Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Decentralizing the Governance of Inland Fisheries in the Pacific Region of Colombia Cover

Decentralizing the Governance of Inland Fisheries in the Pacific Region of Colombia

Open Access
|May 2022

References

  1. 1Agrawal, A., & Gibson, C. (1999). Enchantment and Disenchantment: The Role of Community in Natural Resource Conservation. World Development, 27(4), 629649. DOI: 10.1016/S0305-750X(98)00161-2
  2. 2Andersson, K., Evans, T., Gibson, C., & Wright, G. D. (2014). Decentralization and Deforestation: Comparing Local Forest Governance Regimes in Latin America. In A. Duit (Ed.), State and Environment: The Comparative Study of Environmental Governance (pp. 239264). MIT Press. DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/9780262027120.003.0009
  3. 3Andersson, K., & Ostrom, E. (2008). Analyzing decentralized resource regimes from a polycentric perspective. Policy Sciences, 41(1), 7193. DOI: 10.1007/s11077-007-9055-6
  4. 4Armitage, D., De Loë, R., & Plummer, R. (2012). Environmental governance and its implications for conservation practice. Conservation Letters, 5(4), 245255. DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-263X.2012.00238.x
  5. 5Asher, K. (2009). Black and Green: Afro-Colombians, Development, and Nature in the Pacific Lowlands. Durham, North Carolina: Duke University Press. DOI: 10.1215/9780822390879
  6. 6Baquero, S. A. (2014). Los consejos comunitarios del medio Atrato en la vía del posdesarrollo: hacia un modelo deliberativo de organización de las comunidades negras. Bogotá: Universidad Sergio Arboleda. Escuela de Política y Relaciones Internacionales.
  7. 7Bavinck, M., & Salagrama, V. (2008). Assessing the governability of capture fisheries in the Bay of Bengal – a conceptual enquiry. Journal of Transdisciplinary Environmental Studies, 7, 113.
  8. 8Bello, M. N., Jiménez Ocampo, S., Millán, C., & Pulido, B. (2008). Dinámicas regionales del conflicto y el desplazamiento forzado. Chocó, Medio Atrato. (Grupo de Investigación del Desarrollo Social –, Ed.) (Primera Ed). Cartagena, Colombia: Universidad de San Buenaventura.
  9. 9Béné, C., Belal, E., Baba, M. O., Ovie, S., Raji, A., Malasha, I., … Neiland, A. (2009). Power Struggle, Dispute and Alliance Over Local Resources: Analyzing “Democratic” Decentralization of Natural Resources through the Lenses of Africa Inland Fisheries. World Development, 37(12), 19351950. DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2009.05.003
  10. 10Béné, C., & Neiland, A. E. (2006). From Participation to Governance: A critical review of the concepts of governance, co-management and participation, and their implementation in small-scale inland fisheries in developing countries. WorldFish Center Studies and Reviews 29. Penang, Malaysia; Colombo, Sri Lanka: The WorldFish Center & the CGIAR Challenge Program on Water and Food. Retrieved from http://www.waterandfood.org/fileadmin/CPWF_Documents/Documents/Peer-reviewed_papers/Th3Bene___Neiland_2006.pdf
  11. 11Bennett, A. (2004). Case study methods: Design, use, and comparative advantages. In Models, numbers, and cases: Methods for studying international relations (pp. 1955).
  12. 12COCOMACIA. (2002). Medio Atrato: territorio de vida. Bogotá D.C.: Red de Solidaridad Social.
  13. 13COCOMACIA. (2016). Plan de ordenamiento territorial y ambiental (POTA) del Consejo Comunitario Mayor de la Asociación Campesina Integral del Atrato – COCOMACIA (POTA 2016–2027). Quibdó, Colombia: COCOMACIA.
  14. 14DANE. (2018). Necesidades Básicas Insatisfechas – NBI, por total, cabecera y resto, según municipio y nacional.
  15. 15Escobar, A. (2008). Territories of Difference: Place, Movements, Life, Redes. Durham and London: Duke University Press. DOI: 10.1215/9780822389439
  16. 16Feeny, D., Berkes, F., McCay, B. J., & Acheson, J. M. (1990). The Tragedy of the Commons: Twenty-Two Years Later. Human Ecology, 18(1), 119. DOI: 10.1007/BF00889070
  17. 17García, C., Tavera-Escobar, H., Vieira, C., Rincón, C., & Rentería, E. (2014). Fostering Ethno-Territorial Autonomy: A Colombian Case Study of Community-based Conservation of Mangroves. Journal of Latin American Geography, 13(2), 117152. DOI: 10.1353/lag.2014.0019
  18. 18Gibson, C. C., Lehoucq, F. E., & Williams, J. T. (2002). Does Privatization Protect Natural Resources? Property Rights and Forests in Guatemala. Social Science Quarterly, 83(1), 206225. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/42956282. DOI: 10.1111/1540-6237.00079
  19. 19Guggenheim, S. (2006). Crises and Contradictions: Understanding the Origins of a Community Development Project in Indonesia. The Search for Empowerment: Social Capital As Idea and Practice at the World Bank.
  20. 20Herrera Arango, J. (2017). La tenencia de tierras colectivas en Colombia. Datos y tendencias. CIFOR. DOI: 10.17528/cifor/006704
  21. 21INCODER. (2013). Balance de la gestión para el ordenamiento social y productivo del territorio: Incoder 1960–2012. Bogotá D.C., Colombia: Instituto Colombiano para el Desarrollo Rural – Incoder.
  22. 22Larson, A. M., Barry, D., & Ram Dahal, G. (2010). New rights for forest-based communities? Understanding processes of forest tenure reform. International Forestry Review, 12(1), 7896. DOI: 10.1505/ifor.12.1.78
  23. 23Larson, A. M., Pacheco, P., Toni, F., & Vallejo, M. (2007). The Effects of Forestry Decentralization on Access to Livelihood Assets. The Journal of Environment & Development, 16(3), 251268. DOI: 10.1177/1070496507306220
  24. 24Larson, A. M., & Soto, F. (2008). Decentralization of Natural Resource Governance Regimes. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour, 33, 213239. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.environ.33.020607.095522
  25. 25Leal, C. (2018). Landscapes of Freedom: Building a Postemancipation Society in the Rainforests of Western Colombia. In Landscapes of Freedom: Building a Postemancipation Society in the Rainforests of Western Colombia. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctt1zxsmqx
  26. 26Lemos, M. C., & Agrawal, A. (2006). Environmental Governance. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 31(1), 297325. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.energy.31.042605.135621
  27. 27Machado, M., López Matta, D., Campo, M. M., Escobar, A., & Weitzner, V. (2017). Weaving hope in ancestral black territories in Colombia: the reach and limitations of free, prior, and informed consultation and consent. Third World Quarterly, 38(5), 10751091. DOI: 10.1080/01436597.2017.1278686
  28. 28Martínez Basallo, S. P. (2010). La política de titulación colectiva a las comunidades negras del Pacífico colombiano: una mirada desde los actores locales. Boletín de Antropología Universidad de Antioquia, 24(41), 1343.
  29. 29Meinzen-Dick, R., & Knox, A. (1999). Collective Action, Property Rights, and Devolution of Natural Resource Management: A conceptual framework (Workshop d).
  30. 30Myers, N., Mittermeier, R. A., Mittermeier, C. G., da Fonseca, G. A. B., & Kent, J. (2000). Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature, 403(6772), 853858. DOI: 10.1038/35002501
  31. 31Novak, J. M., & Axelrod, M. (2016). Patterns of Multi-Level Fisheries Governance and Their Impact on Fishermen’s Adaptation Strategies in Tamil Nadu, India. Environmental Policy and Governance, 26(1), 4558. DOI: 10.1002/eet.1694
  32. 32Offen, K. H. (2003). The Territorial Turn: Making Black Territories in Pacific Colombia. Journal of Latin American Geography, 2(1), 4373. DOI: 10.1353/lag.2004.0010
  33. 33Oslender, U. (2007). Violence in development: the logic of forced displacement on Colombia’s Pacific coast. Development in Practice, 17(6), 752764. DOI: 10.1080/09614520701628147
  34. 34Oslender, U. (2008). Another History of Violence: The Production of “Geographies of Terror” in Colombia’s Pacific Coast Region. Latin American Perspectives, 35(5), 77102. DOI: 10.1177/0094582X08321961
  35. 35Oslender, U. (2016). The Geographies of Social Movements. Afro-Colombian Mobilization and the Aquatic Space. Durham and London: Duke University Press. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctv11g962q
  36. 36Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. New York: Cambridge University Press Cambridge. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511807763
  37. 37Ostrom, E. (2010). Polycentric systems for coping with collective action and global environmental change. Global Environmental Change, 20(4), 550557. DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.07.004
  38. 38Ostrom, V. (1976). The American experiment in constitutional choice. Public Choice, 27(1), 112. DOI: 10.1007/BF01718942
  39. 39Palacios-Torres, Y., de la Rosa, J. D., & Olivero-Verbel, J. (2020). Trace elements in sediments and fish from Atrato River: an ecosystem with legal rights impacted by gold mining at the Colombian Pacific. Environmental Pollution, 256, 113290. DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113290
  40. 40Patton, M. Q. (2015). Chapter 5. Designing Qualitative Studies. In Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods (Fourth Edi). Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications, Inc.
  41. 41Paulson Priebe, M. E., Evans, T., Andersson, K., & Castellanos, E. J. (2015). Decentralization, forest management, and forest conditions in Guatemala. Journal of Land Use Science, 10(4), 425441. DOI: 10.1080/1747423X.2014.915350
  42. 42Peña, X., Vélez, M. A., Cárdenas, J. C., Perdomo, N., & Matajira, C. (2017). Collective Property Leads to Household Investments: Lessons From Land Titling in Afro-Colombian Communities. World Development, 97, 2748. DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.03.025
  43. 43Plant, R., & Hvalkof, S. (2001). Land Titling and Indigenous Peoples. Sustainable Development Department Technical Papers Series. Washington, DC.: Inter-American Development Bank.
  44. 44Restrepo, E. (2002). Políticas de la alteridad: etnización de “comunidad negra” en el Pacífico Sur colombiano. Journal of Latin American Anthropology, 7(2), 3458. DOI: 10.1525/jlca.2002.7.2.34
  45. 45Restrepo, E. (2013). Etnización de la negridad: la invención de las “comunidades negras” como grupo étnico en Colombia. Popayán, Colombia: Universidad del Cauca & Pontificia Universidad Javeriana.
  46. 46Ribot, J. C., Agrawal, A., & Larson, A. M. (2006). Recentralizing While Decentralizing: How National Governments Reappropriate Forest Resources. World Development. 34(11), 18641886. DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2005.11.020
  47. 47Romero, J. (2009). Geografía económica del Pacífico colombiano (Vol. 116). Banco de la República.
  48. 48Saavedra-Díaz, L. M., & Jentoft, S. (2017). The role of the small-scale fisheries guidelines in reclaiming human rights for small-scale fishing people in Colombia. In The Small-Scale Fisheries Guidelines (pp. 573594). Springer, Cham. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-55074-9_27
  49. 49Sandström, A., Crona, B., & Bodin, Ö. (2014). Legitimacy in co-management: The impact of preexisting structures, social networks and governance strategies. Environmental Policy and Governance, 24(1), 6076. DOI: 10.1002/eet.1633
  50. 50Schlager, E., Blomquist, W., & Tang, S. Y. (1994). Mobile Flows, Storage, and Self-Organized Institutions for Governing Common-Pool. Land Economics, 70(3), 294317. DOI: 10.2307/3146531
  51. 51Schlager, E., & Ostrom, E. (1992). Property-Rights Regimes and Natural Resources: A Conceptual Analysis. Land Economics, 68(3), 249262. DOI: 10.2307/3146375
  52. 52Sjaastad, E., & Cousins, B. (2009). Formalisation of land rights in the South: An overview. Land Use Policy, 26(1), 19. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2008.05.004
  53. 53Song, A. M., Bower, S. D., Onyango, P., Cooke, S. J., Akintola, S. L., Baer, J., Gurung, T. B., Hettiarachchi, M., Islam, M. M., Mhlanga, W., Nunan, F., Salmi, P., Singh, V., Tezzo, X., Funge-Smith, S. J., Nayak, P. K., & Chuenpagdee, R. (2018). Intersectorality in the governance of inland fisheries. Ecology and Society, 23(2). DOI: 10.5751/ES-10076-230217
  54. 54Suškevičs, M. (2012). Legitimacy Analysis of Multi-Level Governance of Biodiversity: Evidence from 11 Case Studies across the EU. Environmental Policy and Governance, 22(4), 217237. DOI: 10.1002/eet.1588
  55. 55UNHCR. (2015). Construyendo Soluciones Sostenibles: Tangui (Medio Atrato) – Choco. Retrieved from http://tsicolombia.org/sites/acnur/files/cajas-de-herrameintas/hoja-informativa.pdf
  56. 56Vélez, María Alejandra. (2011). Collective Titling and the Process of Institution Building: The New Common Property Regime in the Colombian Pacific. Human Ecology, 39(2), 117129. DOI: 10.1007/s10745-011-9375-1
  57. 57Vélez, Maria Alejandra, Robalino, J., Cardenas, J. C., Paz, A., & Pacay, E. (2020). Is collective titling enough to protect forests? Evidence from Afro-descendant communities in the Colombian Pacific region. World Development, 128, 104837. DOI: 10.1016/J.WORLDDEV.2019.104837
  58. 58Walter, M., & Urkidi, L. (2016). Community Consultations: Local Responses to Large-Scale Mining in Latin America BT – Environmental Governance in Latin America. In F. de Castro, B. Hogenboom, & M. Baud (Eds.) (pp. 287325). London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-137-50572-9_12
  59. 59Weitzner, V. (2017). ‘Nosotros Somos Estado’: contested legalities in decision-making about extractives affecting ancestral territories in Colombia. Third World Quarterly, 38(5), 11981214. DOI: 10.1080/01436597.2017.1302328
  60. 60Wright, G. D., Andersson, K., Gibson, C. C., & Evans, T. P. (2016). Decentralization can help reduce deforestation when user groups engage with local government. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(52), 1495814963. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1610650114
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/ijc.1131 | Journal eISSN: 1875-0281
Language: English
Submitted on: May 19, 2021
Accepted on: May 1, 2022
Published on: May 30, 2022
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2022 Natalia Ocampo-Diaz, Maria Claudia Lopez, Mark Axelrod, Patricia Norris, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.