Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Using OpenBIS as Virtual Research Environment: An ELN-LIMS Open-Source Database Tool as a Framework within the CRC 1411 Design of Particulate Products Cover

Using OpenBIS as Virtual Research Environment: An ELN-LIMS Open-Source Database Tool as a Framework within the CRC 1411 Design of Particulate Products

Data Science Journal
Volume 22 (2023): Issue 1
By: Fabian Plass,  Silvan Englisch,  Benjamin Apeleo Zubiri,  Lukas Pflug,  Erdmann Spiecker and  Michael Stingl  
Open Access
|Nov 2023

References

  1. 1Allan, RJ. 2009. Virtual research environments: from portals to science gateways. 1. publ. Oxford: Chandos Publ.
    Back to article
  2. 2Barillari, C, Ottoz, DS, Fuentes-Serna, JM, Ramakrishnan, C, Rinn, B and Rudolf, F. 2016. openBIS ELN-LIMS: an open-source database for academic laboratories. Bioinformatics, 32(4): 638–640. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv606
    Back to article
  3. 3Bauch, A, Adamczyk, I, Buczek, P, Elmer, F-J, Enimanev, K, Glyzewski, P, Kohler, M, Pylak, T, Quandt, A, Ramakrishnan, C and others. 2011. OpenBIS: a flexible framework for managing and analyzing complex data in biology research. BMC bioinformatics, 12(1): 1–19. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-12-468
    Back to article
  4. 4Bauernhansl, T, Ten Hompel, M and Vogel-Heuser, B. 2014. Industrie 4.0 in Produktion, Automatisierung und Logistik – Anwendung · Technologien · Migration. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-658-04682-8
    Back to article
  5. 5Besançon, L, Peiffer-Smadja, N, Segalas, C, Jiang, H, Masuzzo, P, Smout, C, Billy, E, Deforet, M and Leyrat, C. 2021. Open science saves lives: lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 21(1): 117. DOI: 10.1186/s12874-021-01304-y
    Back to article
  6. 6Bespalov, A, Michel, MC and Steckler, T. (eds.) 2020. Good research practice in non-clinical pharmacology and biomedicine. Cham: Springer International Publishing. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-33656-1
    Back to article
  7. 7Brous, P, Janssen, M and Vilminko-Heikkinen, R. 2016. Coordinating decision-making in data management activities: A Systematic review of data governance principles. In: Scholl, HJ, Glassey, O, Janssen, M, Klievink, B, Lindgren, I, Parycek, P, Tambouris, E, Wimmer, MA, Janowski, T and Sá Soares, D (eds.), Electronic Government. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 115–125. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-44421-5_9
    Back to article
  8. 8Candela, L, Castelli, D and Pagano, P. 2013. Virtual Research Environments: An overview and a research agenda. Data Science Journal, 12(0): GRDI75–GRDI81. DOI: 10.2481/dsj.GRDI-013
    Back to article
  9. 9Clayton, EW, Evans, BJ, Hazel, JW and Rothstein, MA. 2019. The law of genetic privacy: applications, implications, and limitations. Journal of Law and the Biosciences, 6(1): 1–36. DOI: 10.1093/jlb/lsz007
    Back to article
  10. 10Crosas, M. 2011. The dataverse network®: an open-source application for sharing, discovering and preserving data. D-lib Magazine, 17(1/2). DOI: 10.1045/january2011-crosas
    Back to article
  11. 11Egger, J and Masood, T. 2020. Augmented reality in support of intelligent manufacturing – A systematic literature review. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 140: 106195. DOI: 10.1016/j.cie.2019.106195
    Back to article
  12. 12ERC Scientific Council. 2021. Open research data and data management plans. Available at https://erc.europa.eu/sites/default/files/document/file/ERC_info_document-Open_Research_Data_and_Data_Management_Plans.pdf [Last accessed 15 February 2022].
    Back to article
  13. 13European Commission. Directorate General for Research and Innovation. 2016. Realising the European open science cloud: first report and recommendations of the Commission high level expert group on the European open science cloud. LU: Publications Office. Available at https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2777/940154 [Last accessed 13 July 2023].
    Back to article
  14. 14German Research Foundation. 2021. Guidelines collaborative research centres. Available at https://www.dfg.de/formulare/50_06/50_06_en.pdf [Last accessed 17 October 2022].
    Back to article
  15. 15Gisler, M. (ed.) 2001. E-Government. 1: Eine Standortbestimmung / [1. Schweizer e-Government-Symposium am 22. August 2000 in Zürich]. Michael Gisler … (Hrsg.). 2., aktualisierte Aufl. Presented at the Schweizer eGovernment-Symposium, Bern Stuttgart Wien: Haupt.
    Back to article
  16. 16Hildebrand, K, Gebauer, M, Hinrichs, H and Mielke, M. (eds.) 2011. Daten- und informationsqualität. Wiesbaden: Vieweg+Teubner. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-8348-9953-8
    Back to article
  17. 17Hummel, P, Braun, M, Tretter, M and Dabrock, P. 2021. Data sovereignty: A review. Big Data & Society, 8(1): 205395172098201. DOI: 10.1177/2053951720982012
    Back to article
  18. 18Janssen, M, Charalabidis, Y and Zuiderwijk, A. 2012. Benefits, Adoption barriers and myths of open data and open government. Information Systems Management, 29(4): 258–268. DOI: 10.1080/10580530.2012.716740
    Back to article
  19. 19Kimmig, J, Zechel, S and Schubert, U S. 2021. Digital Transformation in Materials Science: A paradigm change in material’s development. Advanced Materials, 33(8): 2004940. DOI: 10.1002/adma.202004940
    Back to article
  20. 20Kraft, A, Razum, M, Potthoff, J, Porzel, A, Engel, T, Lange, F, Van den Broek, K and Furtado, F. 2016. The RADAR Project—A Service for Research Data Archival and Publication. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 5(3). DOI: 10.3390/ijgi5030028
    Back to article
  21. 21Ladley, J. 2020. Data governance: how to design, deploy and sustain an effective data governance program. Second edition. London [England]; San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
    Back to article
  22. 22Lasi, H, Fettke, P, Kemper, H-G, Feld, T and Hoffmann, M. 2014. Industry 4.0. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 6(4): 239–242. DOI: 10.1007/s12599-014-0334-4
    Back to article
  23. 23Lave, J and Wenger, E. 1991. Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge [England]; New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Back to article
  24. 24Lecarpentier, D, Wittenburg, P, Elbers, W, Michelini, A, Kanso, R, Coveney, P and Baxter, R. 2013. EUDAT: a new cross-disciplinary data infrastructure for science. International Journal of Digital Curation, 8(1): 279–287. DOI: 10.2218/ijdc.v8i1.260
    Back to article
  25. 25Li, S, Xu, LD and Zhao, S. 2015. The internet of things: a survey. Information Systems Frontiers, 17(2): 243–259. DOI: 10.1007/s10796-014-9492-7
    Back to article
  26. 26Machina, HK and Wild, DJ. 2013. Laboratory Informatics Tools Integration Strategies for Drug Discovery: Integration of LIMS, ELN, CDS, and SDMS. SLAS Technology, 18(2): 126–136. DOI: 10.1177/2211068212454852
    Back to article
  27. 27Mons, B, Neylon, C, Velterop, J, Dumontier, M, da Silva Santos, LOB and Wilkinson, MD. 2017. Cloudy, increasingly FAIR; revisiting the FAIR Data guiding principles for the European Open Science Cloud. Information Services & Use, 37(1): 49–56. DOI: 10.3233/ISU-170824
    Back to article
  28. 28National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (U.S.), National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (U.S.), National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (U.S.), and National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (U.S.). (eds.) 2018. Open science by design: realizing a vision for 21st century research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
    Back to article
  29. 29Reimer, T and Carusi, A. 2010. Virtual research environment collaborative landscape study. Imperial College London. DOI: 10.25561/18568
    Back to article
  30. 30Tallon, PP. 2013. Corporate governance of big data: perspectives on value, risk, and cost. Computer, 46(6): 32–38. DOI: 10.1109/MC.2013.155
    Back to article
  31. 31Tse, EG, Klug, DM and Todd, MH. 2020. Open science approaches to COVID-19. F1000Research, 9: 1043. DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.26084.1
    Back to article
  32. 32Wilkinson, MD, Dumontier, M, Aalbersberg, Ij J, Appleton, G, Axton, M, Baak, A, Blomberg, N, Boiten, J-W, da Silva Santos, LB, Bourne, PE and others. 2016. The FAIR guiding principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific data, 3(1): 1–9. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2016.18
    Back to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2023-044 | Journal eISSN: 1683-1470
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Submitted on: Nov 4, 2022
Accepted on: Oct 25, 2023
Published on: Nov 22, 2023
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Keywords:
Open Science,
Research data management,
Databases,
ELN-LIMS,
Interdisciplinary work

© 2023 Fabian Plass, Silvan Englisch, Benjamin Apeleo Zubiri, Lukas Pflug, Erdmann Spiecker, Michael Stingl, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 22 (2023): Issue 1Next article