Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Quality of Available Cardiovascular Disease Knowledge Tools: A Systematic Review Cover

Quality of Available Cardiovascular Disease Knowledge Tools: A Systematic Review

Open Access
|Jul 2025

Figures & Tables

gh-20-1-1446-g1.png
Figure 1

PRISMA Flow Diagram.

Table 1

Scale and sample characteristics of included studies.

DEVELOPMENTTRANSLATED LANGUAGETOTAL
Question Length
    Mean1921.520
    Median21.621.521.5
    Minimum5125
    Maximum643064
Question Types (Count)
    True/False (Yes/No) + IDK7613
    Multiple Choice9312
    Combination101
    Likert Scale112
Sample Type (Count)
    Clinical13922
    General Population415
    Pre-clinical101
Gender Male Mean %0.63a0.550.56
Gender Male Median %0.57a0.510.55
Mean Age per Sample
    Mean57.8b61.0a59.1c
    Median60.5b60.7a60.6c

[i] aMissing data = 1 study; bMissing data = 5 studies; cMissing data = 6 studies.

Table 2

Domain areas covered by each CVD knowledge scale, as defined by authors sorted by most frequent domain areas.

STUDYRISK FACTORSNUTRITION/DIETMEDICAL KNOWLEDGE/PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF <3PHYSICAL ACTIVITY/EXERCISETREATMENT OPTIONSSYMPTOMSSELF-CARE & MANAGEMENTPSYCHO SOCIAL RISKSEPIDEMIO LOGICAL KNOWLEDGESTRESSHEART FAILURE SPECIFIC HEALTH LITERACYCHD, CONTRACEPTIVES AND PREGNANCYDIABETES AND CVDRHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS SPECIFIC RISK FACTORSPRE-HOSPITAL ADMISSIONTHOUGHTS & ACTIONS TOWARDS HEART FAILUREHYPERTENSIONFEMALE SPECIFIC CHD KNOWLEDGE
Development StudiesBergman 2011 (27)
Bonin 2014 (28)
Butts 2018 (17)
Cecchetto 2014 (16)
Ghisi 2010b (29)
Gwadry-Sridhar 2003 (30)
John 2009 (19)
Kato 2013 (31)
Khazaei 2018 (23)
Lainscak 2005 (32)
Reilly 2009 (33)
Santos 2018 (34)
Schapira 2012 (35)
Smith 1991 (36)
Thanavaro 2010 (21)
van der Wal 2005 (37)
Wagner 2005 (38)
Woringer 2017 (39)
Language Translation StudiesFrayssac 2017 (18)
Ghisi 2010a (40)
Ghisi 2018 (41)
Lima 2022 (42)
Omovvat 2022 (43)
Saffi 2013(44)
Santos 2019 (45)
Yang 2020 (22)
Yue 2016 (46)
Zehirlioglu 2020 (47)
Table 3

Quality ratings for each CVD knowledge scale.

STUDYCONSTRUCT VALIDITYCRITERION VALIDITYINTERNAL CONSISTENCYTEST-RETEST RELIABILITYOVERALL RATING
UniqueBergman 2011 (27)ACC
Bonin 2014 (28)DCAC
Butts 2018 (17)ACBB
Cecchetto 2014 (16)DAAB
Ghisi 2010b (29)DDAC
Gwadry-Sridhar 2003 (30)CD
John 2009 (19)DDDD
Kato 2013 (31)DCD
Khazaei 2018 (20)ABAA
Lainscak 2005 (32)CD
Reilly 2009 (33)ACC
Santos 2018 (34)DCAC
Schapira 2012 (35)C*D
Smith 1991 (36)*BC
Thanavaro 2010 (21)AACBA
van der Wal 2005 (37)**DD
Wagner 2005 (38)CCAC
Woringer 2017 (39)DCD
TranslationFrayssac 2017 (18)DCBC
Ghisi 2010a (40)DDBC
Ghisi 2018 (41)DCBC
Lima 2022 (42)ADAB
Omovvat 2022 (43)*CBC
Saffi 2013 (44)DCD
Santos 2019 (45)*DAC
Yang 2020 (22)A*ABA
Yue 2016 (46)DBAB
Zehirlioglu 2020 (47)*D

[i] * Information available but does not fit PGF criteria; † insufficient information to evaluate.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/gh.1446 | Journal eISSN: 2211-8179
Language: English
Submitted on: Nov 13, 2024
|
Accepted on: Jun 23, 2025
|
Published on: Jul 9, 2025
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2025 Michael A. Fajardo, Cassia Yung, Samuel Cornell, Rajesh Puranik, Anna L. Hawkes, Shiva Raj Mishra, Jenny Doust, Carissa Bonner, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.