References
- 1Ainsworth, J. 2020. Feelings of ownership and volunteering: Examining psychological ownership as a volunteering motivation for nonprofit service organisations. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 52: 101931. DOI: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.101931
- 2Altamimi, H and Liu, Q. 2022. The nonprofit starvation cycle: Does overhead spending really impact program outcomes? Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 51(6): 1324–1348. DOI: 10.1177/08997640211057404
- 3Arp, LG and Forbes, M. 2018. It takes a village: Open-source software sustainability: A Guidebook for programs serving cultural and scientific heritage. Lyrasis, updated in 2022.
https://research.lyrasis.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/29629696-9abf-4144-8a79-62c6388ddb38/content . Accessed on March 20, 2023. - 4Bitzer, J and Schröder, PJ. 2006. The economics of open-source software development. Elsevier Science, Inc. DOI: 10.1016/B978-044452769-1/50001-9
- 5Blue, G and Davidson, D. 2020. Advancing a transformative social contract for the environmental sciences: From public engagement to justice. Environmental Research Letters, 15(11): 115008. DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/abbf14
- 6Ceptureanu, SI, Ceptureanu, EG, Luchian, CE and Luchian, I. 2018. Community-based programs sustainability. A multidimensional analysis of sustainability factors. Sustainability, 10(3): 870. DOI: 10.3390/su10030870
- 7Charan, R, Carey, D and Useem, M. 2013. Boards that lead: When to take charge, when to partner, and when to stay out of the way. Harvard Business Review Press.
- 8Christensen, CM. 1997. The innovator’s dilemma: When new technologies cause great firms to fail. Harvard Business Review Press.
- 9Durst, S, Hinteregger, S and Zieba, M. 2019. The linkage between knowledge risk management and organizational performance. Journal of Business Research, 105: 1–10. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.08.002
- 10EarthCube Office; EarthCube Leadership Council. 2022.
EarthCube: A retrospective 2011–2022 . In: EarthCube Organization Materials. UC San Diego Library Digital Collections. DOI: 10.6075/J04X5806 - 11Ecological Society of America. 2018. Workshop Report. Sustaining Data Repositories: A Workshop on Creating and Implementing Sustainability Plans. Ecological Society of America. January 25, 2018.
https://esa.org/sbi/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Workshop-Report_Sustaining-Data-Repositories_FINAL.pdf . - 12Erway, R. 2023.
Lasting Impact: Sustainability of Disciplinary Repositories . OCLC Research. Dublin, Ohio.https://dfdf.dk/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/2012-03.pdf . - 13Ferraz, IN and Santos Júnior, CDD. 2021. Organization of free and open source software projects: In-between the community and traditional governance. BBR. Brazilian Business Review, 18: 334–352. DOI: 10.15728/bbr.2021.18.3.6
- 14Fleming, PJ, Stone, LC, Creary, MS, Greene-Moton, E, Israel, BA, Key, KD, Reyes, AG, Wallerstein, N and Schulz, AJ. 2023. Antiracism and community-based participatory research: Synergies, challenges, and opportunities. American Journal of Public Health, 113(1): 70–78. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2022.307114
- 15Garicano, L and Rayo, L. 2016. Why organizations fail: Models and cases. Journal of Economic Literature, 54(1): 137–192. DOI: 10.1257/jel.54.1.137
- 16Goben, A and Sandusky, RJ. 2020. Open data repositories: Current risks and opportunities. College & Research Libraries News, 81(2): 62–65. DOI: 10.5860/crln.81.1.62
- 17Hsu, L, Hutchison, VB and Langseth, ML. 2019. Measuring sustainability of seed-funded earth science informatics projects. PLoS ONE, 14(10):
e0222807 . DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222807 - 18Kaufman, YJ, et al. 1997. The MODIS aerosol algorithm, products, and validation. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 55(4): 569–579. DOI: 10.1175/1520-0469(1998)055
- 19Kitchin, R, Collins, S and Frost, D. 2015. Funding models for open access digital data repositories. Online Information Review, 39(5): 664–81. DOI: 10.1108/OIR-01-2015-0031
- 20Lin, D, et al. 2020. The TRUST Principles for Digital Repositories. Scientific Data, 7(1): 144. DOI: 10.1038/s41597-020-0486-7
- 21Maron, N. 2014.
A guide to the best revenue models and funding sources for your digital resources . Ithaka S+R.http://www.sr.ithaka.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/Jisc_Report_032614.pdf . Accessed on March 20, 2024. - 22Maron, N. 2018. Case Study: CSD and the CCDC. Ecological Society of America.
https://esa.org/sbi/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/Case-Study-1_CSD-and-the-CCDC.pdf . Accessed on March 20, 2024. - 23McMillan, CJ and Overall, JS. 2017. Crossing the chasm and over the abyss: Perspectives on organizational failure. Academy of Management Perspectives, 31(4): 271–287. DOI: 10.5465/amp.2017.0018
- 24Minkler, M, Blackwell, AG, Thompson, M and Tamir, H. 2003. Community-based participatory research: implications for public health funding. American Journal of Public Health, 93(8): 1210–1213. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.93.8.1210
- 25Molk, P and Sokol, DD. 2021. The challenges of nonprofit governance. BCL Rev., 62: 1497.
- 26NASA. 2020.
Science Investigator-led Processing Systems (SIPS) . Earthdata: Open Access for Open Science.https://www.earthdata.nasa.gov/eosdis/sips . - 27National Science Foundation (NSF). 2023.
About Earth Sciences . National Science Foundation. Retrieved March 9, 2023, fromhttps://www.nsf.gov/geo/ear/about.jsp . - 28Paulson, JW, Succi, G and Eberlein, A. 2004. An empirical study of open-source and closed-source software products. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 30(4), 246–256. DOI: 10.1109/TSE.2004.1274044
- 29Raymond, E. 1999. The cathedral and the bazaar. Knowledge, Technology & Policy, 12(3): 23–49. DOI: 10.1007/s12130-999-1026-0
- 30Robinson, OC. 2014. Sampling in interview-based qualitative research: A theoretical and practical guide. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 11(1): 25–41. DOI: 10.1080/14780887.2013.801543
- 31Saadat, V and Saadat, Z. 2016. Organizational learning as a key role of organizational success. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 230: 219–225. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.09.028
- 32Simpson, D. 2013. Looking forward through the rearview mirror: Reflections on 22 years at IRIS – and what the future might hold. IRIS Membership Meeting, December 9, 2013.
- 33Skinner, K and Christina, D. 2022. The Quest for Home: Transforming from Grant-funded Project to Sustainable Operation.
https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2022/05/19/the-quest-for-home-transforming-from-grant-funded-project-to-sustainable-operation/?informz=1&nbd=de50bbdb-968d-471a-ac98-0cfecba6bca0&nbd_source=informz . - 34Stirman, SW, Kimberly, J, Cook, N, Calloway, A, Castro, F and Charns, M. 2012. The sustainability of new programs and innovations: A review of the empirical literature and recommendations for future research. Implementation Science, 7: 17. pmid:22417162. DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-17
- 35Strauss, AL and Corbin, J. 1998. Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. London: Sage.
- 36Virapongse, A, Gallagher, J, Tikoff, B, Cornillon, P, Koskela, R, Shingledecker, S, Trabant, C and Hanson, B. 2022.
Sustainability models for integrated digital Earth Science . In: EarthCube Organization Materials. UC San Diego Library Digital Collections. DOI: 10.6075/J0JH3MBN. - 37Volentine, R, Specht, A, Allard, S, Frame, M, Hu, R and Zolly, L. 2021. Accessibility of environmental data for sharing: The role of UX in large cyberinfrastructure projects. Ecological Informatics, 63: 101317. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2021.101317