Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Heartache and Heartbreak: An Observational and Mendelian Randomization Study Cover

Heartache and Heartbreak: An Observational and Mendelian Randomization Study

Open Access
|Feb 2024

Figures & Tables

gh-19-1-1302-g1.png
Figure 1

A. Study design. B. Mediator screening process.

HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; TDI, Townsend deprivation index; TV, television.

Table 1

The characteristics of included participants.

TOTALNON-CVD (n = 8577, 88.93%)CVD (n = 1068, 11.07%)P-VALUE
Age, years, mean (SD)50.6 (17.3)48.7 (16.9)66.10 (12.2)<0.001
Gender, Male n (%)4718 (48.9%)4104 (47.9%)614 (57.5%)<0.001
Race, n (%)<0.001
Mexican American1286 (13.3%)1195 (13.9%)91 (8.5%)
Other Hispanic968 (10.0%)889 (10.4%)79 (7.4%)
Non-Hispanic White4329 (44.9%)3719 (43.4%)610 (57.1%)
Non-Hispanic Black1916 (19.9%)1690 (19.7%)226 (21.2%)
Other Race – Including Multi-Racial1146 (11.9%)1084 (12.6%)62 (5.8%)
Education level, n (%)<0.001
High school and below4151 (43.0%)3567 (41.6%)584 (54.7%)
Above high school5494 (57.0%)5010 (58.4%)484 (45.3%)
Ratio of family income to poverty, ratio, mean (SD)2.6 (1.6)2.6 (1.7)2.3 (1.5)<0.001
PHQ-9, points, n (%)809 (8.4%)640 (7.5%)169 (15.8%)<0.001
Smoking, n (%)4291 (44.5%)3643 (42.5%)648 (60.7%)<0.001
Drinking, n (%)7325 (76.0%)6524 (76.1%)801 (75.0%)0.443
History of dyslipidemia, n (%)3542 (36.7%)2851 (33.2%)691 (64.7%)<0.001
History of hypertension, n (%)3675 (38.1%)2888 (33.7%)787 (73.7%)<0.001
History of diabetes, n (%)1359 (14.1%)993 (11.6%)366 (34.3%)<0.001
SBP, mmHg, mean (SD)124.2 (18.5)123.3 (18.0)131.3 (21.1)<0.001
DBP, mmHg, mean (SD)70.3 (11.7)70.5 (11.5)68.0 (13.1)<0.001
BMI, kg/m2, mean (SD)29.2 (6.9)29.1 (6.8)30.5 (7.3)<0.001
TG, mmol/L, mean (SD)1.3 (0.7)1.3 (0.7)1.5 (0.8)<0.001
TC, mmol/L, mean (SD)4.9 (1.1)5.0 (1.0)4.6 (1.1)<0.001
HDL, mmol/L, mean (SD)1.4 (0.4)1.4 (0.4)1.3 (0.4)<0.001
LDL, mmol/L, mean (SD)2.9 (0.9)3.0 (0.9)2.6 (1.0)<0.001

[i] CVD, cardiovascular disease; PHQ-9, 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire; TG, triglyceride; TC, total cholesterol; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; BMI, body mass index; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure.

Table 2

Logistic regression associations of depression with CVD in adults.

VARIABLEMODEL 1MODEL 2MODEL 3
OR (95% CI)P VALUEOR (95% CI)P VALUEOR (95% CI)P VALUE
Cardiovascular disease2.36(1.83–3.05)<0.0012.60(1.95–3.46)<0.0012.07(1.55–2.76)<0.001
Coronary heart disease1.71(1.14–2.56)0.0112.14(1.44–3.18)<0.0011.73(1.12–2.69)0.016
Heart attack2.13(1.52–3.00)<0.0012.21(1.52–3.21)<0.0011.77(1.22–2.56)0.004
Angina pectoris2.82(1.95–4.08)<0.0012.90(1.97–4.28)<0.0012.17(1.37–3.43)0.001
Heart failure3.43(2.26–5.20)<0.0013.10(1.91–5.03)<0.0012.45(1.51–3.98)<0.001
Stroke2.75(1.72–4.40)<0.0012.44(1.41–4.21)0.0022.06(1.21–3.53)0.010

[i] Model 1 was univariate logistic regression model; Model 2 was adjusted as age, race, gender, education, and ratio of family income to poverty; Model 3 was adjusted as age, race, gender, education, ratio of family income to poverty, smoking, drinking, dyslipidemia, hypertension, diabetes, diastolic pressure, systolic pressure, TG, TC, HDL-C, LDL-C and BMI based on stepwise regression model. OR, odds ratio; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval; TG, triglyceride; TC, total cholesterol; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol.

Table 3

The association of depression and CVD risk factors in adults.

VARIABLEDEPRESSION AND CVD RISK FACTORSCVD RISK FACTORS AND CVD
β (95% CI)OR (95% CI)P VALUEβ (95% CI)OR (95% CI)P VALUE
Smoking  0.95(0.73,1.17)2.60(2.08–3.23)<0.001  0.52(0.33,0.71)1.68(1.39,2.03)<0.001
Drinking  0.19(–0.02,0.4)1.21(0.98–1.49)0.081  0.06(–0.15,0.27)1.06(0.86,1.31)0.582
Hypertension  0.61(0.38,0.84)1.84(1.46–2.32)<0.001  0.94(0.74,1.15)2.16(1.75,2.65)<0.001
Diabetes  0.77(0.49,1.05)2.15(1.62–2.85)<0.001  0.90(0.66,1.14)2.57(2.10,3.15)<0.001
Dyslipidemia  0.43(0.20,0.66)1.54(1.22–1.93)<0.001  0.77(0.56,0.98)2.45(1.93,3.12)<0.001
Education–0.74(–0.96,–0.52)0.48(0.38–0.59)<0.001–0.35(–0.53,–0.16)0.71(0.59,0.85)<0.001
Income–0.95(–1.10,–0.81)<0.001–0.19(–0.25,–0.13)0.83(0.78,0.88)<0.001
BMI  1.97(1.39,2.55)<0.001  0.05(0.03,0.06)1.05(1.03,1.06)<0.001

[i] Logistic regression model was adjusted as age, race, gender. OR, odds ratio; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval; CVD, cardiovascular disease; BMI, body mass index.

gh-19-1-1302-g2.png
Figure 2

A. Mendelian randomization (MR) estimates of the causal associations of depression on cardiovascular diseases. B. MR estimates of proportions mediated by mediators in the causal association between depression on cardiovascular diseases.

OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; HTN, hypertension; HPL, hyperlipidemia; DM2, type 2 diabetes; POU, prescription opioid use; CHD, coronary heart disease; MI, myocardial infarction; TS, total stroke, AF, atrial fibrillation.

Table 4

The mediation analysis results of depression on various CVD via mediators.

NUMBER OF SNPSβ (95%CI))OR (95%CI)P
Depression on mediators
Type 2 diabetes480.147(0.024,0.270)1.158(1.024,1.309)0.019
Hypertension480.217(0.094,0.340)1.242(1.098,1.405)5.62E–04
Hyperlipidemia480.217(0.094,0.339)1.242(1.099,1.404)5.33E–04
Prescription opioid use480.318(0.224,0.412)1.375(1.252,1.510)2.99E–11
Type 2 diabetes on CVD
Coronary heart disease1530.131(0.091,0.171)1.140(1.095,1.187)1.37E–10
Myocardial infarction1530.118(0.076,0.16)1.125(1.079,1.173)2.72E–08
Stroke1520.095(0.067,0.122)1.099(1.069,1.130)2.13E–11
Hypertension on CVD
Coronary heart disease1380.26(0.194,0.325)1.296(1.214,1.384)7.36E–15
Myocardial infarction1370.24(0.171,0.308)1.271(1.187,1.361)7.17E–12
Atrial fibrillation1380.184(0.138,0.229)1.201(1.148,1.258)3.42E–15
Hyperlipidemia on CVD
Coronary heart disease320.515(0.371,0.659)1.673(1.449,1.932)2.34E–12
Myocardial infarction320.519(0.358,0.680)1.680(1.430,1.973)2.69E–10
Stroke340.124(0.063,0.186)1.133(1.065,1.204)7.30E–05
Prescription opioid use on CVD
Stroke80.211(0.039,0.384)1.236(1.040,1.468)0.016

[i] Summary MR analysis of the IVW methods for the effect of depression on mediators and the effect of mediators CVD. SNP, Single nucleotide polymorphism; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; CVD, cardiovascular disease.

Table 5

The mediation effect of depression on various CVD via mediators.

EXPOSUREMEDIATOROUTCOMEMEDIATION EFFECTPROPORTION MEDIATED %
DepressionHPLCHD0.111 (0.041, 0.183)87.06%
DepressionHTNCHD0.056 (0.021, 0.091)43.92%
DepressionDM2CHD0.019 (0.002, 0.036)14.90%
DepressionHPLMI0.113 (0.040, 0.186)64.91%
DepressionHTNMI0.052 (0.019, 0.085)29.87%
DepressionDM2MI0.017 (0.002, 0.033)9.77%
DepressionPOUTS0.067 (0.009, 0.125)54.33%
DepressionHPLTS0.027 (0.007, 0.047)21.89%
DepressionDM2TS0.014 (0.002, 0.026)11.35%
DepressionHTNAF0.040 (0.015, 0.065)31.51%

[i] CVD, cardiovascular disease; HTN, hypertension; HPL, hyperlipidemia; DM2, type 2 diabetes; POU, prescription opioid use; CHD, coronary heart disease; MI, myocardial infarction; TS, total stroke, AF, atrial fibrillation.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/gh.1302 | Journal eISSN: 2211-8179
Language: English
Submitted on: Nov 16, 2023
|
Accepted on: Jan 23, 2024
|
Published on: Feb 16, 2024
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2024 Dihui Cai, Mengming Xia, Xuhui Chen, Kunimasa Yagi, Liang Xu, Bingyu Wang, Yanyi Wang, Yujie Zhou, Jianhui Liu, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.