Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Rethinking Data Management Planning: Introducing Research Output Management Planning (ROMPi) Approach Cover

Rethinking Data Management Planning: Introducing Research Output Management Planning (ROMPi) Approach

Data Science Journal
Volume 23 (2024): Issue 1
By: Stefano Della Chiesa and  Sujit Kumar Sikder  
Open Access
|May 2024

References

  1. 1Abraham, R, Schneider, J and vom Brocke, J 2019 Data governance: A conceptual framework, structured review, and research agenda. International Journal of Information Management, 49: 424–438. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.07.008
    Back to article
  2. 2Bechhofer, S, Buchan, I, De Roure, D, Missier, P, Ainsworth, J, Bhagat, J, Couch, P, Cruickshank, D, Delderfield, M, Dunlop, I, Gamble, M, Michaelides, D, Owen, S, Newman, D, Sufi, S and Goble, C 2013 Why linked data is not enough for scientists. Future Generation Computer Systems, 29(2), 599–611. DOI: 10.1016/j.future.2011.08.004
    Back to article
  3. 3Bechhofer, S, De Roure, D, Gamble, M, Goble, C and Buchan, I 2010 Research objects: Towards exchange and reuse of digital knowledge. Nature Precedings, 1–1. DOI: 10.1038/npre.2010.4626.1
    Back to article
  4. 4Becker, C, Hundt, C, Engelhardt, C, Sperling, J, Kurzweil, M and Müller-Pfefferkorn, R 2023 Data management plan tools: Overview and evaluation. Proceedings of the Conference on Research Data Infrastructure, 1. DOI: 10.52825/cordi.v1i.338
    Back to article
  5. 5Borgman, C L 2012 Why are the attribution and citation of scientific data important? https://escholarship.org/uc/item/65b51130
    Back to article
  6. 6Borgman, C L (ed.) 2018 Open data, grey data, and stewardship: Universities at the privacy frontier. Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 33(2): 365. DOI: 10.15779/Z38B56D489
    Back to article
  7. 7Boyan, A 2020 Research data strategy: Framework and motivating factors [Preprint]. Open Science Framework. DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/e6ycp
    Back to article
  8. 8Carroll, S R, Garba, I, Figueroa-Rodríguez, O L, Holbrook, J, Lovett, R, Materechera, S, Parsons, M, Raseroka, K, Rodriguez-Lonebear, D, Rowe, R, Sara, R, Walker, J D, Anderson, J and Hudson, M 2020 The CARE Principles for Indigenous Data Governance (1), 19(1): Article 1. DOI: 10.5334/dsj-2020-043
    Back to article
  9. 9Cousijn, H, Braukmann, R, Fenner, M, Ferguson, C, van Horik, R, Lammey, R, Meadows, A and Lambert, S 2021 Connected research: The potential of the PID graph. Patterns, 2(1): 100180. DOI: 10.1016/j.patter.2020.100180
    Back to article
  10. 10De Smedt, K, Koureas, D and Wittenburg, P 2020 FAIR digital objects for science: From data pieces to actionable knowledge units. Publications, 8(2): Article 2. DOI: 10.3390/publications8020021
    Back to article
  11. 11Della Chiesa, S. 2024a Research Output Management Planning (ROMPi) - Template (2.0). Zenodo. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.11108362
    Back to article
  12. 12Della Chiesa, S. 2024b Research Output Lifecycle - Guidance for the Research Output Management Planning (ROMPi) (3.0). Zenodo. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.11108402
    Back to article
  13. 13European Commission 2018 Cost-benefit analysis for FAIR research data: Cost of not having FAIR research data. Publications Office. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2777/02999
    Back to article
  14. 14Förstner, K U, Seidlmayer, E, ZB MED-Informationszentrum Lebenswissenschaften, Deutschland. Bundesministerium Für Bildung, W, Dierkes, J, Depping, R, Technische Hochschule Köln, Universitäts- Und Stadtbibliothek Köln, Lindstädt, B, Universität Zu Köln and Hoffmann, F 2023 Ergebnisse des Projektes DataStewForschung unterstützen—Empfehlungen für Data Stewardship an akademischen Forschungsinstitutionen [Application/pdf]. DOI: 10.4126/FRL01-006441397
    Back to article
  15. 15Gajbe, S B, Tiwari, A, Gopalji and Singh, R K 2021 Evaluation and analysis of data management plan tools: A parametric approach. Information Processing & Management, 58(3): 102480. DOI: 10.1016/j.ipm.2020.102480
    Back to article
  16. 16Hartmann, N K, Jacob, B and Weiß, N 2019 RISE-DE – Referenzmodell für Strategieprozesse im institutionellen Forschungsdatenmanagement. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3585556
    Back to article
  17. 17Haugan, G T 2013 The government manager’s guide to the work breakdown structure. Berrett-Koehler Publishers. DOI: 10.2218/ijdc.v3i1.48
    Back to article
  18. 18Higgins, S 2008 The DCC curation lifecycle model. International Journal of Digital Curation, 3(1): Article 1. DOI: 10.2218/ijdc.v3i1.48
    Back to article
  19. 19Huemann, M and Turner, R, (eds.) 2024 The Handbook of Project Management (6th ed.). Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781003274179
    Back to article
  20. 20Huljenic, D, Desic, S and Matijasevic, M 2005 Project management in research projects. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Telecommunications, ConTEL, 2005, 2: 663–669. DOI: 10.1109/CONTEL.2005.185981
    Back to article
  21. 21Jones, S, Pergl, R, Hooft, R, Miksa, T, Samors, R, Ungvari, J, Davis, R I and Lee, T 2020 Data management planning: How requirements and solutions are beginning to converge. Data Intelligence, 2(1–2): 208–219. DOI: 10.1162/dint_a_00043
    Back to article
  22. 22Kanza, S and Knight, N J 2022 Behind every great research project is great data management. BMC Research Notes, 15(1): 20. DOI: 10.1186/s13104-022-05908-5
    Back to article
  23. 23Krause, M, Rümmler, A, Zinke, K, Little, J and Würzner, K-M 2024, January 15 Data stewardship goes Germany. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.10514268
    Back to article
  24. 24Leonelli, S 2022 Open science and epistemic diversity: Friends or foes? Philosophy of Science, 89(5): 991–1001. DOI: 10.1017/psa.2022.45
    Back to article
  25. 25Lin, D, Crabtree, J, Dillo, I, Downs, R R, Edmunds, R, Giaretta, D, De Giusti, M, L’Hours, H, Hugo, W, Jenkyns, R, Khodiyar, V, Martone, M E, Mokrane, M, Navale, V, Petters, J, Sierman, B, Sokolova, D V, Stockhause, M and Westbrook, J 2020 The TRUST Principles for digital repositories. Scientific Data, 7(1): Article 1. DOI: 10.1038/s41597-020-0486-7
    Back to article
  26. 26Michener, W K 2015 Ten simple rules for creating a good data management plan. PLoS Computational Biology, 11(10): e1004525. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004525
    Back to article
  27. 27Miksa, T, Simms, S, Mietchen, D and Jones, S 2019 Ten principles for machine-actionable data management plans. PLOS Computational Biology, 15(3): e1006750. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006750
    Back to article
  28. 28Oladipo, F, Folorunso, S, Ogundepo, E, Osigwe, O and Akindele, A 2022 Curriculum development for FAIR data stewardship. Data Intelligence, 4(4): 991–1012. DOI: 10.1162/dint_a_00183
    Back to article
  29. 29Peer, L, Biniossek, C, Betz, D and Christian, T-M 2022 Reproducible research publication workflow: A canonical workflow framework and FAIR digital object approach to quality research output. Data Intelligence, 4(2): 306–319. DOI: 10.1162/dint_a_00133
    Back to article
  30. 30Philipson, J, Hasan, A and Moa, H 2023 Making Data Management Plans Machine Actionable: Templates and Tools (1). 22(1): Article 1. DOI: 10.5334/dsj-2023-029
    Back to article
  31. 31Rahal, R-M, Hamann, H, Brohmer, H and Pethig, F 2022 Sharing the recipe: Reproducibility and replicability in research across disciplines. Research Ideas and Outcomes: RIO, 8: Article e89980. DOI: 10.3897/rio.8.e89980
    Back to article
  32. 32Smale, N, Denyer, G, Unsworth, K, Magatova, E and Barr, D 2020 A review of the history, advocacy and efficacy of data management plans. International Journal of Digital Curation 15(1): 30. DOI: 10.2218/ijdc.v15i1.525
    Back to article
  33. 33Specht, A, O’Brien, M, Edmunds, R, Corrêa, P, David, R, Mabile, L, Machicao, J, Murayama, Y and Stall, S 2023 The value of a data and digital object management plan (D(DO)MP) in fostering sharing practices in a multidisciplinary multinational project (1). 22(1): Article 1. DOI: 10.5334/dsj-2023-038
    Back to article
  34. 34Tenopir, C, Rice, N M, Allard, S, Baird, L, Borycz, J, Christian, L, Grant, B, Olendorf, R and Sandusky, R J 2020 Data sharing, management, use, and reuse: Practices and perceptions of scientists worldwide. PLOS ONE, 15(3): e0229003. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229003
    Back to article
  35. 35Ugochukwu, A I and Phillips, P W B 2024 Open data ownership and sharing: Challenges and opportunities for application of FAIR principles and a checklist for data managers. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research, 16: 101157. DOI: 10.1016/j.jafr.2024.101157
    Back to article
  36. 36Vitale, C H and Moulaison Sandy, H 2019 Data management plans A review. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology, 39(6): 322–328. DOI: 10.14429/djlit.39.06.15086
    Back to article
  37. 37Wilkinson, M D, Dumontier, M, Aalbersberg, Ij J, Appleton, G, Axton, M, Baak, A, Blomberg, N, Boiten, J-W, da Silva Santos, L B, Bourne, P E, Bouwman, J, Brookes, A J, Clark, T, Crosas, M, Dillo, I, Dumon, O, Edmunds, S, Evelo, C T, Finkers, R … Mons, B 2016 The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data, 3(1): Article 1. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2016.18
    Back to article
  38. 38Williams, M, Bagwell, J and Nahm Zozus, M 2017 Data management plans: The missing perspective. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 71: 130–142. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2017.05.004
    Back to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2024-034 | Journal eISSN: 1683-1470
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Submitted on: Dec 7, 2023
Accepted on: May 17, 2024
Published on: May 29, 2024
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Keywords:
Data Management Planning,
Research Data Management,
Research Project Management,
Data Stewardship,
FAIR digital object

© 2024 Stefano Della Chiesa, Sujit Kumar Sikder, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 23 (2024): Issue 1Next article