X. (2021). Verifying the Feasibility of Implementing Semantic Interoperability in Different Countries Based on the OpenEHR Approach: Comparative Study of Acute Coronary Syndrome Registries. JMIR Medical Informatics, 9(10), e31288. DOI: 10.2196/31288
    Back to article
  47. 47Oliveira, P., Zejnilović, L., & Canhão, H. (2017). Challenges and opportunities in developing and sharing solutions by patients and caregivers: The story of a knowledge commons for the patient innovation project. In Governing medical knowledge commons (pp. 301–325). Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/9781316544587.014
    Back to article
  48. 48OpenEHR.org. (2021, July 18). https://openehr.org/about/what_is_openehr
    Back to article
  49. 49Ostrom, E. (1990). The evolution of institutions for collective action. Political Economy of Institutions and Decisions, 280. https://doi.org/10/ghm753
    Back to article
  50. 50Ostrom, E. (2005). Understanding Institutional Diversity. New Jersey: Princeton University Press. DOI: 10.1515/9781400831739
    Back to article
  51. 51Ostrom, E. (2010). Analyzing collective action. Agricultural Economics, 41(s1), 155–166. DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-0862.2010.00497.x
    Back to article
  52. 52Ostrom, E. (2012). Nested externalities and polycentric institutions: Must we wait for global solutions to climate change before taking actions at other scales? Economic Theory, 49(2), 353–369. DOI: 10.1007/s00199-010-0558-6
    Back to article
  53. 53Ostrom, E., Burger, J., Field, C. B., Norgaard, R. B., & Policansky, D. (1999). Revisiting the Commons: Local Lessons, Global Challenges. Science, 284(5412), 278–282. DOI: 10.1126/science.284.5412.278
    Back to article
  54. 54Pazaitis, A., & Drechsler, W. (2021). Peer production and state theory: Envisioning a cooperative partner state. In M. O’Neill, C. Pentzold, & S. Toupin (Eds.), The handbook of peer production (pp. 359–370). Wiley-Blackwell. https://www.wiley.com/en-au/The+Handbook+of+Peer+Production-p-9781119537090. DOI: 10.1002/9781119537151.ch27
    Back to article
  55. 55Pitt, J., & Diaconescu, A. (2014). The Algorithmic Governance Of Common-Pool Resources. In From Bitcoin to Burning Man and Beyond: The Quest for Identity and Autonomy in a Digital Society (pp. 133–145). Edited by John H. Clippinger and David Bollier, Published by ID3 in cooperation with Off the Common Books. https://hal.telecom-paris.fr/hal-02287022
    Back to article
  56. 56Poblet, M., & Sierra, C. (2020). Understanding Help as a Commons. International Journal of the Commons, 14(1), 481–493. DOI: 10.5334/ijc.1029
    Back to article
  57. 57Poderi, G. (2018). The subjects of/in commoning and the affective dimension of infrastructuring the commons. The Journal of Peer Production, 14: Infrastructuring the Commons today, when STS meets ICT.
    Back to article
  58. 58Poderi, G. (2019). Sustaining platforms as commons: Perspectives on participation, infrastructure, and governance. CoDesign, 15(3), 243–255. DOI: 10.1080/15710882.2019.1631351
    Back to article
  59. 59Poderi, G. (2020). The subjects of/in commoning and the affective dimension of infrastructuring the commons. Journal of Peer Production, 14.
    Back to article
  60. 60Poderi, G. (2021). On commoners’ daily struggles: Carving out the when/where of commoning. in Ephemera: theory & politics in organization, 21, 73–93.
    Back to article
  61. 61Potts, J. (2019). Innovation commons: The origin of economic growth. Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780190937492.001.0001
    Back to article
  62. 62Premrl, T., Udovč, A., Bogataj, N., & Krč, J. (2015). From restitution to revival: A case of commons re-establishment and restitution in Slovenia. Forest Policy and Economics, 59, 19–26. DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2015.05.004
    Back to article
  63. 63Price, D. (2013). ELearning: From the enclosure to the global learning commons. ELearn, 2013(11). DOI: 10.1145/2541915.2538510
    Back to article
  64. 64Sachdeva, S., & Bhalla, S. (2010). Semantic interoperability in healthcare information for EHR databases. In S. Kikuchi, S. Sachdeva, & S. Bhalla (Eds.), Databases in networked information systems (pp. 157–173). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-12038-1_11
    Back to article
  65. 65Salazar, G., & Cerna, N. (2020). Sustainability and the future of the commons. An epistemological examination. In L. Valera & J. C. Castilla (Eds.), Global changes: Ethics, politics and environment in the contemporary technological world (pp. 111–119). Springer International Publishing. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-29443-4_10
    Back to article
  66. 66Scholz, T. (2016). Uberworked and underpaid: How workers are disrupting the digital economy. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
    Back to article
  67. 67Schweik, C. M., & English, R. (2007). Tragedy of the FOSS commons? Investigating the institutional designs of free/libre and open source software projects. First Monday. DOI: 10.5210/fm.v12i2.1619
    Back to article
  68. 68Shkabatur, J. (2018). The global commons of data. In Stanford technology law review (Vol. 22). DOI: 10.7910/DVN/EIAACS.Elliot
    Back to article
  69. 69Simonsen, J., & Robertson, T. (2012). Routledge international handbook of participatory design. Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780203108543
    Back to article
  70. 70Stavrides, S. (2016). Common space: The city as commons. /z-wcorg/. DOI: 10.5040/9781350219267
    Back to article
  71. 71Steen, M., Manschot, M., & De Koning, N. (2011). Benefits of Co-design in Service Design Projects. International Journal of Design, 5(2), 53–60.
    Back to article
  72. 72Stern, P. C. (2011). Design principles for global commons: Natural resources and emerging technologies. International Journal of the Commons, 5, 213–232. DOI: 10.18352/ijc.305
    Back to article
  73. 73Strandburg, K. J., & Bechtold, S. (2017). The consortium of eosinophilic gastrointestinal disease researchers (CEGIR): An emerging knowledge commons. In Governing medical knowledge commons (pp. 390–420). Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/9781316544587.017
    Back to article
  74. 74Strandburg, K. J., & Frischmann, B. M. (2017). The north american mitochondrial disease consortium: A developing knowledge commons. In Governing medical knowledge commons (pp. 348–389). Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/9781316544587.016
    Back to article
  75. 75Strandburg, K. J., Frischmann, B. M., & Madison, M. J. (2017). The knowledge commons framework. In Governing medical knowledge commons (pp. 9–18). Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/9781316544587.002
    Back to article
  76. 76Teli, M. (2015). Computing and the common. Hints of a new utopia in participatory design. Aarhus Series on Human Centered Computing, 1(1), 4. DOI: 10.7146/aahcc.v1i1.21318
    Back to article
  77. 77Wilkinson, M. D., Dumontier, M., Aalbersberg, Ij. J., Appleton, G., Axton, M., Baak, A., Blomberg, N., Boiten, J. W., da Silva Santos, L. B., Bourne, P. E., Bouwman, J., Brookes, A. J., Clark, T., Crosas, M., Dillo, I., Dumon, O., Edmunds, S., Evelo, C. T., Finkers, R., … Mons, B. (2016). The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data, 3, 1–9. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2016.18
    Back to article
  78. 78Zhang, G.-Q., Cui, L., Mueller, R., Tao, S., Kim, M., Rueschman, M., Mariani, S., Mobley, D., & Redline, S. (2018). The national sleep research resource: Towards a sleep data commons. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 25(10), 1351–1358. DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocy064
    Back to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/ijc.1157 | Journal eISSN: 1875-0281
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Submitted on: Oct 30, 2021
Accepted on: Jul 7, 2022
Published on: Aug 3, 2022
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Keywords:
semantic interoperability,
commoning,
healthcare,
local commons,
semantic resources governance

© 2022 Mate Bestek, Erik Grönvall, Joanna Saad-Sulonen, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 16 (2022): Issue 1Next article