References
- 1Aas, C., Ladkin, A., & Fletcher, J. (2005). Stakeholder collaboration and heritage management. Annals of Tourism Research, 32(1), 28–48. DOI: 10.1016/j.annals.2004.04.005
- 2Andina. (2017, 17 July 2017). UNESCO not to include Peru’s Machu Picchu in ‘World Heitage in Danger’ list. Andina Pereuvian News Agency (wire service). Retrieved from
https://andina.pe/ingles/noticia-unesco-not-to-include-perus-machu-picchu-in-world-heritage-in-danger-list-673883.aspx - 3Apsara, et al. (2013). Angkor Heritage Management Framework. Phnom Penh: UNESCO, APSARA and Government of Cambodia. Retrieved from
https://t7txp90beitcxr8s5rxpohy-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/Angkor-Heritage-Management-Framework-October-2013.pdf - 4Avrami, E., MacDonald, S., Mason, R., & Myers, D. (Eds.) (2019). Values in Heritage Management. Los Angeles: The Getty Conservaton Institute.
- 5Benhamou, F. (2020).
Heritage . In R. Towse (Ed.), A Handbook of Cultural Economics (pp. 255–262). Cheltenham, UK & Northhampton, MA: Edward Elgar. - 6Bertacchini, E., Bravo, G., Marrelli, M., & Santagata, W. (Eds.). (2012). Cultural Commons. Cheltenham UK and Northhampton MA: Edward Elgar. DOI: 10.4337/9781781000069
- 7Bertacchini, E., Liuzza, C., Meskell, L., & Saccone, D. (2016). The politicization of UNESCO world heritage decision making. Public Choice, 167(1), 95–129. DOI: 10.1007/s11127-016-0332-9
- 8Breglia, L. (2009).
When patrimonies collide: The case of Chunchucmil, Yucatán . In L. Mortenson & J. Hollowell (Eds.), Ethnographies and Archaeologies (pp. 55–70). Gainesville: University Press of Florida. - 9Castañeda, Q. (2009).
Heritage and indigeneity: Transformation in the politics of tourism . In M. Baud & A. Ypeij (Eds.), Cultural Tourism in Latin America: The Politics of Space and Imagery (pp. 263–295). Leiden: Brill. DOI: 10.1163/ej.9789004176409.i-324.89 - 10Caust, J., & Vecco, M. (2017). Is UNESCO World Heritage recognition a blessing or burden? Evidence from developing Asian countries. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 27, 1–9. DOI: 10.1016/j.culher.2017.02.004
- 11Comer, D. (2012). Tourism and Archaeological Heritage Management at Petra: Driver to Development or Destruction? New York, Dordrecht Netherlands, Heidelberg Germany, and London: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-1481-0
- 12Dennis, E. M., & Brondizio, E. (2020). Problem framing influences linkages among networks of collective action situations for water provision, wastewater, and water conservation in a metropolitan region. International Journal of the Commons, 14(1). DOI: 10.5334/ijc.974
- 13Frischmann, B. M., Madison, M. J., & Strandburg, K. J. (Eds.) (2014). Governing Knowledge Commons. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199972036.001.0001
- 14Gerber, J.-D., & Hess, G. (2017). From landscape resources to landscape commons: focusing on the non-utility values of landscape. International Journal of the Commons, 11(2), 708–732. DOI: 10.18352/ijc.745
- 15Gibson, C. C., Andersson, K., Ostrom, E., & Shivakumar, S. (2005). The Samaritan’s Dilemma: The Political Economy of Development Aid. Oxford University Press.
- 16Godden Mackay Logan. (2012). Angkor World Heritage Area Tourism Management Plan. Phnom Penh: Godden Mackay Logan, APSARA and UNESCO Retrieved from
http://whc.unesco.org/document/134601 - 17Gould, P. G. (2018a). Empowering Communities Through Archaeology and Heritage. London: Bloomsbury Academic. DOI: 10.5040/9781350036253
- 18Gould, P. G. (2018b).
Privatization, public-private partnerships, and innovative financing for archaeology and heritage . In C. Smith (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology (2nd ed.). Cham, Switzerland: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-51726-1_3384-1 - 19Gould, P. G. (In press).
Democratic heritage and polycentric governance . In K. L. Samuels & J. Daehnke (Eds.), Heritage & Democracy. Gainesville: University of Florida Press. - 20Government of Peru. (2015). Plan Maestro Del Santuario Historico de Machupicchu 2015–2019. Cusco: Government of Peru.
- 21Government of Peru. (2020). Machupicchu only will be able to receive a maximum of 2244 visitors per day. Retrieved from
https://www.machupicchu.gob.pe/machupicchu-only-will-be-able-to-receive-a-maximum-of-2244-visitors-per-day/?lang=en - 22Hampton, M. P. (2005). Heritage, local communities and economic development. Annals of Tourism Research, 32(3), 735–759. DOI: 10.1016/j.annals.2004.10.010
- 23Hauser-Schäublin, B. (Ed.) (2011). World Heritage Angkor and Beyond: Circumstances and Implications of UNESCO Listings in Cambodia (Vol. 2). Göttingen: Universitätsverlag Göttingen. DOI: 10.4000/books.gup.292
- 24Healy, R. G. (1994). The “common pool” problem in tourism landscapes. Annals of Tourism Research, 21(3), 596–611. DOI: 10.1016/0160-7383(94)90122-8
- 25Herrera, A. (2014). Commodifying the indigenous in the name of development: Archaeology and heritage management in the XXI century Central Andes. Public Archaeology, 13(1–3), 69–82. DOI: 10.1179/1465518714Z.00000000055
- 26Hess, C., & Ostrom, E. (Eds.) (2011). Understanding Knoweldge as a Commons: From Theory to Practice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- 27ICC-Angkor, & UNESCO. (2014). 20 Years of International Cooperation for Conservation and Sustainable Development. Phnom Penh: UNESCO.
- 28INC. (2005). Plan Maestro del Santuario Historico De Machupicchu. Cusco: Ministry of Culture.
- 29Labadi, S. (2017).
UNESCO, world heritage, and sustainable development: International discourses and local impacts . In P. G. Gould & K. A. Pyburn (Eds.), Collision or Collaboration: Archaeology Encounters Economic Development (pp. 45–60). Cham Switzerland: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-44515-1_4 - 30Labadi, S., & Gould, P. G. (2015).
Sustainable development: Heritage, community, economics . In L. Meskell (Ed.), Global Heritage: A Reader (pp. 196–216). Malden, MA and Oxford: Wiley Blackwell. - 31Lubell, M. (2013). Governing institutional complexity: The ecology of games framework. Policy Studies Journal, 41(3), 537–559. DOI: 10.1111/psj.12028
- 32Mao, N., Grunfeld, H., DeLacy, T., & Chandler, D. (2014). Agriculture and tourism linkage constraints in the Siem Reap-Angkor region of Cambodia. Tourism Geographies, 16(4), 669–686. DOI: 10.1080/14616688.2014.915878
- 33McGinnis, M. D. (2011). Networks of adjacent action situations in polycentric governance. Policy Studies Journal, 39(1), 51–78. DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2010.00396.x
- 34McGinnis, M. D. (n.d.). Updated Guide to IAD and the Language of the Ostrom Workshop: A Simplified Overview of a Complex Framework for the Analysis of Institutions and their Development. Bloomington: Indiana University Ostrom Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis.
- 35Meskell, L. (2010).
Conflict heritage and expert failure . In S. Labadi & C. Long (Eds.), Heritage and Globalisation (pp. 192–201). London and New York: Routledge. - 36Meskell, L. (2012). The Nature of Heritage: The New South Africa. Chichester UK, Malden MA and Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
- 37Meskell, L. (2018). A Future in Ruins. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
- 38Meskell, L., Liuzza, C., Bertacchini, E., & Saccone, D. (2015). Multilateralism and UNESCO world heritage: Decision-making, states parties and political processes. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 21(5), 423–440. DOI: 10.1080/13527258.2014.945614
- 39Miura, K. (2011a).
Sustainable development in Angkor: Conservation regime of the old villagescape and development . In B. Hauser-Schäublin (Ed.), World Heritage Angkor and beyond: Circumstances and implications of UNESCO listings in Cambodia (pp. 121–138). Göttingen: Universitätsverlag Göttingen. DOI: 10.4000/books.gup.311 - 40Miura, K. (2011b).
World heritage making in Angkor: Global, regional, national and local actors, interplays and implications . In B. Hauser-Schäublin (Ed.), World Heritage Angkor and beyond: Circumstances and implications of UNESCO listings in Cambodia (pp. 9–32). Göttingen: Universitätsverlag Göttingen. DOI: 10.4000/books.gup.304 - 41Morrison, T. H. (2017). Evolving Polycentric Governance of the Great Barrier Reef. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 114(15), 3013–3021. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1620830114
- 42Morrison, T. H., Adger, W. N., Brown, K., Hettiarachchi, M., Huchery, C., Lemos, M. C., & Hughes, T. P. (2020). Political Dynamics and Governance of World Heritage Ecosystems. Nature Sustainability, 3(Nov 2020), 947–955. DOI: 10.1038/s41893-020-0568-8
- 43Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons. Cambridge, UK and New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511807763
- 44Ostrom, E. (1999). Polycentricity, complexity, and the commons. The Good Society, 9(2), 37–41.
- 45Ostrom, V. ([1972] 1999).
Polycentricity (1) and (2) . In M. D. McGinnis (Ed.), Polycentricity and Local Public Economies (pp. 52–74 and 119–139). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan. - 46Ostrom, E. (2005). Understanding Institutional Diversity. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
- 47Ostrom, E. (2008). Polycentric systems as one approach for solving collective-action problems. Indiana University, Bloomington: School of Public & Environmental Affairs Research Paper, (2008–11), 2–23. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1936061
- 48Ostrom, E. (2010). Beyond markets and states: Polycentric governance of complex economic systems. The American Economic Review, 100(3), 641–672. DOI: 10.1257/aer.100.3.641
- 49Ostrom, V., Tiebout, C. M., & Warren, R. (1961). The organization of government in metropolitan areas: A theoretical inquiry. The American Political Science Review, 55(4), 831–842. DOI: 10.1017/S0003055400125973
- 50Porter, B. W., & Salazar, N. B. (2005). Heritage tourism, conflict, and the public interest: An introduction. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 11(5), 361–370. DOI: 10.1080/13527250500337397
- 51Rizzo, I., & Throsby, D. (2006).
Cultural heritage: Economic analysis and public policy . In A. G. Victor & T. David (Eds.), Handbook of the Economics of Art and Culture (Vol. 1, pp. 983–1016). Amsterdam and Oxford: Elsevier. DOI: 10.1016/S1574-0676(06)01028-3 - 52Russo, A. P. (2002). The “vicious circle” of tourism development in heritage cities. Annals of Tourism Research, 29(1), 165–182. DOI: 10.1016/S0160-7383(01)00029-9
- 53Salazar, N. (2012).
The glocalisation of heritage through tourism: Balancing standardisation and differentiation . In S. Labadi & C. Long (Eds.), Heritage and Globalisation (pp. 132–146). Abingdon & New York: Routledge. - 54Schlager, E., & Ostrom, E. (1992). Property-rights regimes and natural resources: A conceptual analysis. Land economics (pp. 249–262). DOI: 10.2307/3146375
- 55Seyfi, S., Hall, C. M., & Fagnoni, E. (2019). Managing World Heritage Site Stakeholders: A Grounded Theory Paradigm Model Approach. Journal of Heritage Tourism, 14(4), 308–324. DOI: 10.1080/1743873X.2018.1527340
- 56Smith, L., & Waterton, E. (2009). Heritage, Community and Archaeology. London: Duckworth.
- 57Throsby, D. (1999). Cultural capital. Journal of Cultural Economics, 23(1–2), 3–12. DOI: 10.1023/A:1007543313370
- 58Thyl De Lopez, T., Ponlok, T., Proeung, S., Sinoeun, C., & Thea, S. (2006). Towards sustainable development in Angkor, Cambodia: Social, environmental and financial aspects of conserving cultural heritage. EEPSEA research report series/IDRC. Regional Office for Southeast and East Asia, Economy and Environment Program for Southeast Asia; no. 2006-RR5.
- 59UNESCO. (1999). Report of the World Heritage Centre-IUCN-ICOMOS Mission to the Historic Sanctuaru of Machu Picchu, Peru, 18–25 October 1999. Marrakesh: UNESCO.
- 60UNESCO-WHC. (1999). Report on the 23rd Session, Bureau of the World Heritage Committee. Paris: UNESCO.
- 61UNESCO-WHC. (2017). Report of the 41st Session of the World Heritage Committee. Paris: UNESCO.
- 62Waitt, G. (2000). Consuming heritage: Perceived historical authenticity. Annals of Tourism Research, 27(4), 835–862. DOI: 10.1016/S0160-7383(99)00115-2
- 63Winter, T. (2007). Post-conflict heritage, postcolonial tourism: Tourism, politics and development at Angkor. Abington, UK & New York: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780203946381