Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
On the Darwin Core Term dwc:habitat, and the Need to Adopt a European Vocabulary Based on NATURA2000 and EUNIS Classifications, with a Comment on International Applicability Cover

On the Darwin Core Term dwc:habitat, and the Need to Adopt a European Vocabulary Based on NATURA2000 and EUNIS Classifications, with a Comment on International Applicability

Open Access
|May 2026

References

  1. Baskauf, S.J. and Sachs, J. (2018) ‘Darwin core as a vocabulary for expressing biodiversity data as RDF’, in A.E. Thessen (ed.) Application of Semantic Technology in Biodiversity Science. Ottawa: IOS Press, pp. 1528. Available at: 10.3233/978-1-61499-854-9-15 (Accessed 15 September 2025).
  2. Baskauf, S.J., Wieczorek, J., Deck, J. and Webb, C.O. (2016) ‘Lessons learned from adapting the Darwin Core vocabulary standard for use in RDF’, Semantic Web, 7, pp. 617627. Available at: 10.3233/SW-150199 (Accessed 05 September 2025).
  3. Costa, W.F., Miranda, L., Borges, R.C., Saraiva, A.M., Imperatriz-Fonseca, V.L. and Giannini, T.C. (2018) ‘The Need of Species Distribution Models Metadata: Using Species Distribution Model to Address Decision Making on Climate Change’, BISS, 2, e25478. Available at: 10.3897/biss.2.25478
  4. Darwin Core Task Group (2009) Darwin Core. Biodiversity Information Standards (TDWG). Available at: https://www.tdwg.org/standards/450 (Accessed 12 September 2025).
  5. Davies, C., Moss, D. and Hill, M. (2004) EUNIS habitat classification revised 2004. Report to the European Environment Agency. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Mark-Hill-9/publication/238708061_EUNIS_habitat_classification_revised_2004/links/55080e410cf26ff55f7fc7c5/EUNIS-habitat-classification-revised-2004.pdf (Accessed 03 September 2025).
  6. Davies, C.E. and Moss, D. (2020) The Eunis Habitat Classification. Available at: 10.17895/ICES.PUB.25636863.V1 (Accessed 27 September 2025).
  7. De Pooter, D. et al. (2017) ‘Toward a new data standard for combined marine biological and environmental datasets—Expanding OBIS beyond species occurrences’, Biodiversity Data Journal, 5. Available at: 10.3897/BDJ.5.e10989 (Accessed 18 September 2025).
  8. European Commission (2013) Interpretation Manual of European Union Habitats. Available at: https://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/help/natura2000/Documents/Int_Manual_EU28.pdf (Accessed 09 October 2025).
  9. Evans, D. (2012) ‘The EUNIS habitats classification—past, present and future’, Revista de Investigación Marina, 19, pp. 2829.
  10. Faber-Langendoen, D., Keeler, T., Meidinger, D., Josse, C., Weakley, A., Tart, D., Navarro, G., Hoagland, B., Ponomarenko, S., Fults, G. and Helmer, E. (2016) Classification and description of world formation types. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-346. Fort Collins, CO: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station . p. 222. Available at: 10.2737/RMRS-GTR-346 (Accessed 01 October 2025).
  11. Franz, N.M. and Sterner, B.W. (2017) ‘To increase trust, change the social design behind aggregated biodiversity data’, Database, pp. 112. Available at: 10.1101/157214 (Accessed 05 September 2025).
  12. Golbreich, C., Horridge, M., Horrocks, I., Motik, B. and Shearer, R. (2007) ‘OBO and OWL: Leveraging Semantic Web Technologies for the Life Sciences’, in K. Aberer, K.-S. Choi, N. Noy, D. Allemang, K.-I. Lee, L. Nixon, J. Golbeck, P. Mika, D. Maynard, R. Mizoguchi, G. Schreiber and P. Cudré-Mauroux (eds.) The Semantic Web. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 169182. Available at: 10.1007/978-3-540-76298-0_13 (Accessed 14 September 2025).
  13. Guo, K., Fang, J.Y., Wang, G.H., Tang, Z.Y., Xie, Z.Q., Shen, Z.H., Wang, R.Q., Qiang, S., Liang, C.Z., Da, L.J. and Yu, D. (2020) ‘A revised scheme of vegetation classification system of China’, Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 44, pp. 111127. Available at: 10.17521/cjpe.2019.0271 (Accessed 06 October 2025).
  14. Houston, D.T., de Rigo, D. and Caudullo, G. (2016) ‘Fagus sylvatica and other beeches in Europe: distribution, habitat, usage and threats’, in J. San-Miguel-Ayanz, D. de Rigo, G. Caudullo, T. Houston Durrant and A. Mauri (eds.) European Atlas of Forest Tree Species. Luxenbourg: Publ. Off. EU, e012b90+.
  15. Jomier, R., Poncet, R. and Michez, N. (2019) ‘How about Habitats and Darwin Core?’ Biodiversity Information Science and Standards, 3, e39271. Available at: 10.3897/biss.3.39271 (Accessed 10 September 2025).
  16. KBA Standards and Appeals Committee (2020) Guidelines for using A Global Standard for the Identification of Key Biodiversity Areas. Version 1.1. Prepared by the KBA Standards and Appeals Committee of the IUCN Species Survival Commission and IUCN World Commission on Protected Areas. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN. Available at: 10.2305/IUCN.CH.2020.KBA.1.1.en (Accessed 04 October 2025).
  17. Knapp, H.D. (2011) ‘European beech forests and their bio-geographical position’, in H.D. Knapp and A. Fichtner (eds.) Beech Forests, Joint Natural Heritage of Europe. Germany: Federal Agency for Nature Conservation, pp. 914.
  18. Loidi, J. (2025) ‘A multi-scalar classification system for the terrestrial vegetation of the world’, Vegetation Classification and Survey, 6, pp. 6978. Available at: 10.3897/VCS.139673
  19. Michener, W.K. (2015) ‘Ecological data sharing’, Ecological Informatics, 29, pp. 3344. Available at: 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2015.06.010 (Accessed 11 October 2025).
  20. Moss, D. (2008) EUNIS habitat classification—a guide for users. Report to the European Environment Agency. Available at: https://www.eea.europa.eu/ds_resolveuid/c89346f6f75142c9bd057f4e57d22384 (Accessed 03 September 2025).
  21. Moss, D. and Davies, C. (2002) Cross-references between the EUNIS habitat classification, lists of habitats included in legislation, and other European habitat classifications. NERC/Centre for Ecology & Hydrology. Available at: https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/8684/ (Accessed 28 September 2025).
  22. Mungall, C.J., Gkoutos, G.V., Smith, C.L., Haendel, M.A., Lewis, S.E. and Ashburner, M. (2010) ‘Integrating phenotype ontologies across multiple species’, Genome Biology, 11, R2. Available at: 10.1186/gb-2010-11-1-r2 (Accessed 08 September 2025).
  23. Nitta, J.H. and Iwasaki, W. (2024) ‘dwctaxon, an R package for editing and validating taxonomic data in Darwin Core format’, Journal of Open Source Software, 9, pp. 15. Available at: 10.21105/joss.06215 (Accessed 06 September 2025).
  24. NVIS Technical Working Group (2017) Australian Vegetation Attribute Manual: National Vegetation Information System, Version 7.0. Department of the Environment and Energy, Canberra. Available at: https://www.dcceew.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/australian-vegetation-attribute-manual-v70.pdf (Accessed 05 October 2025).
  25. Packham, J.R., Hobson, P.R. and Norris, C. (2013) ‘Common beech Fagus sylvatica L; survival and longevity in changing times’, Arboricultural Journal, 35, pp. 6473. Available at: 10.1080/03071375.2013.767078 (Accessed 17 September 2025).
  26. Pizzolotto, R. (2022) ‘Carabids species diversity in Mediterranean beech forests’, Biodiversity Data Journal, 10, e78291. Available at: 10.3897/BDJ.10.e78291 (Accessed 05 September 2025).
  27. Reichman, O.J., Jones, M.B. and Schildhauer, M.P. (2011) ‘Challenges and Opportunities of Open Data in Ecology’, Science, 331, pp. 703705. Available at: 10.1126/science.1197962 (Accessed 12 September 2025).
  28. Schaminée, J.H., Chytrý, M., Hennekens, S.M., Mucina, L., Rodwell, J.S. and Tichý, L. (2012) Development of vegetation syntaxa crosswalks to EUNIS habitat classification and related data sets. Report to the European Environment Agency. Available at: https://www.sci.muni.cz/botany/chytry/Schaminee_etal2012_EEA-Report-Crosswalks.pdf (Accessed 22 September 2025).
  29. Skalski, T., Gargasz, K. and Laskowski, R. (2011) ‘Does mixed diffused pollution decrease ground beetle diversity?’ Baltic Journal of Coleopterology, 11(1), pp. 115. Available at: https://bjc.sggw.edu.pl/article/view/6474 (Accessed 24 September 2025).
  30. Smith, B., Ashburner, M., Rosse, C., Bard, J., Bug, W., Ceusters, W., Goldberg, L.J., Eilbeck, K., Ireland, A., Mungall, C.J., Leontis, N., Rocca-Serra, P., Ruttenberg, A., Sansone, S.-A., Scheuermann, R.H., Shah, N., Whetzel, P.L., Lewis, S. and Consortium, The O.B.I. (2007) ‘The OBO Foundry: coordinated evolution of ontologies to support biomedical data integration’, Nature Biotechnology, 25, pp. 12511255. Available at: 10.1038/nbt1346 (Accessed 20 September 2025).
  31. Smith, B., Ceusters, W., Klagges, B., Köhler, J., Kumar, A., Lomax, J., Mungall, C., Neuhaus, F., Rector, A.L. and Rosse, C. (2005) ‘Relations in biomedical ontologies’, Genome Biology, 6, R46. Available at: 10.1186/gb-2005-6-5-r46 (Accessed 05 September 2025).
  32. Stucky, B.J., Deck, J., Conlin, T., Ziemba, L., Cellinese, N. and Guralnick, R. (2014) ‘The BiSciCol Triplifier: Bringing biodiversity data to the Semantic Web’, BMC Bioinformatics, 15(1), p. 257. Available at: 10.1186/1471-2105-15-257 (Accessed 07 October 2025).
  33. Svenningsen, C.S. and Schigel, D. (2024) ‘Sharing insect data through GBIF: novel monitoring methods, opportunities and standards’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 379, pp. 17. Available at: 10.1098/rstb.2023.0104 (Accessed 11 October 2025).
  34. Villero, D., Pla, M., Camps, D., Ruiz-Olmo, J. and Brotons, L. (2017) ‘Integrating species distribution modelling into decision-making to inform conservation actions’, Biodiversity and Conservation, 26, pp. 251271. Available at: 10.1007/s10531-016-1243-2 (Accessed 06 October 2025).
  35. von Wettberg, E. and Khoury, C.K. (2022) ‘Biodiversity data: The importance of access and the challenges regarding benefit sharing’, Plants, People, Planet, 4, pp. 24. Available at: 10.1002/ppp3.10241
  36. Wieczorek, J., Bloom, D., Guralnick, R., Blum, S., Döring, M., Giovanni, R., Robertson, T. and Vieglais, D. (2012) ‘Darwin Core: An Evolving Community-Developed Biodiversity Data Standard’, PLOS ONE, 7, e29715. Available at: 10.1371/journal.pone.0029715 (Accessed 01 September 2025).
  37. Wilkinson, M.D. et al. (2016) ‘The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship’, Scientific Data, 3, pp. 19. Available at: 10.1038/sdata.2016.18 (Accessed 07 October 2025).
  38. Zimmerman, A.S. (2008) ‘New Knowledge from Old Data: The Role of Standards in the Sharing and Reuse of Ecological Data’, Science, Technology, & Human Values, 33, pp. 631652. Available at: 10.1177/0162243907306704 (Accessed 04 October 2025).
Language: English
Page range: 17 - 17
Submitted on: Oct 14, 2025
Accepted on: Apr 21, 2026
Published on: May 8, 2026
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2026 Roberto Pizzolotto, Fabiola Durante, Wouter Dekoninck, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.