Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Updated 2022 ACC/AHA Guideline Improves Concordance Between TTE and CT in Monitoring Marfan Syndrome and Related Disorders, but Relevant Measurement Differences Remain Frequent Cover

Updated 2022 ACC/AHA Guideline Improves Concordance Between TTE and CT in Monitoring Marfan Syndrome and Related Disorders, but Relevant Measurement Differences Remain Frequent

Open Access
|May 2024

Figures & Tables

Figure 1

Schematic illustration depicting the varying measurement recommendations for CT and TTE at the aortic root and proximal ascending aorta. The American College of Cardiology (ACC) and American Heart Association (AHA) recently revised their measurement guidelines. The 2010 guideline suggested inner edge to inner edge measurement for TTE and external diameter measurement for CT [14, 15]. However, the updated 2022 ACC/AHA guideline now recommends leading edge to leading edge measurement in TTE and inner diameter measurements in CT imaging [12] (adapted from Isselbacher, E.M., et al. [12]).

Table 1

Mean aortic diameters based on CT.

CT
EXTERNAL DIAMETER, 2010 GUIDELINEINTERNAL DIAMETER, 2022 GUIDELINE
SiteAortic sinusAscending aortaAortic sinusAscending aorta
Mean and SD (mm)43.2 ± 5.836.2 ± 7.742.0 ± 5.835.1 ± 7.6
EXTERNAL DIAMETER, 2010 GUIDELINEINTERNAL DIAMETER, 2022 GUIDELINE
SiteAortic annulusSinotubular junctionAortic annulusSinotubular junction
Mean and SD (mm)33.2 ± 5.231.6 ± 6.732.2 ± 5.230.7 ± 6.9
Table 2

Mean aortic diameters based on TTE.

TTE
INNER EDGE, 2010 GUIDELINELEADING EDGE, 2022 GUIDELINE
SiteSinusAscending aortaSinusAscending aorta
Mean and SD (mm)40.5 ± 5.635.0 ± 7.441.7 ± 5.536.2 ± 7.5
Figure 2

Bland-Altman plots depicting differences in diameter measurement at the aortic sinus (a) and at the level of the ascending aorta (b) applying both the 2010 AHA/ACC guideline and the 2022 AHA/ACC guideline. Dotted red line: clinically acceptable limit of agreement for difference (+/–2 mm). Green line: agreement bias. The frequency of measurement differences outside the acceptable clinical agreement limit of difference (outside the range of the lower and upper dotted red line) was significantly lower using the 2022 AHA/ACC guideline.

Table 3

Overview of the measurement differences between CT and TTE in the assessment of the aortic diameter, depending on the application of the current 2022 and the older ACC/AHA guideline from 2010. The agreement bias represents the average difference between the two applied modalities. The lower and upper tolerance range are calculated by adding and subtracting 1.96 times the standard deviation the agreement bias.

MEASUREMENT DIFFERENCES BETWEEN CT AND TTE
GUIDELINE VERSION20102022
SITESINUSASCENDING AORTASINUSASCENDING AORTA
Measurement differences outside acceptable tolerance (n, %)  67 (49%)  56 (41%)  35 (26%)  40 (29%)
Agreement bias (mm)–2.66–1.21–0.30  1.12
Standard deviation of bias (mm)  2.06  3.01  2.05  2.77
Factor of 1.96  1.96  1.96  1.96  1.96
Lower tolerance range–6.7–7.1–4.3–4.3
Upper tolerance range  1.4  4.7  3.7  6.5
Total (n)  137  137  137  137
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/gh.1322 | Journal eISSN: 2211-8179
Language: English
Submitted on: Dec 28, 2023
Accepted on: Apr 16, 2024
Published on: May 8, 2024
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2024 Johannes Kolck, Tobias Daniel Trippel, Karla Philipp, Petra Gehle, Dominik Geisel, Nick Lasse Beetz, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.