Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Data Management Challenges for Translational Agricultural Research in West Africa: The Case of the Crops Research Institute, Ghana Cover

Data Management Challenges for Translational Agricultural Research in West Africa: The Case of the Crops Research Institute, Ghana

Open Access
|Aug 2026

References

  1. Baker, M. (2016) ‘1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility’, Nature, 533, pp. 452454. Available at: 10.1038/533452a
  2. Baruch, Y. and Holtom, B.C. (2008) ‘Survey response rate levels and trends in organisational research’, Human Relations, 61(8), pp. 11391160. Available at: 10.1177/0018726708094863
  3. Belarde-Lewis, M., Littletree, S., Braine, I.S., Srader, K., Guerrero, N. and Palmer, C.L. (2024) ‘Centering relationality and CARE for stewardship of indigenous research data’, Data Science Journal, 23:32, pp. 1–16. Available at: 10.5334/dsj-2024-032
  4. Bezuidenhout, L., Kelly, A.H., Leonelli, S. and Rappert, B. (2017a). ‘‘$100 Is Not Much to You’: open science and neglected accessibilities for scientific research in Africa’, Critical Public Health, 27(1), pp. 3949. Available at: 10.1080/09581596.2016.1252832
  5. Bezuidenhout, L., Leonelli, S., Kelly, A.H. and Rappert, B. (2017b). ‘Beyond the digital divide: towards a situated approach to open data’, Science and Public Policy, 44(4), pp. 464475. Available at: 10.1093/scipol/scw036
  6. Birnholtz, J.P. and Bietz, M.J. (2003) ‘Data at work: supporting sharing in science and engineering’, Proceedings of the 2003 international ACM SIGGROUP conference on supporting group work, pp. 339348. Available at: 10.1145/958160.958215
  7. Borgman, C.L. (2015) Big data, little data, no data: scholarship in the networked world. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Available at: 10.7551/mitpress/9963.001.0001
  8. Borgman, C.L. and Groth, P. (2025) ‘From data creator to data reuser: distance matters’, Harvard Data Science Review, 7(2). Available at: 10.1162/99608f92.35d32cfc
  9. Bowker, G.C. (2005) Memory practices in the sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  10. Briney, K. (2015) Data management for researchers: organize, maintain and share your data for research success. London: Pelagic Publishing. Available at: 10.2307/jj.28833749
  11. Charmaz, K. (2014) Constructing grounded theory. 2nd ed. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  12. Cragin, M.H., Palmer, C.L., Carlson, J.R. and Witt, M. (2010) ‘Data sharing, small science and institutional repositories’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 368(1926), pp. 40234038. Available at: 10.1098/rsta.2010.0165
  13. Crosas, M. (2011) ‘The Dataverse Network: An Open-Source Application for Sharing, Discovering and Preserving Data’, D-Lib Magazine, 17(1/2). Available at: 10.1045/january2011-crosas
  14. Diaba-Nuhoho, P. and Amponsah-Offeh, M. (2021) ‘Reproducibility and research integrity: the role of scientists and institutions’, BMC Res Notes, 14(451). Available at: 10.1186/s13104-021-05875-3
  15. Dotson, K. (2014) ‘Conceptualizing epistemic oppression’, Social Epistemology, 28(2), pp. 115138. Available at: 10.1080/02691728.2013.782585
  16. Douglas, H. and Branch, T.Y. (2024) ‘The social contract for science and the value-free ideal’, Synthese, 203, 40. Available at: 10.1007/s11229-023-04477-9
  17. Edwards, P.N. (2010) A vast machine: computer models, climate data, and the politics of global warming. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  18. Edwards, P.N., Mayernik, M.S., Batcheller, A.L., Bowker, G.C. and Borgman, C.L. (2011) ‘Science friction: data, metadata, and collaboration’, Social Studies of Science, 41(5), pp. 667690. Available at: 10.1177/0306312711413314
  19. Errington, T.M. (2024) ‘Building reproducibility bridges to cross the “Valley of Death”’, The Journal of Clinical Investigation, 134(1), p. e177383. Available at: 10.1172/JCI177383
  20. Faniel, I.M. and Jacobsen, T.E. (2010) ‘Reusing scientific data: how earthquake engineering researchers assess the reusability of colleagues’ data’, Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 19(3–4), pp. 355375. Available at: 10.1007/s10606-010-9117-8
  21. Fricker, M. (2007) Epistemic injustice: power and the ethics of knowing. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Available at: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198237907.001.0001
  22. Jackson, S.J., Edwards, P.N., Bowker, G.C. and Knobel, C.P. (2007) ‘Understanding infrastructure: history, heuristics, and cyberinfrastructure policy’, First Monday, 12(6). Available at: 10.5210/fm.v12i6.1904
  23. Karasti, H., Baker, K.S. and Millerand, F. (2010) ‘Infrastructure time: long-term matters in collaborative development’, Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 19, pp. 377415. Available at: 10.1007/s10606-010-9113-z
  24. Knorr-Cetina, K. (1982) ‘Scientific communities or trans epistemic arenas of research? A critique of quasi-economic models of science’, Social Studies of Science, 12(1), pp. 101130. Available at: 10.1177/030631282012001006
  25. Knorr-Cetina, K. (1995) ‘Laboratory studies: the cultural approach to the study of science’, in S. Jasanoff et al. (eds.) Handbook of science and technology studies. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. pp 140166. Available at: 10.4135/9781412990127.d12
  26. Knorr-Cetina, K. (1999) Epistemic cultures: how the sciences make knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Available at: 10.4159/9780674039681
  27. Latour, B. and Woolgar, S. (1986) Laboratory life: the construction of scientific facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Available at: 10.1515/9781400820412
  28. Leonelli, S. (2016) Data-centric biology: a philosophical study. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Available at: 10.7208/chicago/9780226416502.001.0001
  29. Leonelli, S. (2018) ‘Rethinking reproducibility as a criterion for research quality, research in the history of economic thought and methodology’, in Including a symposium on Mary Morgan: curiosity, imagination, and surprise. Emerald Group Publishing Limited. Vol. 36. pp. 129146. Available at: 10.1108/S0743-41542018000036B009
  30. Leonelli, S. (2020) ‘Learning from data journeys’, in S. Leonelli and N. Tempini (eds.) Data journeys in the sciences. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 124. Available at: 10.1007/978-3-030-37177-7_1
  31. Leonelli, S. (2025) ‘What to do about data distance? Responsible alternatives to data sharing’, Harvard Data Science Review, 7(2), pp. 110. Available at: 10.1162/99608f92.e95b5c26
  32. Leonelli, S. et al. (2018) ‘Introduction: open data and Africa’, Data Science Journal, 17, p. 5. Available at: 10.5334/dsj-2018-005
  33. Lord, P. and Macdonald, A. (2003) e-Science curation report: data curation for e-science in the UK. London: The Digital Archiving Consultancy Ltd.
  34. Lynch, C.A. (2003) ‘Institutional repositories: essential infrastructure for scholarship in the digital age’, Libraries and the Academy, 3(2), pp. 327336. Available at: 10.1353/pla.2003.0039
  35. Merton, R.K. (1968) ‘The Matthew effect in science: the reward and communication systems of science are considered’, Science, 159(3810), pp. 5663. Available at: 10.1126/science.159.3810.56
  36. Mittal, D., Mease, R., Kuner, T., Flor, H., Kuner, R. and Andoh, J. (2023) ‘Data management strategy for a collaborative research centre’, Gigascience, 12, giad049. Available at: 10.1093/gigascience/giad049
  37. Mwelva, J. et al. (2020) ‘Developing open science in Africa: barriers, solutions and opportunities’, Data Science Journal, 19, p. 31. Available at: 10.5334/dsj-2020-031
  38. Neff, G., Tanweer, A., Fiore-Gartland, B. and Osburn, L. (2017) ‘Critique and contribute: a practice-based framework for improving critical data studies and data science’, Big Data, 5(2), pp. 8597. Available at: 10.1089/big.2016.0050
  39. Nulty, D.D. (2008) ‘The adequacy of response rates to online and paper surveys: what can be done?’ Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(3), pp. 301314. Available at: 10.1080/02602930701293231
  40. Odebrecht, C. (2025) ‘Research data governance. The need for a system of cross-organisational responsibility for the researcher’s data domain’, Data Science Journal, 24, p. 12. Available at: 10.5334/dsj-2025-012
  41. Peng, R.D. (2011) ‘Reproducible research in computational science’, Science, 334(6060), pp. 12261227. Available at: 10.1126/science.1213847
  42. Pinamang Acheampong, P., Owusu Danquah, E., Agyeman, K., Obeng Dankwa, K. and Addison, M. (2021) ‘Research and development for improved cassava varieties in Ghana: farmers’ adoption and effects on livelihoods’, in Cassava - Biology, Production, and Use. IntechOpen. Available at: 10.5772/intechopen.97588
  43. Piwowar, H.A. and Vision, T.J. (2013) ‘Data reuse and the open data citation advantage’, PeerJ, 1, p. 1:e175. Available at: 10.7717/peerj.175
  44. Reichmann, S. (2023) ‘Mobile researchers, immobile data: managing data (producers)’, Social Studies of Science, 53(3), pp. 341357. Available at: 10.1177/03063127231156862
  45. Ribes, D. and Jackson, S.J. (2013) ‘Data bite man: the work of sustaining a long-term study’, in Lisa Gitelman (ed.) “Raw Data” Is an Oxymoron. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. pp. 147166. Available at: 10.7551/mitpress/9302.003.0010
  46. Rolland, B. and Lee, C.P. (2013) ‘Beyond trust and reliability: reusing data in collaborative cancer epidemiology research’, Proceedings of the 2013 conference on computer supported cooperative work (CSCW ‘13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA. pp. 435444. Available at: 10.1145/2441776.2441826
  47. Ross-Hellauer, T., Reichmann, S., Cole, N.L., Fessl, A., Klebel, T. and Pontika, N. (2022) ‘Dynamics of cumulative advantage and threats to equity in open science: a scoping review’, Royal Society Open Science, 9(1), p. 211032. Available at: 10.1098/rsos.211032
  48. Soundararajan, S. and Mishra, S. (2023) ‘Data management: the first step in reproducible research’, Indian Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 27, pp. 359363. Available at: 10.4103/ijoem.ijoem_342_22
  49. Star, S.L. (1999) ‘The ethnography of infrastructure’, American Behavioral Scientist, 43(3), pp. 377391. Available at: 10.1177/00027649921955326
  50. Tenopir, C., Allard, S., Douglass, K., Aydinoglu, A.U., Wu, L., Read, E. et al. (2011) ‘Data sharing by scientists: practices and perceptions’, PLoS One, 6(6), p. e21101. Available at: 10.1371/journal.pone.0021101
  51. Tenopir, C., Dalton, E.D., Allard, S., Frame, M., Pjesivac, I., Birch, B. et al. (2015) ‘Changes in data sharing and data reuse practices and perceptions among scientists worldwide’, PLoS One, 10(8), p. e0134826. Available at: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134826
  52. Tenopir, C., Rice, N.M., Allard, S., Baird, L., Borycz, J., Christian, L. et al. (2020) ‘data sharing, management, use, and reuse: practices and perceptions of scientists worldwide’, PLoS One, 15(3), p. e0229003. Available at: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229003
  53. Vines, T.H. et al. (2014) ‘The availability of research data declines rapidly with article age’, Current Biology, 24(1), pp. 9497. Available at: 10.1016/j.cub.2013.11.014
  54. Wallis, J.C., Rolando, E. and Borgman, C.L. (2013) ‘If we share data, will anyone use them? Data sharing and reuse in the long tail of science and technology’, PLoS One, 8(7), p. e67332. Available at: 10.1371/journal.pone.0067332
  55. Walsh, J.P. and Ungson, G.R. (1991) ‘Organisational memory’, The Academy of Management Review, 16(1), pp. 5791. Available at: 10.2307/258607
  56. Whyte, A. and Tedds, J. (2011) Making the case for research data management. Edinburgh: Digital Curation Centre, Jisc Briefing Paper.
  57. Wilkinson, M., Dumontier, M., Aalbersberg, I. et al. (2016) ‘The FAIR guiding principles for scientific data management and stewardship’, Scientific Data, 3, p. 160018. Available at: 10.1038/sdata.2016.18
  58. Williamson, H.F. and Leonelli, S. (eds.) (2022) Towards responsible plant data linkage: data challenges for agricultural research and development. Cham: Springer Verlag. Available at: 10.1007/978-3-031-13276-6
  59. Wu, M.-J., Zhao, K. and Fil-Aime, F. (2022) ‘Response rates of online surveys in published research: a meta-analysis’, Computers in Human Behaviour Reports, 7. Available at: 10.1016/j.chbr.2022.100206
  60. Wu, M. et al. (2026) ‘Bridging the data discovery gap: user-centric recommendations for research data repositories’, Data Science Journal, 25, p. 6. Available at: 10.5334/dsj-2026-006
  61. Wyatt, S. (2025) ‘Distance and other metaphors about reuse of research data’, Harvard Data Science Review, 7(2). Available at: 10.1162/99608f92.1d109ab1
Language: English
Page range: 35 - 35
Submitted on: Sep 11, 2025
Accepted on: Aug 5, 2026
Published on: Aug 26, 2026
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2026 Joyce Koranteng-Acquah, Sabina Leonelli, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.