References
- 1Ali, S. H. (2004). A socio-ecological autopsy of the E. coli O157:H7 outbreak in Walkerton, Ontario, Canada. Social Science and Medicine, 58, 2601–2612. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2003.09.013
- 2Arts, B., & Buizer, M. (2009). Forests, discourses, institutions: a discursive-institutional analysis of global forest governance. Forest Policy and Economics, 11(5), 340–347. DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2008.10.004
- 3Bakker, K., & Cook, C. (2011). Water governance in Canada: innovation and fragmentation. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 27(2), 275–289. DOI: 10.1080/07900627.2011.564969
- 4Beach, D., & Pedersen, R. (2013). Process-Tracing Methods: Foundations and Guidelines. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan. DOI: 10.3998/mpub.2556282
- 5Berardo, R., Turner, V. K., & Rice, S. (2019). Systemic coordination and the problem of seasonal harmful algal blooms in Lake Erie. Ecology and Society, 24(3). DOI: 10.5751/ES-11046-240324
- 6BluMetric Environmental Inc. (2017). Inventory of agri-environmental projects in Ontario addressing phosphorus runoff. In.
- 7Bosomworth, K. (2018). A discursive–institutional perspective on transformative governance: A case from a fire management policy sector. Environmental Policy and Governance, 1–11. DOI: 10.1002/eet.1806
- 8Botts, L., & Muldoon, P. (2008). Evolution of the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement. Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan State University Press.
- 9C-SPAN. (2011). Constitutional Role of Judges [Press release]. Retrieved from
https://www.c-span.org/video/?301909-1/constitutional-role-judges - 10Clement, F. (2010). Analysing decentralised natural resource governance: proposition for a “politicised” institutional analysis and development framework. Policy Sciences, 43(2), 129–156. DOI: 10.1007/s11077-009-9100-8
- 11Cole, D., Epstein, G., & McGinnis, M. (2019). Combining the IAD and SES frameworks. International Journal of the Commons, 13(1), 1–32. DOI: 10.18352/ijc.864
- 12Conservation Ontario. (2003). A Framework for Local Water-Use Decision-Making on a Watershed Basis. Newmarket, ON: Conservation Ontario.
- 13Conservation Ontario. (2012). Watershed Management Futures for Ontario: Conservation Ontario Whitepaper. Newmarket, ON: Conservation Ontario.
- 14Cook, C. (2014). Governing jurisdictional fragmentation: tracing patterns of water governance in Ontario, Canada. Geoforum, 56, 192–200. DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2014.07.012
- 15den Besten, J. W., Arts, B., & Verkooijen, P. (2014). The evolution of REDD+: An analysis of discursive-institutional dynamics. Environmental Science and Policy, 35, 40–48. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2013.03.009
- 16Dryzek, J. S. (2013). The Politics of the Earth: Environmental Discourses (3rd ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
- 17Environment and Climate Change Canada [ECCC], & Ontario Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change [OMECC]. (2018). Canada-Ontario Lake Erie Action Plan: Partnering on Achieving Phosphorus Loading Reductions to Lake Erie from Canadian Sources. Queen’s Printer for Ontario.
- 18Environment Canada, & Ontario Ministry of Environment and Climate Change. (2014). Canada-Ontario Agreement on Great Lakes Water Quality and Ecosystem Health, 2014. Queen’s Printer for Ontario.
- 19Epstein, G., Pittman, J., Alexander, S. M., Berdej, S., Dyck, T., Kreitmair, U., … Armitage, D. (2015). Institutional fit and the sustainability of social-ecological systems. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 14, 34–40. DOI: 10.1016/j.cosust.2015.03.005
- 20Estrin, D., & Swaigen, J. (1993). Environment on Trial: A Guide to Ontario Environmental Law and Policy. Toronto, Ontario: Emond Montgomery Publications Limited.
- 21Fairbrass, J. (2011). Exploring corporate social responsibility policy in the European Union: a discursive institutionalist analysis. Journal of Common Market Studies, 49(5), 949–970. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-5965.2010.02162.x
- 22Folke, C., Lowell, P.,
Jr. , Berkes, F., Colding, J., & Svedin, U. (2007). The problem of fit between ecosystems and institutions: ten years later. Ecology and Society, 12(1). DOI: 10.5751/ES-02064-120130 - 23George, A., & Bennett, A. (2005). Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
- 24Government of Ontario. (2012). Ontario’s Great Lakes Strategy: Queen’s Printer for Ontario.
- 25Great Lakes Protection Act Alliance. (2016). Re: Comments on Ontario’s Proposal on Reducing Phosphorus to Minimize Algal Blooms in Lake Erie (EBR #012-8760) [Press release]. Retrieved from
https://www.cela.ca/sites/cela.ca/files/1090-EBR_%20012-8760_GLPAA_comments.pdf on 29-1-2017 - 26Grover, V. I., & Krantzberg, G. (Eds.). (2012). Great Lakes: Lessons in Participatory Governance. CRC Press – Taylor and Francis Group. DOI: 10.1201/b13146
- 27Hajer, M. (1995). The Politics of Environmental Discourse: Ecological Modernization and the Policy Process. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
- 28Henry, T. (2015). Ohio, Mich., Ont. set to cut algae pollution. Toledo Blade. Retrieved from
https://www.toledoblade.com/local/2015/06/13/Ohio-Mich-Ont-set-to-cut-algae-pollution.html - 29Hollingsworth, J. R. (2000). Doing institutional analysis: implications for the study of innovation. Review of International Political Economy, 7(4), 595–644. DOI: 10.1080/096922900750034563
- 30Hoornbeek, J. A., Filla, J., Venkata, A., Kalla, S., & Chiyaka, E. (2016). Addressing Harmful Algal Blooms: Nutrient Reduction Policies In Ohio’s Lake Erie Basin And Other American Water Basins. Center For Public Policy And Health, Kent State University.
- 31Hoornbeek, J. A., Filla, J., & Yalamanchili, S. (2017). Watershed Based Policy Tools for Reducing Nutrient Flows to Surface Waters: Addressing Nutrient Enrichment and Harmful Algal Blooms in the United States. Fordam Environmental Law Review, 29(1).
- 32Hope, M., & Raudla, R. (2012). Discursive institutionalism and policy stasis in simple and compound polities: the cases of Estonian fiscal policy and United States climate change policy. Policy Studies, 33(5), 399–418. DOI: 10.1080/01442872.2012.722286
- 33Hrudey, S. E. (2008). Safe water? Depends on where you live! Canadian Medical Association Journal, 178(8), 975. DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.080374
- 34IJC, I. J. C. (2014). A Balanced Diet for Lake Erie: Reducing Phosphorous Loadings and Harmful Algal Blooms. Ottawa, ON: International Joint Commission.
- 35Irvine, J. T. (2002). Water Law In Canada: Federal and Provincial Jurisdiction, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan.
- 36Johns, C. (2000). Non-Point Source Water Pollution Management in Canada and the United States A Comparative Analysis of Institutional Arranagements and Policy Instruments. (Doctor of Philosophy). Hamilton, ON: McMaster University. Available from Docs.
- 37Johns, C. (2017).
The Great Lakes, water quality and water policy in Canada . In S. Renzetti & D. Dupont (Eds.), Water Policy and Governance in Canada (Vol. 17, pp. 159–180). Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-42806-2_9 - 38Kern, F. (2011). Ideas, institutions, and interests: explaining policy divergence in fostering ‘system innovations’ towards sustainability. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 29, 1116–1134. DOI: 10.1068/c1142
- 39Kilbert, K., Tisler, T., & Hohl, M. Z. (2012). Legal Tools for Reducing Harmful Algal Blooms in Lake Erie: The University Of Toledo – College Of Law.
- 40Klyza, C. M., & Sousa, D. J. (2013). American Environmental Policy: Beyond Gridlock. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
- 41Kooiman, J. (2003). Governing as Governance. London, United Kingdom: SAGE Publications Ltd.
- 42Kraft, M. E. (2011). Environmental Policy and Politics (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Longman.
- 43Krantzberg, G. (2017). Governance and the Great Lakes Guardians’ Council: Who are We and What should We be Doing? Journal of Aquatic Pollution and Toxicology, 1(12), 1–8.
- 44Lake Erie LaMP Work Group. (2011). Lake Erie Binational Nutrient Management Strategy: Protecting Lake Erie by Managing Phosphorus. Prepared by the Lake Erie LaMP Work Group Nutrient Management Task Group Retrieved from
https://www.epa.gov/greatlakes/lake-erie-binational-nutrient-management-strategy - 45Lauber, V., & Schenner, E. (2011). The struggle over support schemes for renewable electricity in the European Union: a discursive-institutionalist analysis. Environmental Politics, 20(4), 508–527. DOI: 10.1080/09644016.2011.589578
- 46Legislative Research Service. (2011). How an Ontario Bill Becomes Law: A Guide for Legislators and the Public.
- 47Library of Parliament. (2002). Inside Canada’s Parliament: An Introduction to How the Canadian Parliament Works.
- 48Maaskant, K. (2015). Water Quality Assessment in the Thames River Watershed: Nutrient Trends. Upper Thames River Conservation Authority. Retrieved from
https://www.thamesrevival.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/ThamesWQAssess-Oct2015-LkStClairConf-MaaskantUTRCA.pdf - 49MacIvor, H. (2010). Parameters of Power: Canada’s Political Institutions (5th ed.). Toronto: Nelson Education.
- 50Michalak, A. M., Anderson, E. J., Beletsky, D., Boland, S., Bosch, N. S., Bridgeman, T. B., … Zagorski, M. A. (2013). Record-setting algal bloom in Lake Erie caused by agricultural and meteorological trends consistent with expected future conditions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(16), 6448–6452. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1216006110
- 51North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511808678
- 52Nürnberg, G., & LaZerte, B. (2015). Water Quality Assessment in the Thames River Watershed – Nutrient and Sediment Sources. Baysville, Ontario: The Upper Thames River Conservation Authority.
- 53Ohio Environmental Protection Agency. (2018). Nutrient Mass Balance Study for Ohio’s Major Rivers. In D. o. S. W. M. a. A. Section (Ed.), (pp. 83).
- 54Ohio Lake Erie Commission. (2008). Lake Erie Protection and Restoration Plan 2008. Ohio Lake Erie Commission. Toledo, Ohio.
- 55Ohio Lake Erie Phosphorus Task Force. (2010). Ohio Lake Erie Phosphorus Task Force Final Report: Ohio Environmental Protection Agency.
- 56Ohio Lake Erie Phosphorus Task Force. (2013). Ohio Lake Erie Phosphorus Task Force II Final Report: Ohio Environmental Protection Agency.
- 57Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511807763
- 58Ostrom, E. (2009). A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science, 325(4), 419–422. DOI: 10.1126/science.1172133
- 59Ostrom, E. (2011). Background on the Institutional Analysis and Development framework. Policy Studies Journal, 39(1), 7–27. DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2010.00394.x
- 60Peters, B. G. (2012). Institutional Theory in Political Science: The New Institutionalism (3rd ed.). London: Continuum International Publishing.
- 61Phillips, N., Lawrence, T. B., & Hardy, C. (2004). Discourse and institutions. Academy of Management Review, 29(4), 635–652. DOI: 10.5465/amr.2004.14497617
- 62Plummer, R., Spiers, A., FitzGibbon, J., & Imhof, J. (2005). The expanding institutional context for water resources management: the case of the Grand River watershed. Canadian Water Resources Journal, 30(3), 227–244. DOI: 10.4296/cwrj3003227
- 63Polski, M., & Ostrom, E. (1999). An institutional framework for policy analysis and design. Paper presented at the Workshop on Political Theory and Policy Analysis, Indianapolis, IN.
- 64Prudham, S. (2004). Poisoning the well: neoliberalism and the contamination of municipal water in Walkerton, Ontario. Geoforum, 35, 343–359. DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2003.08.010
- 65Radin, B. A., & Boase, J. P. (2000). Federalism, political structure and public policy in the United States and Canada. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 2, 65–89. DOI: 10.1080/13876980008412636
- 66Raitio, K. (2012). New institutional approach to collaborative forest planning on public land: methods for analysis and lessons for policy. Land Use Policy, 29, 309–316. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.07.001
- 67Rydin, Y. (2003). Conflict, consensus, and rationality in environmental planning: An institutional discourse approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- 68Schlager, E., & Blomquist, W. (2008). Embracing Watershed Politics. Boulder, Colorado: University Press of Colorado. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctt46nvqs
- 69Schmidt, V. A. (2000).
Values and discourses in the politics of adjustment . In F. W. Scharpf & V. A. Schmidt (Eds.), Welfare and Work in the Open Economy: From Vulnerability to Competetiveness (Vol. 1, pp. 229–309). New York: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/0199240884.003.0004 - 70Schmidt, V. A. (2002). The Futures of European Capitalism. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/0199253684.001.0001
- 71Schmidt, V. A. (2006). Democracy in Europe: The EU and National Polities. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199266975.001.0001
- 72Schmidt, V. A. (2008). Discursive institutionalism: the explanatory power of ideas and discourse. Annual Review of Political Science, 11, 303–326. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.060606.135342
- 73Schmidt, V. A. (2010). Taking ideas and discourse seriously: explaining change through discursive institutionalism as the fourth ‘new institutionalism’. European Political Science Review, 2(1), 1–25. DOI: 10.1017/S175577390999021X
- 74Schmidt, V. A. (2011). Speaking of change: why discourse is key to the dynamics of policy transformation. Critical policy studies, 5(2), 106–126. DOI: 10.1080/19460171.2011.576520
- 75Schmidt, V. A., & Radaelli, C. M. (2004). Policy Change and Discourse in Europe: Conceptual and Methodological Issues. West European Politics, 27(2), 183–210. DOI: 10.1080/0140238042000214874
- 76Scott, R. W. (2014). Institutions and Organizations: Ideas, Interests, and Identities (4th ed.). Los Angeles: SAGE.
- 77Skogstad, G. (1987). The Politics of Agricultural Policy making in Canada. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. DOI: 10.3138/9781487574703
- 78Smith, D., King, K., & Williams, M. (2015). What is causing the harmful algal blooms in Lake Erie? Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 70(2), 27A–29A. DOI: 10.2489/jswc.70.2.27A
- 79Smith, Z. (2013). The Environmental Policy Paradox (6th ed.). Boston: Pearson.
- 80Sproule-Jones, M., Johns, C., & Heinmiller, T. (Eds.). (2008). Canadian Water Politics: Conflicts and Institutions. Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
- 81Sracic, P., & Binning, W. (2016). Ohio Government and Politics. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications. Kindle Edition. DOI: 10.4135/9781483395548
- 82Statistics Canada. (2018). Annual Demographic Estimates: Canada, Provinces and Territories. Ottawa: Statistics Canada.
- 83Sussman, G., Daynes, B., & West, J. (2002). American Politics and the Environment. New York: Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.
- 84Tuholske, J., & Kilbert, K. (2015). Moving Forward: Legal Solutions To Lake Erie’s Harmful Algal Blooms – Report Commissioned by Lucas County, Ohio Board of County Commissioners. Vermont Law School – Water and Justice Program and The University of Toledo-College of Law. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2667107
- 85US Census Bureau. (2020). Metropolitan and Micropolitan Statistical Areas Population Totals and Components of Change: 2010–2019. Retrieved from
https://www.census.gov/data/tables/time-series/demo/popest/2010s-total-metro-and-micro-statistical-areas.html - 86Verweij, M. (2000). Why is the River Rhine cleaner than the Great Lakes (despite looser regulation)? Law and Society Review, 34(4), 1007–1054. DOI: 10.2307/3115130
- 87Villamayor-Tomas, S., Fleischman, F. D., Ibarra, I. P., Thiel, A., & van Laerhoven, F. (2014). From Sandoz to salmon: conceptualizing resource and institutional dynamics in the Rhine watershed through the SES framework. International Journal of the Commons, 8(2), 361–395. DOI: 10.18352/ijc.411
- 88Wines, M. (2014). Behind Toledo’s Water Crisis, a Long-Troubled Lake Erie. The New York Times. Retrieved from
https://www.nytimes.com/2014/08/05/us/lifting-ban-toledo-says-its-water-is-safe-to-drink-again.html on October 5, 2018 - 89Wozniak, T., Gerken, P., & Contrada, C. (2016). Comments from the Board of Lucas County Commissioners [Press release]
- 90Young, O. R. (2008).
Institutions and environmental change: the scientific legacy of a decade of IDGEC research . In O. R. Young, L. A. King, & H. Schroeder (Eds.), Institutions and Environmental Change: Principal Findings, Applications, and Research Frontiers (pp. 3–45). Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA: The MIT Press. (Reprinted from: Not in File). DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/9780262240574.001.0001