Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Smartphone-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation Program Improves Functional Capacity in Coronary Heart Disease Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Cover

Smartphone-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation Program Improves Functional Capacity in Coronary Heart Disease Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Global Heart
Volume 18 (2023): Issue 1
By: Bambang Dwiputra,  Anwar Santoso,  Budhi Setianto Purwowiyoto,  Basuni Radi,  Ade Meidian Ambari,  Dwita Rian Desandri,  Serlie Fatrin and  Bashar Adi Wahyu Pandhita  
Open Access
|Aug 2023

References

  1. 1Roth GA, Mensah GA, Johnson CO, Addolorato G, Ammirati E, Baddour LM, et al. Global Burden of Cardiovascular Diseases and Risk Factors, 1990–2019. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2020; 76(25): 2982–3021. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.11.010
    Back to article
  2. 2Ibanez B, James S, Agewall S, Antunes MJ, Bucciarelli-Ducci C, Bueno H, et al. 2017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation. European Heart Journal. 2017; 39(2): 119–77. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx393
    Back to article
  3. 3Székely O, Lane DA, Lip GYH. Guideline-adherent secondary prevention post-acute coronary syndromes: the importance of patient uptake and persistence. European Heart Journal. 2018; 39(25): 2365–7. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy308
    Back to article
  4. 4Goel K, Lennon RJ, Tilbury RT, Squires RW, Thomas RJ. Impact of Cardiac Rehabilitation on Mortality and Cardiovascular Events After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in the Community. Circulation. 2011; 123(21): 2344–52. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.983536
    Back to article
  5. 5Balady GJ, Ades PA, Bittner VA, Franklin BA, Gordon NF, Thomas RJ, et al. Referral, Enrollment, and Delivery of Cardiac Rehabilitation/Secondary Prevention Programs at Clinical Centers and Beyond. Circulation. 2011; 124(25): 2951–60. DOI: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e31823b21e2
    Back to article
  6. 6Chaves G, Turk-Adawi K, Supervia M, Santiago de Araújo Pio C, Abu-Jeish A hadi, Mamataz T, et al. Cardiac Rehabilitation Dose Around the World. Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes. 2020; 13(1). DOI: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.119.005453
    Back to article
  7. 7Castellanos LR, Viramontes O, Bains NK, Zepeda IA. Disparities in Cardiac Rehabilitation Among Individuals from Racial and Ethnic Groups and Rural Communities—A Systematic Review. Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities. 2018; 6: 1–11. DOI: 10.1007/s40615-018-0478-x
    Back to article
  8. 8Kemp S. Digital 2022: Global Overview. https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2022-global-overview-report (accessed 13 Jun 2023).
    Back to article
  9. 9Brouwers RWM, Houben VJG, Kraal JJ, Spee RF, Kemps HMC. Predictors of cardiac rehabilitation referral, enrolment and completion after acute myocardial infarction: an exploratory study. Neth Heart J. 2020; 29(3): 151–7. DOI: 10.1007/s12471-020-01492-0
    Back to article
  10. 10Thomas R, King M, Lui K, Oldridge N, Pina I, Spertus J. AACVPR/ACC/AHA >2007 Performance Measures on Cardiac Rehabilitation for Referral to and Delivery of Cardiac Rehabilitation/Secondary Prevention Services. Circulation. 2007; 116(14): 1611–42. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.185734
    Back to article
  11. 11Wallace BC, Dahabreh IJ, Trikalinos TA, Lau J, Trow P, Schmid CH. Closing the Gap between Methodologists and End-Users: R as a Computational Back-End. J Stat Soft. 2012; 49(5). DOI: 10.18637/jss.v049.i05
    Back to article
  12. 12Lunde P, Bye A, Bergland A, Grimsmo J, Jarstad E, Nilsson BB. Long-term follow-up with a smartphone application improves exercise capacity post cardiac rehabilitation: A randomized controlled trial. Eur J Prev Cardiolog. 2020; 27(16): 1782–92. DOI: 10.1177/2047487320905717
    Back to article
  13. 13Dorje T, Zhao G, Tso K, Wang J, Chen Y, Tsokey L, et al. Smartphone and social media-based cardiac rehabilitation and secondary prevention in China (SMART-CR/SP): a parallel-group, single-blind, randomised controlled trial. The Lancet Digital Health. 2019; 1(7): e363–74. DOI: 10.1016/S2589-7500(19)30151-7
    Back to article
  14. 14Song Y, Ren C, Liu P, Tao L, Zhao W, Gao W. Effect of Smartphone-Based Telemonitored Exercise Rehabilitation among Patients with Coronary Heart Disease. J of Cardiovasc Trans Res. 2019; 13(4): 659–67. DOI: 10.1007/s12265-019-09938-6
    Back to article
  15. 15Fang J, Huang B, Xu D, Li J, Au WW. Innovative Application of a Home-Based and Remote Sensing Cardiac Rehabilitation Protocol in Chinese Patients After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Telemedicine and e-Health. 2019; 25(4): 288–93. DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2018.0064
    Back to article
  16. 16Walters D, Varnfield M, Karunanithi M, Ding H, Honeyman E, Arnold D, et al. Technology Based Home-Care Model Improves Outcomes Of Uptake, Adherence And Health In Cardiac Rehabilitation. Heart, Lung and Circulation. 2012; 21: S315. DOI: 10.1016/j.hlc.2012.05.778
    Back to article
  17. 17Johnston N, Bodegard J, Jerström S, Åkesson J, Brorsson H, Alfredsson J, et al. Effects of interactive patient smartphone support app on drug adherence and lifestyle changes in myocardial infarction patients: A randomized study. American Heart Journal. 2016; 178: 85–94. DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2016.05.005
    Back to article
  18. 18Widmer RJ, Allison TG, Lennon R, Lopez-Jimenez F, Lerman LO, Lerman A. Digital health intervention during cardiac rehabilitation: A randomized controlled trial. American Heart Journal. 2017; 188: 65–72. DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2017.02.016
    Back to article
  19. 19Varnfield M, Karunanithi M, Lee CK, Honeyman E, Arnold D, Ding H, et al. Smartphone-based home care model improved use of cardiac rehabilitation in postmyocardial infarction patients: results from a randomised controlled trial. Heart. 2014; 100(22): 1770–9. DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2014-305783
    Back to article
  20. 20Maddison R, Rawstorn JC, Stewart RAH, Benatar J, Whittaker R, Rolleston A, et al. Effects and costs of real-time cardiac telerehabilitation: randomised controlled non-inferiority trial. Heart. 2018; 105(2): 122–9. DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2018-313189
    Back to article
  21. 21Skobel E, Knackstedt C, Martinez-Romero A, Salvi D, Vera-Munoz C, Napp A, et al. Internet-based training of coronary artery patients: the Heart Cycle Trial. Heart Vessels. 2016; 32(4): 408–18. DOI: 10.1007/s00380-016-0897-8
    Back to article
  22. 22Bravo-Escobar R, González-Represas A, Gómez-González AM, Montiel-Trujillo A, Aguilar-Jimenez R, Carrasco-Ruíz R, et al. Effectiveness and safety of a home-based cardiac rehabilitation programme of mixed surveillance in patients with ischemic heart disease at moderate cardiovascular risk: A randomised, controlled clinical trial. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2017; 17(1). DOI: 10.1186/s12872-017-0499-0
    Back to article
  23. 23Yudi MB, Clark DJ, Tsang D, Jelinek M, Kalten K, Joshi SB, et al. SMARTphone-based, early cardiac REHABilitation in patients with acute coronary syndromes: a randomized controlled trial. Coronary Artery Disease. 2020; 32(5): 432–40. DOI: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000000938
    Back to article
  24. 24Vasankari V, Halonen J, Husu P, Vähä-Ypyä H, Tokola K, Suni J, et al. Personalised eHealth intervention to increase physical activity and reduce sedentary behaviour in rehabilitation after cardiac operations: study protocol for the PACO randomised controlled trial (NCT03470246). BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2019; 5(1): e000539. DOI: 10.1136/bmjsem-2019-000539
    Back to article
  25. 25Jackson L. Getting the most out of cardiac rehabilitation: a review of referral and adherence predictors. Heart. 2005; 91(1): 10–4. DOI: 10.1136/hrt.2004.045559
    Back to article
  26. 26Gandhi S, Chen S, Hong L, Sun K, Gong E, Li C, et al. Effect of Mobile Health Interventions on the Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Canadian Journal of Cardiology. 2017; 33(2): 219–31. DOI: 10.1016/j.cjca.2016.08.017
    Back to article
  27. 27Myers J, McAuley P, Lavie CJ, Despres JP, Arena R, Kokkinos P. Physical Activity and Cardiorespiratory Fitness as Major Markers of Cardiovascular Risk: Their Independent and Interwoven Importance to Health Status. Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases. 2015; 57(4): 306–14. DOI: 10.1016/j.pcad.2014.09.011
    Back to article
  28. 28Aspenes ST, Nilsen TIL, Skaug EA, Bertheussen GF, Ellingsen Ø, Vatten L, et al. Peak Oxygen Uptake and Cardiovascular Risk Factors in 4631 Healthy Women and Men. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 2011; 43(8): 1465–73. DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31820ca81c
    Back to article
  29. 29Keteyian SJ, Brawner CA, Savage PD, Ehrman JK, Schairer J, Divine G, et al. Peak aerobic capacity predicts prognosis in patients with coronary heart disease. American Heart Journal. 2008; 156(2): 292–300. DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2008.03.017
    Back to article
  30. 30Beatty AL, Schiller NB, Whooley MA. Six-Minute Walk Test as a Prognostic Tool in Stable Coronary Heart Disease. Arch Intern Med. 2012; 172(14). DOI: 10.1001/archinternmed.2012.2198
    Back to article
  31. 31Moholdt T, Aamot IL, Granøien I, Gjerde L, Myklebust G, Walderhaug L, et al. Long-term follow-up after cardiac rehabilitation. International Journal of Cardiology. 2011; 152(3): 388–90. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2011.08.025
    Back to article
  32. 32Pratesi A, Baldasseroni S, Burgisser C, Orso F, Barucci R, Silverii MV, et al. Long-term functional outcomes after cardiac rehabilitation in older patients. Data from the Cardiac Rehabilitation in Advanced aGE: EXercise TRaining and Active follow-up (CR-AGE EXTRA) randomised study. Eur J Prev Cardiolog. 2019; 26(14): 1470–8. DOI: 10.1177/2047487319854141
    Back to article
  33. 33Bock BC, Albrecht AE, Traficante RM, Clark MM, Pinto BM, Tilkemeier P, et al. Predictors of exercise adherence following participation in a cardiac rehabilitation program. Int J Behav Med. 1997; 4(1): 60–75. DOI: 10.1207/s15327558ijbm0401_4
    Back to article
  34. 34Ettehad D, Emdin CA, Kiran A, Anderson SG, Callender T, Emberson J, et al. Blood pressure lowering for prevention of cardiovascular disease and death: a systematic review and meta-analysis. The Lancet. 2016; 387(10022): 957–67. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01225-8
    Back to article
  35. 35Neubeck L, Redfern J ulie, Fernandez R, Briffa T, Bauman A, Freedman SB. Telehealth interventions for the secondary prevention of coronary heart disease: a systematic review. European Journal of Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation. 2009; 16(3): 281–9. DOI: 10.1097/HJR.0b013e32832a4e7a
    Back to article
  36. 36Clark RA, Conway A, Poulsen V, Keech W, Tirimacco R, Tideman P. Alternative models of cardiac rehabilitation: A systematic review. Eur J Prev Cardiolog. 2013; 22(1): 35–74. DOI: 10.1177/2047487313501093
    Back to article
  37. 37Marquez NM, Saintila J, Castellanos-Vazquez AJ, Dávila-Villavicencio R, Turpo-Chaparro J, Sánchez-Tarrillo JA, et al. Telehealth-based interventions on lifestyle, body mass index, and glucose concentration in university staff during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: A pre-experimental study. Digital Health. 2022; 8: 1–10. DOI: 10.1177/20552076221129719
    Back to article
  38. 38El Missiri A, Abdel Halim WA, Almaweri AS, Mohamed TR. Effect of a phase 2 cardiac rehabilitation program on obese and non-obese patients with stable coronary artery disease. Egypt Heart J. 2021; 73(1): 4. DOI: 10.1186/s43044-020-00119-4
    Back to article
  39. 39Liu N, Yin J, Tan SSL, Ngiam KY, Teo HH. Mobile health applications for older adults: a systematic review of interface and persuasive feature design. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 2021; 28(11): 2483–501. DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocab151
    Back to article
  40. 40Hoque R, Sorwar G. Understanding factors influencing the adoption of mHealth by the elderly: An extension of the UTAUT model. International Journal of Medical Informatics. 2017; 101: 75–84. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.02.002
    Back to article
  41. 41Gao C, Zhou L, Liu Z, Wang H, Bowers B. Mobile application for diabetes self-management in China: Do they fit for older adults? International Journal of Medical Informatics. 2017; 101: 68–74. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.02.005
    Back to article
  42. 42Lee C, Coughlin JF. PERSPECTIVE: Older Adults’ Adoption of Technology: An Integrated Approach to Identifying Determinants and Barriers: Older adults’ adoption of technology. J Prod Innov Manag. 2015; 32(5): 747–59. DOI: 10.1111/jpim.12176
    Back to article
  43. 43Wildenbos GA, Peute L, Jaspers M. Aging barriers influencing mobile health usability for older adults: A literature based framework (MOLD-US). International Journal of Medical Informatics. 2018; 114: 66–75. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2018.03.012
    Back to article
  44. 44Magnani JW, Mujahid MS, Aronow HD, Cené CW, Dickson VV, Havranek E, et al. Health Literacy and Cardiovascular Disease: Fundamental Relevance to Primary and Secondary Prevention: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2018; 138(2). DOI: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000579
    Back to article
  45. 45Reddy KS, Yusuf S. Emerging Epidemic of Cardiovascular Disease in Developing Countries. Circulation. 1998; 97(6): 596–601. DOI: 10.1161/01.CIR.97.6.596
    Back to article
  46. 46Inglis SC, Clark RA, McAlister FA, Stewart S, Cleland JGF. Which components of heart failure programmes are effective? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the outcomes of structured telephone support or telemonitoring as the primary component of chronic heart failure management in 8323 patients: Abridged Cochrane Review. European J of Heart Fail. 2011; 13(9): 1028–40. DOI: 10.1093/eurjhf/hfr039
    Back to article
  47. 47Van den Berg MJ, van der Graaf Y, Deckers JW, de Kanter W, Algra A, Kappelle LJ, et al. Smoking cessation and risk of recurrent cardiovascular events and mortality after a first manifestation of arterial disease. American Heart Journal. 2019; 213: 112–22. DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2019.03.019
    Back to article
  48. 48Shi W, Ghisi GLM, Zhang L, Hyun K, Pakosh M, Gallagher R. A systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression of patient education for secondary prevention in patients with coronary heart disease: impact on psychological outcomes. European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing. 2022; 21(7): 643–54. DOI: 10.1093/eurjcn/zvac001
    Back to article
  49. 49Whitehead SJ, Ali S. Health outcomes in economic evaluation: the QALY and utilities. British Medical Bulletin. 2010; 96(1): 5–21. DOI: 10.1093/bmb/ldq033
    Back to article
  50. 50De Smedt D, Clays E, Annemans L, De Bacquer D. EQ-5D Versus SF-12 in Coronary Patients: Are They Interchangeable? Value in Health. 2014; 17(1): 84–9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2013.10.010
    Back to article
  51. 51Maas AHEM, Appelman YEA. Gender differences in coronary heart disease. Neth Heart J. 2010; 18(12): 598–603. DOI: 10.1007/s12471-010-0841-y
    Back to article
  52. 52Bostrom J, Sweeney G, Whiteson J, Dodson JA. Mobile health and cardiac rehabilitation in older adults. Clin Cardiol. 2019; 43(2): 118–26. DOI: 10.1002/clc.23306
    Back to article
  53. 53Kumar KR, Pina IL. Cardiac rehabilitation in older adults: New options. Clin Cardiol. 2019; 43(2): 163–70. DOI: 10.1002/clc.23296
    Back to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/gh.1253 | Journal eISSN: 2211-8179
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Submitted on: Jan 23, 2023
Accepted on: Jul 7, 2023
Published on: Aug 10, 2023
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Keywords:
Coronary Disease,
cardiac rehabilitation,
smartphone,
secondary prevention

© 2023 Bambang Dwiputra, Anwar Santoso, Budhi Setianto Purwowiyoto, Basuni Radi, Ade Meidian Ambari, Dwita Rian Desandri, Serlie Fatrin, Bashar Adi Wahyu Pandhita, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 18 (2023): Issue 1Next article