Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Open Science, Health Data and Epistemic Harms: A Multidisciplinary Reflection Cover

Open Science, Health Data and Epistemic Harms: A Multidisciplinary Reflection

Open Access
|Apr 2026

References

  1. Azoulay, A. (2020) Address by Audrey Azoulay, Director-General of UNESCO, for the Joint Appeal on Open Science, 27 October 2020 (Speech). Available at: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000374769.locale=en (Accessed: 20 February 2026).
  2. Bezuidenhout, L. (2025) ‘Critically unpacking the concept of equity for Open Science’, Social Epistemology, pp. 118. Available at: 10.1080/02691728.2025.2475460
  3. Bezuidenhout, L., Kelly, A.H., Leonelli, S. and Rappert, B. (2017b) ‘“$100 is not much to you”: Open science and neglected accessibilities for scientific research in Africa’, Critical Public Health, 27(1), pp. 3949. Available at: 10.1080/09581596.2016.1252832
  4. Bezuidenhout, L., Leonelli, S., Kelly, A.H. and Rappert, B. (2017a) ‘Beyond the digital divide: Towards a situated approach to open data’, Science and Public Policy, 44(4), pp. 464475. Available at: 10.1093/scipol/scw036
  5. Byczkowski, M. (2025) ‘Data as medicine’s backbone: Redefining its value to foster innovation in the data economy’, BMJ Health & Care Informatics, 32(1), p. e101513. Available at: 10.1136/bmjhci-2025-101513
  6. Carroll, S.R., Garba, I., Figueroa-Rodríguez, O.L., Holbrook, J., Lovett, R., Materechera, S., Parsons, M., Raseroka, K., Rodriguez-Lonebear, D., Rowe, R., Sara, R., Walker, J.D., Anderson, J. and Hudson, M. (2020) ‘The CARE principles for Indigenous Data Governance’, Data Science Journal, 19(1), p. 43. Available at: 10.5334/dsj-2020-043
  7. Center for Open Science (COS). (n.d.) Open Science: Open science is about transparency, sharing, and inclusivity. Available at: https://www.cos.io/open-science (Accessed: 14 February 2026).
  8. Chang, H.J. (2003) ‘Kicking away the ladder: Infant industry promotion in historical perspective’, Oxford Development Studies, 31(1), pp. 2132. Available at: 10.1080/1360081032000047168
  9. Chtena, N., Alperin, J.P., Morales, E., Fleerackers, A., Dorsch, I., Pinfield, S. and Simard, M.A. (2025) ‘Towards an inclusive Open Science: Examining EDI and public participation in policy documents across Europe and the Americas’, Royal Society Open Science, 12(4), p. 240857. Available at: 10.1098/rsos.240857
  10. Civic Data Cooperative. (n.d.) Digital Commons. Available at: https://civicdatacooperative.com/project/digital-commons/ (Accessed: 9 March 2026).
  11. Cole, N.L., Kormann, E., Klebel, T., Apartis, S. and Ross-Hellauer, T. (2024) ‘The societal impact of Open Science: A scoping review’, Royal Society Open Science, 11(6), p. 240286. Available at: 10.1098/rsos.240286
  12. Cross, J.L., Choma, M.A. and Onofrey, J.A. (2024) ‘Bias in medical AI: Implications for clinical decision-making’, PLOS Digital Health, 3(11), p. e0000651. Available at: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000651
  13. D’Agostino, M., Samuel, N.O., Sarol, M.J., Cosio, F.G.D., Marti, M., Luo, T. et al. (2018) ‘Open data and public health’, Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública, 42, p. e66. Available at: 10.26633/RPSP.2018.66
  14. De Beer, J. and De Koker, R. (2024) ‘Negotiation of new international health law on intellectual property, technology transfer, open science and pathogen access and benefit sharing: a textual and contextual analysis’, BMJ public health, 2(2), p. e001467. Available at: 10.1136/bmjph-2024-001467
  15. Dominik, M., Nzweundji, J.G., Ahmed, N., Carnicelli, S., Mat Jalaluddin, N.S., Fernandez Rivas, D., Narita, V., Enany, S. and Rios Rojas, C. (2022) ‘Open Science – For whom?’, Data Science Journal, 21(1), p. 1. Available at: 10.5334/dsj-2022-001
  16. Dosi, G. and Stiglitz, J.E. (2014) ‘The role of intellectual property rights in the development process, with some lessons from developed countries: An introduction’, in M. Cimoli and others (eds.) Intellectual property rights: Legal and economic challenges for development. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 155. Available at: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199660759.003.0001
  17. Dutta, M., Ramasubramanian, S., Barrett, M., Elers, C., Sarwatay, D., Raghunath, P., Kaur, S., Dutta, D., Jayan, P., Rahman, M., Tallam, E., Roy, S., Falnikar, A., Johnson, G.M., Mandal, I., Dutta, U., Basnyat, I., Soriano, C., Pavarala, V., Sreekumar, T.T., Ganesh, S., Pandi, A.R. and Zapata, D. (2021) ‘Decolonizing open science: Southern interventions’, Journal of Communication, 71(5), pp. 803826. Available at: 10.1093/joc/jqab027
  18. Goldensher, L.O.D. (2023) ‘Problems of knowledge, problems of order: The open science field site’, Frontiers in Sociology, 8, p. 1149073. Available at: 10.3389/fsoc.2023.1149073
  19. Goodley, D. (2025) Humanising the Healthcare Experiences of People with Learning Disabilities and/or Autism: Qualitative Data From Interviews and Ethnographic Data and Research Materials, 2022–2025 (Data Collection). Colchester, Essex: UK Data Service. Available at: 10.5255/UKDA-SN-857910
  20. Grand, A., Wilkinson, C., Bultitude, K. and Winfield, A.F. (2012) ‘Open science: A new “trust technology”?’, Science Communication, 34(5), pp. 679689. Available at: 10.1177/1075547012443021
  21. Hardwick, K. (2019) ‘Where’s the harm in it? Distinguishing epistemic and moral harm in cases of epistemic injustice’, Aporia, 19(1). Available at: https://ojs.st-andrews.ac.uk/index.php/aporia/article/view/1932
  22. Hagner, M. (2018) ‘Open access, data capitalism and academic publishing’, Swiss Medical Weekly, 148(708), p. w14600. Available at: 10.4414/smw.2018.14600
  23. Hetu, M., Koutouki, K. and Joly, Y. (2019) ‘Genomics for all: International open science genomics projects and capacity building in the developing world’, Frontiers in Genetics, 10, p. 95. Available at: 10.3389/fgene.2019.00095
  24. Hofmann, B. (2022) ‘Open science knowledge production: Addressing epistemological challenges and ethical implications’, Publications, 10(3), p. 24. Available at: 10.3390/publications10030024
  25. Kafer, A. (2013) Feminist, queer, crip. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. Available at: 10.2979/6841.0
  26. Knoche, M. and Fuchs, C. (2020) ‘Science communication and open access: The critique of the political economy of capitalist academic publishers as ideology critique’, TripleC, 18(2), pp. 508534. Available at: 10.31269/triplec.v18i2.1183
  27. Kukutai, T. and Taylor, J. (2016) Indigenous data sovereignty: Toward an agenda. Canberra: ANU Press. Available at: 10.22459/caepr38.11.2016
  28. Leonelli, S. (2022) ‘Open science and epistemic diversity: Friends or foes?’, Philosophy of Science, 89(5), pp. 9911001. Available at: 10.1017/psa.2022.45
  29. Leonelli, S. (2023) Philosophy of open science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Available at: 10.1017/9781009416368
  30. Madianou, M. (2019) ‘Technocolonialism: Digital innovation and data practices in the humanitarian response to refugee crises’, Social Media + Society, 5(3), pp. 116. Available at: 10.1177/2056305119863146
  31. Mingus, M. (2011) Changing the Framework: Disability Justice. Leaving Evidence. Available at: https://leavingevidence.wordpress.com/2011/02/12/changing-the-framework-disability-justice/
  32. Mirowski, P. (2023) ‘The evolution of platform science’, Social Research: An International Quarterly, 90(4), pp. 725755. Available at: 10.1353/sor.2023.a916352
  33. Omeranovic, A., Van Long, F.N., Boubaker, A., Turgeon, A. and Nabi, H. (2025) ‘Underrepresented populations in genomic research: A qualitative study of researchers’ perspectives’, BMC medical genomics, 18(1), p. 72. Available at: 10.1186/s12920-025-02140-5
  34. Pal, S. (2025) ‘Health data as a commodity: Implications and opportunities’, SSRN. Available at: 10.2139/ssrn.5081660 (Accessed 2 November 2025).
  35. Piepzna-Samarasinha, L. (2018) Care work: Dreaming disability justice. Vancouver: Arsenal Pulp Press.
  36. Pievatolo, M.C. (2020) ‘Open science: Human emancipation or bureaucratic serfdom?’, Scientific Research and Information Technology, 10, pp. 3552. Available at: 10.2423/i22394303v10Sp35
  37. Ross-Hellauer, T., Reichmann, S., Cole, N.L., Fessl, A., Klebel, T. and Pontika, N. (2022) ‘Dynamics of cumulative advantage and threats to equity in open science: a scoping review’, Royal Society Open Science, 9(1), p. 211032. Available at: 10.31235/osf.io/d5fz7
  38. Sayers, E.W., Cavanaugh, M., Frisse, L., Pruitt, K.D., Schneider, V.A., Underwood, B.A., Yankie, L. and Karsch-Mizrachi, I. (2025) ‘GenBank 2025 update’, Nucleic Acids Research, 53(1), pp. 5661. Available at: 10.1093/nar/gkae1114
  39. Schirru, L. and Albagli, S. (2026) ‘Aspectos legais do uso de dados em projetos de Ciência Cidadã’, Transinformação, 37. Available at: https://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/transinfo/article/view/15177
  40. Serwadda, D., Ndebele, P., Grabowski, M.K., Bajunirwe, F. and Wanyenze, R.K. (2018) ‘Open data sharing and the Global South—Who benefits?’, Science, 359(6376), pp. 642643. Available at: 10.1126/science.aap8395
  41. Sheehan, N., Botta, F. and Leonelli, S. (2024) ‘Unrestricted versus regulated open data governance: A bibliometric comparison of SARS-CoV-2 nucleotide sequence databases’, Data Science Journal, 23(1), p. 29. Available at: 10.5334/dsj-2024-029
  42. Sheehan, N. and Leonelli, S. (2025) ‘Reconciling data actionability and accountability in global health research: The case of SARS-CoV-2’, Global Public Health, 20(1), p. 2436422. Available at: 10.1080/17441692.2024.2436422
  43. Stacey, K. and Milmo, D. (2025) ‘Ministers mull allowing private firms to make profit from NHS data in AI push’, The Guardian, 13 January. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/society/2025/jan/13/ministers-mull-allowing-private-firms-to-make-profit-from-nhs-data-in-ai-push (Accessed: 28 October 2025).
  44. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). (2022) An Introduction to the UNESCO Recommendation on Open Science. Available at: https://unesco.org.uk/site/assets/files/1825/an_introduction_to_the_unesco_recommendation_on_open_science.pdf (Accessed: 03 November 2025).
  45. UNESCO. (2021) UNESCO Recommendation on Open Science. Available at: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000379949.locale=en (Accessed: 03 November 2025).
  46. Wehn, U., Ajates, R., Mandeville, C., Somerwill, L., Kragh, G. and Haklay, M. (2024) ‘Opening science to society: How to progress societal engagement into (open) science policies’, Royal Society Open Science, 11(5), p. 231309. Available at: 10.1098/rsos.231309
  47. Wells, T.N., Willis, P., Burrows, J.N. and van Huijsduijnen, R.H. (2016) ‘Open data in drug discovery and development: Lessons from malaria’, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 15(10), pp. 661662. Available at: 10.1038/nrd.2016.154
  48. Wyber, R., Vaillancourt, S., Perry, W., Mannava, P., Folaranmi, T. and Celi, L.A. (2015) ‘Big data in global health: Improving health in low-and middle-income countries’, Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 93, pp. 203208. Available at: 10.2471/BLT.14.139022
Language: English
Page range: 15 - 15
Submitted on: Nov 18, 2025
Accepted on: Mar 30, 2026
Published on: Apr 10, 2026
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2026 Tatenda Chatikobo, Frances Griffiths, Nikita Hayden, Gary Leeming, Ankita Mishra, Eva Morris, Luca Schirru, Nathanael Sheehan, Andrew Williams, Sharifah Sekalala, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.