Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Centering Relationality and CARE for Stewardship of Indigenous Research Data Cover

Centering Relationality and CARE for Stewardship of Indigenous Research Data

Open Access
|May 2024

References

  1. 1Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Library, Information and Resource Network 2012 Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Protocols for Libraries, Archives, and Information Services. Available from: https://atsilirn.aiatsis.gov.au/protocols.php [Accessed: 17 May 2024].
  2. 2Anderson, J 2005 Access and control of Indigenous knowledge in libraries and archives: Ownership and future use [online]. Correcting Course: Rebalancing Copyright for Libraries in the National and International Arena. The MacArthur Foundation and the American Library Association, Columbia University, New York. Available from: https://iportal.usask.ca/record/27269 [Accessed: 18 December 2023].
  3. 3Anderson, J and Christen, K 2013 ‘Chuck a copyright on it’: Dilemmas of digital return and the possibilities for traditional knowledge licenses and labels. Museum Anthropology Review, 7(1–2): 105126.
  4. 4Anderson, J E 2009 Law, knowledge, culture: the production of Indigenous knowledge in intellectual property law. Cheltenham, United Kingdom: Edward Elgar.
  5. 5Archibald, J 2008 Indigenous storywork: Educating the heart, mind, body, and spirit. Vancouver: UBC Press. DOI: 10.59962/9780774855440
  6. 6Barness, S, Cummins, J, Fernandez, M, James, A, Pierce Farrier K, Pringle, J, Carroll, S R, Taitingfong, R and Wieker, A 2023 CARE Data Principles Primer [online]. Data Curation Network. Available from https://github.com/DataCurationNetwork/data-primers/blob/main/CARE%20Primer/care-primer.md [Accessed: 18 December 2023].
  7. 7Belarde-Lewis, M 2011 Sharing the private in public: Indigenous cultural property and online media. Proceedings of the 2011 iConference, 1624. DOI: 10.1145/1940761.1940764
  8. 8Carpenter, B 2019 Archival initiatives for the Indigenous Collections at the American Philosophical Society [case study]. Case Studies on Access Policies for Native American Archival Materials. Society of American Archivists [online]. Available from: https://www2.archivists.org/sites/all/files/Case_1_Archival_Initiatives_for_Indiginous_Collections.pdf.
  9. 9Carroll, S R, Garba, I, Figueroa-Rodríguez, O L, Holbrook, J, Lovett, R, Materechera, S, Parsons, M, Raseroka, K, Rodriguez-Lonebear, D, Rowe, R, Sara, R, Walker, J D, Anderson, J and Hudson, M 2020 The CARE Principles for Indigenous Data Governance. Data Science Journal, 19(1): 43. DOI: 10.5334/dsj-2020-043
  10. 10Carroll, S R, Garba, I, Plevel, R, Small-Rodriguez, D, Hiratsuka, V Y, Hudson, M and Garrison, N A 2022 Using Indigenous standards to implement the CARE Principles: Setting expectations through tribal research codes. Frontiers in Genetics, 13. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2022.823309
  11. 11Carroll, S R, Herczog, E, Hudson, M, Russell, K and Stall, S 2021 Operationalizing the CARE and FAIR principles for Indigenous data futures. Scientific Data, 8: 108. DOI: 10.1038/s41597-021-00892-0
  12. 12Carroll, S R, Rodriguez-Lonebear, D and Martinez, A 2019 Indigenous data governance: Strategies from United States Native nations. Data Science Journal, 18(1): 115. DOI: 10.5334/dsj-2019-031
  13. 13Chao, T C, Cragin, M H and Palmer, C L 2015 Data Practices and Curation Vocabulary (DPCVocab): An empirically derived framework of scientific data practices and curatorial processes. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(3): 616633. DOI: 10.1002/asi.23184
  14. 14Cragin, M H, Palmer, C L, Carlson, J R and Witt, M 2010 Data sharing, small science, and institutional repositories. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 368(1926): 40234038. DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2010.0165
  15. 15Cremer, F, Daniel, S, Lemaire, M, Moeller, K, Razum, M and Štanzel, A 2021 Data meets history: A research data management strategy for the historically oriented humanities. In Feindt, G, Gissibl, B and Paulmann, J (eds.), Band 21 Cultural Sovereignty Beyond the Modern State: Space, Objects, and Media, (pp. 155178). De Gruyter Oldenbourg. DOI: 10.1515/9783110679151-009
  16. 16Doyle, A M, Lawson, K and Dupont, S 2015 Indigenization of knowledge organization at the Xwi7xwa Library. Journal of Library and Information Science, 13(2): 107134. DOI: 10.6182/jlis.2015.13(2).107
  17. 17DSISS: Data Services for Indigenous Scholarship and Sovereignty 2024 DSISS: Data Services for Indigenous Scholarship and Sovereignty [online]. University of Washington. Available from: https://sites.uw.edu/dsissresearch/. [Accessed 18 December 2023].
  18. 18First Archivist Circle 2007 Protocols for Native American Archival Materials [online]. Available from: http://www2.nau.edu/libnap-p/protocols.html. [Accessed 18 December 2023].
  19. 19Garrett, E 2014 Participant-driven language archiving. Language Documentation and Description, 12: 6884. DOI: 10.25894/ldd165
  20. 20Grimble, R and Wellard, K 1997 Stakeholder methodologies in natural resource management: A review of principles, contexts, experiences and opportunities. Agricultural Systems, 55(2): 173193. DOI: 10.1016/S0308-521X(97)00006-1
  21. 21Harry, D and Kaneche, L A M 2006 Asserting tribal sovereignty over cultural property: Moving towards protection of genetic material and Indigenous knowledge. Seattle Journal of Social for Social Justice, 5(1): 2766. https://digitalcommons.law.seattleu.edu/sjsj/vol5/iss1/13.
  22. 22Huvila, I 2008 Participatory archive: Towards decentralised curation, radical user orientation, and broader contextualization of records management. Archival Science, 8(1): 1536. DOI: 10.1007/s10502-008-9071-0
  23. 23Karcher, S, Kirilova, D, Pagé, C and Weber, N 2021 How data curation enables epistemically responsible reuse of qualitative data. The Qualitative Report, 26(6): 19962010. DOI: 10.46743/2160-3715/2021.5012
  24. 24Kovach, M 2009 Indigenous and qualitative inquiry: A round dance? In Indigenous Methodologies: Characteristics, Conversations, and Contexts (pp. 2338). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
  25. 25Kuhn, N S, Parker, M and Lefthand-Begay, C 2020 Indigenous research ethics requirements: An examination of six Tribal Institutional Review Board applications and processes in the United States. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 15(4): 279291. DOI: 10.1177/1556264620912103
  26. 26Littletree, S, Belarde-Lewis, M and Duarte, M 2020 Centering relationality: A conceptual model to advance Indigenous knowledge organization practices. Knowledge Organization, 47(5): 410426. DOI: 10.5771/0943-7444-2020-5-410
  27. 27Local Contexts 2023 Collections Care Notices [online]. Available from: https://localcontexts.org/notices/cc-notices/ [Accessed 18 December 2023].
  28. 28Marsh, D E, Leopold, R, Crowe, K and Madison, K S 2020 Access Policies for Native American Archival Materials in the National Anthropological Archives [case study]. Case Studies on Access Policies for Native American Archival Materials. Society of American Archivists [online]. Available from: https://www2.archivists.org/sites/all/files/Case_3_Access_Policies_for_Native_American_Archival_Materials.pdf.
  29. 29Pacheco, C M, Daley, S M, Brown, T, Filippi, M, Greiner, K A and Daley, C M 2013 Moving forward: Breaking the cycle of mistrust between American Indians and researchers. American Journal of Public Health, 103(12): 21522159. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301480
  30. 30Palmer, C L, Belarde-Lewis, M, Hohn, T and Teauton, C B 2022 Indigenous research data case study: Toward contextual integrity for Indigenous data. [Online institutional repository]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/1773/49173 [Accessed 18 December 2023].
  31. 31Patin, B, Sebastian, M, Yeon, J and Bertolini, D 2020 Toward epistemic justice: An approach for conceptualizing epistemicide in the information professions. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 57(1). DOI: 10.1002/pra2.242
  32. 32Pringle, J 2019 Northern Arizona University’s Cline Library and the Protocols [case study]. Case Studies on Access Policies for Native American Archival Materials. Society of American Archivists [online]. Available from: https://www2.archivists.org/sites/all/files/Case_2_NAU_Cline_Library_and_Protocols.pdf.
  33. 33Reed, M S, Graves, A, Dandy, N, Posthumus, H, Hubacek, K, Morris, J, Prell, C, Quinn, C H and Stringer, L C 2009 Who’s in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(5): 19331949. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.01.001
  34. 34Research Data Alliance, International Indigenous Data Sovereignty Interest Group 2019 CARE Principles for Indigenous Data Governance [online]. The Global Indigenous Data Alliance. Available from: https://www.gida-global.org/care. [Accessed 18 December 2023].
  35. 35Sanchez, B H, Dunham, E, James, R D, Martin, J, McAllister, L, Saulsberry, A, Soto, A and Varner, A 2021 Our sustained commitment to native communities: Adoption of the protocols as ongoing collection management process [case study]. Case studies on access policies for Native American archival materials. Society of American Archivists [online]. Available from: https://www2.archivists.org/sites/all/files/Case_4_Our_Sustained_Commitment.pdf.
  36. 36Smith, L T 2012 Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples (2nd ed.). London: Zed Books.
  37. 37Society of American Archivists 2018 SAA Council Endorsement of Protocols for Native American Archival Materials [online]. Available from: https://www2.archivists.org/statements/saa-council-endorsement-of-protocols-for-native-american-archival-materials. [Accessed 18 December 2023].
  38. 38Taitingfong, R 2023 Introduction to the CARE Principles: Putting CARE into practice. The ORCID US Community Call: FAIR, CARE, and Persistent Identifiers [video online]. Available from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sfw2MxIVEdQ. [Accessed 18 December 2023].
  39. 39Taitingfong, R, Martinez, A, Carroll, S R, Hudson, M and Anderson, J 2023 Indigenous Metadata Bundle Communique [online]. Collaboratory for Indigenous Data Governance, ENRICH: Equity for Indigenous Research and Innovation Coordinating Hub, and Tikanga in Technology. Available from: https://indigenousdatalab.org/3006-2/. [Accessed 18 December 2023].
  40. 40Tóth-Czifra, E 2020 The risk of losing thick description: Data management challenges faced by the arts and humanities in the evolving FAIR data ecosystem. In Edmond, J (Ed.), Digital Technology and the Practices of Humanities Research (pp. 235266). Cambridge, UK: Open Book Publishers.
  41. 41University of British Columbia 2022 Indigitization: Tools for digitizing and sustaining Indigenous knowledge [online]. Available from: https://www.indigitization.ca/toolkit/ [Accessed 18 December 2023].
  42. 42Wasson, C 2021 Participatory design of language and culture archives. Aldenderfer, M (ed), Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Anthropology. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acrefore/9780190854584.013.234
  43. 43Wilkinson, M D, Dumontier, M, Aalbersberg, I J, Appleton, G, Axton, M, Baak, A, Blomberg, N, Boiten, J-W, Bonino da Silva Santos, L, Bourne, P E, et al. 2016 The FAIR Guiding Principles for Scientific Data Management and Stewardship. Scientific Data, 3(1). DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2016.18
  44. 44Wilson, S 2008 Research is Ceremony: Indigenous Research Methods. Black Point, Nova Scotia: Fernwood Publishing.
Language: English
Submitted on: Jan 3, 2024
Accepted on: May 8, 2024
Published on: May 24, 2024
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2024 Miranda Belarde-Lewis, Sandra Littletree, Iisaaksiichaa Ross Braine, Kaitlin Srader, Nestor Guerrero, Carole L. Palmer, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.