Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Urban-Rural Disparity in Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Use: A 10-Year Statewide Cohort Cover

Urban-Rural Disparity in Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Use: A 10-Year Statewide Cohort

Open Access
|Dec 2025

Figures & Tables

Table 1

Characteristics of the cardiovascular hospitalisation population*.

URBAN n = 880972% (95% CI)REGIONAL n = 304961%; 95% CIRURAL n = 105325%, 95% CI
Male53.94 (53.83–54.04)54.01 (53.84–54.19)56.11 (55.81–56.40)
Female46.06 (45.96–46.17)45.98 (45.81–46.16)43.89 (43.60–44.19)
Age, y
18–4412.55 (12.48–12.62)9.22 (9.11–9.32)9.46 (9.28–9.64)
45–6428.69 (28.59–28.78)27.22 (27.06–27.38)29.32 (29.04–29.59)
65–7420.15 (20.07–20.23)23.06 (22.91–23.21)24.06 (23.80–24.31)
75–8422.92 (22.83–23.00)25.36 (25.20–25.51)24.41 (24.15–24.67)
85+15.70 (15.62–15.78)15.15 (15.02–15.27)12.76 (12.56–12.96)
Comorbidities
Cancer0.01 (0.01–0.02)0.01 (0.00–0.01)0.01 (0.01–0.02)
Congestive heart failure0.29 (0.28–0.30)0.17 (0.16–0.19)0.19 (0.16–0.21)
Diabetes0.51 (0.49–0.52)0.30 (0.28–0.32)0.36 (0.32–0.40)
Hypertension0.55 (0.53–0.56)0.34 (0.32–0.37)0.38 (0.35–0.42)
Obesity0.02 (0.01–0.02)0.02 (0.02–0.03)0.02 (0.01–0.03)
Renal failure0.19 (0.18–0.20)0.10 (0.09–0.11)0.11 (0.09–0.13)
Other comorbidity0.55 (0.53–0.56)0.29 (0.27–0.31)0.28 (0.25–0.31)
Diagnostic group
      Arrythmia diagnosis12.70 (12.63–12.77)14.94 (14.82–15.07)14.90 (14.69–15.12)
      Complete heart block0.51 (0.50–0.53)0.60 (0.58–0.63)0.64 (0.59–0.69)
      Other heart block0.55 (0.54–0.57)0.68 (0.65–0.71)0.70 (0.65–0.75)
      Sick sinus syndrome0.50 (0.49–0.52)0.53 (0.51–0.56)0.55 (0.51–0.60)
      Atrial fibrillation/flutter8.78 (8.72–8.83)10.76 (10.65–10.87)10.50 (10.32–10.69)
      Ventricular tachycardia/ventricular
fibrillation/cardiac arrest
1.22 (1.20–1.24)1.14 (1.10–1.18)1.16 (1.10–1.22)
      Other arrythmia1.23 (1.21–1.25)1.48 (1.44–1.52)1.69 (1.62–1.77)
Cardiomyopathy diagnosis1.80 (1.77–1.83)2.47 (2.42–2.53)2.51 (2.42–2.60)
      Ischaemic0.38 (0.36–0.39)0.49 (0.46–0.51)0.47 (0.43–0.51)
      Non-ischaemic1.70 (1.67–1.73)2.35 (2.30–2.41)2.33 (2.24–2.43)
Syncope Diagnosis7.19 (7.13–7.24)6.22 (6.13–6.30)5.76 (5.62–5.90)

[i] *All patients aged over 18 years who presented with selected cardiovascular conditions to a hospital in New South Wales from 2008 to 2018 (see Table S1 for International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Australian Modification codes). Percentages provided are of total patients from urban, regional and rural areas, respectively.

Table 2

Cardiac device implants in the cardiovascular hospitalisation population*.

URBAN n (%, 95% CI)REGIONAL n (%, 95% CI)RURAL n (%, 95% CI)
Cardiac device implant24303 (2.76, 2.71–2.82)5975 (1.96, 1.88–2.04)2338 (2.23, 2.08–2.38)
      Pacemakers16897 (1.92, 1.89–1.95)4124 (1.35, 1.31–1.39)1522 (1.45, 1.37–1.52)
      Implantable cardiac defibrillators5044 (0.57, 0.56–0.59)1244 (0.41, 0.39–0.43)578 (0.55, 0.51–0.60)
      Cardiac resynchronisation therapy2362 (0.27, 0.26–0.28)607 (0.20, 0.18–0.22)238 (0.23, 0.20–0.26)

[i] *All patients aged over 18 years who presented with selected cardiovascular conditions to a hospital in New South Wales from 2008 to 2018 (see Table S1 for International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Australian Modification codes). Percentages provided are of total patients from urban, regional and rural areas, respectively.

gh-20-1-1503-g1.png
Figure 1

Adjusted odds ratio with 95% CI for CIEDs in regional and rural compared to urban (reference) locations. Adjusted for age and comorbidities. Odds ratio <1 suggests lower implantation rates in regional and rural compared to urban locations.

gh-20-1-1503-g2.png
Figure 2

Trends in CIED insertion by remoteness.

Table 3

Adjusted* mortality rates (95% CI) at 30 days and five years after cardiac implantation for patients at urban versus regional and rural locations.

REMOTENESS CATEGORYPACEMAKER %, (95% CI), P VALUE**DEFIBRILLATOR %, (95% CI), P VALUE**CARDIAC RESYNCHRONISATION %, (95% CI), P VALUE**
30-day mortality
Urban0.6 (0.5–0.7)0.9 (0.6–1.2)0.8 (0.5–1.1)
Regional0.7 (0.6–0.8), P = 0.51.0 (0.7–1.3), P = 0.80.8 (0.5–1.1), P = 0.8
Rural0.7 (0.6–0.8), P = 0.151.1 (0.7–1.4), P = 0.50.9 (0.6–1.2), P = 0.5
5-year mortality
Urban23.7 (23.2–24.2)29.5 (28.2–30.7)24.2 (22.9–25.5)
Regional25.0 (24.5–25.6), P = 0.00130.9 (29.6–32.2), P = 0.1225.5 (24.2–26.8), P = 0.17
Rural26.4 (25.8–27.0), P < 0.00132.5 (31.1–33.8), P = 0.00226.9 (25.5–28.3), P = 0.005

[i] *Rates are adjusted for age and presence of Elixhauser comorbidities.

**P value for mortality in remoteness category vs urban location.

gh-20-1-1503-g3.png
Figure 3

Urban-rural disparity in cardiac implantable electronic device use: 10-year state-wide cohort of 32,616 consecutive CIED patients.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/gh.1503 | Journal eISSN: 2211-8179
Language: English
Submitted on: Oct 18, 2024
Accepted on: Nov 24, 2025
Published on: Dec 10, 2025
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2025 Kenneth K. Cho, Edel O’Hagan, Brodie Sheahen, Sameer Karve, Natasha Nassar, Andrew Wilson, Tim Badgery-Parker, Clara K. Chow, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.