Five Suggestions Towards User-Centred Data Repositories in the Social Sciences

Elias Herman Kruithof; Christophe Vanroelen; Laura Van den Borre

doi:10.5334/dsj-2024-019

Abstract

Data repositories for the social sciences are facing some discipline-specific challenges. This essay provides an overview of the four key challenges. In addition, five suggestions are made to strengthen domain-specific online data repositories in the social sciences, supported by good practices. Using a user-centred approach, these suggestions aim to further open up the social sciences data landscape. The essay first addresses insights regarding the sharing of quantitative and qualitative data in light of the specific needs and issues regarding these two types of data. Thereafter, we suggest (i) ‘data labs’ for novice data re-users, (ii) advocate for the repository as an online meeting place for researchers, (iii&iv) argue for two concrete metadata approaches for quantitative and qualitative data separately, (v) provide ideas for handling epistemological challenges of data sharing, and (vi) introduce the data repository as a possible contact medium for research participants.

References

Alexander, SM, et al. 2020. Qualitative data sharing and synthesis for sustainability science. Nature Sustainability, 3: 81–88. DOI: 10.1038/s41893-019-0434-8
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Birnholtz, JP and Bietz, MJ 2003. Data at work: Supporting sharing in science and engineering. In: Proceedings of the 2003 International ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Groupwork, Sanibel Island, Florida on 9–12 November 2003, pp. 339–348. DOI: 10.1145/958160.958215
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bishop, L 2014. Re-using qualitative data: A little evidence, on-going issues and modest reflections. Studia Socjologiczne, 3(214): 167–176.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bishop, L and Kuula-Lummi, A 2017. Revisiting qualitative data reuse: A decade on. SAGE Open, 7(1). DOI: 10.1177/2158244016685136
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Borgman, CL 2009. Scholarship in the digital age: Information, infrastructure, and the internet. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 24(2): 243–245. DOI: 10.1093/llc/fqn041
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Borycz, J, et al. 2023. Perceived benefits of open data are improving but scientists still lack resources, skills, and rewards. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(339). DOI: 10.1057/s41599-023-01831-7
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Breznau, N 2021. Does sociology need open science? Societies, 11(1): 9. DOI: 10.3390/soc11010009
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Broom, A, Cheshire, L, and Emmison, M 2009. Qualitative researchers’ understandings of their practice and the implications for data archiving and sharing. Sociology, 43(6): 1163–1180. DOI: 10.1177/0038038509345704
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Christensen, G, et al. 2019. Open science practices are on the rise: The State of Social Science (3S) survey. UC Berkeley: Center for Effective Global Action. Retrieved from https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0hx0207r. DOI: 10.31222/osf.io/5rksu
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Coltart, C, Henwood, K, and Shirani, F 2013. Qualitative secondary analysis in austere times: Ethical, professional and methodological considerations. Historical Social Research, 38(4): 271–292. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24142699.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Corti, L 2007. Re-using archived qualitative data – where, how, why? Archival Science, 7: 37–54. DOI: 10.1007/s10502-006-9038-y
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Curty, RG 2016. Factors influencing research data reuse in the social sciences: An exploratory study. International Journal of Digital Curation, 11(1): 96–117. DOI: 10.2218/ijdc.v11i1.401
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
David, R, et al. 2020. FAIRness literacy: the Achilles’ heel of applying FAIR principles. CODATA Data Science Journal, 19(32): 1–11. DOI: 10.5334/dsj-2020-032
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Downey, G, Eschenfelder, KR, and Shankar, K 2019. Talking about metadata labor: Social science data archives, professional data librarians, and the founding of IASSIST. In: Aspray, W (ed.), Historical Studies in Computing, Information, and Society: Insights From the Flatiron Lectures. Cham: Springer, pp. 83–113. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-18955-6_5
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
DuBois, JM, Strait, M, and Walsh, H 2018. Is it time to share qualitative research data? Qualitative psychology, 5(3): 380–393. DOI: 10.1037/qup0000076
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Engzell, P and Rohrer, JM 2021. Improving social science: Lessons from the open science movement. PS: Political Science & Politics, 54(2): 297–300. DOI: 10.1017/S1049096520000967
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Faniel, IM, Frank, RD and Yakel, E 2019. Context from the data reuser’s point of view. Journal of Documentation, 75(6): 1274–1297. DOI: 10.1108/JD-08-2018-0133
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Faniel, IM, Kriesberg, A and Yakel, E 2012. Data reuse and sensemaking among novice social scientists. Proceedings of the ASIST Annual Meeting, 49(1): 1–10. DOI: 10.1002/meet.14504901068
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Freese, J, Rauf, T and Voelkel, JG 2022. Advances in transparency and reproducibility in the social sciences. Social Science Research, 107(102770). DOI: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2022.102770
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Friedrich, T 2020. Looking for data. Unpublished thesis (PhD), Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Philosophische Fakultät. DOI: 10.18452/22173
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Gregory, KM, et al. 2020. Understanding data search as a socio-technical practice. Journal of Information Science, 46(4): 459–475. DOI: 10.1177/0165551519837182
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Gutmann, M, et al. 2004. The selection, appraisal, and retention of social science data. Data Science Journal, 3: 209–221. DOI: 10.2481/dsj.3.209
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Heers, M, Ferrez, E and Morgan de Paula, E 2017. Data sharing and re-use: Researcher practices, attitudes and needs FORS Survey of Social Science Researchers in Switzerland, FORS.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Jeng, W, He, D and Oh, J 2016. Toward a conceptual framework for data sharing practices in social sciences: A profile approach. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 53(1): 1–10. DOI: 10.1002/pra2.2016.14505301037
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Jeng, W and Lyon, L 2016. A report of data-intensive capability, institutional support, and data management practices in social sciences. International Journal of Digital Curation, 11(1). DOI: 10.2218/ijdc.v11i1.398
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kern, D and Mathiak, B 2015. Are there any differences in data set retrieval compared to well-known literature retrieval? In: Kapidakis, S, Mazurek, C and Werla, M (eds.), Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries. Cham: Springer. pp. 197–208. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-24592-8_15
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Koesten, L, et al. 2021. Talking datasets – understanding data sensemaking behaviours. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 146(102562). DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2020.102562
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Krämer, T, et al. 2021. Data-seeking behaviour in the social sciences. International Journal on Digital Libraries, 22: 175–195. DOI: 10.1007/s00799-021-00303-0
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kudrnáová, M and Trtíková, I 2020. Sustainability through the liaison with data archive users. IASSIST Quarterly, 44(4). DOI: 10.29173/iq976
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Late, E and Kekäläinen, J 2020. Use and users of a social science research data archive. PLoS ONE, 15(8). DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233455
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lyon, L 2016. Transparency: The emerging third dimension of open science and open data. LIBER Quarterly: The Journal of the Association of European Research Libraries, 25(4): 153–171. DOI: 10.18352/lq.10113
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Mannheimer, S, et al. 2019. Qualitative data sharing: Data repositories and academic libraries as key partners in addressing challenges. American Behavioral Scientist, 63(5): 643–664. DOI: 10.1177/0002764218784991
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
McLeod, J and O’Connor, K 2020. Ethics, archives and data sharing in qualitative research. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 53(5): 523–535. DOI: 10.1080/00131857.2020.1805310
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Mozersky, J, et al. 2020. Research participant views regarding qualitative data sharing. Ethics & Human Research, 42(2): 13–17. DOI: 10.1002/eahr.500044
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Mozersky, J, et al. 2021. Barriers and facilitators to qualitative data sharing in the United States: A survey of qualitative researchers. PloS ONE, 16(12). DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261719
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Niu, J 2009. Overcoming inadequate documentation. In: Proceedings of the ASIST Annual Meeting. Vol. 46. Silver Spring, MD: American Society for Information Science and Technology. pp. 1–11. DOI: 10.1002/meet.2009.145046024
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Niu, J and Hedstrom, M 2008. Documentation Evaluation Model for Social Science Data. In Proceedings of the ASIST Annual Meeting. Vol. 45. Silver Spring, MD: American Society for Information Science and Technology. p. 11. DOI: 10.1002/meet.2008.1450450223
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Perrier, L, Blondal, E and MacDonald, H 2020. The views, perspectives, and experiences of academic researchers with data sharing and reuse: A meta-synthesis. In: Dorta-González, P. (ed.), PLoS ONE, 15(2). DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229182
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Quarati, A and Raffaghelli, JE 2020. Do researchers use open research data? Exploring the relationships between usage trends and metadata quality across scientific disciplines from the figshare case. Journal of Information Science, 48(4): 423–448. DOI: 10.1177/0165551520961048
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ruggiano, N and Perry, TE 2019. Conducting secondary analysis of qualitative data: Should we, can we, and how? Qualitative Social Work, 18(1): 81–97. DOI: 10.1177/1473325017700701
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sherif, V 2018. Evaluating preexisting qualitative research data for secondary analysis. Forum, Qualitative Social Research/Forum, Qualitative Sozialforschung, 19(2). DOI: 10.17169/fqs-19.2.2821
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Tarrant, A 2017. Getting out of the swamp? Methodological reflections on using qualitative secondary analysis to develop research design. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 20(6). DOI: 10.1080/13645579.2016.1257678
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Yoon, A 2014. ‘Making a square fit into a circle’: Researchers’ experiences reusing qualitative data. Proceedings of the ASIST Annual Meeting, 51(1). DOI: 10.1002/meet.2014.14505101140
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Yoon, A 2017a. Data reusers’ trust development. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68(4). DOI: 10.1002/asi.23730
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Yoon, A 2017b. Role of communication in data reuse. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 54(1). DOI: 10.1002/pra2.2017.14505401050
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Yoon, A and Kim, Y 2017. Social scientists’ data reuse behaviors: Exploring the roles of attitudinal beliefs, attitudes, norms, and data repositories. Library & Information Science Research, 39(3). DOI: 10.1016/j.lisr.2017.07.008
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Zenk-Möltgen, W, et al. 2018. Factors influencing the data sharing behavior of researchers in sociology and political science. Journal of Documentation, 74(5): 1053–1073. DOI: 10.1108/JD-09-2017-0126
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Zhu, Y 2019. Open-access policy and data-sharing practice in UK academia. Journal of Information Science, 46(1): 41–52. DOI: 10.1177/0165551518823174
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Zuiderwijk, A, Shinde, R and Jeng, W 2020. What drives and inhibits researchers to share and use open research data? A systematic literature review to analyze factors influencing open research data adoption. PLoS ONE, 15(9). DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239283
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article

Five Suggestions Towards User-Centred Data Repositories in the Social Sciences

Abstract

Paradigm

My account