Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Factors Influencing the Uptake of Digital Health Interventions for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention Among Healthcare Providers: A Systematic Review Cover

Factors Influencing the Uptake of Digital Health Interventions for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention Among Healthcare Providers: A Systematic Review

Open Access
|Jun 2026

References

  1. World Health Organization. Cardiovascular diseases [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2025 [cited 2025 May 10]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/cardiovascular-diseases-(cvds)
  2. Perel P, Avezum A, Huffman M, Pais P, Rodgers A, Vedanthan R, et al. Reducing premature cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in people with atherosclerotic vascular disease: The World Heart Federation roadmap for secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Global Heart. 2015;10(2):99110. DOI: 10.1016/j.gheart.2015.04.003
  3. Russell E, Kirk A, Dunlop MD, Hodgson W, Patience M, Egan K. Digital physical activity and sedentary behavior interventions for community-living adults: Umbrella review. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2025;27(1):e66294. DOI: 10.2196/66294
  4. Kardan M, Jung A, Iqbal M, Keshtkar S, Geidl W, Pfeifer K. Efficacy of digital interventions on physical activity promotion in individuals with noncommunicable diseases: An overview of systematic reviews. BMC Digital Health. 2024;2(1):40. DOI: 10.1186/s44247-024-00097-6
  5. Alley SJ, Waters KM, Parker F, Peiris DLIHK, Fien S, Rebar AL, et al. The effectiveness of digitalphysical activity interventions in older adults: A systematic umbrella review and meta-meta-analysis. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. 2024;21(1):144. DOI: 10.1186/s12966-024-01694-4
  6. Gold N, Yau A, Rigby B, Dyke C, Remfry EA, Chadborn T. Effectiveness of digital interventions for reducing behavioral risks of cardiovascular disease in nonclinical adult populations: systematic review of reviews. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2021;23(5):e19688. DOI: 10.2196/19688
  7. Lee SA, Park JH. Systematic review and meta analysis of standalone digital behavior change interventions on physical activity. npj Digital Medicine. 2025;8(1):436. DOI: 10.1038/s41746-025-01827-4
  8. Ronteltap A, Bukman AJ, Nagelhout GE, Hermans RCJ, Hosper K, Haveman-Nies A, et al. Digital health interventions to improve eating behaviour of people with a lower socioeconomic position: A scoping review of behaviour change techniques. BMC Nutrition. 2022;8(1):145. DOI: 10.1186/s40795-022-00635-3
  9. Kurniawan AL, Theresia T, Faradina A, Paramastri R, Haryana NR, Ginting RMS, et al. Digital intervention targeting nutrition and physical activity behaviours among healthy individuals in low- and middle-income countries: A scoping review. Journal of Health, Population, and Nutrition. 2025;44(1):348. DOI: 10.1186/s41043-025-01091-y
  10. Talens C, Quinta N da, Adebayo FA, Erkkola M, Heikkilä M, Bargiel-Matusiewicz K, et al. Mobile- and web-based interventions for promoting healthy diets, preventing obesity, and improving health behaviors in children and adolescents: Systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2025;27(1):e60602. DOI: 10.2196/60602
  11. Dodge E, Kelly PJ, Aboul-Enein BH. Digital-based nutrition interventions employing the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) diet: A systematic scoping review. International Journal of Hypertension. 2025;2025(1):6175223. DOI: 10.1155/ijhy/6175223
  12. Kupila SKE, Joki A, Suojanen LU, Pietiläinen KH. The effectiveness of eHealth interventions for weight loss and weight loss maintenance in adults with overweight or obesity: A systematic review of systematic reviews. Current Obesity Reports. 2023;12(3):371394. DOI: 10.1007/s13679-023-00515-2
  13. Nunns M, Febrey S, Abbott R, Buckland J, Whear R, Shaw L, et al. Evaluation of the aspects of digital interventions that successfully support weight loss: Systematic review with component network meta-analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2025;27(1):e65443. DOI: 10.2196/65443
  14. Li S, Li Y, Xu C, Tao S, Sun H, Yang J, et al. Efficacy of digital interventions for smoking cessation by type and method: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Nature Human Behaviour. 2025;9(10):20542065. DOI: 10.1038/s41562-025-02295-2
  15. Maaß L, Badino M, Forberger S, Christianson L, De Santis K. Quitting at your fingertips: A scoping review of reviews on digital smoking cessation interventions. The European Journal of Public Health. 2025;35(Supplement 4):ckaf161.957. DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckaf161.957
  16. Naughton F, Nadkarni A. The contribution of digital treatment to efforts to reduce global tobacco use. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2025;393(15):14491452. DOI: 10.1056/nejmp2500683
  17. Liu L, Zhao Y, Li J, Zhang N, Lan Z, Liu X. Efficacy of digital therapeutics in smoking cessation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine in Novel Technology and Devices. 2023;17:100209. DOI: 10.1016/j.medntd.2023.100209
  18. Lindsay-Perez A, Jurdon R, King T, Koffman L, Roberts N, McManus RJ, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of digital interventions targeting lifestyle factors in patients with hypertension. Journal of Human Hypertension. 2025;39(10):690700. DOI: 10.1038/s41371-025-01051-3
  19. Boima V, Doku A, Agyekum F, Tuglo LS, Agyemang C. Effectiveness of digital health interventions on blood pressure control, lifestyle behaviours and adherence to medication in patients with hypertension in low-income and middle-income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. eClinicalMedicine. 2024;69:102432. DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102432
  20. Katz ME, Mszar R, Grimshaw AA, Gunderson CG, Onuma OK, Lu Y, et al. Digital health interventions for hypertension management in US populations experiencing health disparities: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Network Open. 2024;7(2):e2356070. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.56070
  21. Liu L, Guo J, Jiao X, You L. The effect of digital therapeutics intervention on improving hypertension management in adults: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial. Hypertension Research. 2025;48(2):456469. DOI: 10.1038/s41440-024-01892-4
  22. Siopis G, Moschonis G, Eweka E, Jung J, Kwasnicka D, Asare BYA, et al. Effectiveness, reach, uptake, and feasibility of digital health interventions for adults with hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Lancet Digital Health. 2023;5(3):e144e159. DOI: 10.1016/S2589-7500(23)00002-X
  23. Ng CM, Cheong WL, Chong CW, Teoh SL, Yap WS, Lee SWH. Digital technologies for prediabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome. 2025;19(2):103206. DOI: 10.1016/j.dsx.2025.103206
  24. Nguyen V, Ara P, Simmons D, Osuagwu UL. The role of digital health technology interventions in the prevention of type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review. Clinical Medicine Insights Endocrinology and Diabetes. 2024;17:11795514241246419. DOI: 10.1177/11795514241246419
  25. Kerr D, Ahn D, Waki K, Wang J, Breznen B, Klonoff DC. Digital interventions for self- management of type 2 diabetes mellitus: Systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2024;26(1):e55757. DOI: 10.2196/55757
  26. Moschonis G, Siopis G, Jung J, Eweka E, Willems R, Kwasnicka D, et al. Effectiveness, reach, uptake, and feasibility of digital health interventions for adults with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Lancet Digital Health. 2023;5(3):e125e143. DOI: 10.1016/s2589-7500(22)00233-3
  27. American Medical Association. Physicians’ motivations and requirements for adopting digital health: Adoption and attitudinal shifts from 2016 to 2019 [Internet]. Alliance for Connected Care; 2020. Available from: https://connectwithcare.org/ama-physicians-motivations-and-requirements-for-adopting-digital-health-adoption-and-attitudinal-shifts-from-2016-to-2019/#
  28. Proctor E, Silmere H, Raghavan R, Hovmand P, Aarons G, Bunger A, et al. Outcomes for implementation research: Conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research. 2011;38(2):6576. DOI: 10.1007/s10488-010-0319-7
  29. World Health Organization. Global strategy on digital health 2020-2025 [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2021. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240020924
  30. Whitelaw S, Pellegrini DM, Mamas MA, Cowie M, Van Spall HGC. Barriers and facilitators of the uptake of digital health technology in cardiovascular care: A systematic scoping review. European Heart Journal Digital Health. 2021;2(1):6274. DOI: 10.1093/ehjdh/ztab005
  31. Borges do Nascimento IJ, Abdulazeem H, Vasanthan LT, Martinez EZ, Zucoloto ML, Østengaard L, et al. Barriers and facilitators to utilizing digital health technologies by healthcare professionals. NPJ Digital Medicine. 2023;6(1):161. DOI: 10.1038/s41746-023-00899-4
  32. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.n71
  33. World Health Organization. Classification of digital Interventions, services and applications in health: A shared language to describe the uses of digital technology for health [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2023. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240081949
  34. Kmet LM, Lee RC, Cook LS. Standard quality assessment criteria for evaluating primary research papers from a variety of fields. Alberta: Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research; 2004. p. 22. Available from 10.7939/R37M04F16
  35. Tromp J, Jindal D, Redfern J, Bhatt A, Séverin T, Banerjee A, et al. World Heart Federation roadmap for digital health in cardiology. Global Heart. 2022;17(1):61. DOI: 10.5334/gh.1141
  36. Cao W, Li L, Mathur P, Thompson J, Milks MW. A mobile health application for patients eligible for statin therapy: App development and qualitative feedback on design and usability. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making. 2023;23(1):128. DOI: 10.1186/s12911-023-02221-4
  37. Houle J, Gallani MC, Pettigrew M, Laflamme G, Mathieu L, Boudreau F, et al. Acceptability of a computer-tailored and pedometer-based socio-cognitive intervention in a secondary coronary heart disease prevention program: A qualitative study. Digital Health. 2020;6:2055207619899840. DOI: 10.1177/2055207619899840
  38. Bhandari B, Schutte AE, Jayasuriya R, Vaidya A, Subedi M, Narasimhan P. Acceptability of a mHealth strategy for hypertension management in a low-income and middle-income country setting: A formative qualitative study among patients and healthcare providers. BMJ Open. 2021;11(11):e052986. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052986
  39. Lyles E, Paik K, Kiogora J, Hussein H, Cordero Morales A, Kiapi L, et al. Adoption of electronic medical records for chronic disease care in Kenyan refugee camps: Quantitative and qualitative prospective evaluation. JMIR mHealth and uHealth. 2023;11:e43878. DOI: 10.2196/43878
  40. Sideris K, Weir CR, Schmalfuss C, Hanson H, Pipke M, Tseng PH, et al. Artificial intelligence predictive analytics in heart failure: Results of the pilot phase of a pragmatic randomized clinical trial. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 2024;31(4):919928. DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocae017
  41. Schepart A, Burton A, Durkin L, Fuller A, Charap E, Bhambri R, et al. Artificial intelligence-enabled tools in cardiovascular medicine: A survey of current use, perceptions, and challenges. Cardiovascular Digital Health Journal. 2023;4(3):101110. DOI: 10.1016/j.cvdhj.2023.04.003
  42. Einhorn J, Murphy AR, Rogal SS, Suffoletto B, Irizarry T, Rollman BL, et al. Automated messaging program to facilitate systematic home blood pressure monitoring: Qualitative analysis of provider interviews. JMIR Cardio. 2023;7:e51316. DOI: 10.2196/51316
  43. Adler AJ, Laar AK, Kotoh AM, Legido-Quigley H, Perel P, Lamptey P. Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of a community-based hypertension improvement project in Ghana: A qualitative study of ComHIP. BMC Health Services Research. 2020;20(1):67. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-019-4774-x
  44. Singhal A, Riley JP, Cowie MR. Benefits and challenges of telemedicine for heart failure consultations: A qualitative study. BMC Health Services Research. 2023;23(1):847. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-09872-z
  45. Steinman L, van Pelt M, Hen H, Chhorvann C, Lan CS, Te V, et al. Can mHealth and eHealth improve management of diabetes and hypertension in a hard-to-reach population? -Lessons learned from a process evaluation of digital health to support a peer educator model in Cambodia using the RE-AIM framework. mHealth. 2020;6:40. DOI: 10.21037/mhealth-19-249
  46. Marzolini S, Ghisi GLDM, Hébert AA, Ahden S, Oh P. Cardiac rehabilitation in Canada during COVID-19. CJC Open. 2020;3(2):152158. DOI: 10.1016/j.cjco.2020.09.021
  47. Kołtowski Ł, Krzowski B, Boszko M, Paskudzka D, Peller M, Lodziński P, et al. Cardiological teleconsultation in the coronavirus disease 2019 era: Patient’s and physician’s perspective. Kardiologia Polska. 2021;79(1):7678. DOI: 10.33963/KP.15737
  48. Mehta S, Mehta N, Tang WH, Young J. Cardiologists’ perception of wearable device data in patients with heart failure. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 2020;35(3):940941. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-019-05390-z
  49. Bouchard K, Liu PP, Dautenhahn K, Fiedorowicz JG, Afrin J, Dans M, et al. Cardiology professionals’ views of social robots in augmenting heart failure patient care. European Heart Joural Digital Health. 2023;5(1):6976. DOI: 10.1093/ehjdh/ztad067
  50. Frith G, Carver K, Curry S, Darby A, Sydes A, Symonds S, et al. Changes in patient activation following cardiac rehabilitation using the Active+me digital healthcare platform during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cohort evaluation. BMC Health Services Research. 2021;21(1):1363. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-07363-7
  51. Bernardi R, Exworthy M. Clinical managers’ identity at the crossroad of multiple institutional logics in it innovation: The case study of a health care organization in England. Information Systems Journal. 2020;30(3):566595. DOI: 10.1111/isj.12267
  52. Lukey A, Mackay M, Hasan K, Rush KL. Clinical perspectives on the development of a gamified heart failure patient education web site. Computers, Informatics, Nursing: CIN. 2023;41(8):615620. DOI: 10.1097/CIN.0000000000000983
  53. Vugs S, Scholte NTB, Markopoulos P, Ronner E. Clinician attitudes towards telemonitoring for heart failure care: Opportunities for design research. In: Schmidt A, Väänänen K, Goyal T, Kristensson PO, Peters A (Eds.) CHI EA ’23: Extended Abstracts of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York: Association for Computing Machinery; 2023. pp. 18. DOI: 10.1145/3544549.3585723
  54. Ferguson C, Inglis SC, Breen PP, Gargiulo GD, Byiers V, Macdonald PS, et al. Clinician perspectives on the design and application of wearable cardiac technologies for older adults: Qualitative study. JMIR Aging. 2020;3(1):e17299. DOI: 10.2196/17299
  55. Matthiesen S, Diederichsen SZ, Hansen MKH, Villumsen C, Lassen MCH, Jacobsen PK, et al. Clinician preimplementation perspectives of a decision-support tool for the prediction of cardiac arrhythmia based on machine learning: Near-live feasibility and qualitative study. JMIR Human Factors. 2021;8(4):e26964. DOI: 10.2196/26964
  56. Alaboud K, Shahreen M, Islam H, Paul T, Rana MKZ, Morrison A, et al. Clinicians’ perspectives in using patient-generated health data to improve ischemic heart disease management. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science Proceedings. 2022;2022:112119.
  57. Singh K, Huffman MD, Johnson LCM, Tandon N, Prabhakaran D, Mendenhall E. Collaborative quality improvement strategy in secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease in India: Findings from a multi-stakeholder, qualitative study using consolidated framework for implementation research (CFIR). Global Heart. 2022;17(1):72. DOI: 10.5334/gh.1161
  58. Aw M, Ochieng BO, Attambo D, Opot D, Aw J, Francis S, et al. Critical appraisal of a mHealth-assisted community-based cardiovascular disease risk screening program in rural Kenya: An operational research study. Pathogens and Global Health. 2020;114(7):379387. DOI: 10.1080/20477724.2020.1816286
  59. Brown JD, Hales S, Evans TE, Turner T, Sword DO, O’Neil PM, et al. Description, utilisation and results from a telehealth primary care weight management intervention for adults with obesity in South Carolina. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare. 2020;26(1–2):2835. DOI: 10.1177/1357633X18789562
  60. Hellem A, Whitfield C, Mansour M, Curran Y, Dinh M, Warden K, et al. Determinants of Bluetooth-enabled self measured blood pressure monitoring in federally qualified health centers. medRxiv [Preprint]. 2023: 2023.08.17.23294249. DOI: 10.1101/2023.08.17.23294249
  61. Harris E, Conway D, Jimenez-Aranda A, Butts J, Hedley-Takhar P, Thomson R, et al. Development and user-testing of a digital patient decision aid to facilitate shared decision-making for people with stable angina. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making. 2022;22(1):143. DOI: 10.1186/s12911-022-01882-x
  62. Pelly ML, Fatehi F, Liew D, Verdejo-Garcia A. Digital health secondary prevention using co-design procedures: Focus group study with health care providers and patients with myocardial infarction. JMIR Cardio. 2023;7:e49892. DOI: 10.2196/49892
  63. Palozzi G, Binci D, Schettini I. Digital transformation in the healthcare sector: Empirical evidences of IoHT benefits and limits on chronic disease management. In: Cagáňová D, Horňáková N (Eds.) Mobility internet of things 2018. Cham: Springer; 2020. pp. 433449. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-30911-4_31
  64. Nau T, Owen A, Mazza D, Smith BJ. Engaging primary care providers in a mobile health strategy to support lifestyle change and blood pressure management. Digital Health. 2021;7:20552076211066746. DOI: 10.1177/20552076211066746
  65. Sivakumar B, Lemonde M, Stein M, Goldstein S, Mak S, Arcand J. Evaluating health care provider perspectives on the use of mobile apps to support patients with heart failure management: Qualitative descriptive study. JMIR Cardio. 2022;6(2):e40546. DOI: 10.2196/40546
  66. Bergstedt A, Hilliard B, Alabsi S, Usher MG, Peters M, Grace J, et al. Evaluation of a clinical decision support tool to guide adoption of the American Heart Association telemetry monitoring practice standards. Journal of the American Heart Association. 2024;13(9):e031523. DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.123.031523
  67. Wali S, Guessi Margarido M, Shah A, Ware P, McDonald M, O’Sullivan M, et al. Expanding telemonitoring in a virtual world: A case study of the expansion of a heart failure telemonitoring program during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2021;23(1):e26165. DOI: 10.2196/26165
  68. Artanian V, Ware P, Rac VE, Ross HJ, Seto E. Experiences and perceptions of patients and providers participating in remote titration of heart failure medication facilitated by telemonitoring: Qualitative study. JMIR Cardio. 2021;5(2):e28259. DOI: 10.2196/28259
  69. Gregory ME, Cao W, Rahurkar S, Jonnalagadda P, Stock JC, Ghazi SM, et al. Exploring the incorporation of a novel cardiotoxicity mobile health app into care of patients with cancer: Qualitative study of patient and provider perspectives. JMIR Cancer. 2023;9:e46481. DOI: 10.2196/46481
  70. Wali S, Remtulla Tharani A, Balmer-Minnes D, Cafazzo JA, Laks J, Jeewa A. Exploring the use of a digital therapeutic intervention to support the pediatric cardiac care journey: Qualitative study on clinician perspectives. PLOS Digital Health. 2023;2(12):e0000371. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000371
  71. Steinman L, Heang H, van Pelt M, Ide N, Cui H, Rao M. Facilitators and barriers to chronic disease self-management and mobile health interventions for people living with diabetes and hypertension in Cambodia: Qualitative study. JMIR mHealth and uHealth. 2020;8(4):e13536. DOI: 10.2196/13536
  72. Mahmoud Z, Orji AA, Okoye CF, Ameh FO, Jamro-Comer E, Isah A, et al. Facilitators and barriers to optimal home blood pressure management in patients with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy in a tertiary care facility in Abuja, Nigeria: A qualitative research study. BMC Health Services Research. 2023;23(1):954. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-09976-6
  73. Cohen Rodrigues TR, de Buisonjé DR, Keesman M, Reijnders T, van der Geer JE, Janssen VR, et al. Facilitators of and barriers to lifestyle support and eHealth solutions: Interview study among health care professionals working in cardiac care. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2021;23(10):e25646. DOI: 10.2196/25646
  74. Santos RZD, Almeida S, Scheafer AK, Karsten M, Oh P, Benetti M, et al. Feasibility of a virtual educational programme for behaviour change in cardiac patients from a low-resource setting. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2023;20(11):5934. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20115934
  75. Toft BS, Rodkjær , Sørensen L, Saugbjerg MR, Bekker HL, Modrau IS. Feasibility of early digital health rehabilitation after cardiac surgery in the elderly: A qualitative study. BMC Health Services Research. 2024;24(1):113. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-10601-3
  76. Danielsbacka J, Feldthusen C, Bäck M. Healthcare professionals’ perceptions of using a digital patient educational programme as part of cardiac rehabilitation in patients with coronary artery disease – A qualitative study. BMC Health Services Research. 2023;23(1):1017. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-09997-1
  77. Islam SMS, Halooq A, Dening J, Uddin R, Laranjo L, Chow CK, et al. Healthcare providers’ perspectives on using smart home systems to improve self-management and care in people with heart failure: A qualitative study. International Journal of Medical Informatics. 2022;167:104837. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104837
  78. Jongsma KR, Bekker MN, Haitjema S, Bredenoord AL. How digital health affects the patient-physician relationship: An empirical-ethics study into the perspectives and experiences in obstetric care. Pregnancy Hypertension. 2021;25:8186. DOI: 10.1016/j.preghy.2021.05.017
  79. Gago C, De Leon E, Mandal S, de la Calle F, Garcia M, Colella D, et al. “Hypertension is such a difficult disease to manage”: Federally qualified health center staff- and leadership-perceived readiness to implement a technology-facilitated team-based hypertension model. Implementation Science Communications. 2024;5(1):49. DOI: 10.1186/s43058-024-00587-8
  80. Portz JD, Ford KL, Elsbernd K, Knoepke CE, Flint K, Bekelman DB, et al. “I like the idea of it…but probably wouldn’t use it” – Health care provider perspectives on heart failure mHealth: Qualitative study. JMIR Cardio. 2020;4(1):e18101. DOI: 10.2196/18101
  81. Alessa T, Hawley M, de Witte L. Identification of the most suitable app to support the self-management of hypertension: Systematic selection approach and qualitative study. JMIR mHealth and uHealth. 2021;9(11):e29207. DOI: 10.2196/29207
  82. Dullabh P, Heaney-Huls KK, Chiao AB, Callaham MG, Desai P, Gauthreaux NA, et al. Implementation and evaluation of an electronic health record-integrated app for postpartum monitoring of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy using patient-contributed data collection. JAMIA Open. 2023;6(4):ooad098. DOI: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooad098
  83. Teo SH, Chew EAL, Ng DWL, Tang WE, Koh GCH, Teo VHY. Implementation and use of technology-enabled blood pressure monitoring and teleconsultation in Singapore’s primary care: A qualitative evaluation using the socio-technical systems approach. BMC Primary Care. 2023;24(1):71. DOI: 10.1186/s12875-023-02014-8
  84. Kobe EA, Lewinski AA, Jeffreys AS, Smith VA, Coffman CJ, Danus SM, et al. Implementation of an intensive telehealth intervention for rural patients with clinic-refractory diabetes. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 2022;37(12):30803088. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-021-07281-8
  85. Brown-Johnson CG, Safaeinili N, Baratta J, Palaniappan L, Mahoney M, Rosas LG, et al. Implementation outcomes of Humanwide: Integrated precision health in team-based family practice primary care. BMC Family Practice. 2021;22(1):28. DOI: 10.1186/s12875-021-01373-4
  86. McCarthy MM, Szerencsy A, Taza-Rocano L, Hopkins S, Mann D, D’Eramo Melkus G et al. Implementing a clinical decision support tool to improve physical activity. Nursing Research. 2024;73(3):216223. DOI: 10.1097/NNR.0000000000000714
  87. Gupta A, Ellis SD, Burkhardt C, Young K, Mazzotti DR, Mahnken J, et al. Implementing a home-based virtual hypertension programme-A pilot feasibility study. Family Practice. 2023;40(2):414422. DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cmac084
  88. Suen M, Manski-Nankervis JA, McBride C, Lumsden N, Hunter B. Implementing a sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor module with a software tool (future health today): Qualitative study. JMIR Formative Research. 2024;8:e50737. DOI: 10.2196/50737
  89. Cornell S, Doust J, Morgan M, Greaves K, Hawkes AL, de Wet C, et al. Implementing patient decision aids into general practice clinical decision support systems: Feasibility study in cardiovascular disease prevention. PEC Innovation. 2023;2:100140. DOI: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100140
  90. Khonsari S, Chandler C, Parker R, Holloway A. Increasing cardiovascular medication adherence: A medical research council complex mhealth intervention mixed-methods feasibility study to inform global practice. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2020;76(10):26702684. DOI: 10.1111/jan.14465
  91. Kocanda L, Fisher K, Brown LJ, May J, Rollo ME, Collins CE, et al. Informing telehealth service delivery for cardiovascular disease management: Exploring the perceptions of rural health professionals. Australian Health Review. 2021;45(2):241246. DOI: 10.1071/AH19231
  92. Leonard C, Liu W, Holstein A, Alliance S, Nunnery M, Rohs C, et al. Informing use of telehealth for managing chronic conditions: Mixed-methods evaluation of telehealth use to manage heart failure during COVID-19. Journal of the American Heart Association. 2023;12(4):e027362. DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.122.027362
  93. Gomis-Pastor M, Mirabet S, Roig E, Lopez L, Brossa V, Galvez-Tugas E, et al. Interdisciplinary mobile health model to improve clinical care after heart transplantation: Implementation strategy study. JMIR Cardio. 2020;4(1):e19065. DOI: 10.2196/19065
  94. Riboli-Sasco E, El-Osta A, El Asmar ML, Karki M, Kerr G, Sathaymoorthy G, et al. Investigating barriers & facilitators for the successful implementation of the BP@home initiative in London: Primary care perspectives. PLoS One. 2024;19(2):e0298898. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298898
  95. Nemis-White JM, Hamilton LM, Shaw S, MacKillop JH, Parkash R, Choudhri SH, et al; IMPACT-AF Investigators. Lessons learned from Integrated Management Program Advancing Community Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation (IMPACT-AF): A pragmatic clinical trial of computerized decision support in primary care. Trials. 2021;22(1):531. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-021-05488-y
  96. Vandekerckhove P, Vandekerckhove Y, Tavernier R, De Jaegher K, de Mul M. Leveraging user experience to improve video consultations in a cardiology practice during the COVID-19 pandemic: Initial insights. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2020;22(6):e19771. DOI: 10.2196/19771
  97. Varnfield M, Redd C, Stoney RM, Higgins L, Scolari N, Warwick R, et al. M♡THer, an mHealth system to support women with gestational diabetes mellitus: Feasibility and acceptability study. Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics. 2021;23(5):358366. DOI: 10.1089/dia.2020.0509
  98. Watson KE, Dhaliwal K, Benterud E, Robertshaw S, Verdin N, McMurtry E, et al. Managing medications during “sick days” in patients with diabetes, kidney, and cardiovascular conditions: A theory-informed approach to intervention design and implementation. Canadian Journal of Diabetes. 2024;48(4):259268.e4. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2024.02.003
  99. Kauw D, Huisma PR, Medlock SK, Koole MA, Weirda E, Abu-Hanna A, et al. Mobile health in cardiac patients: An overview on experiences and challenges of stakeholders involved in daily use and development. BMJ Innovations. 2020;6:184191. DOI: 10.1136/bmjinnov-2019-000418
  100. Demers S, Wagner JM. Nurses’ and physicians’ perspectives on text-based postpartum blood pressure monitoring. The Journal for Nurse Practitioners. 2020;17(3):348353. DOI: 10.1016/j.nurpra.2020.09.004
  101. Bazzano AN, Patel T, Nauman E, Cernigliaro D, Shi L. Optimizing telehealth for diabetes management in the Deep South of the United States: Qualitative study of barriers and facilitators on the patient and clinician journey. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2024;26:e43583. DOI: 10.2196/43583
  102. Baratta J, Brown-Johnson C, Safaeinili N, Goldman Rosas L, Palaniappan L, Winget M, et al. Patient and health professional perceptions of telemonitoring for hypertension management: Qualitative study. JMIR Formative Research. 2022;6(6):e32874. DOI: 10.2196/32874
  103. Van Emmenis M, Jamison J, Kassavou A, Hardeman W, Naughton F, A’Court C, et al. Patient and practitioner views on a combined face-to-face and digital intervention to support medication adherence in hypertension: A qualitative study within primary care. BMJ Open. 2022;12(2):e053183. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053183
  104. Grey E, Brown F, Smith P, Springett D, Augustine D, Sengupta R, et al. Patient-clinician dynamics in remote consultations: A qualitative study of cardiology and rheumatology outpatient clinics in the UK. BMJ Open. 2023;13(5):e070923. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070923
  105. Andersson U, Bengtsson U, Ranerup A, Midlöv P, Kjellgren K. Patients and professionals as partners in hypertension care: Qualitative substudy of a randomized controlled trial using an interactive web-based system via mobile phone. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2021;23(6):e26143. DOI: 10.2196/26143
  106. Santana MJ, Zelinsky S, Ahmed S, Doktorchik C, James M, Wilton S, et al. Patients, clinicians and researchers working together to improve cardiovascular health: A qualitative study of barriers and priorities for patient-oriented research. BMJ Open. 2020;10(2):e031187. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031187
  107. Aquino M, Griffith J, Vattaparambil T, Munce S, Hladunewich M, Seto E. Patients’ and providers’ perspectives on and needs of telemonitoring to support clinical management and self-care of people at high risk for preeclampsia: Qualitative study. JMIR Human Factors. 2022;9(1):e32545. DOI: 10.2196/32545
  108. Alarabyat IA, Al-Nsair N, Alrimawi I, Al-Yateem N, Shudifat RM, Saifan AR. Perceived barriers to effective use of telehealth in managing the care of patients with cardiovascular diseases: A qualitative study exploring healthcare professionals’ views in Jordan. BMC Health Services Research. 2023;23(1):452. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-09368-w
  109. Otieno P, Agyemang C, Wainaina C, Igonya EK, Ouedraogo R, Wambiya EOA, et al. Perceived health system facilitators and barriers to integrated management of hypertension and type 2 diabetes in Kenya: A qualitative study. BMJ Open. 2023;13(8):e074274. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074274
  110. Schott SL, Berkowitz J, Dodge SE, Petersen CL, Saunders CH, Sobti NK, et al. Personalized, electronic health record-integrated decision aid for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: A small cluster randomized trial and qualitative analysis of efficacy and acceptability. Circulation Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes. 2021;14(6):e007329. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.120.007329
  111. Thorup CB, Villadsen A, Andreasen JJ, Aarøe J, Andreasen J, Brocki BC. Perspectives on participation in a feasibility study on exercise-based cardiac telerehabilitation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: Qualitative interview study among patients and health professionals. JMIR Formative Research. 2022;6(6):e35365. DOI: 10.2196/35365
  112. Savickas V, Veale EL, Bhamra SK, Stewart AJ, Mathie A, Corlett S. Pharmacists detecting atrial fibrillation in general practice: A qualitative focus group study. BJGP Open. 2020;4(3):bjgpopen20X101042. DOI: 10.3399/bjgpopen20X101042
  113. Gondi S, Ellis S, Gupta M, Ellerbeck E, Richter K, Burns J, et al. Physician perceived barriers and facilitators for self-measured blood pressure monitoring- A qualitative study. PLoS One. 2021;16(8):e0255578. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255578
  114. Schertzer K, Belitzky J, Conboy C, Joshi H, Harvey K, Hondal GS, et al. Physiotherapists’ adoption and perceptions of tele-rehabilitation for cardiorespiratory care in response to COVID-19. Physiotherapy Canada. 2024;76(2):211217. DOI: 10.3138/ptc-2021-0135
  115. McGillion M, Ouellette C, Good A, Bird M, Henry S, Clyne W, et al. Postoperative remote automated monitoring and virtual hospital-to-home care system following cardiac and major vascular surgery: User testing study. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2020;22(3):e15548. DOI: 10.2196/15548
  116. Indraratna P, Biswas U, Liu H, Redmond SJ, Yu J, Lovell NH, et al. Process evaluation of a randomised controlled trial for TeleClinical Care, a smartphone-app based model of care. Frontiers in Medicine. 2022;8:780882. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.780882
  117. Klaiman T, Iannotte LG, Josephs M, Russell LB, Norton L, Mehta S, et al. Qualitative analysis of a remote monitoring intervention for managing heart failure. BMC Cardiovascular Disorders. 2023;23(1):440. DOI: 10.1186/s12872-023-03456-9
  118. Tighe SA, Ball K, Kayser L, Kensing F, Maddison R. Qualitative study of the views of people living with cardiovascular disease, and healthcare professionals, towards the use of a digital platform to support cardiovascular disease self-management. BMJ Open. 2022;12(11):e056768. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056768
  119. Ladegaard CT, Bamberg C, Aalling M, Jensen DM, Kamstrup-Larsen N, Madsen CV, et al. REAching Frail ELderly patients to optimize diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation (REAFEL): A feasibility study of a cross-sectoral shared-care model. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022;19(12):7383. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19127383
  120. Obaid Hassan A, Moreno Lopez R, Lane DA, Lip GYH, Harris RV, Mughal A, et al. Screening of atrial fibrillation in dental practices: A qualitative feasibility study. Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy. 2023;21(9):643649. DOI: 10.1080/14779072.2023.2254679
  121. Auton A, Zaman S, Padayachee Y, Samways JW, Quaife NM, Sweeney M, et al. Smartphone-Based Remote Monitoring for Chronic Heart Failure: Mixed Methods Analysis of User Experience From Patient and Nurse Perspectives. JMIR Nurs. 2023 Jun 6;6:e44630. DOI: 10.2196/44630
  122. Tsukada YT, Kodani E, Asai K, Yasutake M, Seino Y, Shimizu W. Status of medical care and management requirements of elderly patients with heart failure in a comprehensive community health system –Survey of general practitioners’ views. Circulation Reports. 2021;3(2):7785. DOI: 10.1253/circrep.CR-20-0132
  123. Thomas EE, Chambers R, Phillips S, Rawstorn JC, Cartledge S. Sustaining telehealth among cardiac and pulmonary rehabilitation services: A qualitative framework study. European Journal of Cardiovasc Nursing. 2023;22(8):795803. DOI: 10.1093/eurjcn/zvac111
  124. Rakers M, van Hattem N, Simic I, Chavannes N, van Peet P, Bonten T, et al. Tailoring remote patient management in cardiovascular risk management for healthcare professionals using panel management: A qualitative study. BMC Primary Care. 2024;25(1):122. DOI: 10.1186/s12875-024-02355-y
  125. Maria ARJ, Serra H, Heleno B. Teleconsultations and their implications for health care: A qualitative study on patients’ and physicians’ perceptions. International Journal of Medical Informatics. 2022;162:104751. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104751
  126. Cartledge S, Rawstorn JC, Tran M, Ryan P, Howden EJ, Jackson A. Telehealth is here to stay but not without challenges: a consultation of cardiac rehabilitation clinicians during COVID-19 in Victoria, Australia. European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing. 2022;21(6):548558. DOI: 10.1093/eurjcn/zvab118
  127. Hammersley V, Parker R, Paterson M, Hanley J, Pinnock H, Padfield P, et al. Telemonitoring at scale for hypertension in primary care: An implementation study. PLoS Medicine. 2020;17(6):e1003124. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003124
  128. Sobreiro P, Oliveira A. The importance of ICT and wearable devices in monitoring the health status of coronary patients. In: Ahram T, Karwowski W, Pickl S, Taiar R (Eds.) Human systems engineering and design II (IHSED 2019). Cham: Springer; 2020. pp. 705711. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-27928-8_107
  129. Zolezzi M, Elhakim A, Hejazi T, Kattan L, Mustafa D, Aboelbaha S, et al. Translating and piloting a cardiovascular risk assessment and management online tool using mobile technology. Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal. 2023;31(4):492498. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsps.2023.02.001
  130. Chew E, Teo SH, Tang WE, Ng DWL, Koh GCH, Teo VHY. Trust and uncertainty in the implementation of a pilot remote blood pressure monitoring program in primary care: Qualitative study of patient and health care professional views. JMIR Human Factors. 2023;10:e36072. DOI: 10.2196/36072
  131. Cher BP, Kembhavi G, Toh KY, Audimulam J, Chia WA, Vrijhoef HJ, et al. Understanding the attitudes of clinicians and patients toward a self-management eHealth tool for atrial fibrillation: Qualitative study. JMIR Human Factors. 2020;7(3):e15492. DOI: 10.2196/15492
  132. Buis LR, Roberson DN, Kadri R, Rockey NG, Plegue MA, Danak SU, et al. Understanding the feasibility, acceptability, and efficacy of a clinical pharmacist-led mobile approach (BPTrack) to hypertension management: Mixed methods pilot study. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2020;22(8):e19882. DOI: 10.2196/19882
  133. Bezerra Giordan L, Ronto R, Chau J, Chow C, Laranjo L. Use of mobile apps in heart failure self-management: Qualitative study exploring the patient and primary care clinician perspective. JMIR Cardio. 2022;6(1):e33992. DOI: 10.2196/33992
  134. Saifan AR, Alarabyat IA, Alrimawi I, Al-Nsair N. Utilizing telehealth intervention to support patients with cardiovascular diseases in Jordan: A qualitative study. Applied Nursing Research. 2022;68:151641. DOI: 10.1016/j.apnr.2022.151641
  135. Flores-Sandoval C, Sibbald SL, Ryan BL, Adams TL, Suskin N, McKelvie R, et al. Virtual care during COVID-19: The perspectives of older adults and their healthcare providers in a cardiac rehabilitation setting. Canadian Journal on Aging. 2024;43(4):491498. DOI: 10.1017/S0714980824000102
  136. Brouns B, Meesters JJL, de Kloet AJ, Vliet Vlieland TPM, Houdijk S, Arwert HJ, et al. What works and why in the implementation of eRehabilitation after stroke – A process evaluation. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology. 2024;19(2):345359. DOI: 10.1080/17483107.2022.2088867
  137. Muehlensiepen F, Hoffmann MJ, Nübel J, Ignatyev Y, Heinze M, Butter C, et al. Acceptance of telemedicine by specialists and general practitioners in cardiology care: Cross-sectional survey study. JMIR Formative Research. 2024;8:e49526. DOI: 10.2196/49526
  138. Piskorz D, Díaz-Barreiro LA, López Santi R, Múnera A, Molina DI, Barroso WS, et al. Blood pressure telemonitoring and telemedicine for hypertension management-positions, expectations and feasibility of Latin-American practitioners. SURVEY carried out by several cardiology and hypertension societies of the Americas. Blood Pressure. 2022;31(1):236244. DOI: 10.1080/08037051.2022.2123781
  139. Kerr B, Pharithi RB, Barrett M, Halley C, Gallagher J, Ledwidge M, et al. Changing to remote management of a community heart failure population during COVID-19 – Clinician and patient perspectives’. International Journal of Cardiology Heart & Vasculature. 2020;31:100665. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2020.100665
  140. Breil B, Salewski C, Apolinário-Hagen J. Comparing the acceptance of mobile hypertension apps for disease management among patients versus clinical use among physicians: Cross-sectional survey. JMIR Cardio. 2022;6(1):e31617. DOI: 10.2196/31617
  141. Boriani G, Schnabel RB, Healey JS, Lopes RD, Verbiest-van Gurp N, Lobban T, et al. Consumer-led screening for atrial fibrillation using consumer-facing wearables, devices and apps: A survey of health care professionals by AF-SCREEN international collaboration. European Journal of Internal Medicine. 2020;82:97104. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejim.2020.09.005
  142. Queiroz C, Guerreiro C, Oliveira-Santos M, Ferreira D, Fontes-Carvalho R, Ladeiras-Lopes R. Digital health and cardiovascular healthcare professionals in Portugal: Current status, expectations and barriers to implementation. Revista Portuguesa de Cardiologia. 2024;43(8):459467. DOI: 10.1016/j.repc.2023.10.014
  143. Lino IGT, de Gusmao de Oliveira R, Ferraz Teston E, Chatalov Ferreira P, Fransisqueti Marquete V, Carneiro Mussi F, et al. Disposição de enfermeiros para o uso do telemonitoramento em usuários com condições crônicas: estudo transversal. Online Brazilian Journal of Nursing. 2023;22:e20236648. DOI: 10.17665/1676-4285.20236648
  144. Yao Y, Li Z, He Y, Zhang Y, Guo Z, Lei Y, et al. Factors affecting wearable ECG device adoption by general practitioners for atrial fibrillation screening: Cross-sectional study. Frontiers in Public Health. 2023;11:1128127. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1128127
  145. Al Hemyari B, Coffey N, Inman ZW, Singh A. Healthcare providers’ experience using telehealth during the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in a predominantly rural patient base: An online survey. Cureus. 2023;15(3):e36260. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.36260
  146. Kleiner D, Somogyi O, Petlickij FH, Meskó A, Szilvay A, Zelkó R, et al. Implementation of a personal health planning program and health promotion in the community pharmacies. Heliyon. 2022;8(7):e09900. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09900
  147. Kalinina AM, Kulikova MS, Gomoca TA, Gorny BE, Dubovoy II, Drapinka OM. On the topic of demand and usage of the telemedicine model «doctor-patient» for the prevention and control of chronic diseases: the view of a primary health care doctor. Profilakticheskaya Meditsina. 2021;24(28). DOI: 10.17116/profmed20212406128
  148. Koçyigit Burunkaya D, Keser N, Şimşek E, Bozyel S, Dalgıç Y, Şeker M, et al. Perspectives on the use of digital health technologies in cardiology among specialists from an ESC member country: Results from a survey. Turk Kardiyoloji Dernegi Arsivi. 2024;52(1):4451. DOI: 10.5543/tkda.2023.13660
  149. Ding EY, Svennberg E, Wurster C, Duncker D, Manninger M, Lubitz SA, et al. Survey of current perspectives on consumer-available digital health devices for detecting atrial fibrillation. Cardiovascular Digital Health Journal. 2020;1(1):2129. DOI: 10.1016/j.cvdhj.2020.06.002
  150. Kalinina AM, Gornyi BE, Dubovoy II, Antonov KA, Komkov D, Drapinka OM. The attitude of primary care physicians to the use of telemedicine technologies in dispensary observation of patients with chronic diseases (medical and sociological research). Profilakticheskaya Meditsina. 2020;23(6):8. DOI: 10.17116/profmed2020230628
  151. Honein-AbouHaidar GN, Antoun J, Badr K, Hlais S, Nazaretian H. Users’ acceptance of electronic patient portals in Lebanon. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making. 2020;20(1):31. DOI: 10.1186/s12911-020-1047-x
  152. Sanderson KE, Spithoff KD, Corovic M, Langdon KM, Schwalm JD. An Evaluation of Cardiology Virtual Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic. CJC Open. 2021;3(10):12941299. DOI: 10.1016/j.cjco.2021.05.015
  153. Schepart A, Burton A, Durkin L, Fuller A, Charap E, Bhambri R, et al. Artificial intelligence-enabled tools in cardiovascular medicine: A survey of current use, perceptions, and challenges. Cardiovascular Digital Health Journal. 2023;4(3):101110. DOI: 10.1016/j.cvdhj.2023.04.003
  154. Harvey M, Seiler A. Challenges in managing a remote monitoring device clinic. Heart Rhythm O2. 2022;3(1):37. DOI: 10.1016/j.hroo.2021.12.002
  155. Waldman CE, Min JH, Wassif H, Freeman AM, Rzeszut AK, Reilly J, et al. COVID-19 telehealth preparedness: a cross-sectional assessment of cardiology practices in the USA. Personalized Medicine. 2022;19(5):411422. DOI: 10.2217/pme-2021-0179
  156. Morton K, Dennison L, Band R, Stuart B, Wilde L, Cheetham-Blake T, et al. Implementing a digital intervention for managing uncontrolled hypertension in primary care: A mixed methods process evaluation. Implementation Science. 2021;16(1):57. DOI: 10.1186/s13012-021-01123-1
  157. Gordon K, Dainty KN, Steele Gray C, DeLacy J, Shah A, Seto E. Normalizing telemonitoring in nurse-led care models for complex chronic patient populations: Case study. JMIR Nursing. 2022;5(1):e36346. DOI: 10.2196/36346
  158. Coylewright M, Keevil JG, Xu K, Dodge SE, Frosch D, Field ME. Pragmatic study of clinician use of a personalized patient decision aid integrated into the electronic health record: An 8-year experience. Telemedicine Journal and E-Health. 2020;26(5):597602. DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2019.0112
  159. Nayyar D, Pendrith C, Kishimoto V, Chu C, Fujioka J, Rios P, et al. Quality of virtual care for ambulatory care sensitive conditions: Patient and provider experiences. International Journal of Medical Informatics. 2022;165:104812. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104812
  160. Meador M, Sachdev N, Anderson E, Roy D, Bay RC, Becker LH, et al. Self-measured blood pressure monitoring during the COVID-19 pandemic: Perspectives from community health center clinicians. The Journal of Healthcare Quality. 2024;46(2):109118. DOI: 10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000417
  161. Zhang Y, Liu J. Prediction of overall energy consumption of data centers in different locations. Sensors. 2022;22(10):3704. DOI: 10.3390/s22103704
  162. Nilsen P. Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks. Implementation Science. 2015;10:53. DOI: 10.1186/s13012-015-0242-0
  163. Talevski J, Kulnik ST, Jessup RL, Falls R, Cvetanovska N, Beauchamp A. Use of co-design methodology in the development of cardiovascular disease secondary prevention interventions: A scoping review. Health Expectations. 2023;26(1):1629. DOI: 10.1111/hex.13633
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/gh.1561 | Journal eISSN: 2211-8179
Language: English
Page range: 45 - 45
Submitted on: May 26, 2025
Accepted on: May 14, 2026
Published on: Jun 4, 2026
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2026 Ariel Kraselnik, Hannah McGowan, Ines A. Amiali, Irene Gibson, Surabhi Joshi, Nasirumbi Magero, Corinne H. Miller, Sarah Oulousian, Abhinav Sharma, Mbiydzenyuy Ferdinant Sonyuy, Stefan Tino Kulnik, Nilay S. Shah, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.