References
- Acker, JG and Leptoukh, G. 2007. Online analysis enhances use of NASA Earth science data. Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union, 88(2): 14–17. DOI: 10.1029/2007EO020003
- AIRS – Atmospheric Infrared Sounder – Publications. n. d. Accessed: April 20, 2023, from
https://airs.jpl.nasa.gov/resources/publications . - Behnke, J, Mitchell, A and Ramapriyan, H. 2019. NASA’s Earth Observing Data and Information System – Near-Term Challenges. Data Science Journal, 18(1): Article
1 . DOI: 10.5334/dsj-2019-040 - Böhner, D and Teichert, B. 2020. Reference Management Software Comparison – 8th update, Technical University of Munich, University Library, permanent link:
http://mediatum.ub.tum.de/1320978 . - Brase, J. 2009. DataCite – A Global Registration Agency for Research Data. Fourth International Conference on Cooperation and Promotion of Information Resources in Science and Technology, Beijing, 257–261. DOI: 10.1109/COINFO.2009.66
- Burnham, JF. 2006. Scopus database: A review. Biomedical Digital Libraries, 3(1): Article
1 . DOI: 10.1186/1742-5581-3-1 - Chance, K. 2007. OMI/Aura Bromine Monoxide (BrO) Total Column 1-orbit L2 Swath 13 × 24 km V003, Greenbelt, MD, USA, Goddard Earth Sciences Data and Information Services Center (GES DISC). DOI: 10.5067/Aura/OMI/DATA2006
- Chapman, K and Ellinger, AE. 2019. An evaluation of Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar citations in operations management. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 30(4): 1039–1053. DOI: 10.1108/IJLM-04-2019-0110
- CMR – Common Metadata Repository. n. d. Accessed: May 2023
https://www.earthdata.nasa.gov/eosdis/science-system-description/eosdis-components/cmr . - CODATA-ICSTI – Task Group on Data Citation Standards and Practices. 2013. Out of Cite, Out of Mind: The Current State of Practice, Policy, and Technology for the Citation of Data. Data Science Journal, 12 (Special Issue): Article
75 . DOI: 10.2481/dsj.OSOM13-043 - Costas, R, Meijer I, Zahedi, Z and Wouters, PF. 2013. The value of research data metrics for datasets from a cultural and technical point of view. A knowledge exchange report. Leiden. Accessed: June 6, 2022, from
https://hdl.handle.net/1887/23586 . - Cousijn, H, Feeney, P, Lowenberg, D, Presani, E and Simons, N. 2019. Bringing Citations and Usage Metrics Together to Make Data Count. Data Science Journal, 18(1): Article
9 . DOI: 10.5334/dsj-2019-009 - Delgado López-Cózar, E, Orduna-Malea, E and Martín-Martín, A. 2018. Google Scholar as a data source for research assessment (arXiv:1806.04435). arXiv. DOI: 10.31235/osf.io/pqr53
- Duan, X, Zhang, J, Ramachandran, R, Gatlin, P, Maskey, M, Miller, JJ, Bugbee, K and Lee, TJ. 2018. A Neural Network-Powered Cognitive Method of Identifying Semantic Entities in Earth Science Papers. 2018 IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Computing (ICCC), 9–16. DOI: 10.1109/ICCC.2018.00009
- EOSDIS Glossary. n. d. Accessed: April 30, 2023,
https://www.earthdata.nasa.gov/learn/glossary . - GSDCDS – Google Scholar Dataset Citing Documents Search tool, v1.0. n. d.
https://github.com/iragerasimov/GSDCDS . Accessed: September 1, 2023. - GCMD – Global Change Master Directory Keywords. n. d. Accessed: May 9, 2023,
https://www.earthdata.nasa.gov/learn/find-data/idn/gcmd-keywords . - GPM – Global Precipitation Measurement – Publications. n. d. Accessed: April 20, 2023, from
https://pmm.nasa.gov/resources/gpm-publications . - Gusenbauer, M. 2019. Google Scholar to overshadow them all? Comparing the sizes of 12 academic search engines and bibliographic databases. Scientometrics, 118(1): 177–214. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-018-2958-5
- Halevi, G, Moed, H and Bar-Ilan, J. 2017. Suitability of Google Scholar as a source of scientific information and as a source of data for scientific evaluation – Review of the Literature. Journal of Informetrics, 11(3): 823–834. DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2017.06.005
- Heibi, I, Peroni, S and Shotton, D. 2019. Software review: COCI, the OpenCitations Index of Crossref open DOI-to-DOI citations. Scientometrics, 121(2): 1213–1228. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-019-03217-6
- Hendricks, G, Tkaczyk, D, Lin, J and Feeney, P. 2020. Crossref: The sustainable source of community-owned scholarly metadata. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(1): 414–427. DOI: 10.1162/qss_a_00022
- I4OA – Initiative for Open Abstracts. n. d. Accessed: April 30, 2023,
https://i4oa.org/ . - I4OC – Initiative for Open Citations. n. d. Accessed: April 30, 2023,
https://i4oc.org/ . - Ivey, C and Crum, J. 2018. Choosing the Right Citation Management Tool: Endnote, Mendeley, Refworks, or Zotero. Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA, 106(3): 399–403. DOI: 10.5195/jmla.2018.468
- Jasinski, MF, Kumar, SV, Borak, JS, Mocko, DM, Peters-Lidard, CD, Rodell, M, Rui, H, Kato Beaudoing, H, Vollmer, BE, Arsenault, KR, Li, B and Bolten, JD. 2018. NCA-LDAS Noah-3.3 Land Surface Model L4 Daily 0.125 × 0.125 degree V2.0, Greenbelt, Maryland, USA, Goddard Earth Sciences Data and Information Services Center (GES DISC). DOI: 10.5067/7V3N5DO04MAS
- Kratz, JE and Strasser, C. 2015. Researcher Perspectives on Publication and Peer Review of Data. PLOS ONE, 10(2). DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0117619
- Lane, J, Mulvany, I and Nathan, P. 2020. Rich Search and Discovery for Research Datasets: Building the Next Generation of Scholarly Infrastructure. London: Sage, ISBN 978-1-5297-0586-7.
- Li, X and Thelwall, M. 2012. F1000, Mendeley and traditional bibliometric indicators. Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators, 2: 451–551.
- Martín-Martín, A, Orduna-Malea, E, Thelwall, M and Delgado López-Cózar, E. 2018. Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories. Journal of Informetrics, 12(4): 1160–1177. DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2018.09.002
- Mooney, H and Newton, MP. 2012. The Anatomy of a Data Citation: Discovery, Reuse, and Credit. Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication, 1(1). DOI: 10.7710/2162-3309.1035
- NASA GES DISC. 2023. Accessed: April 30, 2023,
https://disc.gsfc.nasa.gov/ . - NASA GES DISC Zotero library. 2023. Accessed: September 10, 2023, at
https://www.zotero.org/groups/2395775/ges_disc/library . - OCO – Orbiting Carbon Observatory – Publications. n. d. Accessed: April 20, 2023, from
https://ocov2.jpl.nasa.gov/science/publications/ . - OMI - Ozone Monitoring Instrument - Publications. n. d. Accessed: April 20, 2023, from
https://acd-ext.gsfc.nasa.gov/Documents/Publications/OMI/ . - Park, H and Wolfram, D. 2017. An examination of research data sharing and re-use: Implications for data citation practice. Scientometrics, 111(1): 443–461. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-017-2240-2
- Parsons, MA, Duerr, RE and Jones, MB. 2019. The History and Future of Data Citation in Practice. Data Science Journal, 18(1). DOI: 10.5334/dsj-2019-052
- Peters, I, Kraker, P, Lex, E, Gumpenberger, C and Gorraiz, J. 2016. Research data explored: An extended analysis of citations and altmetrics. Scientometrics, 107(2): 723–744. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-016-1887-4
- Prins, AA. M, Costas, R, van Leeuwen, TN and Wouters, PF. 2016. Using Google Scholar in research evaluation of humanities and social science programs: A comparison with Web of Science data. Research Evaluation, 25(3): 264–270. DOI: 10.1093/reseval/rvv049
- Robinson-García, N, Jiménez-Contreras, E and Torres-Salinas, D. 2016. Analyzing data citation practices using the data citation index. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(12): 2964–2975. DOI: 10.1002/asi.23529
- Robinson-Garcia, N, Mongeon, P, Jeng, W and Costas, R. 2017. DataCite as a novel bibliometric source: Coverage, strengths and limitations. Journal of Informetrics, 11(3): 841–854. DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2017.07.003
- Priem, J, Piwowar, H and Orr, R. 2022. OpenAlex: A fully-open index of scholarly works, authors, venues, institutions, and concepts (arXiv:2205.01833). arXiv. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2205.01833
- Roy Rosenberg Center for History and New Media, George Mason University. 2020. Zotero. Available:
https://www.zotero.org/ . - Silvello, G. 2018. Theory and practice of data citation. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 69(1): 6–20. DOI: 10.1002/asi.23917
- Van Noorden, R. 2014. Google Scholar pioneer on search engine’s future. Nature. DOI: 10.1038/nature.2014.16269
- Vannan, S, Downs, RR, Meier, W, Wilson, BE and Gerasimov, IV. 2020. Data sets are foundational to research. Why don’t we cite them?. Eos, 101. DOI: 10.1029/2020EO151665
- Wanchoo, L, James, N and Ramapriyan, H. 2017. NASA EOSDIS Data Identifiers: Approach and System. Data Science Journal, 16: Article
0 . DOI: 10.5334/dsj-2017-015 - Wilkinson, MD, Dumontier, M, Aalbersberg, Ij. J, Appleton, G, Axton, M, Baak, A, Blomberg, N, Boiten, J.-W, Santos, LB. da S, Bourne, PE, Bouwman, J, Brookes, AJ, Clark, T, Crosas, M, Dillo, I, Dumon, O, Edmunds, S, Evelo, CT, Finkers, R, … Mons, B. 2016. The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data, 3(1): 1–9. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2016.18
- Zhao, M, Yan, E and Li, K. 2018. Data set mentions and citations: A content analysis of full-text publications. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 69(1): 32–46. DOI: 10.1002/asi.23919