Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Impact of Stress Hyperglycemia on No-Reflow Phenomenon in Patients with ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Cover

Impact of Stress Hyperglycemia on No-Reflow Phenomenon in Patients with ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Open Access
|Mar 2022

Figures & Tables

Table 1

Demographic and baseline clinical characteristics of all patients in the two groups.

GROUP I (TIMI 3 FLOW) (N = 415) (86.5%)GROUP II (NO-REFLOW) (N = 65) (13.5%)P VALUE
Age, years54.99 ± 9.0657.52 ± 9.400.037*
Male gender, n (%)212 (51.1%)35 (53.8%)0.679
Hypertension, n (%)154 (37.1%)25 (38.5%)0.834
Diabetes mellitus, n (%)115 (27.7%)20 (30.8%)0.610
Smoking, n (%)112 (27.0%)24 (36.9%)0.098
Dyslipidemia, n (%)154 (37.1%)26 (40.0%)0.654
Prior myocardial infarction, n (%)32 (7.7%)4 (6.2%)0.658
Chronic kidney disease, n (%)51 (12.3%)11 (16.9%)0.300
BMI, (kg/m2)25.03 ± 3.2225.37 ± 3.080.435
Systolic BP, mmHg119.6 ± 19.5108.5 ± 24.30.001*
Diastolic BP, mmHg77.45 ± 12.774.26 ± 13.40.064
Heart rate, (bpm)72.24 ± 13.374.78 ± 13.90.156
Atrial fibrillation, n (%)47 (11.3%)13 (20.0%)0.049*
Killip class > 175 (18.1%)19 (29.2%)0.035*
LVEF, (%)45.36 ± 4.9245.12 ± 5.750.725
Non-diabetic patients with SH, n (%)34 (11.3%)17 (37.8%)0.001*
Non-diabetic patients with euglycemia, n (%)266 (88.7%)28 (62.2%)
Diabetic patients with SH, n (%)21 (18.3%)9 (45.0%)0.008*
Diabetic patients with euglycemia, n (%)94 (81.7%)11 (55.0%)

[i] BMI: body mass index; BP: blood pressure; LVEF: left ventricular ejection fraction; SH: stress hyperglycemia; *: significant P value.

Table 2

Laboratory results of all patients in the two groups.

GROUP I (TIMI 3 FLOW) (N = 415) (86.5%)GROUP II (NO-REFLOW) (N = 65) (13.5%)P VALUE
RBS in non-diabetic patients with euglycemia, mg/dl114.9 ± 16.5118.0 ± 20.20.348
RBS in non-diabetic patients with SH, mg/dl174.7 ± 23.9201.4 ± 29.60.001*
RBS in diabetic patients with euglycemia, mg/dl168.8 ± 22.4178.7 ± 16.70.163
RBS in diabetic patients with SH, mg/dl246.9 ± 50.4302.2 ± 8.330.003*
Hemoglobin level, g/dL12.32 ± 1.3412.09 ± 1.420.221
Creatinine pre-procedure, mg/dl1.029 ± 0.241.055 ± 0.280.427
Creatinine post-procedure, mg/dl1.190 ± 0.471.220 ± 0.490.633
CK-MB, U/L89.25 ± 43.485.08 ± 43.50.472
HbA1c in non-diabetic patients with euglycemia, %5.18 ± 0.3905.13 ± 0.3940.577
HbA1c in non-diabetic patients with SH, %5.16 ± 0.4525.20 ± 0.4660.764
HbA1c in diabetic patients with euglycemia, %6.35 ± 0.1616.35 ± 0.1290.929
HbA1c in diabetic patients with SH, %6.40 ± 0.1226.44 ± 0.0720.433
Total cholesterol, mg/dl219.9 ± 54.4229.4 ± 56.90.194
HDL, mg/dl39.13 ± 8.1839.84 ± 8.880.517
LDL, mg/dl131.9 ± 24.8130.5 ± 22.00.660
Triglycerides, mg/dl180.8 ± 39.5182.8 ± 37.40.697

[i] RBS: random blood sugar; SH: stress hyperglycemia; CK-MB: Creatine kinase myocardial band; HDL: high density lipoprotein; LDL: low-density lipoprotein; *: significant P value.

Table 3

Angiographic results of all patients in the two groups.

GROUP I (TIMI 3 FLOW) (N = 415) (86.5%)GROUP II (NO-REFLOW) (N = 65) (13.5%)P VALUE
The total ischemia time, h5.20 ± 2.945.11 ± 2.860.813
Initial TIMI flow
    0331 (79.8%)53 (81.5%)0.956
    134 (8.2%)4 (6.2%)
    219 (4.6%)3 (4.6%)
    331 (7.5%)5 (7.7%)
Thrombus burden
    Low141 (34.0%)23 (35.4%)0.748
    Moderate160 (38.6%)22 (33.8%)
    High114 (27.5%)20 (30.8%)
Aspiration catheter31 (7.5%)13 (20%)0.001*
Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors47 (11.3%)55 (84.6%)0.001*
Reperfusion type
    Balloon angioplasty24 (5.8%)35 (53.8%)0.001*
    Direct stenting116 (28.0%)12 (18.5%)
Stenting after pre-dilatation275 (66.3%)18 (27.7%)
Length of the lesion, mm20.68 ± 5.1121.29 ± 6.150.385
Volume of contrast agent, (ml)182.5 ± 65.1170.3 ± 76.30.170
Culprit vessel
    LM coronary artery, n (%)3 (0.7%)2 (3.1%)0.082
    LAD coronary artery, n (%)168 (40.5%)24 (36.9%)0.586
    CX coronary artery, n (%)124 (29.9%)23 (35.4%)0.371
    Right coronary artery, n (%)120 (28.9%)16 (24.6%)0.474
Post-procedural TIMI flow
    00 (0.0%)22 (33.8%)0.001*
    10 (0.0%)28 (43.1%)
    20 (0.0%)15 (23.1%)
    3415 (100%)0 (0.0%)

[i] TIMI: thrombolysis in myocardial infarction; LM: left main; LAD: left anterior descending; CX: circumflex; *: significant P value.

Table 4

Multivariate regression analysis for the independent predictors of no-reflow phenomenon.

MULTIVARIATE ANALYSISP VALUE
OR(95% CI)
Age > 60 years1.0190.550–1.8860.953
Stress hyperglycemia3.2471.656–6.3680.001*
Killip class >11.8931.004–3.5700.049*
Atrial fibrillation1.1610.504–2.6770.726
Cardiogenic shock3.7781.458–9.7900.006*
Cardiac arrest2.5950.758–8.8760.129
gh-17-1-1111-g1.png
Figure 1

Relationship between random blood sugar in patients with and without stress hyperglycemia and TIMI flow grade.

gh-17-1-1111-g2.png
Figure 2

ROC curve analysis for random blood sugar in non-diabetic (A) and diabetic patients (B) for prediction of no-reflow phenomenon after primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

gh-17-1-1111-g3.png
Figure 3

Kaplan-Meier curve showing survival functions of the patients in Group I (TIMI 3 flow) and Group II (no-reflow group).

Table 5

Clinical outcomes of all patients in the two groups.

GROUP I (TIMI 3 FLOW) (N = 415) (86.5%)GROUP II (NO-REFLOW) (N = 65) (13.5%)P VALUE
Mortality, n (%)15 (3.6%)6 (9.2%)0.040*
Major bleeding, n (%)5 (1.2%)1 (1.5%)0.822
Cardiogenic shock, n (%)14 (3.4%)12 (18.5%)0.001*
Cardiac arrest, n (%)9 (2.2%)5 (7.5%)0.014*
Heart failure, n (%)48 (11.6%)13 (20.0%)0.058
Contrast-induced nephropathy, n (%)42 (10.1%)12 (18.5%)0.048*
Re-infarction, n (%)11 (2.7%)4 (6.2%)0.131
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/gh.1111 | Journal eISSN: 2211-8179
Language: English
Submitted on: Oct 19, 2021
Accepted on: Mar 9, 2022
Published on: Mar 29, 2022
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2022 Mohamed Khalfallah, Dina A. Maria, Amany Allaithy, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.