Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Patient-Reported Outcome-Based, Comprehensive Assessment of Quality of Life of Adults with Congenital Heart Disease in India Cover

Patient-Reported Outcome-Based, Comprehensive Assessment of Quality of Life of Adults with Congenital Heart Disease in India

Open Access
|Oct 2025

Figures & Tables

gh-20-1-1479-g1.png
Figure 1

The conceptual model of Wilson and Cleary, eluding causal links among characteristics of the individual, social environment, biological and physiological variables contributing to various facets of quality of life assessment. Characteristics of the individual, the underlying disease, and the environment affect physiological factors. The physiological factors influence the physical and psychological functioning, which in turn influences the patient’s own perception of their health status and overall quality of life.

Table 1

Demographics and medical details stratified by gender.

CHARACTERISTICOVERALL, N = 3251MEN, N = 1831WOMEN, N = 1421p-value2
Age24 (21, 30)24 (21, 31)24 (21, 29)0.7
Disease Complexity0.2
    Simple68 (21%)32 (17%)36 (25%)
    Moderate122 (38%)74 (40%)48 (34%)
    Complex135 (42%)77 (42%)58 (41%)
Employed182 (56%)119 (65%)63 (44%)<0.001
Education0.7
    Below high school27 (8.3%)16 (8.7%)11 (7.7%)
    High school95 (29%)49 (27%)46 (32%)
    Bachelor’s degrees121 (37%)71 (39%)50 (35%)
    Master’s degree82 (25%)47 (26%)35 (25%)
Married86 (26%)44 (24%)42 (30%)0.3
No of children0.004
    0268 (82%)150 (82%)118 (83%)
    123 (7.1%)7 (3.8%)16 (11%)
    228 (8.6%)22 (12%)6 (4.2%)
    34 (1.2%)2 (1.1%)2 (1.4%)
    42 (0.6%)2 (1.1%)0 (0%)
Self-reported NYHA0.8
    1161 (50%)94 (52%)67 (48%)
    2110 (34%)62 (34%)48 (34%)
    333 (10%)17 (9.4%)16 (11%)
    417 (5.3%)8 (4.4%)9 (6.4%)
    Unknown422

[i] 1 Median (IQR); n (%).

2 Wilcoxon rank sum test; Pearson’s Chi-squared test; Fisher’s exact test.

Table 2

Comparison of Patient Reported outcome measures with global data.

CHARACTERISTIC1 MEAN (SD)2014, N = 2001GLOBAL DATA 2014, N = 4028p VALUE2022, N = 1251GLOBAL DATA 2022, N = 8415p VALUE
PCS67.2 (20.7)77.2 ± 20.9<0.00168.8 (20.5)75.2 ± 21.30.001
MCS68.9 (19.5)72.1 ± 19.00.02171.4 (17.7)69.2 ± 18.70.166
EQ VAS77.6 (18.7)77.9 ± 16.50.83176.3 (16.1)73.3 ± 17.80.038
QOL76.7 (18.5)78.3 ± 16.60.21672.1 (18.3)72.5 ± 20.00.809

[i] PCS – Physical Component Summary.

MC-S – Mental Component Summary.

EQ VAS – EuroQoL Visual Analogue Scale.

QoL – Quality of Life.

gh-20-1-1479-g2.png
Figure 2

Correlation of the various patient-reported outcome measures. All measures were strongly related to each other. This relationship remained similar for men and women. Standardized values of each of these PROMs are depicted on the x and y axes to demonstrate the relationship between them.

gh-20-1-1479-g3.png
Figure 3

Differential effect of unemployment on the various patient-reported outcome measures. Employed women had worse scores in EuroQoL VAS, MCS, and LAS-QOL. PCS scores of women were unaffected by employment status.

Table 3

Relative ranking and effect sizes of items measuring physical functioning, psychological functioning and general health status and Quality of Life using adjusted R2-independent forward stepwise multiple linear regression.

MODEL 1 : NYHA INCLUDED
VARIABLESPCS (TOTAL R2 = 0.339)MCS (TOTAL R2 = 0.123)HS (TOTAL R2 = 0.134)QOL (TOTAL R2 = 0.040)AVERAGE R2 RANKSt VALUEAVERAGE EFFECT SIZE (COHEN’S f2)
PARTIAL R2 RANKEFFECT SIZE (t-VALUE)PARTIAL R2 RANKEFFECT SIZE (t-VALUE)PARTIAL R2 RANKEFFECT SIZE (t-VALUE)PARTIAL R2 RANKEFFECT SIZE (t-VALUE)
Self-reported NYHA-not limited5 (0.090)9.31 (0.035)6.72 (0.057)6.12 (0.026)2.92.56.250.145
Self-reported NYHA-Slightly limited1 (0.009)2.91 (0.019)2.512.70.316
Male3 (0.044)3.833.80.446
Masters degree or higher2 (0.034)3.323.30.462
Center -I1 (0.006)2.512.50.015
Decrease in Age (Years)4 (0.045)3.443.40.444
MODEL 2: NYHA EXCLUDED
(TOTAL R2 = 0.136)(TOTAL R2 = 0.012)(TOTAL R2 = 0.014)(TOTAL R2 = 0.014)
Male3(0.027)4.31(0)2.01(0)2.21.72.830.051
Decrease in Age (Years)4(0.029)4.244.20.124
Masters degree or higher5(0.031)3.253.20.121
Complexity-Simple1(0.011)3.713.70.144
Complexity-Moderate2(0.015)2.222.20.141
Center – I1(0.0001)2.212.20.013

[i] PCS – Physical Component Summary.

MCS – Mental Component Summary.

EQ VAS – EuroQoL Visual Analogue Scale.

QoL – Quality of Life.

gh-20-1-1479-g4.png
Figure 4

Hierarchy of factors influencing overall quality of life in order of effect size from the Wilson and Cleary model. The average effect size is shown on the x-axis and the factors responsible on the y-axis.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/gh.1479 | Journal eISSN: 2211-8179
Language: English
Submitted on: Mar 13, 2025
Accepted on: Sep 18, 2025
Published on: Oct 16, 2025
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2025 Navaneetha Sasikumar, Sakthi Saravanan, Krishna Prasenan, Seeja Raji, Georg Gutjahr, Abish Sudhakar, Shanthi Chidambarathanu, Philip Moons, Raman Krishna Kumar, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.