Abstract
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) represents the largest burden of disease globally and despite the availability of strong evidence supporting cost-effective treatments for people with CVD, the implementation of these treatments remains low, especially in low-income settings. Shortages in workforce have led to focus on how to increase clinical capacity. However, a simplistic focus on training clinicians will not fill the gaps in research, policy and implementation, which also need to be addressed at the same time. There are multiple efforts to develop early career capacity across diverse areas at national and international level to address these gaps. To-date, there have been limited efforts to compare or evaluate such programmes, and there are no efforts to harmonise such programmes to take advantage of synergies. We now compare three international programmes on global cardiovascular research to train individuals in their early- and mid-career by aims, experience and outputs.