Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Earth Science Data Repositories: Implementing the CARE Principles Cover

Earth Science Data Repositories: Implementing the CARE Principles

Data Science Journal
Volume 23 (2024): Issue 1
By: Margaret O’Brien,  Ruth Duerr,  Riley Taitingfong,  Andrew Martinez,  Lourdes Vera,  Lydia L. Jennings,  Robert R. Downs,  Erin Antognoli,  Talya ten Brink,  Nicole B. Halmai,  Dominique David-Chavez,  Stephanie Russo Carroll,  Maui Hudson and  Pier Luigi Buttigieg  
Open Access
|Jul 2024

References

  1. 1Anderson, A, Huttenlocher, D, Kleinberg, J and Leskovec, J 2013 Steering User Behavior with Badges. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on World Wide Web, 95–106. WWW ’13. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery. DOI: 10.1145/2488388.2488398
    Back to article
  2. 2Arbour, L and Cook, D 2006 DNA on Loan: Issues to Consider When Carrying Out Genetic Research with Aboriginal Families and Communities. Community Genetics, 9(3): 153–60. DOI: 10.1159/000092651
    Back to article
  3. 3Avila, R 2023 Updating the Open Definition to Meet the Challenges of Today. Open Knowledge blog March 16, 2023. Available at: https://blog.okfn.org/2023/03/16/updating-the-open-definition-to-meet-the-challenges-of-today/.
    Back to article
  4. 4Bahim, C, Casorrán-Amilburu, C, Dekkers, M, Herczog, E, Loozen, N, Repanas, K, Russell, K and Stall, S 2020 The FAIR Data Maturity Model: An Approach to Harmonise FAIR Assessments. Data Science Journal, 19: 41. DOI: 10.5334/dsj-2020-041
    Back to article
  5. 5Baker, K S and Duerr, R E 2017 Research and the Changing Nature of Data Repositories. In Johnston, L R (ed.) Curating Research Data. Chicago: American Library Association. pp. 33ff.
    Back to article
  6. 6Baker, K S, Duerr, R E and Parsons, M A 2015 Scientific Knowledge Mobilization: Co-Evolution of Data Products and Designated Communities. International Journal of Digital Curation, 10(2): 110–35. DOI: 10.2218/ijdc.v10i2.346
    Back to article
  7. 7Ball, A 2012 Review of Data Management Lifecycle Models. Bath: University of Bath.
    Back to article
  8. 8‘BC Provenance – Local Contexts.’ n.d. Accessed October 31, 2023. Available at: https://localcontexts.org/label/bc-provenance/.
    Back to article
  9. 9BCO-DMO n.d. Introduction to BCO-DMO | BCO-DMO. Accessed December 29, 2023. Available at: https://www.bco-dmo.org/.
    Back to article
  10. 10Belarde-Lewis, M, Littletree, S, Braine, I R, Srader, K, Guerrero, N and Palmer, C L 2024 Centering Relationality and CARE for Stewardship of Indigenous Research Data. Data Science Journal, 23: 32. DOI: 10.5334/dsj-2024-032
    Back to article
  11. 11Canada, Polar Knowledge 2018 Conducting Research in Canada’s North. December 6, 2018. https://www.canada.ca/en/polar-knowledge/online-portal-for-researchers.html.
    Back to article
  12. 12Carlson, D J 2012 IPY 2007–2008: Where Threads of the Double Helix and Sputnik Intertwine. In Huettman, F (ed.), Protection of the Three Poles. Tokyo: Springer Japan, 35–50. DOI: 10.1007/978-4-431-54006-9_2
    Back to article
  13. 13Carroll, S R, Garba, I, Figueroa-Rodríguez, O L, Holbrook, J, Lovett, R, Materechera, S, Parsons, M, et al 2020 The CARE Principles for Indigenous Data Governance, 19(1): 43. DOI: 10.5334/dsj-2020-043
    Back to article
  14. 14Carroll, S R, Garba, I, Plevel, R, Hiratsuka, V Y, Hudson, M and Garrison, N A 2022 Using Indigenous Standards to Implement the CARE Principles: Setting Expectations through Tribal Research Codes. Frontiers in Genetics, 13. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2022.823309
    Back to article
  15. 15CCSDS 650.0-B-1 2012 REFERENCE MODEL FOR AN OPEN ARCHIVAL INFORMATION SYSTEM (OAIS). CCSDS. Available at: https://public.ccsds.org/pubs/650x0m2.pdf.
    Back to article
  16. 16Chapman, A 2020 Current Best Practices for Generalizing Sensitive Species Occurrence Data. GBIF Secretariat. DOI: 10.15468/doc-5jp4-5g10
    Back to article
  17. 17Christen, K A 2012 Does Information Really Want to Be Free? Indigenous Knowledge Systems and the Question of Openness. International Journal of Communication, 6: 24ff.
    Back to article
  18. 18CIESIN, Columbia University 2024 Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center. Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center. February 2, 2024. Available at: https://sedac.ciesin.columbia.edu/.
    Back to article
  19. 19Collaboratory for Indigenous Data Governance n.d. Collaboratory for Indigenous Data Governance. Accessed December 11, 2023. Available at: https://indigenousdatalab.org/.
    Back to article
  20. 20CoreTrustSeal Standards and Certification Board 2022 CoreTrustSeal Requirements 2023–2025. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.7051012
    Back to article
  21. 21Cultural Survival, and First Peoples Worldwide 2023 Securing Indigenous Peoples Right to Self-Determination: A GuIde On Free, PrIor And Informed Consent. Cultural Survival blog. Available at: https://www.culturalsurvival.org/news/new-guide-supports-indigenous-leaders-develop-fpic-protocols-and-secure-self-determined.
    Back to article
  22. 22DataONE n.d. Data Observation Network for Earth | DataONE. Accessed February 9, 2024. Available at: https://www.dataone.org/.
    Back to article
  23. 23Davis, M 2016 Data and the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. In Kukutai, T and Taylor, J (eds.), Indigenous Data Sovereignty: Toward an Agenda. Canberra: Australian National University (ANU) Press. DOI: 10.22459/CAEPR38.11.2016.02
    Back to article
  24. 24Downs, R R 2021 Improving Opportunities for New Value of Open Data: Assessing and Certifying Research Data Repositories. Data Science Journal, 20: 1. DOI: 10.5334/dsj-2021-001
    Back to article
  25. 25Drabiak-Syed, K 2010 Lessons from Havasupai Tribe v. Arizona State University Board of Regents: Recognizing Group, Cultural, and Dignity Harms as Legitimate Risks Warranting Integration into Research Practice. J. Health & Biomedical L. 6, pp. 175.
    Back to article
  26. 26Duerr, R 2024 Examples of CARE-Related Activities Carried out by Repositories, in Sequences or Groups. Environmental Data Initiative. DOI: 10.6073/PASTA/AAEDD84525AE922D3115FD05CF5BF4FE
    Back to article
  27. 27Duerr, R, O’Brien, M, Taitingfong, R, Martinez, A, Lourdes, V, Jennings, L, Downs, R, et al. 2024 Earth and Environmental Science Repository Activities in Support of the CARE Principles. https://zenodo.org/records/10521041.
    Back to article
  28. 28EDI n.d. Environmental Data Initiative. Accessed December 29, 2023. Available at: https://edirepository.org/.
    Back to article
  29. 29Eitzel, M V, Cappadonna, J, L, Santos-Lang, C, Duerr, R E, Virapongse, A, West, S E, Kyba, C, Bowser, A, Cooper, C B and Sforzi, A 2017 Citizen Science Terminology Matters: Exploring Key Terms. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 2(1). DOI: 10.5334/cstp.96
    Back to article
  30. 30ELOKA 2023 Welcome | ELOKA. Available at: https://eloka-arctic.org/.
    Back to article
  31. 31ESIPFed n.d. Home – Earth Science Information Partners (ESIP). ESIPFed. Accessed December 28, 2023. Available at: https://www.esipfed.org/.
    Back to article
  32. 32Foundation of Digital Badges and Micro-Credentials. n.d. Accessed June 3, 2024. Available at: https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-319-15425-1.
    Back to article
  33. 33Garba, I, Sterling, R, Plevel, R, Carson, W, Cordova-Marks, F M, Cummins, J, Curley, C, et al. 2023 Indigenous Peoples and Research: Self-Determination in Research Governance. Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics, 8. DOI: 10.3389/frma.2023.1272318
    Back to article
  34. 34GIDA 2023a CARE Principles. Global Indigenous Data Alliance. January 23, 2023. Available at: https://www.gida-global.org/care.
    Back to article
  35. 35GIDA 2023b IEEE Provenance. Global Indigenous Data Alliance. January 23, 2023. Available at: https://www.gida-global.org/ieee-provenance.
    Back to article
  36. 36Gilbert, T, Williams, P, Fields, M, Williams, L, Flitt, W, Savage, M, John, C, et al. 2017 Gwich’in Nąįį Googindì’ K’ìt/Gwich’in Place Names AtlasGwich’in Place Names Atlas. Boulder, Colorado USA: National Snow and Ice Data Center. Available at: https://eloka-arctic.org/product/atlas/gwichin-place-names-atlas.
    Back to article
  37. 37Global Indigenous Data Alliance 2023 Global Indigenous Data Alliance. Available at: https://www.gida-global.org.
    Back to article
  38. 38Hernandez, J 2022 Fresh Banana Leaves: Healing Indigenous Landscapes Through Indigenous Science. Available at: https://bookshop.org/p/books/fresh-banana-leaves-healing-indigenous-landscapes-through-indigenous-science-jessica-hernandez/16859402.
    Back to article
  39. 39Hudson, M, Carroll, S R, Anderson, J, Blackwater, D, Cordova-Marks, F M, Cummins, J, David-Chavez, D, et al. 2023 Indigenous Peoples Rights in Data: A Contribution toward Indigenous Research Sovereignty, Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics, 8: 1173805. DOI: 10.3389/frma.2023.1173805
    Back to article
  40. 40ICPSR 2024 ICPSR Data Excellence Research Impact. Available at: https://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/pages/.
    Back to article
  41. 41ITK and NRI 2007 Nickels, S, Shirley, J and Laidler, G (ed.), Negotiating Research Relationships with Inuit Communities: A Guide for Researchers. Ottawa and Iqualuit: Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami and Nunavut Research Institute. Available at: https://repository.oceanbestpractices.org/handle/11329/1605?show=full
    Back to article
  42. 42ITTAQ 2024 Clyde River Weather, Kangiqtugaapik (Clyde River) Weather Station Network. Available at: https://clyderiverweather.org/.
    Back to article
  43. 43Jennings, L, Anderson, T, Martinez, A, Sterling, R, David Chavez, D, Garba, I, Hudson, M, Garrison, N A and Carroll, S R 2023 Applying the ‘CARE Principles for Indigenous Data Governance’ to Ecology and Biodiversity Research. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 7. DOI: 10.1038/s41559-023-02161-2
    Back to article
  44. 44Jones, M, Slaughter, P and Habermann, T. 2019 Quantifying FAIR: automated metadata improvement and guidance in the DataONE repository network. DOI: 10.5281/ZENODO.3408465
    Back to article
  45. 45Kanao, M, Okada, M and Kadokura, A 2014 Metadata Management at the Polar Data Centre of the National Institute of Polar Research, Japan. Data Science Journal, 13. DOI: 10.2481/dsj.IFPDA-05
    Back to article
  46. 46Kukutai, T 2023 Indigenous Data Sovereignty—A New Take on an Old Theme. Science, 382(6674): eadl4664. DOI: 10.1126/science.adl4664
    Back to article
  47. 47Kukutai, T and Taylor, J (eds.) 2016 Indigenous Data Sovereignty: Toward an Agenda. Canberra: ANU Press. DOI: 10.22459/CAEPR38.11.2016
    Back to article
  48. 48Library of Congress 2023 PREMIS Data Dictionary for Preservation Metadata. Available at: https://www.loc.gov/standards/premis/.
    Back to article
  49. 49Lin, D, Crabtree, J, Dillo, I, Downs, R R, Edmunds, R, Giaretta, D and De Giusti, M, et al. 2020 The TRUST Principles for Digital Repositories. Scientific Data, 7(1): 144. DOI: 10.1038/s41597-020-0486-7
    Back to article
  50. 50Local Contexts 2024 Local Contexts – Grounding Indigenous Rights. Available at: https://localcontexts.org/.
    Back to article
  51. 51Local Contexts n.d. TK Labels – Local Contexts. Accessed December 29, 2023. Available at: https://localcontexts.org/labels/traditional-knowledge-labels/.
    Back to article
  52. 52LTER n.d.; Home - LTER. Accessed February 9, 2024. Available at: https://lternet.edu/.
    Back to article
  53. 53MacInnes, A, Colchester, M and Whitmore, A 2017 Free, Prior and Informed Consent: How to Rectify the Devastating Consequences of Harmful Mining for Indigenous Peoples. Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation, 15(3): 152–60. DOI: 10.1016/j.pecon.2017.05.007
    Back to article
  54. 54Mc Cartney, A M, Anderson, J, Liggins, L, Hudson, M L, Anderson, M Z, TeAika, B, Geary, J, Cook-Deegan, R, et al. 2022 Balancing openness with Indigenous data sovereignty: An opportunity to leave no one behind in the journey to sequence all of life. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(4): e2115860119. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2115860119
    Back to article
  55. 55Montenegro, M 2019 Subverting the Universality of Metadata Standards: The TK Labels as a Tool to Promote Indigenous Data Sovereignty. Journal of Documentation, 75(4): 731–49. DOI: 10.1108/JD-08-2018-0124
    Back to article
  56. 56Noorbergen, T J, Adam, M T P, Roxburgh, M and Teubner, T 2021 Co-Design in mHealth Systems Development: Insights From a Systematic Literature Review. AIS Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction, 13(2): 175–205. DOI: 10.17705/1thci.00147
    Back to article
  57. 57NSF 2024 Proposal & Award Policies & Procedures Guide (PAPPG) (NSF 24-1) | NSF – National Science Foundation. Available at: https://new.nsf.gov/policies/pappg/24-1.
    Back to article
  58. 58NSIDC 2023 Homepage. National Snow and Ice Data Center. Available at: https://nsidc.org/home.
    Back to article
  59. 59O’Brien, M, Duerr, R, Taitingfong, R, Martinez, A, Vera, L, Jennings, L, Downs, R, et al. 2024 Alignment between CARE Principles and Data Repository Activities. Environmental Data Initiative. DOI: 10.6073/PASTA/23E699AD00F74A178031904129E78E93
    Back to article
  60. 60OKFN 2016 Open Data Handbook. Open Knowledge Foundation. Available at: https://opendatahandbook.org/guide/en/.
    Back to article
  61. 61RDA 2017 International Indigenous Data Sovereignty IG. Available at: https://www.rd-alliance.org/groups/international-indigenous-data-sovereignty-ig.
    Back to article
  62. 62Royal Society Te Aparangi 2023 Mana Raraunga Data Sovereignty. Available at: https://www.royalsociety.org.nz/assets/Mana-Raraunga-Data-Sovereignty-web-V1.pdf.
    Back to article
  63. 63Scassa, T and Taylor, F 2017 Legal and Ethical Issues around Incorporating Traditional Knowledge in Polar Data Infrastructures. DataScienceJournal, 16: 3, 1–14. DOI: 10.5334/dsj-2017-003
    Back to article
  64. 64Shingledecker, S, Mills, A, Orlando, M, Burgess, A, Allen, P and Cruz, E 2024 2023 Annual Report for Earth Science Information Partners (ESIP). ESIP. DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.25114319.v1
    Back to article
  65. 65Smithsonian Institution 2019 Smithsonian Directive 609 – Digital Asset Access and Use. Smithsonian Institution. Available at: https://www.si.edu/content/pdf/about/sd/SD609.pdf.
    Back to article
  66. 66Taitingfong, R, Martinez, A, Russo Carroll, S, Hudson, M and Anderson, J 2023 Indigenous Metadata Bundle Communiqué. Collaboratory for Indigenous Data Governance, ENRICH: Equity for Indigenous Research and Innovation Coordinating Hub, and Tikanga in Technology. Available at: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1XJReoSqazzp8DI2u2NlLnnwlhoJvXEI0BqAmt0wupU4/edit.
    Back to article
  67. 67TK Labels – Local Contexts. n.d. Accessed October 31, 2023. Available at: https://localcontexts.org/labels/traditional-knowledge-labels/.
    Back to article
  68. 68United Nations n.d.-a. Indigenous Peoples. United Nations. Accessed January 11, 2024. Available at: https://www.un.org/en/fight-racism/vulnerable-groups/indigenous-peoples.
    Back to article
  69. 69United Nations n.d.-b. United Nations Declaration On The Rights Of Indigenous Peoples. Accessed March 26, 2024. Available at: https://social.desa.un.org/issues/indigenous-peoples/united-nations-declaration-on-the-rights-of-indigenous-peoples.
    Back to article
  70. 70USGAO 2022 Tribal Funding: Actions Needed to Improve Information on Federal Funds That Benefit Native Americans | U.S. GAO. Available at: https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-22-104602.
    Back to article
  71. 71Vierkant, P n.d. DataCite – Connecting Research, Advancing Knowledge. DataCite. Accessed February 9, 2024. Available at: https://datacite.org/.
    Back to article
  72. 72W3C 2018 ODRL Information Model 2.2. Available at: https://www.w3.org/TR/odrl-model/.
    Back to article
  73. 73Webb, R, Bai, X, Stafford Smith, M, Costanza, R, Griggs, D, Moglia, M, Neuman, M, et al. 2018 Sustainable Urban Systems: Co-Design and Framing for Transformation, Ambio, 47(1): 57–77. DOI: 10.1007/s13280-017-0934-6
    Back to article
  74. 74Wilkinson, M D, Dumontier, M, Aalbersberg, I J, Appleton, G, Axton, M, Baak, A, Blomberg, N, et al. 2016 The FAIR Guiding Principles for Scientific Data Management and Stewardship, Scientific Data, 3(1): 160018. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2016.18
    Back to article
  75. 75Younging, G 2018 Elements of Indigenous Style: A Guide for Writing by and about Indigenous Peoples. Indigenous Collection. Edmonton, Alberta: Brush Education.
    Back to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2024-037 | Journal eISSN: 1683-1470
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Submitted on: Mar 29, 2024
Accepted on: Jun 17, 2024
Published on: Jul 3, 2024
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Keywords:
Data Repositories,
CARE Principles,
Indigenous Peoples,
Collaboratory for Indigenous Data Governance,
Earth Science Information Partners,
ESIP

© 2024 Margaret O’Brien, Ruth Duerr, Riley Taitingfong, Andrew Martinez, Lourdes Vera, Lydia L. Jennings, Robert R. Downs, Erin Antognoli, Talya ten Brink, Nicole B. Halmai, Dominique David-Chavez, Stephanie Russo Carroll, Maui Hudson, Pier Luigi Buttigieg, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 23 (2024): Issue 1Next article