Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Identifying Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy from Nonobstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: Development and Validation of a Model Based on Electrocardiogram Features Cover

Identifying Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy from Nonobstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: Development and Validation of a Model Based on Electrocardiogram Features

Open Access
|Aug 2023

Figures & Tables

gh-18-1-1250-g1.png
Figure 1

Study flow chart.

AF, atrial fibrillation; PM, pacemaker; BBB, bundle branch block; HCM, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy; HOCM, obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy; HNCM, non-obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy; LR, logistic regression.

Table 1

Baseline characteristics.

ALLTRAINING COHORTTEMPORAL VALIDATION COHORT
HOCM N = 132HNCM N = 102PHOCM N = 102HNCM N = 70PHOCM N = 30HNCM N = 32P
Age, y (mean, SD)47 (14)46 (15)0.63547 (14)47 (15)0.96248 (15)44 (15)0.372
Male (n, %)97 (73.48)66 (64.71)0.14774 (72.55)46 (65.71)0.33823 (76.67)20 (62.50)0.227
Echocardiography parameters
MWT, mm23 [20, 27]20 [17, 23]<0.00123 [20, 27]19 [17, 24]<0.00124 [20, 27]20 [16, 22]0.003
RAD, mm34 [32, 36]35 [32, 37]0.09234 [31, 36]35 [31, 37]0.09135 [33, 36]34 [32, 37]0.854
LAD, mm44 [41, 48]40 [37, 45]<0.00144 [40, 48]41 [37, 45]<0.00145 [42, 48]40 [37, 45]0.001
EDV, ml78 [65, 88]77 [67, 90]0.53278 [65, 87]80 [69, 91]0.17480 [71, 91]74 [62, 89]0.269
ESV, ml31 [25, 37]32 [27, 39]0.18631 [25, 36]33 [27, 39]0.12632 [26, 38]31 [27, 39]0.972
LVEF, %59 [57, 62]58 [56, 61]0.09059 [57, 62]58 [56, 61]0.13759 [57, 62]59 [57, 61]0.548
E/E’14.48 [11.15, 20.48]11.13 [9.31, 13.87]<0.00115.17 [11.69, 20.90]11.56 [9.31, 13.87]<0.00113.40 [10.92, 16.43]10.95 [9.63, 14.05]0.046
E/A0.81 [0.66, 1.32]0.84 [0.73, 1.35]0.2960.80 [0.66, 1.28]0.85 [0.75, 1.35]0.1360.85 [0.66, 1.44]0.77 [0.65, 1.35]0.667
LVOTGmax, mmHg58 [22, 96]5 [3, 7]<0.00164 [22, 99]5 [4, 7]<0.00171 [35, 102]6 [4, 10]<0.001
SAM sign [n, %]112 (84.85)10 (9.80)<0.00187 (85.29)9 (12.86)<0.00125 (83.33)1 (3.13)<0.001

[i] Data are expressed as n (%), mean (SD), or median [25th and 75th percentiles], otherwise specified.

MWT, maximum wall thickness; RA, right atrium dimension; LA, left atrium dimension; EDV, end-diastolic volume; ESV, end-systolic volume; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; E, early diastolic mitral inflow velocity; A, late diastolic mitral inflow velocity; E’, early diastolic mitral annular tissue velocity; A’, late diastolic mitral annular tissue velocity; E/A, ratio of peak velocities of the early diastolic peak and late peak in mitral inflow; E/E’, ratio of early diastolic peak velocity in mitral inflow to mitral annular; LVOTGmax, the maximum of left ventricular outflow tract gradient; SAM, systolic anterior motion.

Table 2

ECG parameters.

ALLTRAINING COHORTTEMPORAL VALIDATION COHORT
HOCM N = 132HNCM N = 102PHOCM N = 102HNCM N = 70PHOCM N = 30HNCM N = 32P
P, ms106 [100, 114]100 [92, 107]<0.001104 [100, 110]100 [90, 106]<0.001112 [104, 122]100 [93, 108]<0.001
QRS, ms104 [94, 112]100 [92, 111]0.408104 [92, 112]104 [92, 114]0.951104 [96, 107]96 [92, 108]0.094
PR, ms154 [139, 172]148 [136, 164]0.117151 [136, 172]152 [138, 164]0.720160 [146, 176]146 [133, 163]0.009
QTc, ms430 [411, 445]426 [413, 441]0.441428 [410, 442]427[414, 441]0.965433 [416, 454]422 [410, 443]0.102
Abnormal Q37 (28.03)19 (18.63)0.09526 (25.49)10 (14.29)0.08811 (36.67)9 (28.13)0.589
TWI, %80 (60.61)61 (59.80)0.90162 (60.78)41 (58.57)0.87418 (60.00)20 (62.50)>0.999
RI, mv1.20 [0.80, 1.68]0.80 [0.50, 1.23]<0.0011.29 [0.80, 1.70]0.90 [0.50, 1.20]0.0011.05 [0.70, 1.40]0.80 [0.60, 1.38]0.133
RV1, mv0.31 [0.10, 0.70]0.40 [0.20, 0.80]0.5350.31 [0.10, 0.70]0.40 [0.20, 0.80]0.2670.35 [0.10, 0.70]0.55 [0.26, 1.20]0.055
RV2, mv0.80 [0.30, 1.50]1.03 [0.52, 1.90]0.0470.80 [0.30, 1.50]0.80 [0.50, 1.55]0.4500.74 [0.29, 1.76]1.35 [0.81, 2.30]0.036
RV3, mv1.75 [0.90, 2.60]1.45 [0.95, 2.50]0.5231.65 [0.79, 2.60]1.35 [0.80, 2.50]0.4572.23 [1.07, 2.70]1.95 [1.10, 2.40]0.587
RV4, mv2.60 [1.74, 3.68]2.35 [1.39, 3.50]0.1542.60 [1.72, 3.70]2.45 [1.38, 3.33]0.2942.70 [1.93, 3.50]1.95 [1.39, 3.78]0.310
RV5, mv2.70 [1.70, 3.55]2.35 [1.30, 3.36]0.0722.61 [1.60, 3.70]2.60 [1.30, 3.35]0.2102.85 [1.95, 3.21]1.71 [1.29, 3.39]0.178
RV6, mv2.03 [1.40, 2.80]1.80 [1.10, 2.70]0.0702.00 [1.30, 3.00]1.85 [1.08, 2.63]0.1592.30 [1.64, 2.80]1.68 [1.16, 2.78]0.215
RaVL, mv0.60 [0.38, 1.12]0.50 [0.20, 1.23]0.0190.64 [0.40, 1.13]0.50 [0.20, 1.00]0.0320.45 [0.33, 1.12]0.50 [0.23, 0.78]0.521
SIII, mv0.30 [0.00, 0.79]0.30 [0.00, 0.70]0.5950.30 [0.00, 0.72]0.30 [0.00, 0.70]0.6850.41 [0.00, 0.85]0.30 [0.00, 0.72]0.622
SV1, mv2.10 [1.40, 2.76]1.30 [0.92, 1.73]<0.0012.10 [1.40, 2.80]1.30 [0.90, 1.80]<0.0012.00 [1.25, 2.72]1.39 [1.03, 1.69]0.007
SV2, mv2.30 [1.50, 3.17]1.90 [1.30, 2.50]0.0082.30 [1.50, 3.11]1.85 [1.20, 2.50]0.0292.35 [1.54, 3.83]2.00 [1.40, 2.48]0.128
SV3, mv1.50 [0.68, 2.38]1.50 [0.80, 2.40]0.6341.50 [0.70, 2.30]1.50 [0.78, 2.40]0.5761.73 [0.44, 2.50]1.49 [0.93, 2.38]0.966
SV4, mv0.90 [0.40, 1.78]1.03 [0.58, 1.90]0.1350.90 [0.38, 1.53]1.20 [0.58, 1.90]0.0840.85 [0.43, 2.03]0.95 [0.53, 1.64]0.933
SV5, mv0.40 [0.10, 0.90]0.68 [0.30, 1.10]0.0050.35 [0.00, 0.90]0.70 [0.30, 1.13]0.0040.42 [0.20, 1.26]0.50 [0.30, 1.08]0.708
SV6, mv0.20 [0.00, 0.40]0.30 [0.00, 0.60]0.0180.20 [0.00, 0.30]0.25 [0.00, 0.60]0.0300.27 [0.08, 0.53]0.30 [0.15, 0.59]0.645
RV5SV1, mv4.58 [3.44, 6.16]3.50 [2.50, 4.91]<0.0014.60 [3.20, 6.30]3.55 [2.40, 4.95]0.0014.58 [3.90, 5.81]3.35 [2.50, 4.93]0.010
RⅠSⅢ, mv1.50 [1.00, 2.28]1.25 [0.70, 1.93]0.0051.53 [1.00, 2.25]1.25 [0.68, 2.00]0.0141.40 [1.00, 2.34]1.20 [0.80, 1.90]0.231
RaVLSV3, mv2.30 [1.38, 3.19]2.30 [1.30, 2.86]0.5982.30 [1.40, 3.06]2.30 [1.22, 2.90]0.7112.23 [1.13, 3.79]2.20 [1.30, 2.80]0.688
RV2V3, mv2.60 [1.40, 4.22]2.55 [1.50, 4.23]0.5732.53 [1.40, 4.19]2.30 [1.40, 4.07]0.8213.00 [1.41, 4.73]2.95 [2.23, 5.05]0.375
SV2V3, mv3.95 [2.21, 5.16]3.50 [2.28, 4.80]0.1863.85 [2.22, 4.90]3.55 [2.25, 4.80]0.3774.68 [1.99, 5.63]3.48 [2.25, 4.80]0.254
RV1V2, mv1.25 [0.44, 2.15]1.43 [0.90, 2.62]0.0421.30 [0.43, 2.12]1.30 [0.70, 2.33]0.3881.08 [0.43, 2.53]2.03 [1.13, 3.51]0.029
SV1V2, mv4.46 [3.13, 5.70]3.20 [2.37, 4.13]<0.0014.37 [2.98, 5.83]3.30 [2.00, 4.45]<0.0014.48 [3.30, 5.48]3.20 [2.41, 3.99]0.005
RV3V4, mv4.35 [2.62, 6.08]3.90 [2.30, 6.00]0.2924.15 [2.58, 6.10]3.95 [2.18, 5.93]0.3825.15 [3.11, 5.93]3.85 [2.50, 6.25]0.517
SV3SV4, mv2.50 [0.99, 4.21]2.60 [1.39, 4.30]0.3582.45 [1.06, 3.92]2.80 [1.30, 4.30]0.2352.58 [0.82, 4.81]2.40 [1.45, 4.09]0.816

[i] Data are expressed as n (%) or median [25th and 75th percentiles].

TWI, T wave inversion; RV5SV1, amplitude of the R wave in V5 plus the S wave amplitude in V1; RⅠSⅢ, amplitude of the R wave in lead Ⅰ plus the S wave amplitude in lead Ⅲ; RaVLSV3, amplitude of the R wave in lead aVL plus the S wave amplitude in precordial lead V3; RV2V3, amplitude of the R wave in precordial lead V2 plus V3; SV2V3, amplitude of the S wave in precordial lead V2 plus V3. The rest set as the analogy.

Table 3

Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses.

VARIABLESUNIVARIABLE ANALYSISMULTIVARIABLE ANALYSIS
COEFFICIENTOR (95% CI)PCOEFFICIENTOR (95% CI)P
RaVL0.361.43 (0.88, 2.31)0.150
SV1V20.341.40 (1.17, 1.68)<0.001
RⅠSⅢ0.251.29 (0.97, 1.71)0.081
SV6–0.480.62 (0.34, 1.13)0.116
RⅠ0.732.07 (1.26, 3.41)<0.001
RV5SV10.311.37 (1.14, 1.65)0.001
SV20.351.42 (1.06, 1.90)0.017
SV5–0.470.63 (0.41, 0.96)0.032
P0.071.07 (1.04, 1.11)<0.0010.0681.07 (1.04, 1.11)<0.001
SV10.912.49 (1.67, 3.72)<0.0010.9302.54 (1.65, 3.89)<0.001
Constant–8.135
gh-18-1-1250-g2.png
Figure 2

The calibration and ROC curve of the model in the training, temporal, and external validation cohorts.

Calibration plots between the predicted and observed HOCM patients in the training (A), temporal (B), and external validation (C) cohorts. The 45° blue line represents a perfect prediction, and the red line represents the predictive performance of the model. ROC curves of the training (D), temporal (E), and external (F) validation cohorts.

gh-18-1-1250-g3.png
Figure 3

The relationship between LVOTG and the prediction score value.

gh-18-1-1250-g4.png
Figure 4

Examples illustration.

A, The ECG of the patient from case 1 (HNCM); B, the prediction result of case 1 with a low HOCM probability; C, Peak LVOTG (12 mmHg) of the patient from case 1; D, The ECG of the patient from case 2 (HOCM); E, the prediction result of case 2 with a high HOCM probability; F, Peak LVOTG (92 mmHg) of the patient from case 2.

AFAtrial fibrillation
BBBBundle branch block
CIConfidence intervals
CICClinical impact curve
DCADecision curve analysis
ECGElectrocardiogram
EchoEchocardiography
EDVEnd-diastolic volume
ESVEnd-systolic volume
HCMHypertrophic cardiomyopathy
HNCMNonobstructive HCM
HOCMObstructive HCM
LADLeft atrium dimension
LRLogistic regression
LVLeft ventricular
LVEFLeft ventricular ejection fraction
LVHLeft ventricular hypertrophy
LVOTGLeft ventricular outflow tract gradient
LVOTOLeft ventricular outflow obstruction
MWTMaximum wall thickness
RARight atrium
ROCReceiver operator characteristic
RV5SV1The sum amplitude of R wave in lead V5 And S wave in lead V1
SAMSystolic anterior motion
SRTSeptal reduction therapy
SV1The amplitude of S Wave in Lead V1
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/gh.1250 | Journal eISSN: 2211-8179
Language: English
Submitted on: Oct 21, 2022
Accepted on: Jun 27, 2023
Published on: Aug 4, 2023
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2023 Lanyan Guo, Zhiling Ma, Weiping Yang, Fuyang Zhang, Hong Shao, Liwen Liu, Chao Gao, Ling Tao, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.