Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
ECG Criteria for Left Ventricular Hypertrophy in Hypertensive Black Africans: Insights from the coArtHA Trial Cover

Figures & Tables

Graphical abstract

Overview of the study population, methods, and key findings. LVH: left ventricular hypertrophy; fTTE: focused transthoracic echocardiography; LVMI: left ventricular mass index; LVM: left ventricular mass; BSA: body surface area; ECG: electrocardiography.

Figure 1

Study flow chart and selection of participants. Legend—fTTE: focused transthoracic echocardiography; ECG: electrocardiography.

Table 1

Characteristics of electrocardiographic indexes used in this study.

ECG INDEXDEFINITIONCUT-OFF VALUE
Cornell voltage criteria (11)SV3 + RaVL>2.0 mV for women and
>2.8 mV for men
Cornell voltage product (19)(SV3 + RaVL)*QRS>244.0 mVms (19)
or >243.6 mVms (56)
Cornell voltage product, adjusted for women 0.6 mVMen: (SV3 + RaVL)*QRS
Women: (SV3 + RaVL + 0.6 mV)*QRS
>244.0 mVms (8, 48)
or >243.6 mVms
Cornell voltage product, adjusted for women 0.8 mVMen: (SV3 + RaVL)*QRS
Women: (SV3 + RaVL + 0.8 mV)*QRS
>244.0 mVms (48)
or >243.6 mVms (57)
Novacode 6.1 LVH (58)RaVL + SV3≥2,600 μV in men
≥2,200 μV in women
RaVL (59, 60)≥1.1 mV
General MESA ECG-LVH (61)SV1 + SV2 + RV5≥4.2 mV
Ethnicity- and sex-specific MESA ECG-LVH criterion (11)SV1 + SV2 + RV5≥4.8 in men
≥4.3 in women
Sokolow–Lyon voltage (8)SV1 + either RV5/RV6 (whichever is higher)>3.5 mV
Sokolow–Lyon voltage product (11)SV1 + (RV5/RV6)*QRS duration≥371,000 μVms (371 mVms )
Framingham-adjusted Cornell voltage (11, 62)Men: [RaVL + SV3 + 0.0174*(age – 49) + 0.191*(BMI – 26.5)];
Women: [RaVL + SV3 + 0.0387*(age – 50) + 0.212*(BMI – 24.9)]
Men ≥2.8 mV
Women ≥2.0 mV
Minnesota Code 3.1 (63)RV5/V6 or
RI/II/III/aVF or
RaVL
>26 mm
>20 mm
>12 mm
Minnesota Code 3.3 (63)RI
or
R V5/V6 plus SV1;
no MC 3.1
>15 mm but ≤20 mm,
>35 mm
Strain pattern (52, 64)Coexistence in any of the leads I, II, avL, or V3 to V6: ST-segment horizontal
or downward sloping depression ≥ 0.05 mV, plus negative T-wave; down-sloping convex ST-segment with an inverted asymmetrical T-wave opposite to the QRS axis
Yes/No

[i] RaVL: R wave in aVL; BMI: body mass index; MC: Minnesota Code; ECG: electrocardiography; LVH: left ventricular hypertrophy; MESA: the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis.

Table 2

Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics of the study sample, overall and regarding subgroups with echocardiographic signs for LVH.

VARIABLESOVERALL (n = 1125)fTTE-LVH PRESENT (n = 56)fTTE-LVH ABSENT (n = 1069)
Tanzania, n (%)553 (49.2)47 (83.9)506 (47.3)
Lesotho, n (%)572 (50.8)9 (16.1)563 (52.7)
Age, years, median (IQR)53.4 (44.6–64.4)59.0 (49.1–68.1)53.2 (44.3–64.3)
Male, n (%)314 (27.9)8 (14.3)306 (28.6)
HIV positive, n (%)423 (37.6)10 (17.9)413 (38.6)
Previously diagnosed HT, n (%)469 (41.7)34 (60.7)435 (40.7)
Diabetes, n (%)22 (2.0)022 (2.1)
Diabetes never checked, n (%)102 (9.1)3 (5.4)99 (9.3)
BMI (kg/m2), median (IQR)26.4 (22.8–30.7)25.1 (21.5–28.1)26.5 (22.8–30.7)
BSA (m2), median (IQR)1.71 (1.55–1.85)1.57 (1.47–1.76)1.70 (1.56–1.85)
Systolic BP (mmHg), median (IQR)149 (141–163)165 (152–182)148 (140–161)
Diastolic BP (mmHg), median (IQR)99 (93–106)104 (98–116)98 (93–105)

[i] Values are presented as n (%), if applicable, with percentages calculated within column groups. fTTE: focused transthoracic echocardiography; HT: hypertension; LVH: left ventricular hypertrophy; BMI: body mass index; BP: blood pressure; BSA: body surface area.

Table 3

Prevalence of positive ECG markers in the entire cohort, as well as separated for the group with echocardiographic signs of LVH and those without.

INDEXOVERALL (n = 1125)ECHOCARDIOGRAPHIC SIGNS FOR LVH (n = 56)NO ECHOCARDIOGRAPHIC SIGNS FOR LVH (n = 1070)p-value
Cornell voltage criteria, >2.0 mV (women), >2.8 mV (men), n (%)256 (22.8)28 (50.0)228 (21.3)<0.001
Cornell voltage product ≥ 243.6 mVms, n (%)103 (9.2)21 (37.5)82 (7.7)<0.001
Cornell voltage product ≥ 244 mVms, n (%)100 (8.9)21 (37.5)79 (7.4)<0.001
Cornell voltage product ≥ 243.6 mVms, n (%), adjusted 0.6 mV (women)203 (18.0)30 (53.6)173 (16.2)<0.001
Cornell voltage product ≥ 244 mVms, n (%), adjusted 0.6 mV (women)197 (17.5)30 (53.6)167 (15.6)<0.001
Cornell voltage product ≥ 243.6 mVms, n (%), adjusted 0.8 mV (women)255 (22.7)36 (64.3)219 (20.5)<0.001
Cornell voltage product ≥ 244 mVms, n (%), adjusted 0.8 mV (women)249 (22.1)34 (60.7)215 (20.1)<0.001
Novacode 6.1 LVH, ≥ 2.2 mV (women), ≥ 2.6 mv (men), n (%)240 (21.3)30 (53.6)210 (19.6)<0.001
RaVL ≥ 1.1 mV, n (%)190 (16.9)23 (41.1)167 (15.6)<0.001
general MESA ECG-LVH, ≥ 4.2 mV, n (%)633 (56.3)33 (58.9)600 (56.1)0.784
Ethnicity- and sex-specific MESA ECG-LVH criterion (African American), ≥ 4.3 mV (women), ≥ 4.8 mV (men), n (%)566 (50.3)30 (53.6)536 (50.1)0.716
Sokolow–Lyon voltage > 3.5 mV, n (%)390 (34.7)29 (51.8)361 (33.8)0.009
Sokolow–Lyon voltage product, ≥ 371 mVms, n (%)172 (15.3)24 (42.9)148 (13.8)<0.001
Framingham-adjusted Cornell voltage, ≥ 2.0 mV (women), ≥ 2.8 mV (men), n (%)564 (50.1)34 (60.7)530 (49.6)0.179
Minnesota Code 3.1, n (%)270 (24.0)30 (53.6)240 (22.5)<0.001
Minnesota Code 3.3, n (%)205 (18.2)4 (7.1)201 (18.8)0.419
Strain pattern, n (%)44 (3.9)12 (21.4)32 (3.0)<0.001

[i] ECG: electrocardiography; LVH: left ventricular hypertrophy; MESA: the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis.

Table 4

Performance of standard ECG-LVH criteria in overall study population.

PARAMETERSENSITIVITY
(95% CI)
SPECIFICITY
(95% CI)
PPV (95% CI)NPV (95% CI)ACCURACYLR+LR–TPFPTNFN
Cornell voltage criteria (>2.0 mV women, >2.8 mV men)0.500 (0.373–0.627)0.787 (0.761–0.810)0.109 (0.077–0.154)0.968 (0.954–0.978)0.7722.3440.6362822884128
Cornell voltage product (unadjusted) ≥ 243.6 mVms0.375 (0.260–0.506)0.923 (0.906–0.938)0.204 (0.137–0.292)0.966 (0.953–0.975)0.8964.8890.677218298735
Cornell voltage product (unadjusted) ≥ 244 mVms0.375 (0.260–0.506)0.926 (0.909–0.940)0.210 (0.142–0.300)0.966 (0.953–0.975)0.8995.0740.675217999035
Cornell voltage product (women +0.6 mV) ≥ 243.6 mVms0.536 (0.407–0.660)0.838 (0.815–0.859)0.148 (0.106–0.203)0.972 (0.959–0.981)0.8233.310.5543017389626
Cornell voltage product (women +0.6 mV) ≥ 244 mVms0.536 (0.407–0.660)0.844 (0.821–0.864)0.152 (0.109–0.209)0.972 (0.959–0.981)0.8283.4290.5503016790226
Cornell voltage product (women +0.8 mV) ≥ 243.6 mVms0.643 (0.512–0.755)0.795 (0.770–0.818)0.141 (0.104–0.189)0.977 (0.965–0.985)0.7883.1380.4493621985020
Cornell voltage product (women +0.8 mV) ≥ 244 mVms0.607 (0.476–0.724)0.799 (0.774–0.822)0.137 (0.099–0.185)0.975 (0.962–0.983)0.7893.0190.4923421585422
Novacode 6.1 LVH (≥ 2.2 mV women, ≥ 2.6 mV men)0.536 (0.407–0.660)0.804 (0.779–0.826)0.125 (0.089–0.173)0.971 (0.957–0.980)0.7902.7270.5783021085926
R amplitude aVL ≥ 1.1 mV0.411 (0.292–0.541)0.844 (0.821–0.864)0.121 (0.082–0.175)0.965 (0.951–0.975)0.8222.6290.6982316790233
General MESA ECG-LVH ≥ 4.2 mV0.589 (0.459–0.708)0.439 (0.409–0.469)0.052 (0.037–0.072)0.953 (0.931–0.969)0.4461.0500.9363360046923
MESA ECG-LVH African American (≥ 4.3 women, ≥ 4.8 men)0.536 (0.407–0.660)0.499 (0.469–0.529)0.053 (0.037–0.075)0.953 (0.933–0.968)0.5001.0680.9313053653326
Sokolow–Lyon voltage > 3.5 mV0.518 (0.390–0.643)0.662 (0.633–0.690)0.074 (0.052–0.105)0.963 (0.947–0.975)0.6551.5330.7282936170827
Sokolow–Lyon voltage product ≥ 371 mVms0.429 (0.308–0.559)0.862 (0.840–0.881)0.140 (0.096–0.199)0.966 (0.953–0.976)0.8403.0960.6632414892132
Framingham-adjusted Cornell (≥ 2.0 women, ≥ 2.8 men)0.607 (0.476–0.724)0.504 (0.474–0.534)0.060 (0.043–0.083)0.961 (0.941–0.974)0.5091.2250.7793453053922
Minnesota Code 3.10.536 (0.407–0.660)0.775 (0.750–0.799)0.111 (0.079–0.154)0.970 (0.956–0.979)0.7642.3860.5993024082926
Minnesota Code 3.30.154 (0.062–0.335)0.758 (0.727–0.785)0.020 (0.008–0.049)0.966 (0.949–0.978)0.7390.6351.117420162822
Strain pattern0.214 (0.127–0.338)0.970 (0.958–0.979)0.273 (0.163–0.418)0.959 (0.946–0.970)0.9327.1580.8101232103744

[i] NPV: Negative predictive value; PPV: positive predictive value; LR+: positive likelihood ratio (rule-in power); LR–: negative likelihood ratio (rule-out power); TP: true positive; FP: false positive; TN: true negative; FN: false negative.

Figure 2

Receiver-operating curves (ROC) with area under the ROC (AUROC) and precision-recall curves (PRC) with area under the PRC (AUPRC) for continuous ECG parameters. Legend—ECG: electrocardiography; LVH: left ventricular hypertrophy; MESA: Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis.

Figure 3

Decision curve analysis of ECG criteria for the detection of LVH. Net benefit is plotted against threshold probability, representing the risk of LVH at which echocardiography would be recommended. Colored curves represent predicted probabilities derived from single-predictor logistic regression models for each ECG criterion. Dashed gray curves indicate reference strategies for treating all patients or treating none. Higher net benefit indicates greater clinical utility.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/gh.1562 | Journal eISSN: 2211-8179
Language: English
Page range: 57 - 57
Submitted on: Nov 10, 2025
Accepted on: May 21, 2026
Published on: Jul 21, 2026
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2026 Annina S. Vischer, Valeriya Nemtsova, Blaise Lukau, Martin Rohacek, Jonathan Macko, Johanna Oehri, Herry Mapesi, Fiona Vanobberghen, Andrew Katende, Ravi Gupta, Herieth Ismael Wilson, Alain Amstutz, Elizabeth Senkoro, Theonestina Byakuzana, Geofrey Mbunda, Jamali Siru, Winfrid Gingo, Niklaus Daniel Labhardt, Maja Weisser, Thilo Burkard, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.