Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Work Engagement and Well-being in Chilean Judicial Assistance Workers Cover

Work Engagement and Well-being in Chilean Judicial Assistance Workers

Open Access
|Sep 2024

Figures & Tables

Table 1

Ad Hoc measurement items.

I am feeling good in my workplace.
I am feeling stressed in my workplace.
I have a good quality relationship with my peers.
I have a good quality relationship with my supervisor/boss.
I have an appropriate workload.
My job has the essential ergonomic conditions.
Table 2

Descriptive Statistics of dependent variables.

ABSORPTIONDEDICATIONVIGOURWORK ENGAGEMENTWORK WELL-BEING
Mean11.32112.46411.64335.42921.821
Std. Deviation2.2412.0971.9864.4593.568
Skewness–0.138–0.058–0.7250.1260.286
Std. Error of Skewness0.3190.3190.3190.3190.319
Kurtosis–0.373–1.5700.819–1.004–0.525
Std. Error of Kurtosis0.6280.6280.6280.6280.628
Minimum6.0009.0006.00028.00016.000
Maximum15.00015.00015.00043.00030.000
Table 3

Gender t-test comparisons.

VARIABLEtdfpCOHEN’S dSE COHEN’S d
Absorption–1.780540.081–0.6210.376
Dedication–2.957540.005a–1.0320.418
Vigor–4.06554<.001a–1.4180.471
Work Well-Being–3.192540.002–1.1140.429
Work Engagement–4.35054<.001a–1.5180.487

[i] Note. Student’s t-test.

Table 4

Descriptive statistics for sex comparisons.

VARIABLESEXnMEANSDSE
AbsorptionMale1510.2002.6160.827
Female4111.5652.1050.310
DedicationMale1510.8001.2290.389
Female4112.8262.0800.307
VigorMale159.6002.4590.777
Female4112.0871.5750.232
Work Well-BeingMale1518.8002.0440.646
Female4122.4783.5010.516
Work EngagementMale1530.6001.0750.340
Female4136.4784.2150.621
Table 5

Work area t test comparisons.

tdfpCOHEN’S dSE COHEN’S d
Absorption0.616540.730a0.1680.274
Dedication–1.284540.102–0.3510.277
Vigour–1.958540.028–0.5360.281
Work Well-Being–1.877540.033–0.5130.281
Work Engagement–1.143540.129–0.3130.276

[i] Note. Student’s t test.

Table 6

Descriptive statistics for work area comparisons.

WORK AREAnMEANSDSECOEFFICIENT OF VARIATION
AbsorptionProfessional3411.4712.5610.4390.223
Technical2211.0911.6590.3540.150
DedicationProfessional3412.1761.9460.3340.160
Technical2212.9092.2870.4880.177
VigourProfessional3411.2352.1610.3710.192
Technical2212.2731.5180.3240.124
Work Well-BeingProfessional3421.1183.6660.6290.174
Technical2222.9093.1910.6800.139
Work Engagement.Professional3434.8824.3330.7430.124
Technical2236.2734.6210.9850.127
Table 7

Pearsons correlation between dependent variables.

VARIABLEWORK WELL-BEINGABSORPTIONDEDICATIONVIGOUR
Work Well-Beingr
p-value
Absorptionr0.398
p-value0.002
Dedicationr0.6920.230
p-value<.0010.003
Vigourr0.4220.2100.451
p-value0.0010.005<.001
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/glo.93 | Journal eISSN: 2059-2949
Language: English
Submitted on: Jul 9, 2024
Accepted on: Aug 30, 2024
Published on: Sep 16, 2024
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2024 Cintya Guzmán-Arellano, Benjamín Solar-Alveal, Jorge Maluenda-Albornoz, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.