Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Open Source Hardware, Exploring how Industry Regulation Affects Knowledge Commons Governance: An Exploratory Case Study Cover

Open Source Hardware, Exploring how Industry Regulation Affects Knowledge Commons Governance: An Exploratory Case Study

Open Access
|May 2021

References

  1. 1Abuhav, I. (2018). ISO 13485: 2016: A Complete Guide to Quality Management in the Medical Device Industry. CRC Press. DOI: 10.1201/9781351000796
  2. 2Ackermann, J. R. (2009). Toward open source hardware. University of Dayton Law Review, 34(2).
  3. 3Allen, D., & Potts, J. (2015). The Innovation Commons – Why it Exists, What it Does, Who it Benefits, and How. Paper presented at the International Association for the Study of the Commons biannual global conference, Edmonton, Canada. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2617141
  4. 4Allen, D., & Potts, J. (2016). How innovation commons contribute to discovering and developing new technologies. International Journal of the Commons, 10(2), 1035. DOI: 10.18352/ijc.644
  5. 5Beldiman Dana, D. (2018). Navigating Patents in an Open Hardware Environment. Co-Creation, 177. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-97788-1_14
  6. 6Benkler, Y. (2002). Freedom in the commons: Towards a political economy of information. Duke LJ, 52, 1245.
  7. 7Benkler, Y. (2006). The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom. Yale University Press.
  8. 8Benkler, Y. (2016). Peer production, the commons, and the future of the firm. Strategic Organization, 15(2), 264274. DOI: 10.1177/1476127016652606
  9. 9Benkler, Y., & Nissenbaum, H. (2006). Commons-based Peer Production and Virtue. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 14(4), 349419. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9760.2006.00235.x
  10. 10Bergsland, J., Elle, O. J., & Fosse, E. (2014). Barriers to medical device innovation. Medical devices (Auckland, NZ), 7, 205. DOI: 10.2147/MDER.S43369
  11. 11Bollier, D., & Pavlovich, R. (2008). Viral spiral: How the Commoners Built a Digital Republic of Their Own. New York: New Press.
  12. 12Bonvoisin, J., & Mies, R. (2018). Measuring Openness in Open Source Hardware with the Open-o-Meter. Paper presented at the Procedia CIRP. DOI: 10.1016/j.procir.2018.08.306
  13. 13Bonvoisin, J., Mies, R., Boujut, J.-F., & Stark, R. (2017). What is the “Source” of Open Source Hardware? Journal of Open Hardware, 1(1). DOI: 10.5334/joh.7
  14. 14Boujut, J.-F., Pourroy, F., Marin, P., Dai, J., & Richardot, G. (2019). Open Source Hardware Communities: Investigating Participation in Design Activities. Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design, 1(1), 23072316. DOI: 10.1017/dsi.2019.237
  15. 15Boyle, J. (2003). The Second Enclosure Movement and the Construction of the Public Domain. Law and contemporary problems, 66, 3374. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.470983
  16. 16Broumas, A. G. (2017). The ontology of the intellectual commons. International Journal of Communication, 11. DOI: 10.16997/book49.b
  17. 17Carillo, K., & Okoli, C. (2008). The Open Source Movement: a revolution in software development. Journal Computer Information System, 49, 19.
  18. 18Chesbrough, H. (2003). Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Harvard Business Press.
  19. 19Chesbrough, H., & Appleyard, M. (2007). Open Innovation and Strategy. CALIFORNIA MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 50. DOI: 10.2307/41166416
  20. 20Chien, C. (2013). Startups and patent trolls. Stan. Tech. L. Rev., 17, 461. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2146251
  21. 21Coriat, B. (2011). From natural-resource commons to knowledge commons common traits and differences. LEM Working Paper Series., 16.
  22. 22Coriat, B., & Orsi, F. (2002). Establishing a new intellectual property rights regime in the United States: Origins, content and problems. Research Policy, 31(8–9), 14911507. DOI: 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00078-1
  23. 23Davenport, T. H., & Prusak, L. (1998). Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
  24. 24De Maria, C., Di Pietro, L., Díaz Lantada, A., Madete, J., Makobore, P. N., Mridha, M., … Ahluwalia, A. (2018). Safe innovation: On medical device legislation in Europe and Africa. Health Policy and Technology, 7(2), 156165. DOI: 10.1016/j.hlpt.2018.01.012
  25. 25Dedeurwaerdere, T., Frischmann, B., Hess, C., Lametti, D., Madison, M., Schweik, C., & Strandburg, K. (2014). An Introduction to Knowledge Commons. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199972036.001.0001
  26. 26Elezi, A. (2018). Une renaissance de l’examen clinique: l’échostéthoscopie. Histoire de la recherche contemporaine, VII(1). DOI: 10.4000/hrc.2131
  27. 27EU. (2010). MEDICAL DEVICES: Guidance document - Classification of medical devices. Retrieved from.
  28. 28FDA, U. (2013). Mobile medical applications guidance for industry and Food and drug administration staff. In: Rockville, MD: FDA.
  29. 29FDA, U. (2018). Technical considerations for additive manufactured medical devices: guidance for industry and Food and Drug Administration staff.
  30. 30Frischmann, B. M., Madison, M. J., & Strandburg, K. J. (2014). Governing Knowledge Commons. Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199972036.001.0001
  31. 31Gibb, A., & Abadie, S. (2014). Building open source hardware: DIY manufacturing for hackers and makers. Pearson Education.
  32. 32Gibney, E. (2016). ‘Open-hardware’ pioneers push for low-cost lab kit: conference aims to raise awareness of shared resources for building lab equipment. Nature, 531(7593), 147149. DOI: 10.1038/531147a
  33. 33Gruber, M., & Henkel, J. (2006). New ventures based on open innovation-an empirical analysis of startup firms in embedded Linux. International Journal of Technology Management, 33(4), 356372. DOI: 10.1504/IJTM.2006.009249
  34. 34Henry, N. L. (1974). Knowledge Management: A New Concern for Public Administration. Public Administration Review, 34(3), 189196. DOI: 10.2307/974902
  35. 35Hess, C. (2008). Mapping the new commons. Available at SSRN 1356835. Retrieved from https://ssrn-com.eur.idm.oclc.org/abstract=1356835
  36. 36Hess, C. (2012). The Unfolding of the Knowledge Commons. St. Anthony’s International Review, 8(1), 1324.
  37. 37Hess, C., & Ostrom, E. (2003). Ideas, artifacts, and facilities: information as a common-pool resource. Law and contemporary problems, 66(111).
  38. 38Hess, C., & Ostrom, E. (2007). Introduction: An Overview of the Knowledge Commons. In Understanding knowledge as a commons. DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/6980.001.0001
  39. 39Hippel, V., & Krogh, V. (2003). Open source software and the “private-collective” innovation model: Issues for organization science. Organization science, 14(2), 209223. DOI: 10.1287/orsc.14.2.209.14992
  40. 40Huang, B. (2015). Open-source hardware–microcontrollers and physics education–integrating diy sensors and data acquisition with arduino. Paper presented at the the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference. DOI: 10.18260/p.24542
  41. 41Laerhoven, F. v., & Ostrom, E. (2007). Traditions and Trends in the Study of the Commons. International Journal of the Commons, 1(1), 328. DOI: 10.18352/ijc.76
  42. 42Lerner, J., & Tirole, J. (2004). The economics of technology sharing: open source and beyond. NBER Working Paper No. 10956. DOI: 10.3386/w10956
  43. 43Li, Z., & Seering, W. (2019). Does Open Source Hardware Have a Sustainable Business Model? An Analysis of Value Creation and Capture Mechanisms in Open Source Hardware Companies. Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design, 1(1), 22392248. DOI: 10.1017/dsi.2019.230
  44. 44Madison, M. J., Frischmann, B. M., & Strandburg, K. J. (2009). The University as Constructed Cultural Commons. Washington University Journal of Law and Policy, 30.
  45. 45Madison, M. J., Frischmann, B. M., & Strandburg, K. J. (2010). Reply: The Complexity of Commons. Cornell Law Review, 95.
  46. 46Maia Chagas, A., Molloy, J. C., Prieto-Godino, L. L., & Baden, T. (2020). Leveraging open hardware to alleviate the burden of COVID-19 on global health systems. PLOS Biology, 18(4), e3000730. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000730
  47. 47Malkin, R., & von Oldenburg Beer, K. (2013). Diffusion of novel healthcare technologies to resource poor settings. Annals of biomedical engineering, 41(9), 18411850. DOI: 10.1007/s10439-013-0750-5
  48. 48Marrali, M. (2014). Filling the gap: Evaluating which legal mechanisms effectively protect freedom and openness in hardware. In: University of Groningen Digital Archive.
  49. 49Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative case study research. Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation, 3954.
  50. 50Narula, J., Chandrashekhar, Y., & Braunwald, E. (2018). Time to Add a Fifth Pillar to Bedside Physical Examination: Inspection, Palpation, Percussion, Auscultation, and Insonation. JAMA Cardiol, 3(4), 346350. DOI: 10.1001/jamacardio.2018.0001
  51. 51Niezen, G., Eslambolchilar, P., & Thimbleby, H. (2016). Open-source hardware for medical devices. BMJ innovations, 2(2), 7883. DOI: 10.1136/bmjinnov-2015-000080
  52. 52Ochasi, A., & Clark, P. (2015). Reuse of pacemakers in Ghana and Nigeria: medical, legal, cultural and ethical perspectives. Developing world bioethics, 15(3), 125133. DOI: 10.1111/dewb.12047
  53. 53Organization, W. H. (1985). Future use of new imaging technologies in developing countries: report of a WHO scientific group [meeting held in Geneva from 24 September to 1 October 1984]. World Health Organization.
  54. 54OSHWA, O. S. H. A. (2020). Definition 1.0. Retrieved from http://www.oshwa.org/definition
  55. 55Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons, The evolution of institutions for collective actions. Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511807763
  56. 56Ostrom, E., & Hess, C. (2007). Understanding Knowledge as a Commons. The MIT Press.
  57. 57Pandey, G., & Vora, A. (2019). Open Electronics for Medical Devices: State-of-Art and Unique Advantages. Electronics, 8(11), 1256. DOI: 10.3390/electronics8111256
  58. 58Pearce, J. M. (2015a). Quantifying the value of open source hardware development. Modern Economy, 6, 111. DOI: 10.4236/me.2015.61001
  59. 59Pearce, J. M. (2015b). Return on investment for open source scientific hardware development. Science and Public Policy, 43(2), 192195. DOI: 10.1093/scipol/scv034
  60. 60Pearce, J. M. (2017). Emerging business models for open source hardware. Journal of Open Hardware, 1(1), 2. DOI: 10.5334/joh.4
  61. 61Potts, J. (2017). Governing the innovation commons. Journal of Institutional Economics, 14(6), 10251047. DOI: 10.1017/S1744137417000479
  62. 62Powell, A. (2012). Democratizing production through open source knowledge: from open software to open hardware. Media, Culture & Society, 34(6), 691708. DOI: 10.1177/0163443712449497
  63. 63Raasch, C., Herstatt, C., & Balka, K. (2009). On the open design of tangible goods. R&D Management, 39(4). DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9310.2009.00567.x
  64. 64Redlich, T., & Moritz, M. (2019). Co-Creation: Reshaping Business and Society in the Era of Bottom-up Economics. Springer.
  65. 65Schultz, J., & Urban, J. M. (2012). Protecting open innovation: The defensive patent license as a new approach to patent threats, transaction costs, and tactical disarmament. Harv. JL & Tech., 26, 1.
  66. 66Schweik, C. M., & English, R. (2007). Tragedy of the FOSS Commons? Investigating the Institutional Designs of Free/Libre and Open Source Software Projects. First Monday, 12. DOI: 10.5210/fm.v12i2.1619
  67. 67Schweik, C. M., & English, R. C. (2012). Internet Success: A Study of Open-Source Software Commons. The MIT Press. DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/9780262017251.001.0001
  68. 68Schweik, C. M., Stepanov, A., & Grove, J. M. (2005). The open research system: a web-based metadata and data repository for collaborative research. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 47(3), 221242. DOI: 10.1016/j.compag.2004.12.006
  69. 69Schweisfurth, T., Raasch, C., & Herstatt, C. (2011). Free revealing in open innovation: a comparison of different models and their benefits for companies. International Journal Product Development. DOI: 10.1504/IJPD.2011.038867
  70. 70Shuhuai, R., Chen, J., Xingjun, S., Haiqing, L., & Jialin, C. (2009). From information commons to knowledge commons Building a collaborative knowledge sharing environment for innovative communities. The Electronic Library, 27(2), 247257. DOI: 10.1108/02640470910947593
  71. 71Spier, R. (2002). The history of the peer-review process. TRENDS in Biotechnology, 20(8), 357358. DOI: 10.1016/S0167-7799(02)01985-6
  72. 72Stallman, R. (1985). The GNU manifesto. Dr. Dobb’s Journal, 10(3). Retrieved from http://ftp.math.utah.edu/pub/tex/bib/toc/dr-dobbs-1980.html#10(3):March:1985
  73. 73Stallman, R. (1999). The GNU Operating System and the Free Software Movement. O Reilly.
  74. 74Stallman, R., Lessig, L., & Gay, J. (2002). Free software, free society: Selected essays of Richard M. Stallman. – Chapter 1. In J. Gay (Ed.) GNU Press.
  75. 75Strandburg, K. J., Frischmann, B. M., & Madison, M. J. (2017). Governing Medical Knowledge Commons. Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/9781316544587
  76. 76Twomey, J. (2013). Know Your Regulations Before You Design Medical Electronics. Electronic Design. Retrieved from https://www.electronicdesign.com/power-management/article/21798672/know-your-regulations-before-you-design-medical-electronics
  77. 77WHO. (2010). Medical devices: managing the mismatch: an outcome of the priority medical devices project. World Health Organization.
  78. 78Williams, A., Gibb, A., & Weekly, D. (2012). Research with a hacker ethos: what DIY means for tangible interaction research. Interactions, 19(2), 1419. DOI: 10.1145/2090150.2090156
  79. 79Winter, L., Pellicer-Guridi, R., Broche, L., Winkler, S. A., Reimann, H. M., Han, H., … Moritz, M. (2019). Open Source Medical Devices for Innovation, Education and Global Health: Case Study of Open Source Magnetic Resonance Imaging. In Co-Creation (pp. 147163). Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-97788-1_12
  80. 80Yin, R. K. (2014). Qualitative study research: Design and methods. In: Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/ijc.1081 | Journal eISSN: 1875-0281
Language: English
Submitted on: Sep 23, 2020
Accepted on: Mar 2, 2021
Published on: May 14, 2021
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2021 Pascal Carpentier, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.