Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Data Management in Distributed, Federated Research Infrastructures: The Case of EPOS Cover

Data Management in Distributed, Federated Research Infrastructures: The Case of EPOS

Data Science Journal
Volume 23 (2024): Issue 1
By: Daniele Bailo,  Rossana Paciello,  Jan Michalek,  Daniela Mercurio,  Agata Sangianantoni,  Kauzar Saleh Contell,  Otto Lange,  Giovanna Maracchia,  Kuvvet Atakan,  Keith G. Jeffery and  Carmela Freda  
Open Access
|Jan 2024

References

  1. 1Atakan, K, et al. 2019. EPOS-IP Project – Deliverable 6.7 – Second Delivery of Data Management Plan (September).
    Back to article
  2. 2Bailo, D, Jeffery, KG, et al. 2022. Data integration and FAIR data management in Solid Earth Science. Annals of Geophysics, 65(2): DM210. DOI: 10.4401/ag-8742
    Back to article
  3. 3Bailo, D, Paciello, R, et al. 2022. Integrated access to multidisciplinary data through semantically interoperable services in a metadata-driven platform for Solid Earth Science, MTSR 2022. In: 16th International Conference on Metadata and Semantics Research. London, 7th–11th November 2022, pp. 1–14.
    Back to article
  4. 4Best, MMR, et al. 2016. The EMSO-ERIC Pan-European Consortium: Data benefits and lessons learned as the legal entity forms. 5(3): 8–15. DOI: 10.4031/MTSJ.50.3.13
    Back to article
  5. 5Bristol University. 2014. EC Horizon 2020 Pilot on Open Research, pp. 1–7.
    Back to article
  6. 6Cardoso, J, Castro, LJ and Miksa, T. 2021. Interconnecting systems using machine-actionable data management plans – hackathon report. Data Science Journal, 20(1): 1–11. DOI: 10.5334/dsj-2321-035
    Back to article
  7. 7Cocco, M, et al. 2022a. The EPOS Research Infrastructure: a federated approach to integrate solid Earth science data and services. Annals of Geophysics, 65(2): 1–15. DOI: 10.4401/ag-8756
    Back to article
  8. 8Cocco, M, et al. 2022b. The EPOS Research Infrastructure: a federated approach to integrate solid Earth science data and services. Annals of Geophysics, 65(2): DM208. DOI: 10.4401/ag-8756
    Back to article
  9. 9Contell, KS, et al. 2022. Long-term sustainability of a distributed RI: the EPOS case. Annals of Geophysics, 65(2): 1–16. DOI: 10.4401/ag-8786
    Back to article
  10. 10Dillo, I and De Leeuw, L. no date. Data seal of approval: Certification for sustainable and trusted data repositories 2 DATA SEAL OF APPROVAL Data Seal of Approval. Available at: http://www.datasealofapproval.org [Accessed: 26 November 2018].
    Back to article
  11. 11Donnelly, M, Jones, S and Pattenden-Fail, JW. 2010. DMP online: A demonstration of the digital curation centre’s web-based tool for creating, maintaining and exporting data management plans. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 6273 LNCS(October): pp. 530–533. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-15464-5_74
    Back to article
  12. 12EPOS IP WP6 and WP7 Teams. 2015. EPOS ICS-TCS Integration Guidelines – Handbook for TCS integration: Level-2. Zenodo. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.34666
    Back to article
  13. 13European Commission. 2013 (December). Guidelines on Data Management in Horizon 2020. Version 1, p. 6. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/grants_manual/hi/oa_pilot/h2020-hi-oa-data-mgt_en.pdf.
    Back to article
  14. 14European Commission. 2016 (July). H2020 Programme. Guidelines on FAIR Data Management in Horizon 2020, Version 3, p. 12. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/grants_manual/hi/oa_pilot/h2020-hi-oa-data-mgt_en.pdf.
    Back to article
  15. 15European Commission. 2021 (May). Horizon Europe. Data Management Plan Template. Version 1.0. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/info/funding-tenders/opportunities/portal/screen/how-to-participate/reference-documents;programCode=HORIZON, under: Templates & forms – Project reporting templates – Data management plan.
    Back to article
  16. 16European Commission (EC). 2017 (March). Guidelines to the rules on Open Access to Scientific Publications and Open Access to research data in Horizon 2020. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/grants_manual/hi/oa_pilot/h2020-hi-oa-pilot-guide_en.pdf.
    Back to article
  17. 17European Research Council (ERC). 2019 (July). Open Research Data and Data Management Plans: Information for ERC grantees, p. 19. Available at: https://erc.europa.eu/sites/default/files/document/file/ERC_info_document-Open_Research_Data_and_Data_Management_Plans.pdf.
    Back to article
  18. 18European Strategy Forum on Research Infrastructures (ESFRI). 2021. Roadmap & Strategy Report on Research Infrastructures. DOI: 10.25607/OBP-1861
    Back to article
  19. 19Force, I. 2010 (Oct). Infrastructure for Spatial Information in Europe Technical Guidance for the implementation of INSPIRE Download Services, (1088), pp. 1–89.
    Back to article
  20. 20Gajbe, SB, et al. 2021. Evaluation and analysis of Data Management Plan tools: A parametric approach. Information Processing and Management, 58(3): 102480. DOI: 10.1016/j.ipm.2020.102480
    Back to article
  21. 21Jones, S, et al. 2020. Data management planning: How requirements and solutions are beginning to converge. Data Intelligence, 2(1–2): 208–219. DOI: 10.1162/dint_a_00043
    Back to article
  22. 22Karasti, H, et al. 2018. Little Data, Big Data, No Data? Data Management in the Era of Research Infrastructures.
    Back to article
  23. 23Kohler, E, et al. 2017. D4.2 Guidelines for implementing the EPOS data policy and access rules. European Commission, 18: 1–26. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/documents/downloadPublic?documentIds=080166e5b190e31a&appId=PPGMS.
    Back to article
  24. 24Marti, M, et al. 2022. Addressing the challenges of making data, products, and services accessible: An EPOS perspective. Annals of Geophysics, 65(2): DM212. DOI: 10.4401/ag-8746
    Back to article
  25. 25Martin, RC and Micah, M. 2006. Agile Principles, Patterns, and Practices in C#.
    Back to article
  26. 26Michener, WK. 2015. Ten simple rules for creating a good Data Management Plan. PLoS Computational Biology, 11(10): 1–9. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004525
    Back to article
  27. 27Miksa, T, et al. 2018. Defining requirements for machine-actionable Data Management Plans. Zenodo. Available at: https://zenodo.org/record/1266211#.XOb2oYhKiUk.
    Back to article
  28. 28Naik, N and Jenkins, P. 2017. Securing digital identities in the cloud by selecting an apposite Federated Identity Management from SAML, OAuth and OpenID Connect. In: International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science. Briton, UK on 10–12 May 2017, pp. 163–174. DOI: 10.1109/RCIS.2017.7956534
    Back to article
  29. 29Paciello, R, et al. 2022. EPOS-DCAT-AP 2.0 – State of play on the Application Profile for metadata exchange in the EPOS RI. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-39141-5_21
    Back to article
  30. 30Petzold, A, et al. 2019. ENVRI-fair-interoperable environmental fair data and services for society, innovation and research. In IEEE 15th International Conference on eScience. San Diego, CA: eScience, on 24 Jul 2019, pp. 277–280. DOI: 10.1109/eScience.2019.00038
    Back to article
  31. 31Sallans, A and Donnelly, M. 2012. DMP online and DMPTool: Different strategies towards a shared goal. International Journal of Digital Curation, 7(2): 123–129. DOI: 10.2218/ijdc.v7i2.235
    Back to article
  32. 32Schmiederer, S and Kuberek, M. 2022. Forschungsdaten-Policy für Forschungsprojekte im Spannungsfeld zwischen Kooperationsvertrag und Datenmanagementplan: Untersuchung und Abgrenzung zentraler Dokumente in Forschungsvorhaben. Bausteine Forschungsdatenmanagement, 2). DOI: 10.17192/bfdm.2022.2.8446
    Back to article
  33. 33Singer, R. 2019. Shape up stop running in circles and ship work that matters. Basecamp.com, V1.8, pp. 1–135. Available at: https://basecamp.com/shapeup.
    Back to article
  34. 34Sommerville, I. 2010. Software engineering. Software Engineering. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2362.2005.01463.x
    Back to article
  35. 35Spinuso, A, et al. 2022. SWIRRL. Managing provenance-aware and reproducible workspaces. Data Intelligence, 4(2): 243–258. DOI: 10.1162/dint_a_00129
    Back to article
  36. 36Swauger, S. 2015. ‘DMPTool. The Charleston Advisor, 16(3): 12–15. DOI: 10.5260/chara.16.3.12
    Back to article
  37. 37Vermeulen, A, et al. 2015. ICOS Carbon Portal Progress Report 2014 & 2015.
    Back to article
  38. 38Wilkinson, MD, et al. 2016. The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data, 3: 160018. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2016.18
    Back to article
  39. 39Williams, M, Bagwell, J and Nahm Zozus, M. 2017. Data management plans, the missing perspective. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 71: 130–142. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2017.05.004
    Back to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2024-005 | Journal eISSN: 1683-1470
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Submitted on: Dec 15, 2022
Accepted on: Dec 19, 2023
Published on: Jan 24, 2024
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Keywords:
Data Management,
Federated Research Infrastructures,
EPOS,
FAIR Principles,
Open Data,
Data Integration,
Solid Earth Science,
Data Management Plans

© 2024 Daniele Bailo, Rossana Paciello, Jan Michalek, Daniela Mercurio, Agata Sangianantoni, Kauzar Saleh Contell, Otto Lange, Giovanna Maracchia, Kuvvet Atakan, Keith G. Jeffery, Carmela Freda, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 23 (2024): Issue 1Next article