Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Information Commons Between Enclosure and Exposure: Regulating Piracy and Privacy in the EU Cover

Information Commons Between Enclosure and Exposure: Regulating Piracy and Privacy in the EU

Open Access
|Sep 2020

References

  1. 1Andersson Schwarz, J. (2017). Platform Logic: An Interdisciplinary Approach to the Platform-Based Economy. Policy & Internet, 9(44), 374394. DOI: 10.1002/poi3.159
  2. 2Angelopoulos, C. (2017). On Online Platforms and the Commissions new Proposal for a Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market. or Accessed 20 July 2020. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2947800
  3. 3Boyle, J. (1997). Shamans, Software, and Spleens: Law and the Construction of the Information Society. Cambridge and London: Harvard University Press.
  4. 4Boyle, J. (2003). The Second Enclosure Movement and the Construction of the Public Domain. Law and Contemporary Problems, 66(33), 3374.
  5. 5Burkart, P. (2013). Pirate Politics, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/9205.001.0001
  6. 6Carvalho, H. (2013). Learning from ACTA: The Best Way to Appear to be Concerned with the Intellectual-Propertyless. Asia-Pacific Journal of EU Studies, 11(1), 69107.
  7. 7Cieply, M., & Wyatt, E. 2012. Dodd calls for Hollywood and Silicon Valley to meet. New York Times, 19 January 2012.
  8. 8Commission’s Research Center (JRC). (n.d.), Online News Aggregation and Neighbouring Rights for News Publishers. https://www.asktheeu.org/en/request/4776/response/15356/attach/6/Doc1.pdf, accessed 20 July 20, 2020
  9. 9Coombe, R. (1998). The Cultural Life of Intellectual Properties: Authorship, Appropriation, and the Law. Durham: Duke University Press. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctv11sn021
  10. 10de Beukelaer, C., & Fredriksson, M. (2018). The Political Economy of Intellectual Property Rights: The Paradox of Article 27 Exemplified in Ghana. Review of African Political Economy, 46(161), 459479. DOI: 10.1080/03056244.2018.1500358
  11. 11Dür, A., & Mateo, G. (2014). Public Opinion and Interest Group Influence: How Citizen Groups Derailed the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement. Journal of European Cultural Policy, 21(8), 11991217. DOI: 10.1080/13501763.2014.900893
  12. 12Farrand, B. (2015). Lobbying and Lawmaking in the European Union: The Developing of Copyright Law and the Rejection of the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 35(3), 487514. DOI: 10.1093/ojls/gqu028
  13. 13Fredriksson Almqvist, M. (2016a). Piracy and the Politics of Social Media. Social Sciences, 5(3). https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/5/3/41, accessed 14 November 2019. DOI: 10.29379/jedem.v7i1.365
  14. 14Fredriksson Almqvist, M. (2016b). Pirate Politics Between Protest Movement and the Parliament. Ephemera: Theory & Politics in Organization, 16(2), 99116.
  15. 15Fredriksson, M. (2015a). The Pirate Party and the Politics of Communication. International Journal of Communication, 9, 909924. http://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/3742/1339, accessed 14 November 2019. DOI: 10.1080/10286632.2018.1459590
  16. 16Fredriksson, M. (2015b). Pirates, Librarian and Open Source Capitalists: New Alliances in the Copyright Wars. In H. Porsdam (Ed.), Copyrighting Creativity: Creative Values, Cultural Heritage Institutions and Systems of Intellectual Property. Farnham: Ashgate.
  17. 17Fredriksson, M. (2018). Review of A Critical Guide to Intellectual Property, edited by Matt Callahan & Jim Rogers. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 24(4), 559561. Accessed 14 November 2019. DOI: 10.1080/10286632.2018.1459590
  18. 18Fredriksson, M. (2019). Sweden and Beyond: The Pirate Party and Non-Media-Centric Media Politics. In S. Mishra & R. Kern-Stone (Eds.), Transnational Media: Concepts and Cases (pp. 191197). Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell.
  19. 19Fredriksson, M., & Arvanitakis, J. (2015). Piracy, Property and the Crisis of Democracy. Journal of edemocracy and Open Government, 7, 135150. https://jedem.org/index.php/jedem/article/view/365, accessed 14 November 2019. DOI: 10.29379/jedem.v7i1.365
  20. 20Galloway, S. (2018). The Four: The Hidden DNA of Amazon, Apple, Facebook and Google. New York: Portfolio, Penguin.
  21. 21Giannopoulou, A. (2018). Porposed Durective on Copyright in the Digital Single Market: A Missed Opportunity. Alexander von Humbolt Institute for Internet od Gesellchaft: Digital Society Blog, 11 September 2018: https://www.hiig.de/en/proposed-directive-on-copyright-in-the-digital-single-market-a-missed-opportunity/, accessed 20 July 2020.
  22. 22Guibault, L., Westkamp, G., Rieber-Mohn, T., Hugenholtz, B., van Eechoud, M., Helberger, N., Steijger, L., Rossini, M., Dufft, N., & Bohn, P. (2007). Study of the Implementation and Effect in Member States’ Laws of Directive 2001/29/EC on the Harmonization of Certain Aspects of Copyright and Related Rights in the Information Society. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.
  23. 23Halbert, D. J. (2005). Resisting Intellectual Property Law. New York: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780203799512
  24. 24Hemmungs Wirtén, E. (2004). No Trespassing: Authorship, Intellectual Property Rights, and the Boundaries of Globalization. Toronto and Buffalo: University of Toronto Press. DOI: 10.3138/9781442620896
  25. 25Hemmungs Wirtén, E. (2008). Terms of Use: Negotiating the Jungle of the Intellectual Commons. Toronto and Buffalo: University of Toronto Press. DOI: 10.3138/9781442689251
  26. 26Jacques, S., Garstka, K., Hviid, M., & Street, J. (2018). An Empirical Study of the Use of Automated Anti-Piracy Systems and Their Consequences for Cultural Diversity. Scripted, 12(2), 277312. DOI: 10.2966/scrip.150218.277
  27. 27Jakobsson, P. (2012). Öppenhetsindustrin. Örebro: Örebro universitet. http://oru.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:482726/FULLTEXT02.pdf, accessed 19 March 2019.
  28. 28Jakobsson, P., & Stiernstedt, F. (2012). Reinforcing Property by Strengthening the Commons: A New Media Policy Program? TripleC, 10(1), 4955. DOI: 10.31269/triplec.v10i1.314
  29. 29Karaganis, J. (2011). Rethinking Piracy. In J. Karaganis (Ed.), Media Piracy in Emerging Economies (pp. 174). New York: Social Science Research Council. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-658-08460-8_28-1
  30. 30Larsson, S. (2011). The Path Dependence of European Copyright. Scripted, 8(1), 731.
  31. 31Lee, TB. (2013). 15 Years Ago, Congress Kept Mickey Mouse out of the Public Domain. Will they do it Again? The Washington Post, October 25, 2013: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-switch/wp/2013/10/25/15-years-ago-congress-kept-mickey-mouse-out-of-the-public-domain-will-they-do-it-again/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.4415be5d90ac, accessed 14 November 2019.
  32. 32Lessig, L. (1999). Code and other Laws of Cyberspace. New York: Basic Books.
  33. 33Lessig, L. (2001). The Future of Ideas: The Fate of the Commons in a Connected World. New York: Random House.
  34. 34Lessig, L. (2008). Remix: Making Art and Commerce Thrive in the Hybrid Economy. New York: Penguin Press. DOI: 10.5040/9781849662505
  35. 35Lessig, L. (2011). Republic Lost: How money corrupts congress—and a plan to stop it. New York: Twelve Books.
  36. 36Losey, J. (2014). The Anti Counterfeiting Trade Agreement and European Civil Society. Journal of Information Policy, 4, 205227. DOI: 10.5325/jinfopoli.4.2014.0205
  37. 37Marcut, M. (2017). Crystalizing the EU Digital Policy: An Exploration into the Digital Single Market. Cham: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-69227-2
  38. 38Masnick, M. (2012). Don’t get SOPA’d is the new mantra on Capitol Hill. Techdirt, 12 March 2012. https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120309/13371418054/dont-get-sopad-is-new-mantra-capitol-hill.shtml, accessed 14 November 2019. DOI: 10.14763/2019.2.1409
  39. 39Meese, J., Jagasia, P., & Arvanitakis, J. (2019). Citizen or Consumer? Contrasting Australia and Europe’s Data Protection Policies. Internet Policy Review, 8(2). https://policyreview.info/node/1409/pdf. Accessed 14 November 2019.
  40. 40Mitchell, HC. (2005). The Intellectual Commons: Towards an Ecology of Intellectual Property. Lanham. MD: Lexington Books.
  41. 41O’brien, D. (2019). EU Parliament Signs off on Disastrous Internet Law: What Happens Next. Electronic Frintier Foundation, 26 March 2019. https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2019/03/eus-parliament-signs-disastrous-internet-law-what-happens-next?fbclid=IwAR0rYxnS6lGBBrQ7j7vte81sLS7nxfXT-YI0MopUA4oJCSchUBsqLDbwr28, accessed 21 July 2020.
  42. 42Reynolds, M. (2019). What is Article 13? The EU’s Divisive new Copyright Plan Explained. Wired, 15 April 2019. https://www.wired.co.uk/article/what-is-article-13-article-11-european-directive-on-copyright-explained-meme-ban, accessed 14 November 2019.
  43. 43Rimmer, M. (2014). Trick or Treaty?: The Australian Debate over the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement 2011. In R. Pedro & S. Xavier (Eds.), The ACTA and The Plurilateral Enforcement Agenda: Genesis and Aftermath, Geneva (pp. 169201). International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781107707207.015
  44. 44Rydell, A., & Sundberg, S. (2009). Piraterna: De svenska fildelarna som plundrade Hollywood. Stockholm: Ordfront.
  45. 45Schroff, S., & Street, J. (2018). The politics of the Digital Single Market: Culture vs. Competition vs. Copyright. Information, Communication & Society, 21(10), 13051321. DOI: 10.1080/1369118X.2017.1309445
  46. 46Svensson, M., & Larsson, S. (2009). Social Norms and Intellectual Property: Online Norms and the European Legal Development. Lund: Lund University.
  47. 47The Economist. (2018). Copy that: America Should Borrow from Europe’s Data Privacy Law. The Economist, 5 April, 2018.
  48. 48Weatherall, K. (2011). Politics, Compromise, Text and the Failures of the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement. Sydney Law Review, 33, 229263.
  49. 49Xalabarder, R. (2016). Press Publisher Rights in the new Copyright in the Digital Single Market Draft Directive. CREATe Working Paper 2016/15. https://zenodo.org/record/183788, accessed 20 July 2020.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/ijc.1034 | Journal eISSN: 1875-0281
Language: English
Submitted on: Feb 27, 2020
Accepted on: Aug 29, 2020
Published on: Sep 25, 2020
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2020 Martin Fredriksson, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.